Showing posts with label Pat Quinn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pat Quinn. Show all posts

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Million$ in Motion in Lead Up to Last Weekend

Cross posted from ICPR's blog, The Race is On:

The last weekend approaches and looking through the disclosure reports shows how the candidates are filling up for their final push. Some interesting deployments of money:

* The Republican Governors Association has moved $900K to Illinois in the last two days. We can guess where that’s going; Bill Brady has reported $100K from the RGA the day after some of these transfers, and more is likely. Where the RGA money came from is much harder to figure out. We wish the RGA would identify the sources of funds used in Illinois in real time, as the DGA does.

* Other large recent donors to Brady include Lake Forest business owner Ernie Semersky ($35K), Glenview businessman John Miller ($25K), Molex honcho John Krehbiel ($25K) and the Illinois Republican Party ($208K). In all, Brady reports $735,600 in the last two days

* House Republican Leader Tom Cross moved $125K to his Citizens to Change Illinois committee. Expect to see in-kinds from CCI to favored legislative candidates in the next few days. Note that CCI is in no way affiliated with CHANGE Illinois!, the reform organization of which ICPR is a member.

* House Speaker Michael Madigan gave $250K to the Democratic Party of Illinois (which he also chairs). DPI gave $250K to Gov. Quinn’s campaign. Madigan also reported $100K from the same DC-based Engineers local that previously gave Quinn $400K. The reports show only that all three of these transactions took place on the same day (October 26); it’s impossible to say which occurred first or whether there's any correlation.

* In addition to the DPI, Quinn shows $38K from the Health Care Council of Illnois, a trade group of nursing homes, and another $50K from JB Pritzker. In all, Quinn has reported about $450K in the last few days.

* The Senate Republicans transferred $275K to the Illinois Republican Party, which has done a lot of mailings on behalf of candidates. Tom Cross sent $300K at the same time.

* AFSCME reloaded its coffers with $100K from DC. AFSCME has been comparatively bipartisan this year, so it’s hard to predict where that money is going.

ICPR will have more tomorrow on the top legislative races around the state.

To comment, please visit ICPR's blog.

Read more...

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Bill Brady and his Indiana/Kentucky/Tennessee envy

It never occurred to me that anyone in Illinois envied Indiana. Here we are, with Chicago, the jewel of the Midwest, the gravitational force that draws people from throughout the region, and one of our gubernatorial candidates actually wants Illinois to be more like Indiana, Kentucky and Tennessee???

I've heard of people being ashamed of their family, but I guess I had never witnessed someone being ashamed of their state. More to the point, why would anyone want to be like Indiana?

I get to see how bad Indiana is every single school day. I live in a school district of some renown close to the border, and one of the problems the district has is that people outside the boundaries of the district try to get their kids in it. So every morning, when the train comes, you see a line of kids walking from the train to school. Employees who are supposed to verify residency have told me that many of these kids who try to sneak into the school come from Indiana.

With Bill Brady wanting to cut a billion dollars from our public schools and make us "more like Indiana, Kentucky and Tennessee" I have to wonder what schools *our* kids will be trying to sneak into under a Governor Bill Brady? Missouri's??? Mississippi's???

It's almost like Bill Brady wants to undermine public education -- and an economic legacy once the envy of the world.

There really is a difference in approach between the two parties, and it was made clear in last night's debate. Democrats are talking about building Illinois into a great post-Industrial power, not just in the Midwest but in the country. While the term silicon prairie is overused, Democratic candidates talk about investing in the state, expanding beyond the bizarrely single-sector focus on financial technology and welcoming development in future technologies, whether they would be classified as high tech or not.

But listen to the Republicans. They keep focusing on "small business," as if small business was the savior for all the jobs lost by the rusting away of the Industrial complex. Not only is that belief a pipe dream -- there isn't a single economist out there who would argue that small businesses could replace all the jobs lost by the de-industrialization of the Midwest -- it's defies reality.

Had Republican ideology been based in reality, it would have noticed that credit markets have been reducing loans to small businesses, especially the vital short-term loans that many small businesses use to cover expenses. St. Louis Fed economist Julie Stackhouse reports, “Businesses across the country report that credit conditions remain very difficult. In fact, the data on small loans made by banks show that outstanding loans have dropped from almost $700 billion in the second quarter of 2008 to approximately $660 billion in the first quarter of 2010.”

Republicans keep talking about jobs, but Democrats have been creating them by investing in Illinois and its people. And that's the difference. Democratic candidates like Pat Quinn, Alexi Giannoulias, David Miller and Robin Kelly want Illinois to be, well, MORE LIKE Illinois. They dream of a state that is, once again, not only the economic engine of the Midwest but in the driver's seat for the entire country, even the world.

These two difference visions for the future of Illinois expose another difference: that over the future of education in the state, and how much value we should attach to it. If Illinois' future is "small business" (whatever that is), then education isn't that important. You don't need a college degree to work in a small business (at least not the kind of small business that Brady or Rutherford are talking about). You probably don't even need a high school education. Brady's small business strategy backs up his intention of cutting state spending in public education.

But the Democrat's vision of an Illinois that is once again a leader in high technology and leading edge economic development requires a strong commitment to public education, through the post-grad level. It's a big gap: one in a future where Illinois is a world leader, the other where Illinois is, well, "like Indiana, Kentucky and Tennessee."

When you think about Indiana, Kentucky or Tennessee, you don't think about economic engines or driving the world economy. You don't think of supercomputers or cutting-edge development. These are small states with small goals and small futures. And that appears to be what Republicans like Bill Brady and Dan Rutherford want: a small future for Illinois. A simple choice. A simple belief in our future. Or not. But I sure don't want to live in a state "like Indiana."

Read more...

Friday, October 02, 2009

October issue: Jerry Stermer, "Voice for the man"


Get a glimpse of who helps shape Gov. Pat Quinn's agenda and style in the October edition of Illinois Issues magazine. Maureen McKinney profiles Jerry Stermer in the "Voice for the man."

Read the third and final installment of a three-part series on the plight of nonprofits in Illinois. Crystal Yednak writes, "Joining forces: To prepare for an uncertain future, nonprofits collaborate rather than compete."

And if you want to read about the anticipated effects of this year's state budget banking on delaying payments to certain Medicaid providers, read my feature, "Pay delay."

As always, our columnist Charlie Wheeler gives valuable context and analysis about what legislators and the governor have done by booting the tough choices into next year.

I also provide analysis about how "small budget cuts hit home in a big way." Case in point: grant-funded programs for people with disabilities and college students are in limbo.

And executive editor Dana Heupel gives the national context to Illinois' budget woes in his monthly column.

Our print readers also can read two guest essays: the first by Brent Never, who adds to the picture of how nonprofits are at the mercy of the state; the second by Jack Van Der Slik, who analyzes why politicians shrink from raising taxes as long as they can. Also available in print-only are more articles about campaign finance, the University of Illinois Board of Trustees, a lawsuit over Chicago's parking meters, the closure of Howe Developmental Center, the attack of the waterhemp weed and other Illinois issues.

Read more...

Thursday, September 10, 2009

No Word from Jack Franks Yet

by Cal Skinner


It's after Labor Day.

That's when McHenry County State Rep. Jack Franks said he was going to decide what he was going to run for.

Will it be governor?

Since Franks is against an income tax hike and Governor Pat Quinn and State Comptroller Dan Hynes are both on record as being in favor of an income tax hike, there is certainly an opportunity there.

A Democrat against an income tax hike?

When I was running against Rod Blagojevich in 2002, he came out against an income tax increase.

And Franks says he's against an income tax hike.

There would be that little matter of feeding the Democratic Party interest groups, however.

And he has just been named a

"Taxpayer Friend"

by Jim Tobin's National Taxpayers United of Illinois.
 
He ranks as high as any Republican!

Or will he run for state representative, the "walk in the park" option?

Or lieutenant governor, an office, he might very well be able to pick off?  But will he be willing to stake his future on a tax hike promising Quinn or Hynes?

He could run for one of the financial offices where he could use his banking background?

In any event, it's past Labor Day.

Folks are waiting in McHenry County.

Vacating the legislative seat could set off quite a primary election among Republicans.  Maybe a Democrat will even file to replace Franks.

= = = = =
In the photo of the Rod Blagojevich Impeachment Committee hearing, State Rep. Jack Franks shakes hands with U.S. Senator Roland Burris after Burris' testimony.

Published first on McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Thursday, September 03, 2009

Hynes challenges Quinn and his tax plan

By Bethany Jaeger
The Democratic primary election between Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn and Comptroller Dan Hynes gained another dynamic Wednesday as Hynes officially announced his candidacy for governor with a proposal to raise the state income tax based on income.


Both political campaigns are staying true to their original slogans that we wrote about during the State Fair. Hynes says Quinn received his job by default after the legislature impeached former Gov. Rod Blagojevich and that Quinn has since failed to implement a consistent and calibrated agenda. Quinn, on the other hand, maintains that Hynes, as comptroller, has stood on the sidelines as a “shrinking violet.”

Before today, however, Hynes had not officially announced where he stood on an income tax increase other than saying the legislature and governor should look to cut spending first. On Wednesday, he announced, first in Chicago then in Springfield, a three-step plan that would rely on various cuts and efficiencies this fiscal year and propose a graduated income tax next fiscal year.

Because the state Constitution specifies Illinois’ income tax rate is a “flat” rate applied evenly to individuals, as well as a separate flat rate applied to businesses, changing the tax structure to a graduated rate would require a constitutional amendment. Hynes said he would want the General Assembly to approve a measure to put the question to voters about whether to change the Constitution in the November 2010 election.

The graduated rate, according to Hynes, would range from the current 3 percent on individuals to a new 7.5 percent, which Hynes said would only apply to individuals who make more than $1 million a year. He would not change the corporate rate. If instituted in January 2011, Hynes said the new tax would generate $5.5 billion to help close the budget deficit his second year in office.

Quinn, in his March budget proposal to the General Assembly, proposed raising the individual income tax rate from 3 percent to 4.5 percent and the corporate rate from 4.8 percent to 7.2 percent, but he would keep the rate “flat,” which would not require a constitutional amendment.

“Rather than taking years to enact through a constitutional amendment, it could have been done quickly through an act of the legislature,” said John Kupper, spokesman for the Taxpayers for Quinn campaign.

Quinn also wanted to triple the personal tax exemption, which he said in March would mean that about half of the state’s taxpayers would pay less, while the other half would pay more than they currently do.

Today, Hynes countered that Quinn would levy a 50 percent higher tax rate on all taxpayers, while his proposal would only increase taxes on those making more than $200,000 a year. “Because of the graduated income tax and the way it is designed, you’re actually going to pay more under Pat Quinn’s plan, even if you make a half a million dollars a year,” Hynes said in Springfield. “That is why his plan is not only inequitable and unfair, but really, wrongheaded and backwards.”

Both Quinn and Hynes use similar language — cut spending before seeking higher taxes — (we quoted Quinn as saying it in June, when budget negotiations hit a stalemate). Quinn cut $1 billion in spending already and said he is working toward another $1 billion as part of the final budget agreement for fiscal year 2010 (the current year).

But Hynes says Quinn’s approach to cutting is across-the-board and, therefore, unfair. Instead, one of Hynes’ cost-cutting proposals is to fire half of Blagojevich’s political employees or appointees making more than $70,000 a year. Hynes said his campaign identified 1,600 such employees through state payroll. Firing half of them, or 800 workers, would save $100 million a year, he said, but it would be up to the governor and his agency directors to determine which half to fire.

Other immediate cost-saving measures proposed by Hynes today include reducing discretionary grants, slashing contracts for advertising, consulting and other professional services and closing so-called tax loopholes by expanding the state sales tax to include such “luxury” services as Botox cosmetic injections, car and truck rentals and membership of private clubs. He’d also borrow $1.5 billion to pay down backlogged bills, which he said would leverage enhanced federal reimbursements temporarily available through the federal stimulus package.

Hynes said those would be the prelude to the second year, when he would then increase the income tax, merge the comptroller’s and treasurer’s offices and create two or three more gaming licenses to open new casinos, among other ideas. (See his proposals here.)

Several of his ideas — instituting a graduated income tax structure, building three new casinos, increasing the sales tax on cigarettes by $1, closing corporate tax breaks and prohibiting the state from rolling over unpaid bills into the next fiscal year — have been proposed within the past few years but have all stalled in the legislature.

In a phone interview shortly after the Springfield event, Hynes said legislators who opposed those ideas in the past might look at them in a different light under the current economic and fiscal circumstances. He added that his leadership style would differ. “I’d like to think that I have the ability to persuade lawmakers that this is the correct path. Part of that is leadership. Part of it is having a clear vision and being consistent, not wavering, not waffling and not changing your opinion, your position and your plan every week.”

Kupper of the Quinn campaign dismissed Hynes’ ideas as playing politics. “In a very real sense, this is a proposal that was put together for the benefit of a political campaign and not a serious effort to address the state’s fiscal problems,” he said. “It’s a lot of rehashed proposals that came right out of the political playbook 101. The question is better addressed to Dan Hynes as to how he is going to enact these things, since he’s pretty much been on the sidelines as these budget issues have been debated.”

Read more...

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Dan Hynes' Supporters Prospect in Jack Franks' Back Yard

by Cal Skinner

Imagine my surprise to be on the receiving end of a fund raising pitch for State Comptroller Dan Hynes' gubernatorial campaign.

I don't mean because I'm a Republican precinct committeeman.

I mean because it came from one of Jack Frank's heavy hitting McHenry County constituents.

My understanding is that it being distributed to active McHenry County Democrats.

The solicitation in question is for a Wednesday, August 26th, event at the River East Art Center, starting at 5 o'clock for the heavy hitters, 5:30 for ordinary mortals who can ante up $250.

It might be a signal for the state representative with the big campaign fund to announce what intentions he has for next year.

Having one's gubernatorial ambition mentioned once in a while after being repeatedly ignored is not enough to win a contested statewide primary election against appointed Governor Pat Quinn and Hynes.

Posted first on McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Saturday, August 08, 2009

Jack Franks Not Being Mentioned for Governor

by Cal Skinner

State Comptroller Dan Hynes announced he was going to take on an "indecisive" Governor Pat Quinn in the Democratic Party primary election Thursday.

In the ABC-TV Six O'clock News report of Hynes' candidacy, McHenry County State Representative Jack Franks' name was not mentioned.

African-American Metro-East State Senator James F. Clayborne, Jr., was mentioned as a possible gubernatorial candidate.

As I have observed before, being ignored is one of the worst things that can happen to a politician.

That's been the rule, rather than the exception, since July.

Meanwhile, if you read McHenry County Blog carefully two days ago, you know where Franks was.

He and his buddies were probably discussing the options I suggest a month ago.

Franks did escape being named as the sponsor of his hopelessly compromised gubernatorial recall constitutional amendment in a Chicago Tribune editorial yesterday:

Quinn supports giving citizens the power to recall public officials, as do we. But the measure waiting in the Senate is just a bit of Hokum--it allows for the recall only of the governor, protecting every other elected official in the state.
But he did get a bill signed Friday.

Posted first on McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Wednesday, August 05, 2009

Quinn Urged to Veto "Protect Incumbents Act"

Randall Stuffelbeam, Chair of the Constitution Party of Illinois; Kent McMillen, Press Relations Chair for the Libertarian Party of Illinois; and Richard Winger of Ballot Access News urged Illinois Governor Pat Quinn to veto House Bill 723, known as the Protect Incumbents Act, during a press conference held by the Free & Equal Elections Foundation in Chicago on Monday.

"HB 723 would make it nearly impossible for third parties to slate candidates in Illinois," said Free & Equal Chair Christina Tobin. "The bill would make it so that when no candidate of an established party runs in a primary for a particular office, that party can only fill the vacancy in nomination if the candidate they "slate" collects a large number of signatures."

Read more...

Monday, August 03, 2009

The next governor may be a guy named Clayborne

Since local news organizations pretty much ignore state politics -- except trials and budget crises -- most Peorians probably have never heard of State Sen. James Clayborne. He's the Illinois Senate majority leader. And he's mulling over a run for governor.

Rich Miller predicts that Clayborn would make interesting candidate:

Sen. Clayborne is not the sort of Democrat that Chicago media types are accustomed to seeing. He’s a downstate attorney with a pretty solid pro-business voting record who is also regularly endorsed by organized labor.

He’s pro-gun, but he’s also pro-choice. He ran and lost for senate president last year, and the campaign exposed some rifts with his fellow black senators, partly over his strong rating from the National Rifle Association.

Gun owner rights are not usually very popular with Democratic primary voters, and particularly with Chicago blacks. Pro-gun southern white Glenn Poshard was able to win the Democratic nomination in 1998, although that issue was used against him in the fall by Republican George Ryan. Just about every likely Republican nominee strongly favors the National Rifle Association’s view of things, so that issue might not hurt Clayborne as much as it did Poshard if he manages to win the primary.

He would face the current holder of that office, Patrick Quinn, and Comptroller Dan Hynes.

How would Clayborne fair in Peoria in a primary? Quinn is liked as an honest guy. But he's been pretty ineffectual and voters really don't give a rat's ass about honesty, to be perfectly honest about it. Hynes is liked and respected. He picked up fans here due to his office's handing of the Springdale Cemetery mess, but that was many years ago. And Hynes' popularity didn't really help Allen Mayer, an attorney in Hynes' office, when Mayer ran for state house representative. He was beaten in the primary by Jehan Gordon.

While Peoria swings Democratic these days, it doesn't swing too far left. We sent Aaron Schock to Springfield twice, remember, before an Obama avalanche sent Gordan there to replace him. Remember, Schock positioned himself as a moderate then.

The pro gun thing will also really help Clayborne. So with the union support and so will the business support.

I predict Clayborne would do well in Peoria in the primary. If goes without saying that whoever wins the Democratic primary will win the governor's mansion. The Illinois GOP couldn't organize an ice cream social.

Cross posted to Peoria Pundit.

Read more...

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Tribune Giving Jack Franks No Respect

by Cal Skinner

I mentioned that the Chicago Tribune's coverage of the Democratic Party primary for governor ignored McHenry County State Rep. Jack Franks in its Saturday article.

Being ignored is the cruelest thing a paper can do to a politician.

As I was reading my Tribune Monday, I noticed that political reporter Rick Pearson continues the trend.

It's a story about U.S. Senator Dick Durbin staying neutral in a race between appointed Governor Pat Quinn and State Comptroller Dan Hynes.

Not a word about Franks' ambition.

Perhaps our McHenry County Democrat should concentrate on lieutenant governor, state treasurer or state comptroller, none of which have incumbents running for re-election. That was my suggestion July 9th.

After I finished writing this article yesterday afternoon, I heard Franks quoted on WBEZ, public radio in Chicago, on the way to McHenry County College's tax hike preparation meeting. That's St. Louis' tax hike specialist's Unicom-ARC latest Northern Illinois project.

He said he was willing to go on the offensive against both Quinn and Hynes.

Posted first at McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Monday, July 20, 2009

Jack Franks Meets with the Mayor

Yesterday, I wrote about McHenry County Democrat State Rep. Jack Frank's Friday.

Franks rolled out evidence of spending big bucks in his campaign disclosure. Look at the contributions' side of Franks' D-2. No contribution limits yet, remember.

The display of ready cash coming in big chunks should make second tier Democrats contemplating a statewide race (like Julie Hamos) give new respect to the resources Franks can bring to the table on behalf of his political ambitions.

Even first tier candidates like State Comptroller Dan Hynes probably does not have the family money to match Franks'.

What's Franks interested in?

My guesses are here.

He told the Northwest Herald he was interested in running for governor and, I guess, Franks could play the role that Mike Howlett took when Chicago ward bosses threw everything into defeating self-styled reform Democrat Dan Walker in 1976.

Franks has never portrayed himself as an organization guy, even as he has taken money from every union he could tap, including teachers' unions.

Not only did Franks display his financial resources Friday, but he was on WTTW's Chicago Tonight again.

And that wasn't all that happened.

The McHenry County Democrat was granted a face-to-face with Chicago Mayor Richard Daley.

My guess is that in their heart of hearts that they are pretty close in political views.

The political arena in Chicago has, of course, resulted in Daley moving left.

Franks has shown similar leftward movement on abortion and gun control during the past year. But on abortion, at least, he backed off.

It will be interesting to see how Franks will modify his stands as he moves from conservative McHenry County to the liberal electorate that rules statewide Democratic primary elections.

No one would suggest those who control the Democratic Party statewide are not composed of tax eaters.

I can't wait to see how they will react to Franks' current opposition to an income tax hike.

Published first on McHenry County Blog, where there is information about Jack Franks you won't find anywhere else.

Read more...

Thursday, July 09, 2009

Lost in the Shuffle: Financial Aid for 137,000 College Students

Lost in the shuffle of the current budget debate, the SJ-R gives some much needed attention to deep cuts in funding for the Illinois Student Assistance Commission currently sitting on Governor Quinn's desk.

But the real hattip goes to The Pantagraph. The Bloomington paper has provided some of the best coverage of the impact of proposed budget cuts, and not just to community-based providers.

They posted this handy chart which details the impact of financial aid cuts by legislative district.

Some tasty tidbits:

- 1700+ students in Senator Christine Radogno's (N-Taxes) district will see the largest cuts in financial aid in the Senate, averaging $2124 per family.

- 6 Senate Republicans will lose a net of more than $4 million each in financial aid to their district.

- State Rep. Karen May (N-Taxes) will see the largest average loss of financial aid in the House, at $2,345 per family, followed by Jim Durkin ($2,159) and Ed Sullivan ($2,154), two more opponents of a tax increase.

136,954 families will lose an average of $1,661 in financial aid. A family of four making less than $126,700 a year would have been better off with Pat Quinn's tax increase.

Read more...

Monday, May 18, 2009

"Doomsday" projected without tax hike

By Bethany Jaeger and Jamey Dunn
Gov. Pat Quinn tried to bolster his case for the need to raise state income taxes by describing drastic cuts — including laying off thousands of teachers and state police troopers and discontinuing health care for hundreds of thousands of people — if the legislature failed to approve an income tax increase within the next two weeks.


Public employee unions and human service providers immediately warned that a “doomsday budget” would threaten their members and the general public, especially when education and social services are most needed during an economic recession. State legislators, meanwhile, remain split on the need to raise taxes, cut spending or both to balance next year’s operating budget. Quinn estimates that the state faces at least an $11.6 billion deficit when combining this fiscal year and next.

While speaking at a City Club of Chicago luncheon today, the governor said he is telling people what they need to know, not what they want to hear. “Right now, it’s a very hard time, and people don’t like to pay taxes to begin with, and especially in hard times. But if we don’t use the public revenue of Illinois to help rescue our state economy, we’re going to continue in hard times.”

He projected a “slash and burn” budget that would cut $7.5 billion from state spending and rely on $4.1 billion from the federal stimulus funds. The cuts would include:

  • $1.5 billion from education, resulting in the loss of 14,300 teachers and eliminating preschool for 100,000 children.
  • $554 million from higher education, affecting 400,000 college students who would lose their state financial aid grants.
  • $1.2 billion from health care, leading 650,000 people of all ages to lose state-sponsored programs for prescription drugs and retirement health care.
  • $368 million from senior services, ending services for 271,000 seniors who currently use programs for community care, elder abuse and neglect and Circuit Breaker property tax relief.
  • $27 million from veterans’ care, closing four veterans’ homes and eliminating a program to treat traumatic brain injuries and post traumatic stress disorders.
  • $769 million from human services, eliminating home care for 5,000 people with disabilities and addiction treatment and prevention for another 45,000 people, as well as child care for 1,000 children.
  • $549 million from economic development, eliminating all state funding for public transit and AMTRAK.
  • $98 million from agriculture and natural resources, erasing funding for state fairs and closing 60 parks and every museum in the state.
  • $1 billion from local governments, which would affect their ability to fund public safety and other local services.
  • $294 million from public safety, laying off nearly 1,000 state troopers and releasing about 6,000 prisoners early from their detentions.

“I would say to those legislators who think the only way to get to a balanced budget is to cut everywhere we can, maybe they could take some of those prisoners home to their own house when they get out of jail,” Quinn said, drawing laughs and applause from the audience.

However, opponents to Quinn’s proposed income tax increase said the plan is a ploy to scare people into accepting higher taxes. Sen. Matt Murphy, a Palatine Republican, said he thinks Quinn’s proposal is a “gimmick.”

“I think his doomsday budget was the one he put out on March 18 with the biggest tax hike in state history,” he said. “That would cost people their jobs in a recession, and I think that’s the real doomsday.”

Murphy, co-chair of the Senate Deficit Reduction Committee, issued a report along with the other Republicans suggesting cuts that could help balance the budget, highlighting changes in the Medicaid system. “We can balance this budget without raising taxes and without having the draconian cuts that [Quinn] put out today,” he said. “It’s not going to be pain-free. It’s not going to be easy. If it were easy, we wouldn’t be in this situation.” Murphy added that he is disappointed the potential budget cuts that the committee considered have not been a major part of the discussion.

Sen. John Sullivan, a Rushville Democrat and member of the same committee, added that he is concerned cuts to health care and education, two of the largest parts of the budget, would jeopardize the state’s access to federal stimulus dollars. “Because of federal stimulus money that the state of Illinois will be receiving, we cannot reduce eligibility for Medicaid or health care services. And also, with regard to education, we cannot lower our appropriations,” he said.

Others say it’ll take both: cuts and tax increases. Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia, an Aurora Democrat who chairs the appropriations committee for elementary and secondary education, said taxpayers will need to see that the state is cutting as much as it can before they’ll accept paying increased taxes.

Sen. Donne Trotter, chief budget negotiator for the Senate Democrats, said he thinks approving a tax increase would be easier for legislators than approving drastic cuts outlined by Quinn’s office. He said: “Our problem is not finding a revenue source. It’s agreeing on one. There’s so many options out here, and we’ll just have to wait and see, as we progress, which one it is going to be.”

Trotter said he didn’t think a tradition such as the Illinois State Fair would really be cut. But, he said, people should take Quinn’s so-called doomsday budget seriously because cuts will be necessary to balance the budget. “There’s going to have to be some reductions. We can’t tax our way out of this,” he said.

Quinn stuck to his message that Illinois needs a permanent income tax increase, as opposed to a temporary increase, to manage the structural deficit and to “deal with reality in the 21st century.”

“Very few governors say, ‘Let’s raise taxes.’ But if you have to do it in order to make the people stronger today and in the long run, so be it.”

Meanwhile, legislative leaders met again behind closed doors this evening to talk about a major construction program funded by various tax and fee increases. Expect movement on that plan as soon as tomorrow.

Read more...

Thursday, May 07, 2009

3,000 jobs at stake

By Bethany Jaeger, with Jamey Dunn contributing
House Speaker Michael Madigan wants the “fumigation” of state government to move faster than it has since Gov. Pat Quinn replaced impeached Gov. Rod Blagojevich. The speaker introduced legislation that would force Quinn to assess about 3,000 high-level state employees that had been hired or appointed by Blagojevich and his predecessor, imprisoned Gov. George Ryan.

“I’m not satisfied with the pace of change,” Madigan said during a Statehouse news conference today. “I think that we have to move faster, we have to move more dramatically.”




The concept has support from Quinn and Senate President John Cullerton, according to his spokeswoman, Rikeesha Phelon.

In fact, Quinn said he thinks it’s a good idea and that he expects it to pass. “It actually helps the process. I think it helps us to take boards and commissions where individuals are appointed to set terms that may not expire for years to come and give me an opportunity to evaluate those people who are appointed either by Rod Blagojevich or George Ryan, both of whom are under clouds of doubt.”

Quinn would have 60 days to reevaluate whether he wanted to retain state agency directors, their top assistants or board members or commissioners appointed by Ryan or Blagojevich. Quinn would be able to reappoint people he thought were doing a good job, but they would have to win Senate confirmation again. Employees also would be able to reapply for their positions.

Madigan said the action is not intended to impugn the integrity or the work habits of people who are doing a good job, but it is intended to be “rather dramatic.” “It clearly will be the type of fumigation of the Ryan and Blagojevich appointments that I think the people of the state of Illinois are demanding so that we can move away from the scandals of the past.”

About 90 of about 276 of the state’s boards and commissions would be affected. They include everything from the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum to universities' boards of trustees. Those not affected would include state employees who cannot be fired because of their political affiliations (based on the so-called Rutan provision from a 1990 Illinois Supreme Court decision).

A high-profile position affected by the proposal would include Ginger Ostro, director of the governor’s budget office under Blagojevich and, now, Quinn. Someone not affected would be Jack Lavin, Blagojevich’s director of the economic development agency, the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity. Quinn appointed Lavin his chief operating officer, responsible for coordinating the state’s capture and use of federal stimulus funds. Also not affected by the legislation for now would be John Filan, Blagojevich’s former budget director and former chief operating officer. He currently serves as executive director the Illinois Finance Authority, created in 2004 by Blagojevich.

Although Filan would not be affected by his bill, Madigan said, “I’d like to come back at a later date on that.”

The bill would potentially fire two senior staff members of the Health Facilities Planning Board, Jeffrey Mark and David Carvalho, whom we wrote about earlier this week. Democrats defended the two employees, while House Minority Leader Tom Cross urged the need to fire them because they served before, during and after Blagojevich insiders corrupted the board. Cross tried in vain yesterday to advance his own legislation that would fire them.

Senate Minority Leader Christine Radogno added, “It makes sense to take a look at people that were here during the times when we have had unprecedented problems.”

Madigan said he intends to advance the legislation next week. Lawmakers return May 12, which starts the end-of-session rush to approve major budget and ethics initiatives by May 31.

Read more...

Friday, May 01, 2009

Pat Quinn Brings Freedom of Information Requests into 21st Century

by Cal Skinner

I've been filing Freedom of Information requests with state agencies for years.

They always wanted pieces of paper. Sometimes a Fax would do; sometimes they insisted I mail a hard copy.

Now comes information that Governor Pat Quinn is directing all agencies under his jurisdiction to accept FOI requests by email, just like McHenry County College did (!) yesterday.

Imagine, state government recognizing that modes of communication have changed.

The Post Office has certainly figured that out.

Also annoying was the excessive cost charged by agencies like the Illinois Department of Revenue.

A year ago, Governor Rod Blagojevich's Revenue Department folks wanted to charge me 50 cents a page.

How one could justify a cost of more than a dime a page is beyond me.

I understand the Quinn Administration is also in the process of bring down the cost to some more or less reasonable level.

Ready for that, Revenue Department?

= = = = =
McHenry County College would not release the heavily redacted biography of BMB Communications Management's John Maguire. His company is the one that wants to build the highest (1,500 foot) free standing broadcast tower in the country in Crystal Lake.Pat Quinn Brings Freedom of Information Requests into 21st Century.

Posted first on McHenry County Blog, of course.

Read more...

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

If the flame is extinguished- UPDATED

By Jamey Dunn
Quinn is sticking to his back-up plan of tackling ethics issues at the ballot box if the legislature does not approve substantial reforms by the end of this session. However, the state Constitution limits the issues voters can petition to get on the ballot.





“If things don’t go exactly according to plan, there is a process in Illinois that exists that allows people to go to the ballot box,” Quinn said outside his Statehouse office this morning. “And I haven’t been a stranger to that over the years, and we certainly will examine that, if necessary. But, I hope it isn’t.”

Despite Quinn’s generally optimistic and cooperative tone, Quinn essentially said if the legislature fails to make major changes in the way state government operates, he would look to the voters to do it for them.

He’s tried to do that in the past. However, the proposals were blocked from the ballot by the Illinois Supreme Court in 1976, when it ruled the initiatives did not fall under the limited scope set by the Constitution. The state charter limits voters from changing anything other than the section that deals with the legislature. And any proposed changes have to pertain to “structural and procedural subjects.”

The governor said he would like to broaden the way voters can amend the Constitution by allowing them to also consider initiatives related to ethics, which he said would “give the voters ongoing power to enact ethics wherever needed.”

Quinn backs other changes that were not recommended in the report, including recall of elected officials and extending public financing beyond judicial races to the other branches of government. He said that he hopes to get a recall amendment on the ballot in 2010. UPDATED: Lawmakers are considering several recall amendments. Some would grant voters the power to recall executive officers only, and some would apply to the legislative and judicial branches, as well.

Commissioners said they could not reach a unanimous decision on whether to recommend a recall amendment, so the report lists “recall” as needing further consideration.

Quinn said that because many of the proposed ethics reforms have been discussed for years, the General Assembly should be able to make decisions on them by the end of session. “The people of Illinois are impatient, and they feel it shouldn’t take long at all to enact good government and clean government.”

Read more...

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Walking the Walk – Gov. Pat Quinn Leads by Example

by Cal Skinner

Governor Pat Quinn has released his income tax forms to at least the Chicago Sun-Times.

Springfield Bureau Chief Dave McKinney reports that Quinn earned $120,226 last year.

More interesting to me was that he contributed to $12,379 to charitable organizations.

Over 10%.

10.26%, to be more exact.

You will remember the Biblical suggestion that believers tithe 10% of their income to church. In fact, tithe meant a tenth in Old English.

Why is this worth a story?

Check out what now-President Barack Obama gave to charity before and after he gained the national spotlight.

Compare what Obama, Chicago Mayor Richard Daley and retired President George W. Bush contributed to the percentage donated by Quinn.

All are less than what Methodist Church founder John Wesley recommended:

Gain all you can.

Save all you can.

Give all you can.
Wesley died with very little, having given away what he got as it came to him.

Any other politicians who want to share their percentage of charitable giving, drop me a line at McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Saturday, March 21, 2009

50% Tax Hike Not Enough

One of the states mega-taxeating advocates State Senator and Rev. James Meeks thinks a 50% income tax is not high enough.

That's what Chicago Sun-Times columnist Mark Brown reported yesterday.

How does Brown feel?

Here's the end of his column:

“...I support his overall goal. If we're going to raise the income tax, this is the time to deal with education funding, too.

“There are more legislators than you might expect who are willing to raise taxes, even in this economy, but if they're going to take the political hit, they're only going to do it once, and they're going to want to have something more to show for it than getting the state's bills paid more quickly.”
And, if this McHenry County Blog interests you, this one about Pat Quinn tax hike editorial cartoons might be of interest.

Read more...

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Quinn Hits Business

Unmentioned in Governor Pat Quinn's budget address was what his 50% income tax hike proposal will do to Illinois business.

Here's what the Illinois State Chamber of Commerce says,

“If this plan were passed, Illinois would have the 5th highest corporate income tax rate in the nation, though we would be close to tied for second. Illinois at 9.7% would be surpassed only by Iowa at 12%, Minnesota at 9.8%, Pennsylvania at 9.99%, and DC at 9.975%. (All three of these states have graduated taxes, but the rates shown are the highest rate for that state.)

