Tribune Questionaire: You make the call
The deadline for the Chicago Tribune questionaires for the state legislature was last Friday. I thought it would be fun for us to take a stab at answering them. My answers are below. Have fun.
Questions 1-3: The Budget
1. Illinois has faced staggering budget shortfalls in recent years, leading to debate about whether the state should increase taxes and/or reduce spending. What are your priorities for the budget? Where should spending rise or fall? Should the state increase or reduce taxes, and in what specific areas?
Health care, education and public safety. Despite Governor Blagojevich's efforts, vast inefficiencies remain in state government, state agencies remain top-heavy, and they continue to operate as isolated towers intent on preserving their own turf. But rather than debate whether we should be spending more or less, we should be discussing how we can improve the budget and procurement process, increase efficiency, and drive corruption from the dark corners of the state bureaucracy. We've been doing a good job of running state government like a business -- but Wal-Mart proves you can profit on the stock market, follow the letter of the law most of the time and still be morally bankrupt. We need to run state government more like Habitat for Humanity.
2. There is a significant gap in spending between the wealthiest and poorest school districts in Illinois. Is that a matter for the state or for local taxpayers to address? Should the state legislature change the way it raises and distributes revenues for local schools? Should the state provide more money for the poorest districts and, if so, how?
Yes. Massive disparities in education spending lead to massive disparities in education quality. One high school has PhD's and Master's degrees teaching its classes, the other is using text books that were written when there was still a Soviet Union. Those disparities lead to even larger ones down the road that destabilize our economy by creating a permanent underclass in our rural communities and inner cities, making it impossible for them to attract jobs. What businessman is going to want to relocate to a community he wouldn't send his own kids to school in? Every real estate agent, every businessman can tell you that schools are the smartest single investment you can make.
We need to start by reinvesting all of the tax expeditures currently provided for economic development into our schools, where they will bring the highest rate of return, and by ending the "hold harmless" for our schools that perpetuates inequalities by sending hundreds of thousands of dollars each year to schools that don't need a penny of additional state aid.
Beyond that, the bipartisan Center for Tax and Budget Accountability provides a good road map for balancing out the dollars and cents, investing in education from pre-school through college, by expanding the sales tax base to include services and shifting part of the income tax to provide property tax relief.
3. The General Assembly made certain reforms in the state pension system in 2005, but also deferred $2.3 billion in payments to the system. The five state pension plans face a combined shortfall of $38 billion, a figure that will grow in the coming years. What changes in contributions and benefits need to be made to the state’s pension system? Please be specific.
The first thing we need to do is turn our national economy around. Illinois' pension system was 88% fully funded in 2000, but 9/11, GOP mismanagement of our federal budget, and the ensuing economic stagnation cost Illinois' investment portfolio $14 billion.
The rest of the pension shortfall exists because, in times of fiscal hardship, it's easier to provide public employees with a pension increase -- which can be paid down the road -- than a pay raise; and it's easier to short pension payments -- which can be made up down the road -- than cut health care for seniors or funding for our schools. Address 1 and 2 above and I'm betting there will be plenty of money to fund or pensions.
5 comments:
YDD, my friend, you don't have all the numbers right on question #3, which of course drives guys like me crazy. (I'm also letting you slide on question #1 which wasn't exactly fully answered..)
However, I strongly agree with your general approach. Really examine state agencies, cut out the bloat, (not you Tessa) simplify procurement, and knock down all these silos of power in SPI and CHI.
Make the long-discussed education changes, and, with GA cooperation, there very well be enough for the State to fully fund its pension obligations. Speaking of silos, in this discussion, the question of why the City of Chicago and Cook County need twice as many pensions funds as "downstate" to cover a smaller group of employees is timely.
YDD,
Sound answers to all three and # 3. will be the most important issue in Illinois for the next three Administrations. However, for . . . , 'We need to run state government more like Habitat for Humanity.' Not Bad, but I think we should run state government like Southwest Air.' That was the only air-carrier in America not ambushed by 9-11.
Lets rehash how YDD handled the questionnaire:
Question #1: How should the budget be changed? Should taxes be increased or spending reduced and where?
YDD's non-answer: We need a more loving, efficient government. Group hug everyone!
Question #2: Should local or state taxes pay for schools? How specifically can the state get more money to poor schools?
YDD's non-answer: Disparity bad. Education good. Grrr.
Question #3: The state isn't paying into the pension system and it will be billions in the red in the future. How specifically should it be fixed?
YDD's non-answer: Umm...uh...its the federal government's fault. Yeah, that's the ticket!
These are the typical superficial answers that the state Democrats have given us the last 3 years which is why the state is in the toilet. They don't have the "testicular virility" to fix the budget by either raising taxes or significantly reducing spending, or even a measure of both. They are too afraid to take on suburban parents who object to school funding changes. They take enron/airline-style measures with the pension system. To blame the federal government or the national economy for the state's problems is truly pathetic. Maryland went from a 3 billion deficit to a 1 billion surplus over the last three years (during the same time the Dems took over IL government) because their first term governor (who happens to be Republican) made the hard choices in reducing spending and didn't raise taxes. Now they have money to spend on various projects and programs without risking the state's financial future. We need someone like that who can make tough choices without regard to their political future. That may be Gitwiz or Judy or Bill or Edwin, but it clearly is not Blago. Listen to these challengers to see if they offer real detailed solutions, because Blago is giving us the same answers as YDD, all fluff and no substance.
1. Yes, Taxes need to be increased. I pay taxes - lots of taxes - that is the responsibility of citizenship. In order for government to match its obligations, taxes must be levied.
2. State taxes should pay for Illinois schools. For every New Trier there are hundreds of Harpers. If you want to beef about it send your kid to a Catholic school. The state should give tax-breaks to families in private schools.
3. The State needs to pay into the pension funds just as every other employer in Illinois. The State must not be allowed to loot pension funds and required to account for those funds quarterly - like real pension funds.
Yellow Dog……interesting post. As always, a few thoughts:
#1) You start of great, but I definitely would argue that Illinois has NOT done a good job running the state like a business. Any businessman can tell you that if their books looked like the state’s right now, they’d be in serious trouble (they can’t just shortchange their pension systems whenever they feel they need to, you know). But there is something to be said for the fact that government is not a business, and we should not get too caught up in trying to run it like one. But a non-profit organization that serves only the specific (albeit very important) needs of a certain group is not a good model either.
#2) It’s cliché but oh, so true, to say that in many districts (ahem, CPS) there is an equally serious spending crisis. Naperville spends far less per students than CPS, but their test scores are light years ahead. Of course, there are socio-economic factors that contribute to the different scores of those communities as well, and I fully acknowledge that. But any solution to address the funding disparity will need to acknowledge the fact that funding may not be the only, or most important, factor that needs to be addressed if voters in the suburbs are going to go along with the plan.
#3) There are lots of states that do not have the same pension problems that we have, and they are all part of this national economy that has apparently been mismanaged by the GOP. I’d post more about this one, but I am running short on time.
Post a Comment