Big Early Vote in 50th Ward
As I pointed out on CapitolFax awhile back, it's a common misperception that run-off elections have significantly lower turn-out than citywide municipal elections. In fact, in 2003 the average aldermanic run-off saw a drop in turn-out of only 3%, and one race actually saw turn-out increase.
I also predicted that the 50th Ward would be one of the races this time around where turn-out would increase, and a new report from the Daily Southtown on early voting turn-out sure makes it seem that way:
After sounding an alarm about the lack of early voters in February, Chicago election officials said they're seeing a big spike in the number of people heading to the polls before Election Day.
With only 11 aldermanic races up for election April 17, the Chicago Board of Elections recorded 5,324 early votes through Sunday, officials said.
That's 443 voters per ward, as compared with 214 per ward at this point in February's early voting. Early voting ends Thursday....
....The heated 50th Ward race between veteran Bernie Stone and challenger Naisy Dolar in the city's Rogers Park community had drawn 1,002 votes as of Sunday, 300 more than any other race. (emphasis added)
Conventional wisdom tells us that high turn-out benefits challengers, but in the Stone-Dolar race, it really depends on whether those early votes are coming from Stone's base or Dolar's base.
According to the Board of Elections, in February, Stone got 55% or more of the vote in 21 of the 45 precincts. However, he got less than 45% of the vote in 17 precincts. To underscore just how polarized the vote is in this ward, Stone broke 75% in six precincts, but there are seven precincts where he got less than 25% of the vote. Where those early votes are coming matters very much indeed. Too bad the Southtown didn't provide us with that level of analysis.
Consider this a municipal run-off open thread. Try to keep the shilling to a respectable minimum.
6 comments:
According to the Board of Elections, the five races with a turnout of 500+ are the 2nd, the 35th, the 43rd, the 49th and the 50th. The 18th is not far behind. The 50th really is in a world of its own.
No idea what this means, but agreed this sounds like an interesting chance to evaluate the hypothesis that early turnout is good for challengers.
The information on who voted early is available from the CBOE. If someone had the time and inclination, we could collect that info and see exactly where the votes are coming from. If the CBOE wasn't such a PIA about having to get those numbers in person, I'd do it.
Agreed, Bridget. Why not just post it on their website as a downloadable file?
Langdon Neal, are you listening?
It's misleading to say that the average drop in voter turnout in the 2003 runoff elections was only 3%. Turnout dropped in three out of four races. The 1st Ward was the exception with an increase of 30%, almost all of which was an increase in the vote for Manny Flores. I'm sure this is what Joe Moore is hoping to do this time.
The drop in the other three wards is a very different story:
Ward 6, -26.3%
Ward 15, -26.9%
Ward 21, -11.5%
I'm predicting turnout of around 8000 in the 50th Ward--a drop of about 24%
Is Mike Noonan (the campaign manager for the Corruption Board President Toddler Stroger) who lied all fall to us to get the Toddler, AND the lobbying partner of Co-Schemer A Victor "the HOG" Reyes of the HDO organization connected to Drug dealers and Hired Trucks--really running the Bernie Stone campaign?
Noonan was there, but the rumor is that he and Daley's troops have been pulled. Early reports had him moved to Vi Daley's race, now I'm hearing that he is working for Tillman. Also the spin is that Berny is so far ahead that they pulled the troops, however I doubt Daley/Stone is that over confident.
If this is all true I believe they are cutting their loses.
Post a Comment