“This, in combination with lost incentives, would be one more reason for employers to look elsewhere to avoid Illinois’ long‐standing anti‐business climate.”
Since there are no mitigating increases in deductions for business taxpayers, the tax hike would be at least 50% on those who create jobs in Illinois.

Indeed, if “loopholes” are closed for business, its tax burden would increase by more than 50%.

Talk about a reason to think about leaving Illinois...

Or a reason not to expand or bring a new business to Illinois.

Posted first on McHenry County Blog, where you might be interested in reading
A $5 Billion Deficit, Plus $1 Billion a Year in New Spending Equals $11 Billion

Read more...

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Share the wealth and spread the pain

By Bethany Jaeger, with Jamey Dunn and Hilary Russell contributing
The theme of Gov. Pat Quinn’s first budget proposal, which will be announced at noon Wednesday before the General Assembly, is “shared sacrifice.”



It is “a very difficult budget, but it’s an honest budget,” Jack Lavin, Quinn’s chief operating officer, said during a Springfield budget briefing tonight. “It’s an honest budget that we present the people of Illinois to address the tsunami of red ink that we are facing, but it’s one worth having — shared sacrifice, shared responsibility — to address this unprecedented budget crisis.”

The tsunami of red ink he’s talking about is the recent $11.6 billion deficit projected by the end of next fiscal year. The budget proposal needs to go through the legislative process, meaning it’s far from a done deal. For it to become law, Quinn will have to persuade lawmakers to take a series of politically tough votes.

The most controversial item would be to increase the state income tax rate on individuals and businesses. The rate levied on individuals would rise from 3 percent to 4.5 percent, while the rate applied to corporations would jump from 4.8 percent to 7.2 percent.

According to the administration, if Quinn's budget is enacted, about half of the state’s 11.3 million taxpayers would pay more in state income taxes, while the rest could pay less.

That’s partially because Quinn wants to help individuals cope with the increased rate by tripling the personal exemption from $2,000 to $6,000, which would take a chunk out of the new tax revenue. A family of four would pay no state income tax on the first $24,000 they earned.

Quinn also proposes implementing a “back-to-school sales tax holiday” for 10 days each August to help spur the economy and help families better afford everything from school supplies to gym shoes for kids.

Jerry Stermer, Quinn’s chief of staff, said the extraordinary budget scenario creates a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to reform the state’s tax structure based on ability to pay. “So those who have more ability can pay more. Those who have less ability ought to be asked to pay much less. And this would bring that kind of fairness to our code.”

If the legislature didn’t enact all of Quinn’s proposals, his administration says drastic changes would occur. According to Ginger Ostro, Quinn’s budget director, if the state cut spending without raising new revenue to fill the deficit, state government would return to 2004 funding levels. The result: 800,000 people losing health care coverage, 200 state police officers laid off, 34,000 teachers laid off, per-student education funding down by $1,200 per child, and one of the state’s four veteran’s homes closed.

Highlights
State employees (Pending negotiations with public employee unions)

  • Take four furlough days (one each quarter) — $36 million saved.
  • Pay more into their health care plans (the administration offered no estimate per person) — $200 million saved.

Pension benefits
  • Maintain the “defined benefit” plan, but new employees would receive fewer benefits.
  • Employees would increase their contributions by 2 percentage points.
  • Cost-of-living adjustments would be readjusted to 50 percent of the consumer price index or 3 percent, whichever is lower.
  • Similar to the Social Security system, retirement age for new employees would be 67.
  • Employees covered by Social Security would earn 1.5 percent of their final pay per year of service. Employees not covered by Social Security would earn 2 percent.
  • Estimated savings by the new system: $162 million by 2045.

Pension funding
  • The administration would pay less than scheduled into the five public employee pension systems by $550 million this fiscal year and by nearly $2.3 billion next fiscal year.

Budget cuts
  • The $500 million in cuts implemented in FY09 would remain.
  • Across-the-board 2 percent reductions in grant programs, excluding programs for education and health care — $80 million saved.
  • Reduce some community grant amounts by 10 percent and eliminate other grants altogether.
  • Consolidate the Historic Preservation Agency into the Department of Natural Resources, reducing some administrative positions — $2.3 million saved.
  • Other cuts and efficiencies to state agencies — $390 million total saved.

Federal stimulus
  • Use about $4 billion of federal stimulus funds to plug the state deficit.
  • Use $2.9 billion in federal stimulus funds to reduce the Medicaid payment cycle to 30 days.
  • Use $2 billion to support elementary, secondary and higher education to avoid budget cuts below current FY09 levels.

Road and school construction
$26 billion plan paid for by:
  • Increase driver's license fees from $10 to $20.
  • Increase license plate fees from $79 to $99.
  • Increase vehicle registration fees from $15 to $30.
  • Increase title transfer fees from $65 to $105.
  • Use Road Fund money.
  • Shave some of the local governments’ share of tax revenues to pay for school construction.
  • No increase in motor fuel taxes.
We'll have reaction from lawmakers and policy analysts after Quinn's budget address tomorrow.

Read more...

  © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP