Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 05, 2008

Hillary snubs Eric & Kathy radio show


Hat tip to Mrs. Marathon Pundit for this one.

The Eric & Kathy Show is a popular morning radio talk show in Chicago, broadcasting on WTMX-FM. Earlier today, a Hillary Rodham Clinton campaign representative called the show's producer and asked if they'd like to have the former Chicago area resident appear on the show for a telephone interview at 9:00am. The show accepted the offer, they called the magic telephone number at the agreed upon time, but the hosts were put on hold for 15 minutes, after which the pair was told that the senator would not be available.

I'm listening to the Eric and Kathy now, they're still talking about the snub.

To comment on this post, please visit Marathon Pundit.

Read more...

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Hillary's vacuous vetting exposes International Profit Associates hypocrisy

My good friend Dan Curry has been working on the Hillary/International Profit Associates story for months, and I'm sure he won't mind that I take his post, almost word for word, and post it here.

Dan blogs at Reverse Spin, and I highly recommend his blog.

On Meet the Press last Sunday, Hillary Clinton proclaimed that new vetting procedures had been been put in place to prevent her from taking money from sleaze merchants like Norman Hsu.

If you think you've heard that line before, you are right.

The spokeswoman for Mrs. Clinton, Ann Lewis, said Mrs. Clinton was not aware of Mr. Burgess's background when he held fund-raising affairs for her in 2000 and 2003, nor did she know whether other prominent Democrats had rejected contributions. She said that Mrs. Clinton’s vetting procedures have been strengthened since the senator’s appearance at I.P.A.

That paragraph appeared in a May 2006 article in the New York Times focusing on questionable contributions to Clinton from Illinois-based International Profit Associates, a business consulting company run by a convicted criminal that is beset by fraud allegations and a massive federal sexual harassment lawsuit.

Small business owners across the country, frustrated by Hillary’s continued refusal to turn away IPA funds, have written her this letter today. The small business owners were victimized by IPA’s fraud and are suing IPA in a federal racketeering lawsuit pending in Chicago.

Hillary Clinton for President
4420 North Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA. 22203

Dear Senator Clinton:

We, the undersigned small business owners from across the country are deeply offended that you continue to accept campaign contributions from top officials of a business consulting company, International Profit Associates (IPA), Buffalo Grove, IL., that defrauded us. As we struggle in federal court via a civil racketeering lawsuit to recover the thousands of dollars this company took from us illegally, you continue to use political donations that might have come directly from our pockets.

We also are appalled because you accepted the money amid dark clouds of fraud allegations, a criminal past by the company's founder, and one of the largest sexual harassment lawsuits ever filed by the federal government.

We are trying to fight back against this company and you, Senator Clinton, are enabling it. We ask that you immediately donate to charity the more than $150,000 the New York Times says you've accepted from IPA's top officials, a figure that includes a ride on IPA's corporate jet and a donation from a high school age son of an IPA official.

Surely, now, in the wake of the Norman Hsu scandal, some time, including:

  • IPA is being sued by the federal government's Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for widespread sexual harassment. In a New York Times article May 7, 2006 titled, "Rubbing Shoulders with Trouble, and Presidents," EEOC lawyer Diane Smason called the allegations "probably the most egregious" ever filed by the agency's Chicago office. She said the investigation found that "sex harassment is the standard operating procedure for this company." That case is pending in U.S. District Court.


  • The Illinois Attorney General’s office has acknowledged publicly that it is investigating IPA for alleged fraud.


  • The Better Business Bureau says IPA has an "unsatisfactory record" based on reoccurring complaints that total 427 in the last three years. The BBB has issued "alerts" in various states to warn businesses that IPA was soliciting work there.


  • The company founder, John Burgess, is a convicted criminal, according to numerous published reports. He was convicted of attempted grand larceny and of soliciting a 16-year-old prostitute, those reports state. He was disbarred as a lawyer in New York state in July 1987 for "failing to answer charges which involved perjury, larceny, a conviction for patronizing a 16-year-old prostitute, possession of drugs and engaging in a pattern over a six-year period of lies and deceit," according to The Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of New York state. Burgess also is named as a key defendant in the sexual harassment lawsuit.


  • The company's attorney, Myron "Mike" Cherry, also a contributor of yours, has been identified in published reports as "Individual "H" in the Illinois criminal indictment of businessman Antoin "Tony" Rezko. Cherry has acknowledged in published reports that he was the conduit for some of the IPA campaign contributions.


  • Already, politicians across the country have returned donations from IPA because of the company's checkered past. Illinois Senator Barack Obama, Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle and former Wisconsin Attorney General Peg Lautenschlager are among those who have returned contributions from IPA.

    We have made our fraud allegations in a federal racketeering lawsuit pending in U.S. District Court in Chicago.

    Mrs. Clinton, we see from published reports that you have identified yourself as a champion for women’s rights and an advocate for small business owners. We cannot fathom, in light of those self-labels, how you could possibly accept campaign contributions from a company accused by the federal government of sexually harassing scores of women and one that has left behind a long trail of fraud complaints from small business owners. Do you believe the 114 women who were allegedly sexually harassed at IPA are not telling the truth about that harassment? Do you believe the Better Business Bureau is wrong? Do you think the state Attorney General is unjustified in her investigation of IPA?

