Friday, June 30, 2006

Lemons into Lemonade

Despite their thorough coverage, the Capital Fax and Archpundit have overlooked one noteworthy aspect of the notorious Fitzgerald letter (pdf):

We are also sensitive to ensuring the maximum recovery of possible State of Illinois losses from the alleged criminal conduct we are investigating. I assure you that we will vigorously seek to protect the State’s interest in this regard, as we would for any victim of an alleged crime. In particular, should there be a federal indictment resulting from our investigation, under the federal Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) any defendants convicted in any such case must ordered to pay full restitution to any victim.

Furthermore, should the United States seek the forfeiture of assets, we would likely agree to equitably remit any forfeited assets to any victim of the crimes charged to the extendt necessary to make the crime victim whole. And we can assure you that if, through our investigation and any subsequent trial, we are able to demonstate that the State of Illinois was such a victim, we would pursue whatever remedies are available through restitution or forfeiture to return any losses sustained by Illinois to the state’s coffers.
They say that the Chinese have a single word for "crisis" and "opportunity" -- People of Illinois, this is our "cris-itunity"!

The governors' office should be soliciting parties who wish to bid for the right to future revenues due Illinois in the form of forfeitures and restitution. Much like the Skyway lease, a bidder would pay an up-front sum in exchange for any money that comes into the state's coffers as the result of this federal prosecution. And if bidders expect the degree of fraud that the feds will uncover in Illinois government to be high, they will bid accordingly.

The value of fraud in governmental hiring in Illinois likely exceeds the value of the lottery and Thompson Center combined.

Finally, government corruption that pays off for the citizens of Illinois!

Read more...

If Kinko's charged a dollar a page...

Cross posted from ICPR's blog, The Race is On:

… nobody would go to Kinko’s. But what if you HAD to go to Kinko’s to get a copy of the document you wanted?

For years now, ICPR has tracked candidate ads on Chicago television stations. We do this partly by taping broadcasts and partly by obtaining the contracts from the 9 largest stations in the Chicago market. Stations are required by federal law to make copies of these contracts available to the public, though the law also allows stations to charge a reasonable copying fee. Which quickly raises the question, what’s reasonable?

Actual fees charged by the stations vary wildly. Some are free. Others are ten cents a page, or twenty cents a page. But one is fully a dollar a page. That’s out of the ballpark of most stations; it’s also much more than what commercial copiers charge, and it’s more than most governmental agencies charge for copies.

Today’s papers carry at least two stories on a challenge to the DuPage Election Commission’s practice of charging $1 per page for copies requested by the public. High copying fees prevent the public from gaining access to records that are supposed to be available to the public, not just to see, not just to read, but to have, to write on, to mark up, to study. High copying fees, as the people quoted in these stories so eloquently describe, work against the purpose of public access to records.

We stand with those who ask the DuPage Election Commission to lower their fees. And we also hope that the people at WBBM (CBS-Channel 2) in Chicago will re-examine what it actually costs them to make copies of ad contracts.

Read more...

Yusef Jackson in Bud ( er bid) to Buy Sun Times

Looks like the Peotone Airport Ploy will get some solid media coverage if the Bud Brothers's, Yusef, gets the winning bid for the Sun Times. Reports in the media, like Phil Rosenthal's column in the Chicago Tribune ( June 30, 2006), estimate that Yusef Jackson with the backing of grocery store magnate Ron Burckle of California might pop down $ 850 million buds ( er, Bucks) for The Bright One.http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/columnists/chi-0606300177jun30,1,3499896.column?coll=chi-business-hed

Read more...

CQ's Congressional election predictions

Congressional Quarterly (CQ) has their take on House races up on their site. Nationally they predict the outcome will be republicans winning 224 seats and the democrats 202. Interesting to Illinois voters is how they see the individual state races and by clicking on the interactive map a page of individual district demographic information pops up as well as commentary on the various candidates.

CQ sees Illinois' 6th district pitting republican Peter Roskam over democrat Tammy Duckworth leaning republican. They have democrat Melissa Bean winning her race with republican David McSweeney in the 8th. Safe seats include republican John Shimkus in the 19th, democrat Jerry Costello in the 12th etc...

Updated race predictions will be online after July 15.

Read more...

Thursday, June 29, 2006

Waiting for Congressman Rahm Emanuel’s Deposition

There are going to be some interesting questions asked of Democratic (Party) Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Rahm Emanuel.

And, it won’t be at a press conference.

It will be at a deposition, unless Emanuel can extract himself from a federal lawsuit just filed Thursday.

8th congressional district peace candidate Bill Scheurer apparently didn’t get the 14,000 signatures required to get on the ballot as a candidate for the Moderate Party, but, besides running a write-in campaign, Scheurer has sued various Democratic Party officials, including Emanuel.

McHenry County Blog reported last Friday how Scheurer was duped by what certainly must be a Democratic Party operative.

The operative, whose name remains unknown, used a card from an employee of first term Democratic Party Congressman Dan Lapinski to convince Scheurer than he was the employee, a guy who runs a political consulting firm on the side.

The impostor promised to get at least 10,000 petition signatures for Scheurer, but didn’t deliver, leaving Scheurer short of the necessary 14,000 names a week before filing.

Scheurer won’t be on the ballot this fall, but he will extract revenge until the suit is concluded. Besides the suit, he will run a write-in campaign.

Congressman Lipinski is also named in the suit, as is Michael Madigan, Chairman of the Illniois Democratic Party.

= = = = =

Congressman Rahm Emanuel is show on top, Bill Scheurer in the middle and Congressman Dan Lipinski on the bottom.

Read more...

Wednesday, June 28, 2006

Ald. Bernie Stone accuses unions of strong-arming colleagues over "big box" ordinance

Crossposted on Marathon Pundit. (And there is plenty of DePaul stuff to be found, too.)

Ald. Joe "No Foie Gras For Me" Moore is spearheading the Chicago City Council drive to raise the minimum wage for large "big box" retailers such as Wal-Mart and Target.

Moore, whose 49th Ward is not surprisingly lacking in attractive retail outlets, harrumphs that Wal-Mart and the like "can afford" to pay the higher wages.

Perhaps. But that doesn't make it less likely that these chains will open new stores in Chicago? Stores that aren't built here, won't employ Chicagoans.

Moore's neighbor to the west is 50th Ward Alderman Bernie Stone.

Bernie wants to block Moore's bill. And he had some interesting things to say yesterday to the Chicago Sun-Times:

"The unions have backed aldermen against the wall. They've threatened to fund opponents against them and to solicit opponents to run against" those who dare to oppose the big-box ordinance, Stone said

"I'm not stupid. I know certain aldermen have been threatened. That's the type of campaign the unions have run. I think it's despicable what's been done. They figure they've got us by the short hairs."

Chicago Federation of Labor President Dennis Gannon, who has led the charge for the big-box ordinance, emphatically denied strong-arming aldermen.

Read more...

Incumbent Republican Congressmen at Risk

As I was driving home from Cub Scout Camp, I heard that the United States Supreme Court has validated the GOP Texas legislature’s re-districting of its congressional seats.

Congressional districts must be re-districted after every census, of course, but, under the guidance of former congressional leader Dick Armey, a newly elected and Republican-controlled legislature decided to do it a second time in order to elect more Republicans

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that it is OK to re-district congressional seats more than once a decade.

Here are the implications I’ve thought of so far for Illinois:

· Republican congressmen are going to be a whole lot more supportive of GOP gubernatorial candidate Judy Topinka than they otherwise would have been.

One way to stop Illinois Democrats from lowering the hammer of reapportionment would be to elected Judy Topinka. After all, reapportionment doesn’t become law until a governor signs a bill. Congressional candidates like David McSweeney and Peter Roskam now have a real reason to gin up their troops for Topinka. Republican congressmen will also probably start being a big help in Topinka’s fund raising quest. She may end up with enough money for a real television campaign this fall.

· All congressmen are going to be a lot more responsive to state legislators than they previously have been.

Federal congressmen generally pretty much ignore state elections. They have had no stake, except for the once-every-ten-year’s reapportionment. From now on, state legislators have a choke chain that did not exist before.

United States Representatives now have a large stake in seeing their party’s candidates elected to the General Assembly. Before, any stake was limited to the elections ending in the year “0.”

Besides that, I can think of one change in Federal legislation that would receive bi-partisan state legislative support...nationwide.

When the 1992 re-districting was forthcoming, Congressman Phil Crane sent a letter to Illinois legislators promising to lower the tax rate on non-congressional campaign funds. He didn’t deliver.

Currently, in a typical Animal Farm scenario, congressmen’s political action committees have a 15% tax rate, while state and local PAC’s pay 35%. That probably is to make it much harder for state and local politicians to accumulate the resources to challenge a sitting congressman. That incredible disparity in tax rate much change.

· If Democrats can reach agreement on new district lines, there will be more Democratic Party and fewer Republican Party congressmen than there are now.

That's pretty obvious.

Although the Democrats would have time to pass reapportionment legislation before a Governor Judy Topinka would take office, there is not guarantee that they will.

I remember trying to convince Lee Daniels to pass legislation to force the Metropolitan Sanitary District board members to run from single member districts, instead of at-large, when he was House Speaker. For some reason, he refused to do so, even though it would have assured at least some GOP suburban representation on the MSD’s board. Maybe there was a side deal I wasn’t privy to.

There could be a side deal here between Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan and United State House Speaker Dennis Hastert, assuming Madigan needs any incentive whatsoever to help elect Topinka.

After all, Topinka doesn't want to serve more than one term anyway. She can raise the income tax, becoming a heroine of the Left Stream media for doing the "right thing," and retire on an excellent pension, after Attorney General Lisa Madigan is sworn in as Governor.

Read more...

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

Blagojevich salutes new running program

The group is called Illinois Runs, and guess who is a board member?

(You have to scroll down a bit.)

Here in PDF form is the congratulatory letter from Governor Rod Blagojevich to Beth Onines, wishing the Illinois Runs executive director good luck with the new venture.

A similar post can be found on Marathon Pundit.

Read more...

Ditka's Defense of Guillen: Immigrants are Too Stupid

I like the White Sox. And while Ozzie Guillen is not the best coach and has made some questionable pitching changes in his career, he sure knows how to get the most out of his team on the field.

Still, there's no defense for his comments toward Sun-Times sports columnist Jay Mariotti, and after today's driveling interview with Mike Ditka in the Sun-Times, I have to agree with Moriotti's contention on Chicago Tonight (6/26) that the Sun-Times is not really backing it's staff up.

Is it news that Mike Ditka likes Ozzie Guillen? Only if it's news that Harry Caray liked Budweiser. What I did love was Ditka's defense of Guillen:

"He's down-to-earth, he's blue-collar and he's also also a product of Venezuela who has spent his life playing baseball and that's just who he is. So he probably still doesn't understand a lot of things in our country as well as he understands baseball. And let's be honest, this is the same problem players from the Dominican Republic and other countries have when they don't speak perfect English. There will be misunderstandings."
It's an interesting defense. First, by definition, there are no blue collar professional baseball players; these are guys that hire other people to walk the picket line for them when they go on strike. And even most blue collar folks I know realize that you don't run around calling journalists "fag" when you're the coach of a major sporting team.

Secondly, Ozzie Guillen has lived in the U.S. for over twenty years. He may be an immigrant, but he's not a moron, and I'm sure he's learned what the word "fag" means now, if he didn't already know when he got here.

Third, this was no "misunderstanding." This is only the latest insult by Guillen over a journalist's perceived sexual orientation, which included a locker room incident where Guillen, then a player and buck-naked at the time, walked up behind a guy and pretended to sodomize him from behind.

