Tristano's Promise
There is so little in the plea agreement of Michael Tristano.
Tristano’s 13-page plea agreement reveals almost nothing, except the promise of things to come. Tristano agreed to cooperate fully with federal authorities.
What doors will Tristano unlock? What does he know? Could he lead the authorities all the way to Speaker Michael Madigan?
As the former chief of staff for long-time House Republican leader and one-time Speaker Lee Daniels, most expect it is the retiring state representative who has the most to fear.
In the summer of 2002, attorney Richard Means turned over evidence to Attorney General Jim Ryan--then the GOP gubernatorial candidate--that Daniels’ House staff had been for campaign work in the 2000 election cycle.
Ryan passed the package onto U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald.
After than, Daniels’ political world came tumbling down.
First, he resigned under pressure from the State Republican Party Chairmanship, a post he had long sought in order to “be like Mike” Madigan. (State parties get the cheapest postage rates. Madigan is chairman of the Democratic Party.)
Then, he “decided” not to run for re-election as House Republican leader. Tom Cross, Daniels’s former jogging “buddy” led the overthrowing of his long-time leader.
With Tristano pleading guilty, it is reasonable to think that the U.S. Attorney’s Office is still looking for Daniels’ scalp.
Now, federal authorities have not only the man Tristano described as “Lee’s filing cabinet,” that is, former State Rep. and direct mail expert Roger Stanley (now out of prison), but also the man who decided what was sent to that “filing cabinet.”
And, indeed, Roger Stanley’s name figures prominently in the plea agreement. Tristano stipulated to helping a Willow Springs real estate development firm, in which Stanley was a partner, obtain $1.3 million in public improvement money for Willow Springs from state government. In return, Stanley’s firm gave a Southern Illinois GOP challenger a little-work job.
While Tristano does not plead guilty to this, he did stipulate to it for purposes of sentencing.
Tristano also admitted to dummying a expense voucher for which a check was mailed “on or about June 8, 2000.” Subsidies to House Republican campaigns through this and similar activity amounted to a somewhere between $120,000 and $200,000.
The assistance included “preparation of campaign strategy documents, weekly reports summarizing campaign activity, management of campaigns, design of campaign literature, solicitation of voters, and analysis of polling data,” according to the plea agreement, which was “supervised” by the defendant. The activity took place between 1998 and 2001.
“Defendant knew and it was reasonably foreseeable to him that the State was paying employees to do campaign work. Defendant also knew and it was reasonably foreseeable to him that State facilities, such as the Minority Leader’s Offices in Springfield and Chicago, were used to store campaign documents and that State property including computers were used to conduct campaign work.”
Sentencing is set for June 14th.
There is so much more to this story, but this is what the plea agreement adds. In future days, perhaps McHenry County Blog will add some details.
10 comments:
Pretty misleading, Cal, considering Speaker Madigan was investigated and thoroughly exonerated by U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald.
By all accounts, Lee Daniels wasn't emulating Mike Madigan, he was patterning himself after George Ryan, who, according to sworn court testimony, patterned himself after Jim Edgar.
It would be interesting to know if things were done any differently in Gov. Thompson's days. You'd hope after all of his experience as a U.S. prosecutor, he'd know what Mike Madigan figured out: tempting as the shortcuts to power may be, they're just not worth the risk.
I rarely agree with YDD, but today I do. Cal, you are not being truthful. They have no intentions of going after Madigan. You already lost an election, don't lose the little respect you have by stretching the truth.
YDD, right church, wrong pew. It was the central district and US Attorney Jan Paul Miller that investigated the Speaker's operation and found no Federal issues.
I 'm with you on the balance of your post. Cal went too far on this one.
Those who don't think Lee was emulating Mike haven't watched him very closely.
Does anyone really think Lee came up with his "policy" staff out of thin air? That they did political work is not something that is a big secret.
Perhaps you are not willing to grant that the dominos Tristano may knock over might touch anything on the Democratic side of the aisle. Maybe you will be correct.
But, political insiders, think of whether you know things about the opposition party that might be of interest to a U.S. Attorney. Was Tristano as big an insider as you?
I certainly don't know anything about Mike that I'd issue a subpoena for if I were U.S. Attorney...except for the Speaker's employee time sheets when they were challenging the Ralph Nader petitions.
If legislative leaders really had nothing to hide, wouldn't you think that their employees' time sheets should be subject to public review?
yellow dog you are being pretty misleading yourself. Patrick Fitzgerald never thoroughly exonerated Michael Madgian as you claim. As numbersguy knows, it wasn't in Fitzgerald's hands to begin with. They may have closed the investigation on that particular matter at that particular time, but that is hardly a thorough exoneration.
And no one knows if Fitzgerald or any other US Attorney may have ANOTHER investigation into Madgian opened. WE didn't know about Ryan's and Topinka's until months after they started. I find it very odd that Michael Madigan refuses to make public how his employees were being paid on the days they were working to kick Nader off the ballot.
I don't doubt that they have no intentions to go after Madigan but you don't know that either political hack. Honestly, that is anyone's guess and Cal is free venture there. I also don't doubt that Madigan uses his government employees for campaign work. In fact, I have it on video. But Madigan refuses to release the records that would say if they were being paid vacation, sick, regular, etc. What an open, honest, public servant and leader he is.
Jeff--you have a video? What low life scum goes around taking video of political workers? Let a life dude. You sound like "one bullet Barney".
What low life scum sends government employees to do campaign work? That's theft. All I did was bring along a video camera while I was helping Ralph Nader try to enjoy the democracy our country is suppose to adhere to.
I think your definition of low life scum may be backwards. We meed more honest people willing stick out their necks to expose thieves in our government.
I'll let the readers decide who needs to get a life more, you and your lack of knowledge name-calling comment, or me standing up for the principles of democracy and honest government while bringing along a video camera for something I was gonna do anyway. It's not like I was Jack Ryan's intern.
It remains to be seen if the aforementioned sentencing will actually take place on June 14 as announced. After all, we are still awaiting the sentencing of Bob Creamer (husband of Cong. Jan Schakowskt, D-9th), which was originally set for last December 21. No explanation has been given for the delay. So don't be shocked if you do not see a sotry on June 15 regarding the length of Mr. Tristano's sentence.
Rich Means gets things done.
Convict con artist Cramer has a lot of no shame and Jan the witch Shak attack. The media really gave that sleazy couple a pass.
I see Rich has the following comment on Madigan's new phone protocol in his weekly column:
"Walk past House Speaker Michael Madigan’s office and there’s a good chance you’ll see him standing in the hallway talking on his cell phone. Madigan won’t take any calls that are even remotely political in his own office these days. A few years ago he didn’t even have a cell phone."
Maybe he is not worried about Tristano, but it appears he is worried about something.
Post a Comment