Showing posts with label political parties. Show all posts
Showing posts with label political parties. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Republicans push for party spending limits

By Rachel Wells

House Republicans are pushing for continued campaign finance reform with new legislation that would limit the power of political parties and all four legislative leaders in general elections.

As proposed by House Minority Leader Tom Cross, HB 5008 would expand on campaign contribution limits that were passed along party lines during last fall's veto session. The campaign finance reform bill -- signed into law by Gov. Pat Quinn exactly one year after then-Gov. Rod Blagojevich was arrested on corruption charges -- placed contribution limits on individuals, businesses, unions and political committees during both the general and primary election cycles but only limited legislative leaders and political parties during primary races.

Under the new bill, legislative leaders and political parties would be limited to giving $200,000 to statewide candidates, $125,000 to Senate candidates and $75,000 to House candidates during general elections, as they are now limited in the primaries.

Cross called the proposed legislation a solution to Illinois' "image issue" created in part by the consolidation of power in the hands of a few, the very same situation that could keep the bill from being heard at all.

"I think almost every member would tell you they're for this. The reform groups are for it, the public is for it, and it would be a shame to let two people (House Speaker Micheal Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton), in kind of evidence of the problem we're talking about, stop a piece of legislation like this. I would hope that it would get a vote and it would get a vote where people could actually vote their true feelings," Cross said.

Sen. Don Harmon, an Oak Park Democrat involved in last year's negotiations, said near unanimous approval of Cross' proposal is highly unlikely. "I can say with certainty that not all members would support that," Harmon said. "They believe the political parties exist for the purpose of electing members of their political party. That's their role, to elect Democrats or elect Republicans."

Madigan cited the same argument last fall in testimony against extending limits on parties to general elections.

Reform coalition Change Illinois supported the signing of last year's bill but says its members will continue to advocate for further contribution limits, like those proposed in HB 5008. "The contribution limits bill passed and signed last year was an historic step forward, and the next step should be enactment of limits on contributions from political parties and legislative caucus committees controlled by the four legislative leaders," the organization stated in a news release.

During the announcement, Cross was pressed concerning his endorsement of Republican gubernatorial candidate Andy McKenna, who was reprimanded by the Illinois Republican State Central Committee. As reported this morning by the State Journal-Register and described in the committee's ethics inquiry, then-chairman McKenna used party funds to commission a statewide poll measuring voter attitudes toward potential candidates. Although the poll included McKenna's name, he failed to disclose that fact at any point to the State Central Committee and failed to alert members of his potential for personal benefit in commissioning the poll.

Cross dismissed any connection between his endorsement of a candidate who violated party ethics codes and his call to weaken party power as a step toward reform. He said that critics of McKenna are using the controversy to score political points during an election year.

"People that are talking about this that don't want to talk about the fact that they're for tax increases and not talking about restraining spending and creating jobs. It's kind of a political 101 -- 'let's throw some dirt on an issue and not talk about the real issue,'" Cross said.

Read more...

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Special License Plates

Yesterday's question of the day on the Capitol Fax Blog mentioned the passage of a bill, out of Senate committee, to authorize the issuance of NASCAR special license plates and Rich Miller asked what other special license plates people would like to see in Illinois.

A few months ago, I presented a draft bill to Republican House Minority Leader Tom Cross, my representative, that would have authorized the creation of special license plates for each legally established political party. The design would have been mutually agreed upon between the Chairman of each State Central Committee and the Illinois Secretary of State; and the proceeds would have been used (1) to pay for the cost of issuing the plates, and (2) as a distribution to the local County Central Committee of each party in which the plates were registered.

My thinking on this was that the act would not only give Illinois citizens an opportunity to promote their chosen political party but also potentially help reduce each party's reliance on private campaign contributions.

To his credit, as is usually the case, Representative Cross was kind and professional enough to personally call me in order to discuss the proposal. He explained to me that, while he thought the proposal was an interesting idea, various police groups have expressed concerns with special plates and that there had been a general move away from the issuance of new special plates.

Based on this feedback, I rethought my position on this issue. If the promulgation of special license plates presents a law enforcement problem, then I'm against them. After all, the primary purpose of vehicular license plates is law enforcement--not aesthetic vanity or fundraising.

Shortly thereafter, to my dismay, I was surprised to learn that Representative Cross then voted for a bill to authorize the issuance of "In God We Trust" special license plates.

Without even getting into the issues of separation of church and state raised by this overtly religious phrase (which became the "national motto" only in 1956) it seems to me that there is a serious disconnect here. If special license plates do indeed present a law enforcement problem, our elected representatives should listen to the concerns of enforcement officials, rather than simply ignoring them for political or religious reasons.

Of course, another possibility is that special plates do not actually present a law enforcement problem; and Representative Cross simply didn't like the idea of special plates for established political parties. If that was the case, I would have preferred that he told me that.

Do special license plates really present a law enforcement problem?

Also, in your opinion, was Representative Cross being genuine/honest when he told me that police groups have expressed concerns with special license plates and that there had been a "move away" from them? (Did he later change his mind, or was there something particularly important about these special plates that overrode the law enforcement issue?)

Read more...

  © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP