You've been Sinclaired
Over the weekend, the Internet Death Eaters swarmed over Larry Sinclair, adopting him as their Messiah.
Larry, an admitted former drug abuser, alleges that he engaged in felonious activity with Barack Obama back in 1999.
Frustrated that the traditional media ignored his fairy tale, Larry uploaded his accusations to You Tube, although it might have been more appropriate for You Porn.
While the Death Eaters continued to push and prod this non-existent sex scandal, WhiteHouse.com offered Larry $10,000.00 to take a polygraph regarding his allegations—Larry, who apparently lives in HUD assisted housing, quickly accepted.
The holes in Sinclair’s story are too numerous to list. The irony is that Larry may actually believe the encounter happened—but that does not make it true.
While the main stream media has rightly ignore this feckless story, the Death Eaters are quietly pushing this crap to every Democratic Super Delegate on the planet
Although Sinclair’s myth is not enough for Obama's Super Delegates to switch allegiance to Clinton, the salaciousness may be enough to give Clinton's Super Delegates pause in switching allegiance to Obama.
And with the nomination hanging by a chad, that pause is quite damaging to Obama.
Sadly, based upon Sinclair’s one minute and forty-two second “confession”, a new definition of poli-sleaziness may have been born:
Sinclaired, to be, verb: A politically motivated, false and malicious statement posted on the Internet to prevent Super Delegates from changing their allegiance.
7 comments:
Well, how do you know it's a "non-existent" scandal before we know the facts? Sinclair is specific with dates and places, so it shouldn't be tough for journalists to figure out the truth by asking a few questions.
I get the feeling from posts like this that most Obama fans probably won't want to know the truth.
Kind of ironic in that Obama allowed supporters (I was at an event where Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr completely lied about and exaggerated the marital "abuse" of Blair Hull)
lied about BLAIR HULL and put info out there when HULL was ahead in the polls
and Obama operatives (just ask the media on the off the record sources or talk to Dan Proft-Ryan campaign manager about how the info was really leaked)
taking glea and leaking and making jokes about JACK RYAN
Barack Obama admitted to committing crimes that if he got caught for he would of never been able to run for President, and the same crimes that others ruin their lives over with the criminilization of recreational drug use and mandatory sentencing
Kind of ironic in that Obama allowed supporters (I was at an event where Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr completely lied about and exaggerated the marital "abuse" of Blair Hull)
lied about BLAIR HULL and put info out there when HULL was ahead in the polls
and Obama operatives (just ask the media on the off the record sources or talk to Dan Proft-Ryan campaign manager about how the info was really leaked)
taking glea and leaking and making jokes about JACK RYAN
Barack Obama admitted to committing crimes that if he got caught for he would of never been able to run for President, and the same crimes that others ruin their lives over with the criminilization of recreational drug use and mandatory sentencing
Larry Sinclair has said he is on disability. Is his disability a mental disorder?
Who cares? Bill Clinton Dem in the White House.
Republican Larry Craig
just a bj
I spent (wasted) some time listening to the Sinclair accusations yesterday.
This is what I think:
1. Sinclair was in the Chicago area in November 1999.
2. Sinclair had an encounter with an African American male that involved drug use and oral sex.
3. The African American male was not Barack Obama.
Here's some relevant facts:
1. Sinclair explicitly says that he never talked politics or issues with the person he shared drugs with.
2. The geography does not make sense. Sinclair says they rode around in a limousine for a few hours one night, and that this person then showed up in Gurnee -- a long way from Chicago -- for a second night.
3. At this time (November 1999), Obama was a congressional candidate. It's unlikely that he had the time to spend two evenings -- including one in Gurnee -- with Sinclair.
4. Sinclair doesn't remember many details, like the name of the club where he met this person. After nine years, it's unlikely that he would forget those things but remember the name of the other person.
5. A person engaging in a one-night stand involving drug use is highly unlikely to use his real name.
I feel sorry for Sinclair. I think he really believes his story, and is confused why everyone dismisses it. I think it never even occurred to him that he's mistaken the identity of the person he met in 1999.
Mr. Sinclair may just be telling the truth. How would be the Obama crowd respond if he IS?
Post a Comment