    We believe this is our concern because the campaign contributions you continue to accept came from the money that we believe was taken from us illegally. We do not believe you should continue to further your political career with such tainted cash.

    We are not singling you out in this request. We plan to make the same request to other public officials who continue to accept and hold IPA-related campaign contributions. We wrote you first because you are running for President and certainly should be setting an example for other politicians.

    Sincerely,
    Amari Company, Inc., Amherst, NH.
    Amazing Productions, Inc., Tamarac, FL.
    Precision Painting and Decorating, Inc., Elmhurst, IL.
    All About Construction, Inc., Fort Myers, FL.
    Capital Removal, Gold River, CA.
    BBQ Island, LLC., Gilbert, AZ.
    Compsolution VA, Inc., Richmond, VA.
    JRP Construction, LLC., Yuma, AZ.
    Evco Commercial Construction, Corp., Lake Elsinore, CA.
    Gunnison Metal Shop, Inc., Gunnison, CA.
    Captains Select Seafood, Minneapolis, MN.
    MSI Redimix Inc., Mesquite, CA.
    Joseph E. Clouse, Inc., Lehigh Acres, FL.
    Kyles Discount Stuff, McPherson, KS.
    Dames Air, LLC., Warrenton, MO.
    Home Theater Design Group, Carrollton, TX.
    Gigs Inc., Tewksbury, MA.
    Cool Access LLC., Mesquite, TX.
    Philipsburg Electric & Supply, Inc., Philipsburg, PA.
    Gilbert-American Companies, Rockwall, TX.
    Hinsdale Sales and Rental, Inc., Hinsdale, NH.
    Hitech Fire Detection, Inc., Houston, TX.

  • Tonight, the Democratic candidates for President are debating in New Hampshire. Considering that some of IPA’s victims are from that state, it would be the perfect time for somebody to ask Hillary about how IPA has escaped her vaunted vetting procedures.

    The International Profit Associates story is out there on the Internet, but you have to do some digging to find it. The Oprah Winfrey Show's take on it can be found here.

    From Oprah's site:

    According to Charlotte, even the top executive participated in the harassment. "John Burgess, the owner, had his assistant proposition me to have sex with him," she says. "She started telling me a story of how he sleeps with women in the company and how I can get a better job if I do sleep with him."

    Shortly after Charlotte rejected her boss's proposition, she says, she was demoted. "The next day I went to the [Human Resources] department and spoke with the manager," Charlotte says. "She looked at me and shrugged her shoulders and said, 'That's how he is.'"

    To comment on this or any other Marathon Pundit post, click here.

    Read more...

    Friday, May 04, 2007

    Park Ridge, Illinois surrounded by farms? A Hillary fib?


    In Sunday's Chicago Sun-Times, Jennifer Hunter reported on a speech Hillary Clinton made in San Diego where she speaks about her experience growing up in the town of Park Ridge, which is just a few miles west of where I live in Morton Grove.

    She recalled Park Ridge was surrounded by farms that relied on migrant labor and that she used to baby-sit the workers' children, an experience that awakened her to the complexities of the immigrant experience.

    That paragraph didn't pass the smell test with me. However, Hunter didn't present those as direct Hillary quotes, so perhaps, Hillary didn't actually say those things.

    Well, she did. Roger Hedgecock subbed for Rush Limbaugh Thursday, and he played that segment of her San Diego speech. What was played matched almost word for word what was reported in Hunter's report.

    Hedgecock asked people who knew about the Chicago area to opine on Hillary's agricultural exclamation.

    Well, while Hillary was supposedly watching those migrant kids, I was a toddler in Chicago's South Side Roseland neighborhood, where there were no farms. I'm not old enough to give my first hand recollections of Kennedy-era Park Ridge.

    However, I've lived in the north suburban area of Chicago long enough--and spoken to enough old-timers who did live around here then, to realize that although there were some farms near Park Ridge, circa 1963, the suburb wasn't surrounded by farms when Hillary said she was watching those kids.

    Park Ridge is bordered by Chicago on it's southern and southeastern borders. The old Rodham farmhouse, pictured above, is within walking distance of Chicago's city limits. But as late as 1970 there were a few farms in Chicago proper, but very few.

    Directly southwest of Park Ridge is O'Hare International Airport. The airport dates back to the 1940s, but it didn't begin become an commercial airport until the mid-1950s. No farms there. The other sides of Park Ridge are bordered by Niles, Glenview, and Des Plaines. Once you do a quick drive through these suburbs, and it becomes very clear that the majority of the residences in those towns--outside of the recent tear-down constructions, are post-war housing boom units. Those homes probably supplanted farm land, but most of them were built--I would guess--before Hillary Rodham was old enough to babysit young-ins. That is, if she actually did watch those migrant kids. The Clintons have a way with stretching the truth.

    Yes, there were certainly a few farms surrounding Park Ridge then. As late as 1999, I saw a pumpkin patch in Glenview--There are condos there now.

    To comment on this post, or to vote in the Pajamas Media presidential straw poll, click here.

    Read more...

      © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

    Back to TOP