Governor's Tax Relief, Education Spending Still Not Good Enough
Thanks to CapitolFax, we now know that the Governor's Gross Receipts Tax has been sugarcoated with $1 billion in property tax relief. I say sugarcoated because the Governor's proposal provides only a fraction of the tax relief included in House Bill 750. And while Blagojevich still hasn't made the details of how his property tax relief plan would work, my bet is that he will be following President Jones' edict that property tax relief only goes to low-income families.
A property tax relief plan that fails to recognize that skyrocketing property taxes have hurt middle class families and Illinois employers is a failure in my book.
The two plans compared:
Blagojevich Gross Receipts Tax:
$1 billion in property tax relief, targeted to low-income families
- Only 9.2 percent of Illinois families are below the poverty level, and an estimated 50% or more of them rent and would not receive property tax relief;
- No property tax relief for middle class families;
- No property tax relief for employers.
$2.7 billion in property tax relief to every homeowner and employer in Illinois
- Every homeowner and employer receives a 20% - 25% rebate on their property tax levy for local schools;
- Property tax relief is spread across the state:
- 15% of property tax relief goes to Chicago;
- 27% of property tax relief goes to suburban Cook County;
- 32% of property tax relief goes to Collar Counties;
- 24% of property tax relief goes to Downstate Illinois;
- Property tax relief offsets net increase in corporate income taxes, so that Illinois employers see a net decrease in direct taxes paid by $100 million.
- Expansion of Family Tax Credit is fully refundable;
- Ensures low-income renters enjoy tax relief;
- Guarantees that bottom 60% of all taxpayers will see no net increase in tax burden.
House Bill 750 generates $9.05 billion in new taxes, but provides $3.6 billion in tax relief, for a net tax increase of only $5.45 billion, or 30% less than the Governor's plan. House Bill 750 provides $3.9 billion for K-12 classroom instruction in the first year -- 260% more than the Governor's plan, bringing the foundation level funding for schools up to 100% of recommended levels. In addition, HB 750 provides $300 million more for higher education, 600% more than the Governor's plan.
In the final analysis, only 20% of the net new spending in the Governor's plan goes to education, while 72% of House Bill 750's net new spending goes to education. Granted, this doesn't include new spending on school construction, and I'll post comparisons of both school construction plans as soon as they are available.
9 comments:
oh golly gee whiz, I get to save 24% of my property taxes - A whole $900. Please get the smelling salts, I feel like I am going to faint.
Good work YDD, his shucking and jiving has just begun. I hope the media exposes his dumbass idea for the sham that it is.
Anon, 24 percent off my property taxes would be about three times what you save. Not inconsequential, but I'd still have to pay a LOT more in income taxes.
Beware of the shell game. It's not 24% off your property taxes. It's 24% (if you believe that) off the K-12 school PORTION of your property taxes only.
24% is an outright false claim also. The bill itself says 20%, and that's the amount the GA sends to the school district, not the amount rebated from the school portion of your property tax bill which will be based on what you paid for the school portion of property taxes in 2005.
The bill doesn't expand the Family Tax Credit, it creates it. It starts at a whole $75 at the $17,136 income level. Hardly what I would call rent relief for the poor, which is the claim being made here. HB 750 provides no tax relief to renters whatsoever. None. Zip. Zilch. Zero. Anyone telling you otherwise has an agenda that is not the truth and can't be trusted.
A property owner and renter with the exact same income get the exact same Family Tax Credit, although the property owner might get a property tax rebate while the renter will not.
The "guarantee" that the bottom 60% of taxpayers will see no net increase in tax burden can be trusted as much as Blago's claim only big business will pay his gross receipts tax. There is no guarantee the bottom 60% of taxpayers won't see a tax increase, that's complete BS.
And of course the most important point, no one in favor of HB 750 will mention anything the bill does to actually improve education. HB 750 does nothing to improve education, it's all about the money. They want us to hand them $6 billion more of our money with absolutely no strings attached to even ask them for better performaing schools.
Rich, if you want the real picture on how much you will pay here's what you do. Find your 2005 property tax bill. Find the line or lines for K-12 schools and add them. Multiply by .2(20%), and that is the MOST property tax relief you will get. Then look at your 2006 state income tax return. Multiply the total amount you owed in state income taxes by .6667 (67%). That is how much more you would pay in income taxes under HB 750.
I am in the bottom 60% of all taxpayers and will receive a net tax increase not even counting the new 6.25% sales tax I'll be paying on services. You can't increase taxes by $6 billion and not hit the poor so don't believe schell games being played.
Jeff Trigg -
You and Cal Skinner must be reading a different HB 750 than the rest of us. HB 750 contains most -- if not all -- of the Chicago Tribune's recommendations for improving education quality and reform.
Great news for you though, the bill is only on second reading, so if you have some constructive criticism about additional accountablity/reform measures you'd like to see implemented, suggest them here or to the bill's sponsor.
Yes, some folks will see their taxes go up under HB 750, but most people will not. Based on the net new spending outlined, taxes will go up by 30% more under the Governor's plan.
It's much easier to tear down someone else's ideas than submit your own. If you've got a better plan, get it drafted and filed. But the do-nothing attitude some folks have adopted is actually costing us much more than either plan will in the long run.
Estimates are that the 800,000 high school drop-outs in Illinois cost the state's economy $10 billion every year, in lost wages and income taxes, higher prison costs and higher welfare costs.
HB 750 doesn't contain a single Tribune recommendation on education reform pertaining to quality. You are reading a different bill, or reading the propaganda put out by the government employee unions and their groups that more money is the only solution needed. Read the Tribune's 2nd EDIT in the series, "In Return for the Money".
"Yes, Illinois definitely needs to better fund public education. And in return for more money, we need to insist that Illinois educators be more accountable for their good or bad performance, more transparent about how they spend our dollars, and more willing to embrace rigorous, research-driven strategies for teaching our kids.
Asking that Illinois educators help overhaul the policy world in which they live--by reforming their pension rules and ending their resistance to termination for lousy teachers, to name two snag points--is the quo without which Illinois taxpayers shouldn't contribute more quid."
Does HB 750 have more accountability for good and bad performance? No. More transparency on how the money is spent? No. Anything to encrouage research-driven teaching strategies? No.
Pension rules reform? No. Makes it easier to fire lousy teachers? No. Without the last two Nos, the Tribune says the taxpayers shouldn't cough up another penny.
Pension rules reform is drafted and filed without any Democrat support. No one will touch tenure in Springfield with all the teachers union money flowing and it's not like it isn't being lobbied for. Hardly your do-nothing scenario.
Estimates are that the 800,000 high school drop outs in Illinois are currently in a government school system where only two teachers statewide are fired each year on average. Seems to me there are a whole lot of bad teachers in Illinois resulting in those 800,000 high school drop-outs that are costing us $10 billion a year but nothing in HB 750 would do anything to reform that. My proposal, eliminate tenure for K-12 completely. I'll compromise, make it 20 years before eligibility. Throwing more money as the current system that is supposedly costing us $10 billion without reforming it in the least bit, is simply insane.
I'll make these predictions before I even need to read the bill.
1. There will be NO property tax relief at all. There MIGHT be a small dip in the rate of growth.
2. There will be no "accountability" written into the bill.
__
How do I know these things? The Legislature (both parties) is bought and paid for by the Education Establishment, which will never allow a reduction in the their access to cash (hence no real property tax relief). These folks will also NEVER allow themselves to be held accountable for anything.
__
HB 750 taxes are probably necessary to plug the obscene pension abuse of the last 10-20 years. The only rational thing to do is ZERO out the education property tax entirely.
Anything less will allow the trough-feeding education establishment to game yet another fake swap in their favor.
YDD, you can't be a "progressive" and defend the public education monopoly. They are no better than Enron Hucksters.
I've not yet heard anyone make a rational, intellectually sound case against funding children instead of wasteful bureaucracies.
That is why carping about all those dropouts rings so hollow. So-called progressives refuse to pass any changes that attack the monopoly, which leads to my 3rd prediction....
If HB750 passes, there will absolutely no change in the number of dropouts, in test scores, or any other outcomes, and if it doesn't pass, things won't get any worse.
This isn't about "the children". It's about filling the trough.
It's about teachers pensions. Make no mistake about it and YYD knows it.
Trigg, again, I think you're reading a different bill. All of these items are included in the latest version of HB 750 that I've read:
---High-quality, experienced teachers, principals and superintendents Provide sound teacher induction programs, ongoing professional development, including training more National Board certified teachers; provide sufficient incentives for high-performing teachers and those serving in hard-to-staff schools, as well as programs to recruit minorities into teaching and administration such as the “Grow Your Own” program.
---Accountability and oversight of district spending Implement a school accountability system to 1) fund an annual third-party analysis of school districts’ finances; 2) measure the efficiency of districts’ operations related to student performance; and 3) watch for operational or financial problems.
---Accountability investments for proven education improvement strategiesTarget low-performing schools with an “Accountability Block Grant” (sometimes referred to as “education venture pool”) to implement proven strategies such as literacy coaching, extended learning time through summer and after-school programs, reduced class sizes and smaller schools, parental involvement, and extra training for staff in high-need areas. Implement programs to align curriculum across grade levels.
Now, what the Tribune said:
Yes, Illinois definitely needs to better fund public education. And in return for more money, we need to insist that Illinois educators be more accountable for their good or bad performance, more transparent about how they spend our dollars, and more willing to embrace rigorous, research-driven strategies for teaching our kids.
Yes, the Chicago Tribune will continue to rail about how teacher pension benefits are to blame, and ignore the huge golden parachutes handed out to failing CEO's. Yes, the Chicago Tribune will continue to rail about the inability to get rid of bad teachers, ignoring how long it took Chicago to rid the Chicago Cubs of Tribune ownership. But who can take these arguments seriously, especially coming from the Chicago Tribune?
Post a Comment