Sunday, March 09, 2008

Will the 18th District go Democratic like the 14th?

The answer: Maybe. But if it does, it won't be for the same reasons.

For those Peorians who don't follow state politics (thanks in no small part to the local media's general disinterest in the subject) were was some huge news Saturday. Democrat Bill Foster, a political unknown, defeated millionaire GOP foe Jim Oberweis in a special election to replace Dennis Hastert as Congressman from the 14th District.

Foster will serve the remainder of Hastert's term, and will have to face re-election in the November general election. His foe then will likely be Oberweis again. Which, in my opinion, is good news for Foster.

Consider the implications o the win. The far-west suburban district has been considered a Republican stronghold. But changing demographics and a general dissatisfaction with the GOP has tilted the district more Democratic.

There's speculation that this might mean trouble for another Congressional district that's traditionally been a sure win for the GOP -- the 18th District. After all, incumbent Congressman Ray LaHood is retiring.

My advice to the Dems is to not get cocky. A lot of factors played out in the 14th that don't affect the 18th.

First, I doubt that 18th's demographics have changed all that much since last election. Maybe there's some data bearing this out. There's been a lot of overall growth in that district as working class folks from Chicago are moving in. Not so much here in central Illinois.

Second, Aaron Schock is no Jim Oberweis. Love him or hate him, Schock has proven himself capable of winning elections. Oberweis has proven nothing, except that voters don't like him. The millionaire dairyman has been able to buy his way past the primaries a couple of times, but in the end has been rejected by voters four times in the last six years.

For reasons I have expressed before, I don't think Schock is as strong as his supporters think he is. And I also do not think opponent Colleen Callahan is a weak candidate in the least. And I agree that if Barack Obama heads the ticket, Callahan is is really good shape in November.

The importance of Foster's victory in the 14th is that it's red meat to the troops. The last Democrat who came close to winning was G. Douglas Stephens back when he first ran against Bob Michael. And he did it with the support of rank-and-file Democrats who felt tossed to the side of the road by the economy. They didn't get a lot of help from the national party, and I would advise them to not count on any help this time around, either.

7 comments:

Anonymous,  6:27 AM  

The dynamics of the loss suffered (once again) by Jim Oberweis go beyond the normal pull & push of GOP and Dem political pholosophy. The tepid turnout by GOP voters illustrates that fact.
The numerous supporters of Chris Lauzen did not rush out to help prop up the weak GOP candidate pushed on them by Denny Hastert and the Illinois Republican Party leadership. Lauzen supporters simply stayed at home on election day. They represented the substantial (and necessary) votes that Hastert and Oberweis couldn't buy.
Will this happen again in November? If Foster proves to be a decent representative of the people in Hastert's old district, the answer is going to be "Yes".
Oberweis was a poor choice at the get-go for this District. Andy should have thrown the Illinois GOP's support behind Lauzen at the beginning. Andy is a nice guy but the wrong guy for the job that he has.
The only miracle that the GOP can pray for now is that Foster "flubs up" while in Washington. If Foster proves to be just another boot-licker for the Democrats, then Oberweis "might" have a chance in November. But, only if Foster manages to get the voters in District 14 mad at him.
If Foster simply plays it smart and doesn't do anything to risk upsetting the people back in his home district, he will trounce Oberweis again in November.
What is amazing is that Hastert and the Illinois GOP and it's "fearless leader" (or perhaps I should say "feckless leader") can't seem to recognize what is going on around them in the state of Illinois? They continuously back "losers" because they know that they can control them. The dynamic and energizing GOP candidates which they should be backing are left to go it alone. The majority of GOP voters in Illinois have had a belly-full of this stupidity. The Foster victory on Saturday is just one more readily-apparent validation of the above statement.
Oberweis needs to apologize to Lauzen on bended-knee for the nasty and ill-conceived attack ads that used to hurt Lauzen in the GOP Primary. Oberweis needs Lauzen's help "badly". Oberweis needless nastiness in the GOP Primary showed the Independent voters and Lauzen GOP supporters that they couldn't vote for Oberweis with a clear conscience.
Oberweis better "mend fences" before November or he will (once again) be left "crying over his spilled milk".

Anonymous,  6:50 AM  

Any truth to the rumor that Andy McKenna believes that since he has been "so successful" in backing "winners" as GOP candidates (like Jim Oberweis) for the Illinois Republican Party that he has decided to run Judy Barr Topinka for Governor of Illinois one more time? If Judy refuses to be "recycled", Andy is considering asking Big Jim Thompson to run again. Or, maybe he will make another "milk run"?

Anonymous,  9:59 AM  

There is no Republican party in Illinois. I have voted Republican and been involved my whole life. I voted for Foster. I am sick and tired of recycled loosers and had chosen looser from the Rep. establichement. Running a candidate that cannot even be elected a township chairman. Blow it up and start it over again. By the way do we have a candidate to run for US Senator? What a joke.

Anonymous,  8:44 PM  

Oberweis did indeed pull defeat out of the jaws of victory, but I don't think this is a portent of things to come in the 18th. Callahan will not get any help from the national party and Schock is a formidable fundraiser. Raising money is a skill, believe it or not, and it takes time to learn how to do. Callahan has never done it before and faces a steep learning curve.

The best analogy for the 18th isn't the Oberweis-Foster race but the Hare-Zinga race in 2006. It was an open seat that leaned Democrat and should have been contested, but Hare had been on Evans' staff for over 20 years and knew the game while Zinga just couldn't raise money. Hare did have a Democratic tailwind that helped him a bit and Schock will have a similar headwind, but the 18th is more Republican than the 17th is Democrat. Callahan doesn't have Hare's experience--or even Zinga's.

Unless Callahan has a couple of million dollars of her own money she's going to throw into the race Schock will get over 60% of the vote.

Anonymous,  1:43 PM  

People tend to conveniently forget that Chris Lauzen cast the first stone in the mudslinging that became the primary.

Anonymous,  7:00 PM  

Watch the 11th district--previously a republican stronghold, go BLUE this November. With Weller caught up in a torrent of questionable dealings leading to his retirement, & his recently nominated successor, Baldermann, bailing out of the race less than 3 weeks after securing the nomination, the 11th district will most assuredly be sending Senate Majority Leader Debbie Halvorson to D.C. It seems the gop is having difficulty finding a viable candidate in more than one district.

Anonymous,  8:03 PM  

Anon 143

False. Oberweis started the negative campaigning. And continued it at a 3 to 1 pace.

  © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP