Modeling IL-14
Special elections are impossible to model, you have no idea who will show up and there's no recent past performance to base expectations on. So take all of this with a HUGE grain of salt. But I took the performance of the last three cycles and tried to model what a 50-50 election would look like:
COUNTY | R | D |
BUREAU | 44.76% | 55.24% |
DeKALB | 46.27% | 53.73% |
DuPAGE | 51.58% | 48.42% |
HENRY | 46.61% | 53.39% |
KANE | 49.10% | 50.90% |
KENDALL | 59.52% | 40.48% |
LEE | 53.84% | 46.16% |
WHITESIDE | 34.54% | 65.46% |
Totals | 50.00% | 50.00% |
So when returns start coming in tonight, if you're trying to get a sense of who's up and who's down, this is as good of a baseline as I can give you.
ETA: Methodology
If you're interested in the methodology here, I took the results in the district from 02, 04 and 06 and figured out what part of each candidate's overall vote total came from each county. I then averaged the three and reapplied it to a 50-50 election. For example, in DeKalb County the percentage of the democratic candidate's total vote that came from that county was 10.91% in 2006, 13.10% in 2004 and 11.64% in 2002 for an average of 11.88%. Repeat this process for each county and for each party candidate and then pick any arbitrary turnout total and apply the percentages to get the above table.
3 comments:
ummm you are a little off your rocker with dekalb county
How so?
Way off on Kendall as well. While I didn't expect Foster to win Kendall I had a hunch it would be close.
With all 75 precincts in the county reporting, Foster won by 91 votes.
Post a Comment