Illinois has come along way in ending discrimination. Both gubernatorial candidates support our current anti-discrimination laws and marched in this year's Pride Parade. An effort to enshrine the anti-gay American agenda in our Constitution is about to go down in flames. And new research is shedding light on the link between biology and gayness.

Despite all that, Jay Mariotti is slowly being squeezed out of his profession because of Guillen's bigoted views about his perceived sexuality, and Ditka's redneck defense of Guillen's redneck remarks is that Latino immigrants are to stupid to know what they are saying.

There ought to be a Constitutional Ban Against Stupid People.

Read more...

Monday, June 26, 2006

Sad News

Things like this put everything quickly back into perspective:
(Crain’s) — Alexis Giannoulias, founder and chairman of Chicago-based Broadway Bank, died suddenly while traveling in his native Greece over the weekend.

Mr. Giannoulias, 69, suffered an apparent heart attack, according to a spokesman for his son, Alexi Giannoulias, who is the Democratic nominee for state treasurer... In addition to his three sons, Mr. Giannoulias is survived by his wife of 38 years, Anna.

Politics can be a rough and tumble business, and this is the type of story that should remind everybody of priorities and what's really important in life. My condolences to my friend Alexi, his terrific mom, and their whole family.

Read more...

Bill Scheurer Files for Congress in the 8th Congressional Distric; Green, Constitution and Indepence Parties File against Blagojevich & Topinka

Whether he had 14,000 signatures or not is unknown at this point, but Moderate Party candidate Bill Scheurer is listed as having filed for congress in the 8th congressional district on the State Board of Elections web site.

Scheurer can be accurately described as a "peace candidate."

Scheurer was the victim of a dirty trick last week in which a political consultant impersonator did not deliver the 18,000 signatures that he had promised.

Reached in his car, McHenry County Blog asked how many signatures he filed. His enigmatic answer:

The official public answer is, "We filed 10-12,000 less than the number we would have filed had we not been the victim of criminal fraud. We filed 10-12,000 more signatures than either of the corporate party candidates filed to get on the ballot themselves."

(Republican David McSweeney just emailed me that he filed "2,500-3,000 signatures." Do the math and you will see that Scheurer has precious few signatures over the 14,000 required or he is a bit short.)

A copy of our filing was pulled with three minutes after it was filed.

We are pursuing several avenues of criminal investigation I have filed to be on the ballot to be on the ballot as a third party candidate. I have also filed with all three of the counties a declaration of candidacy for a write-in candidate.

We believe that the Democratic Party is involved in a fraud against democracy itself. And the way they can wipe their hands clean of that is to welcome me into the race like the other party.
Scheuer said he had
4 or 5-dozen volunteers in the streets
this past weekend.

I have previously suggested that the Democrats have the most to lose if Sheurer is on the ballot. Substantiating that opinion was David McSweeney's announcement that he would not challenge Scheurer's petitions.

It will be interesting to see who challenges Scheurer's petitions. A good clue is that House Speaker and Democratic Party Chairman Mike Madigan's former parliamentarian Mike Kasper is the person who picked up copies of Scheurer's petitions.

For more information on Scheurer, click here.

Also filing were the following gubernatorial candidates:
· Randall Stufflebeam of the Constitution Party
· Rich Whitney of the Green Party and
· James Blaine of the Independence Party
Stufflebeam won the game of “chicken” and will be last on the ballot, if he withstands an expected ballot challenge from supporters of Judy Topinka. Stufflebeam is a social conservative who would not have participated in the Gay Pride Parade yesterday, as Topinka did.

Stufflebean told McHenry County Blog:
"We ended up filing 4,382."
The answer to the question about whom he expected to challenge his petitions:
"The Republicans."
Stufflebeam said that the Democrats were there ready to contest (Green Party Whitney's petitions), but
"Apparently, the Republicans ran out of time because it was five o’clock."
The Green Party seems most confident in its having gathered the 25,000 necessary signatures, which, I hasten to add is 5 times the number required by the power party candidates.

As Green campaign manager Jennifer Rose told McHenry County Blog,
"We exceeded the legal requirement by several thousand."
The Independence Party candidate did not file a full slate of candidates, so will be disqualified, if anyone cares to challenge its petitions’ sufficiency.

Read more...

Limiting Limits

Cross posted from ICPR's blog, The Race is On:

Today’s Supreme Court ruling in the Vermont campaign finance case shows strong legal support for reasonable campaign finance reform, and it points the way to enacting such reforms here in Illinois.

Vermont’s law, perhaps the toughest in the nation, is unlike any measure now pending in Illinois. Vermont’s law limited giving to as little as $200, which, the Court noted, “are the lowest in the Nation.” It applied the same limits to individuals, parties and PACs. Limits applied to all giving over a two-year period, rather than applying for each election. Although the law never took effect, the Court suggested that it would have applied to expenses incurred by volunteers even if not reimbursed by a campaign. And perhaps most importantly, it restricted total expenditures. Sizing up all of these restrictions, a plurality of the Court concluded that the Act was unconstitutional.

Showing how complicated this kind of law can be, however, the ruling was not a majority opinion. Four justices (Breyer, Roberts, Alito and Kennedy) agreed that, while some limits are allowable, these are not. Three others (Souter, Stevens, and Ginsburg) concluded not only that some limits are allowable, but that the appellate court should study this further; Justice Stevens suggested he would have upheld these limits. Only two justices, Scalia and Thomas, argued that the Vermont law and also every other restriction on campaign finances are unconstitutional. Even though they could not agree on a single reason, a majority of the justices agreed that Vermont’s laws went too far. As a result of this fracture, the practical impact of this case may be limited.

Illinois, without any limits, remains the Wild West of campaign finance in the USA. Donors can and do give six- and even seven-figure contributions to support a single candidate. The impact of these large contributions cannot be underestimated. Large donors continue to enjoy practical benefits and access unavailable to ordinary citizens. Illinois continues to need campaign finance reforms, and this ruling shows how to craft reforms that respect free speech.

Reform proposals here would likely not run afoul of today’s ruling. Limits legislation now pending in the state legislature, including HB 743 and SB 1822, set higher overall limits, apply limits per election rather than per biennium, allow larger contributions from PACs than from individuals, and higher still from parties; and do not touch overall spending limits. Indeed, Illinois’ current proposals would do nothing more than bring our state into the 20th Century of campaign finance laws.

For a copy of the Supreme Court ruling in Randall v Sorrell, click here (PDF)

Read more...

Sometimes I enjoy watching cable access...

Just about every weekend morning from about 10:30 AM to 11:30 AM I watch this slot on Chicago Access Network Channel 19. This slot has programming where often I would see programming hosted by blacks that are live call-in programs. Usually the topic of discussion is politics and issues as pertaining to blacks living in Chicago.

This weekend was interesting. On Saturday morning was a program called Daleyland. This is a somewhat frequent programs that might air maybe 4 or more times a year hosted by Eugene Mathews. He would have a co-host who on this day was a man named Boyse Edwards (I'll talk about him in a minute).

In any case this show usually laments the policies of Mayor Richard M. Daley and his control over city politics. On this day they didn't talk much about Daley for the most part they steered clear of Daley. The show revolved around President Bush, the shutdown of a federal courthouse in downtown Chicago, the recent incident involving a police officer involved with a drug ring, and then the issue of illegal immigration. In any case there is an indication that the show will return in August hopefully I'll be able to tune in.

On Sunday was a live call-in program produced by Jamm Right Productions called the B-Corner. This was hosted by the aforementioned Boyse Edwards who for the first half hour had as his guest, Cook County Commissioner Tony Peraica. He talked about the current race for county board president mostly and the wrangling involved with figuring out what to do about the sickness of John Stroger.

Peraica says that the board has difficulty agreeing on anything let alone if Stroger should be removed and replaced. Even went so far as to saying that the Democrats on the County Board disregarding the advice of their fellow Democrat State's Attorney Dick Devine who suggested that John Stroger could be replaced temporarily.

He even talked about an impromptu press conference he had in city hall where according to him he was no where near the floor of the council but was in another room nearby. Apparently he was responding to a statement made in the city council by Ald. Todd Stroger with regards to his father's health. Saying that John Stroger was on a feeding tube to name one thing I recall correctly. Anyway eventually this conference was cut short when some police asked him to leave. Peraica even said he was almost about ready to box.

So anyway this segment ended with Peraica talking about why he should be elected. He didn't seem to make it clear that he wanted to be elected. Just said a line about vote for me for change or vote for the status quo. But he did say about one true statement, it's a shame that 24% of Cook County residents can vote while a much higher number of Iraqis can go out and vote in the middle of a war.

The programs that I see everynow and then, seem to have more black public official on then I'd see on more mainstream outlets. I think that on Beyond the Beltway one time Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. was lamenting that the media never seems to talk to him about other issues other than black issues. They never talk to him about say economic issues and education and it's definitely not like he's educated (he does have a Bachelor's, a Master in Divinity, and a jurist doctorate). Either way watching Chicago Access Network seems to be the main why I can connect with the city's black officials.

Read more...

Friday, June 23, 2006

Dirty Tricks May Keep 8th District 3rd Party Candidate Bill Scheurer Off the Ballot

Democratic Party fraud to keep Bill Scheurer from running against Melissa Bean?

That’s what today's article by Joshua Holland on AlterNet hints.

It seems that Bill Scheurer hired a guy whose day job is with U.S. Rep. Dan Lapinski to collect 18,000 signatures. Or, at least that's what he thought.

The story says,

In mid-May, a man claiming to be Anthony Constantine from AR Consulting got in touch with the Scheurer campaign and pitched the firm's services: for a fee, they'd help collect the needed signatures. They met, and Scheurer hired the firm.
The firm was hired. Scheurer got a progress report every week. Early this week Scheurer was supposed to pay for and receive the signatures. The guy didn’t show up, sick relative and all that.

To continue the story,
finally, Constantine returned a call after being threatened with legal action.

Constantine says it's the first he's heard of any of this. He never met with Scheurer, AR Consulting never cut a deal with his campaign and he definitely doesn't have the thousands of signatures that Scheurer needs to get on the ballot. It's a hard blow for the peace candidate's long-shot candidacy.

There's no evidence linking any of this directly to Bean, or to the Democratic leadership. But Illinois Dems have come out in force against Scheurer -- DCCC Chair Rahm Emmanuel has been particularly vocal.

The only thing that's certain is that Scheurer finds himself missing several thousand precious signatures just ten days before the filing deadline.
One can say that Scheurer was naive to the ways of Illinois Democratic Party politics. That's for sure.

Who do you smell?

If you want to help collect petitions this weekend, here are the details.

The AlterNet article pretty well explains what I posted earlier, which is below:
= = = = =
Got this email yesterday from Bill Scheurer’s campaign coordinator Vince DeSecki:
Friends,

This weekend is the final push to get our pro-peace, pro-working-family candidate on the ballot for the IL-8th Congressional District this November.

People are coming from far and wide (Washington DC, Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois) to be part of this historic campaign. Please join them!

Also, bring others with you, spread the word, and have everyone do the same. We expect dozens of people in this celebration of our democracy.
______________________________________________________________________

We are going out on: June 24, Saturday, 10:00 AM; and June 25, Sunday, 12:00 Noon.

We are staging from the Lake Villa Public Library parking lot at 1001 E. Grand Ave., Lindenhurst, IL. Here is the link to a map of this location.

Take the Tri-State Parkway (I-94) exit for "Lindenhurst, Route 132, Grand Avenue, West" and go a few miles west. The library is across the street from Deep Lake Rd.

Thanks to everyone. This is the culmination of all our hard work. See you this weekend.

petition_4bill@yahoo.com
Campaign@WinWithBill.com
hone: 847-543-1253 Mobile: 847-867-6631
The deadline for filing is Monday. A Democratic Party challenge is a certainty.

If you are interested in Scheurer's candidacy, I posted a fuller article today at McHenry County Blog. It references the others I have written since February.

Read more...

Thursday, June 22, 2006

Jeff Ladd - Second Thoughts

After sleeping on the story about Jeff Ladd’s pending retirement below, I came to the conclusion that it was too negative. (Photo is of Ladd and McHenry County Board Chairman Ken Koehler.)

That’s probably based on his 1970 political opposition to my family’s goal of locating McHenry County College in Crystal Lake when his family was trying to put it on their land behind McHenry West High School, plus his support of the 1974 RTA.

I imagine that the political broadside that I developed with the cover blast

The Ladd Sight Is a Bad Site
Vote No December 5th
didn’t help the relationship. (The referendum failed by 80%-20%.)

Both of us then, and in the RTA fight, were probably representing our own self-interests.

With regard to RTA, Ladd had, by 1974, left the family home construction firm, where he was treasurer, and become a railroad commuter for law school and his subsequent job.

I got to work by car and could not see the justification for car drivers being forced to subsidize the train commuters from McHenry County, who, at that time, earned about twice the income of the average McHenry County resident.

(You can see how deeply the RTA fight affected me from the above paragraph. I can still call up the arguments and facts I used back then.)

The basic philosophy of the RTA re-structuring, which House Speaker George Ryan and Chicago Mayor Jane Byrne agreed to in the early 1980's:
de-centralization was good.
Chicago would get to run the Chicago Transportation Authority--which, of course, it already did--while suburban interests would have control of suburban trains and buses, along with their political patronage.

Selecting Ladd as head of the train division, now call Metra, placed a strong leader in charge of a vital suburban interest.

As an example of the tremendous pressure that Ladd put on Metra’s staff to accomplish the goals he set for the agency, read what WBBM’s Bob Roberts reported Saturday:
Ladd fumed over delays for two consecutive rush hours to riders on Metra's BNSF commuter line, pronouncing the three-hour delays endured by some to be "unacceptable."
And, Roberts continued,
He defended his territory vigorously, and that meant butting heads often, especially in recent years, with leaders of the Chicago area's other transit agencies.
And, beyond.

When Governor Rod Blagojevich wanted to re-centralize the region’s mass transit agencies and put them all under firm Democratic Party control, Ladd led the successful opposition.

For that, Ladd certainly deserves high praise.

Ladd was criticized for ignoring the South Suburbs.

What nonsense!

Ladd’s comment in the WBBM piece:
They shouldn't (feel slighted). They have more service than anybody on the entire system,
brought back one of the anomalies I found in 1974.

While McHenry County’s trains ran only once an hour during non-peak times, the South Shore ran every half an hour.

How unfair was and is that?

Here’s how Ladd summed up his service to the Chicago region to WBBM:
The operations were such when we came into being that I don't leave with anything but a sense of satisfaction and pride in what we have accomplished. We built the finest commuter rail operation in the country.
I see no reason to argue with that conclusion.

There certainly were tons of deferred maintenance and need for new equipment, the money for which Ladd pried out of Springfield and Washington…not always from sources for which I would approve, but he did get the job done.

(One of the reasons Senator Dick Klemm voted for George Ryan’s Illinois FIRST was that money from it would go to rehabilitation the railroad bridge over the Fox River. Jack Franks and I voted against Illinois FIRST, on the other hand, I because it stiffed Chicago area highways. Note well that 8 years later we still don’t have 4 lanes on
· Route 47 through Huntley,
· Algonquin Road from Randall Road to Route 47 or
· 31 north from Crystal Lake to McHenry. )
From a more parochial viewpoint, Ladd had long desired a new McHenry County train station. His favored location was Ridgefield, nearer his almost Bull Valley home than the Downtown Crystal Lake station. Instead, we now have the station on Pingree Road, built to European standards. In other words, it allows people to get from one side of the track to the other without actually crossing the tracks, as is the typical situation at Chicagoland stations.

All in all, a job well done.

For my more critical first take on Ladd's retirement, click McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

The Clout List's Race column

Notice the third column for Race on the Clout List (pdf file)? It's W's, B's, H's, and a few O's.

My experience working with race indicators is the results are vastly different if Race is self reported versus someone else reporting. Self reported results yield far more blanks or unknowns. A few blanks on this list and not a single U from my scan.

I don't think they were using the data for affirmative action reports so it would be interesting to see what in the world they did do with it; and who was deciding what Race everyone belonged too.

I thought -if I was using this list- I would have been more interested in the person's precinct of residence, but that may have turned out to be as flakey as the flakey biology of race.

cross posted at Bill Baar's West Side.

Read more...

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Emanuel out after November

via The Hill,

Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.) will step down from the House Democrats’ campaign operation after the November elections to spend more time with his family, he told The Hill yesterday.
[***]
He lamented a lack of effort from some of his colleagues.

“I’ve ruffled feathers with a purpose. There’s a sclerosis that’s set in. I’ve ruffled feathers of elder members of caucus with intention of recruiting younger members. I’ve ruffled of New Democrats and Blue Dogs. I’ve ruffled feathers, no doubt about it.”
I think the sclerosis is winning.

Read more...

That Oatmeal Might be Rat Poison, But Tastes Like Cream to Goo-Goos: Some Thoughts on 'The Combine' and Who's Pouring the Cream

The Quaker Oats Man, Illinois Corporate Shill Tom Roeser had a great piece about the lad who set the table, Petey Fitzgerald, when George Ryan was convicted back in April. Old Roeser who delights in others' misfortune - especially local game that spit out the Oats Ball - is especially truculant concerning the "The Combine." My favorite is his sniffing about poor Phil Gramm - a world class piece of slime. The List, The Squealing, The Lincoln Library, Quaker Oats Corp., Halliburton, Enron, and the 'deep-thinkers' have some root in Old Tom's mentoring of Petey Fitzgerald. For those Progressive souls made swooning by politics by politicians, the cats pouring the cream to you might like to eat some mice. Exemplum Gratia!

http://tomroeser.com/default.asp?categoryID=83

'The first bad luck of the draw had been the election in 1998 (the same year that George Ryan won governor) of Peter Fitzgerald as U. S. Senator. Never were two Republicans farther apart in philosophy and practice than George Ryan and Peter Fitzgerald. Ryan has a blow-torch temper, stalking, angry and demonstrative; Fitzgerald is calm, studied, soft-spoken and to some even naïve. Ryan is an old-line pol to whom philosophy means nothing; Fitzgerald is the brilliant, reclusive philosophical conservative scion of a multi-millionaire banker-a graduate of Dartmouth and Harvard Law who studied in Greece and speaks the language fluently. He’s learned in the law, in business, in ethics and the classics (Latin and Greek) who disdains politics-as-usual. From the day Peter Fitzgerald served in Springfield as a reform state senator, he was at odds with the Republican secretary of state. As Senator, Fitzgerald blocked a lot of Governor Ryan’s initiatives and refused to act as a subsidies bearer for the state. He blocked Ryan’s plan to get federal funding for the Abraham Lincoln Library and Museum because Ryan wanted to use the Library as a patronage dump for his favorites. Ryan never slept an untroubled night in the mansion as governor with the feds on his tail. He thought he could fix it with either Lazar or another Democratic prosecutor-and, friend of Daley as he was, he probably could. Nevertheless, he started to re-craft his image to appeal to a future jury pool. He switched from being a death penalty advocate to vigorous opponent who granted clemency to all prisoners on death row which gained him huge publicity from the liberal media (for which he sought the Nobel Prize). Since African Americans dominated death row, Ryan calculated he would make gains with any blacks on the jury. One large group remaining was Hispanic. Ryan became a darling of liberaldom nationally by going to Cuba, meeting with Fidel Castro in Cuba, urging the U. S. to change its views on the Communist dictator. To please Daley, he switched overnight from an opponent of O’Hare expansion to a firm supporter of it. A former pro-lifer, he vetoed a pro-life bill to win favor with pro-choicers, being totally a re-born liberal; he now supported gay rights, too. The Combine was happy with Republican Ryan. All that had to happen next was the election of a Democratic president in 2000. To ensure the Democrats would carry Illinois and further ingratiate himself with Daley, Gov. Ryan backed a man who was a long-shot candidate for the GOP nomination. A long-shot candidate but a very good man: Texas Senator Phil Gramm, superb on economic issues but afflicted with a cracker barrel Georgia-born accent and a neck that extended out of his collar like a turtle’s which marred his presentation (but there were those who liked him, including me). Even there, Ryan’s venality came through: he couldn’t resist scuttling around, talking to Gramm’s managers about being paid from Gramm’s campaign fund: this as governor, an incredible craven gesture, and seeing that some family members were paid, as well. This greed was another part of his un-doing. The records showed Ryan didn’t do anything whatever for the money he received and the sinecure ended up as part of the indictment. Gramm, a private citizen, came in to testify that he was amazed to find out later that Ryan was paid. In bold terms, Gramm said that there’s a difference between being truly in love or being paid for love, calling Ryan a “prostitute” off-stage following his testimony. Always exploding from the short-fuse, Ryan struck back with an ill-considered public denunciation before television, blasting Gramm in front of the Dirksen courthouse, trying to tie him and his wife Wendy to the Enron scandal since Wendy was on the board (although linkage of the Gramms is tenuous and today he is being mentioned as the next secretary of the treasury) while the ex-governor’s lawyers winced. The legendary Ryan blow-torch temper had to let off steam. When Ryan bellowed out against Gramm, I am told that his lawyer Dan Webb decided the ex-governor could not be trusted to testify in his own behalf: he could only last at most 20 minutes before he’d blow a gasket. After Gramm’s campaign faded and George W. Bush won the nomination, Ryan insisted on running the Bush presidential campaign in Illinois in 2000 by virtue of his being governor-designing it, many believe, to lose. Certainly there was no Bush presence in Illinois. Indeed, Ryan did an extraordinary thing on election day itself: arranging a meeting during that day with Daley, pretending that it was on a policy matter…and prior to the polls closing, congratulating Daley lavishly for carrying Illinois for Gore. Now all Gore had to do was win the whole enchilada. Well, as we know, he won more popular votes but lost in the Supreme Court to Bush. And Bush’s election as president was the second bad luck of the draw for George Ryan. The third bad luck of the draw was the appointment of Patrick Fitzgerald as U. S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois because of the recommendation of Sen. Peter Fitzgerald (no relation). I well remember dining next to William Bauer, former chief judge of the local U. S. Court of Appeals. A gifted man, he is at turns witty and unfathomable. He started Jim Thompson on his career when Bauer was U. S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois. He made Thompson his first assistant. Bauer convicted Otto Kerner with Thompson’s help. Then Bauer went to the District Court and Thompson took over the job. Why, asked Bauer with great emotion, did Peter Fitzgerald convince Bush to name an outsider, Patrick Fitzgerald, as U. S. Attorney here? An insult to the local bar. I asked him this: Did you know that the last local D. A., Scott Lazar, was planning to go to China on a vacation with Mayor Richard M. Daley when the trip was called off because of 9/11? Did the Judge think that was too cozy? Yes, Bauer said. He was astounded at the news. I believe him. Anyhow, Peter Fitzgerald believed an outsider was indispensable to get a clean sweep of corruption here. He was massively turned off by Ryan and the governor’s determination to be boss. Ryan was up to his old tricks with the aid of his friend Denny Hastert: he tried to cash in on the state’s Lincoln museum by filling it with patronage hires. Fitzgerald took to the Senate floor to filibuster against it. Hastert tried to interfere in the naming of a prosecutor only to be told to butt out by Peter Fitzgerald. Then Fitzgerald began to interview only prosecutors from outside Illinois, a fresh departure from the old home-town prosecutor game the Combine plays. After Patrick Fitzgerald was confirmed, it was only a matter of time. Whether it was that Senator Peter Fitzgerald wanted to stay home with his wife and son, it was also true that the Combine wouldn’t back him for reelection. Judy Baar Topinka became State GOP Chairman and incredibly declined to endorse him, an incumbent, scandal-free, highly regarded Republican Senator for reelection in 2004. Peter Fitzgerald then declined to run again: a great loss when this young man threw in the cards. But Peter Fitzgerald has won just the same. It took time: eight years of painstaking work for Patrick Fitzgerald to nail down the Ryan case, but he did it. Throughout those years Ryan’s relations with Daley blossomed and Ryan’s hope grew that John Kerry might win the presidency in 2004 and appoint a new prosecutor. No such luck. The conviction of George Ryan is more than of a man but of the old-line play-for- pay political alliance between Democrats and Republicans. To shore up the Combine’s defense, Jim Thompson, architect of the scandal-tarred alliance, devoted the resources of his law firm to Ryan’s defense for free. It didn’t work. Now the one who will begin to lose sleep is Richard M. Daley. Among others. The question as mentioned above is whether or not Patrick Fitzgerald wants to follow through with a total slam-dunk: for the stuff of future convictions is there. *************** In the meantime, a gubernatorial election is being waged this year and a mayoral election will be run in 2007. The legatee of the old days of the Combine is Judy Baar Topinka, who declined to endorse Peter Fitzgerald for reelection. If she wins the governorship, that office will be in play to continue the game and do what it can to forestall trouble for Daley. Daley is determined to run for reelection unless he gets the feeling that the feds are coming so close he should conserve his energies-but he can be reelected rather easily. The huge circle of business and industries close to Daley are close to Jim Thompson and a large coterie of Demi-publicans as well. There’s a central thread which if it gets pulled…well, look out. Thus , it turns out that leaders of both parties are considering that it wouldn’t be fatal if the opposite side were to win the governorship. Here’s how some Democrats think: If Topinka were to win, she would likely ask for and get a general income tax hike which would stunt her popularity for the remainder of her term. In four years, when she would be age 66, she would decline to run again. That’s when a revitalized Democratic party could return with, let us say, a Lisa Madigan, the apple of Speaker Mike’s eye. So some Democrats reason: it would not be too bad to have Topinka win. You get rid of Rod who drives the party nuts, you get a social liberal and then get rid of her for a full-blooming liberal in four years. At the same time, there are some Republicans who reason that it is not entirely crazy to hope that Rod Blagojevich wins a second term. Topinka’s win would shut out conservatives for four years, even those non-conservatives like Ron Gidwitz who want fiscal reform. The GOP would be open to new ideas. In that way at least one party-the Republican-could conceivably be open to reconstruction along traditional lines. They reason: one more term for Blagojevich might be short-range salutary. He doesn’t seem to have many friends in his own party. After a term during which he either is forced to raise taxes or go out in ignominy with the state in terrible shape, maybe even, in a strange calibration, to a vice presidential nomination in 2008 (stranger things have happened), the public will have had such a belly-full of liberal Democrats, the state would be ready for Republicans and reform. In a sense, the galloping leather-lunged Senator-Minister James Meeks who uses his church as a political launching pad with no fear that the IRS will come, evidently, could decide everything. I doubt he’ll run-but if he does, he takes automatically a huge number of votes from Blagojevich. African Americans are not noted to stand by idly or vote for a white when one of their number-especially the dynamic kind that Meeks is-runs for a major office. Forget that many Republican social conservatives will support him because pro-life to him is different than pro-life to them. All the same, Meeks has it within his power to elect Topinka. You can bet your third to the last bottom dollar that Topinka’s people are dealing with him. Mike Madigan wants his little girl to be governor after one term: You can bet your second to the last bottom dollar that Topinka’s people are cutting a deal with Papa Madigan for his covert support for one Topinka term only. The Jim Thompson-Richard Daley combine would accept Topinka as governor. You can now bet your bottom dollar that somebody from the Combine is talking to Meeks. On the other hand, young Jesse wants to be mayor but wants more concessions from Blagojevich for the Abraham Lincoln airport in Peotone; they wouldn’t be discouraged if Meeks delivers and decides not to run for governor. A demonstrative black ally of the Jackson’s who causes the Democrats to lose the governorship doesn’t help Young Jesse’s reputation as a mayoral candidate in 2007, All of these things can’t interest George Ryan very much. You’ve heard of the old axiom “from shirtsleeves to shirtsleeves in three generations.” In one generation-his-Ryan will have moved from the posture of extending his royal ring for caressing because he granted prestige license plates for power-brokers to actually getting down to the business of making license plates in a prison factory.Is this a great country or what?"


Getting Greater all the time Tommy! ( No thanks to Corporate Shills. ) And it ain't going anywhere! A Rat has whiskers and so does a cat, but that don't make them brothers.

N.B. - Sorry about the Cyber language glitch in the paste-up of Tom Roeser's musings. Looks like it came right outta Commie Russia.



10:11 AM

Read more...

LaBarbera's Deviant Behavior

Today, the Illinois Family Institute defends Robert J. Smith, who was fired from his post on the D.C. Metro Board for refering to gay Americans as "persons of sexual deviancy." The IFI webpost goes on to argue that the word "deviant" merely means "differing from the norm or from the accepted standard of society."

Nothing pejorative about "deviant," eh? Fine.

Let's add these folks to the list of "deviants":

-Anyone who stands along a parade route with a bullhorn, chastising paraders while quoting the Bible. Definitely not a behavior your average American engages in.

-Anyone who moves from Maryland to Illinois to run for the U.S. Senate.

-Anyone who flies over stadiums in helicopters alluding to rounding up immigrants, or spends millions of dollars on losing statewide races more than once.

-Anyone who calls themselves a social conservative but takes their wife to a sex club.

-Left-handed people like Pat Robertson.

-Smokers.

Read more...

Da Mare, Listlessly UPDATED

Cross posted from ICPR's blog, The Race is On:

Yesterday’s revelation that the Mayor’s Office of Intergovernmental Affairs kept a 60-page clout list, detailing over 5,000 applicants and their political sponsors, has provoked outrage and indignation in the press and even around the water cooler (and not just at our office). In size and scope, this list dwarfs any previously disclosed lists maintained by either Gov. George Ryan or Gov. Rod Blagojevich. While there is broad consensus that patronage hiring and civil service should not mix, maybe it’s worth exploring why.

Mark Brown’s column today notes that patronage hiring “gives political leaders too much power.” Without disagreeing, I think that condenses the effect too much. Here’s my unpacking of the problems of patronage (in no particular order):

* Telling staff that the quality of their work is meaningless cheapens their labor and their lives. This is equally true of front line workers and supervisors.

* Putting workers in a position where they believe that their jobs depend on political work coerces them to forfeit their political independence

* Showing taxpayers that government will waste their money for private, electoral gains fuels backlash at government efforts for the common good.

* Locking a block of voters and campaign workers to a particular candidate dilutes the deliberative function of elections.

* Giving one set of candidates ready access to campaign cash and workers (I won’t use the euphemism “volunteers” in this context) disadvantages competing candidates and ideas and perverts the outcome of elections.

I’m sure there are other reasons, that’s what I came up with in 15-minuts of keyboarding. And we should distinguish between a system of tracking all applicants and their rec. letters from what we seem to have here, which tracks only those applicants with politically-connected sponsors. Handing the public payroll over to political insiders is a horrible idea for many, many reasons.

On an unrelated note, I would hope that Corporation Counsel Mara Georges will finally stop saying that the Shakman Decree is outdated and should be dumped, and that the aldermen will stop complaining about the cost of the Shakman monitor. At the very least, the list shows that the City needs a refresher on Shakman compliance. If Chicago's aldermen really want to stop acting like sheep, they'll demand an end to these abusive hiring practices.

UPDATE: The Tribune has posted the list here. (pdf; zoom in 200% to read the names)

Read more...

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Freedom Folks on Pat Quinn

I like him. I wish he was Gov.... Freedom Folks among the few who follow him here.

Read more...

“Firm that made toll signs also a Blagojevich donor”

That’s what the Daily Herald state government reporter John Patterson discovered.

What a surprise.

Actually, the idea of checking out such a connection flitted through my mind yesterday, too, but I didn’t follow through. I’m glad Patterson did, because the public ought to know that

Western Remac Inc., based in Woodridge, gave $1,200 to Blagojevich’s 2002 bid for governor.
The company has been a tollway vendor for 20 years, a tollway spokesman told him.

What the contribution shows--at minimum--is that vendors think it is in their best interest to contribute to Governor Rod Blagojevich’s campaign fund.

Or should that read, “Rod R. Blagojevich,” as the sign says?

Maybe, since gubernatorial contributions are only shown to Friends of Blagojevich after the primary election in 2002, it shows how nervous this long-time vendor was that he would lose his connection to the tollway.

Or maybe the owner is just a Democrat that one of Blagojevich supporters hit up.

All of its contributions are to Democrats (Lisa Madigan, Richard M. Daley and John Schmidt), except the most recent of $250, which went to the man who took control of Cicero--Larry Dominick.

32 of the $15,000 signs have been ordered.

It takes 37,500 forty-cent tolls to raise $15,000 to pay for one sign.

It takes 1.2 MILLION passes through the automatic toll lanes to pay for all 32 signs.

Pretty expensive for campaign signs.

Read yesterday's story on the signs, including what Tribune readers think about it, go to McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

'All my guys were qualified'

via Sun Times,

Political operative Dominic Longo, of the controversial Coalition for Better Government group, made no apologies for going to bat for his people. "All my guys were qualified," Longo said.
Amazing Daley's administration could keep a list like this secret for so long in the first place. Or why no one assumed it existed in the first place and sent an FOI request for it.... if there is such a thing as an FOI request for City Government. Or maybe just why a reporter never asked about it for all these years.

Read more...

Monday, June 19, 2006

Marking "His" Territory

Lots of animals mark their territories.

Dogs pee. Politicians put up signs with their names on them.

During a campaign, yard signs mark current and, sometimes, eventually hoped for territories.

When a new president of the Cook County Board takes office, the signs in the Forest Preserve are changed to reflect that fact.

Back in 1973, the “People’s” Governor, Dan Walker, the man who somehow captivated the media by walking from the bottom of Illinois to the Wisconsin border, decided that he did not need to put his name on the state’s welcoming signs.

When Walker made the announcement, I was in my first year in Springfield, just as was he. I sent him a congratulatory letter and a press release of praise to local papers.

How ironic that it took over 30 years for a subsequent governor--Rod Blagojevich--to decide to undue that good work of his Democratic Party predecessor.

No longer do just the people of Illinois welcome visitors. Not now that Rod's name is on the sign.

Even the little "welcome to Illinois" on Route 47 north of Hebron has it.

But, that was not enough.

As Jon Hilkevitch writes in his “Getting Around” column in today’s Chicago Tribune, the new

Open Road Tolling – Rod R. Blagojevich, Governor
signs sprouting on all the toll roads cost $15,000 apiece.

“The signs, mounted on steel monotubes above the open-road tolling lanes, require special materials and galvanized brackets that the tollway sign shop cannot install,” the reporter explained.

Tollway spokesman Kathleen Cantillon explained,
We consider it an important sign.
Right.

Important politically.

At least pee is free. It doesn’t waste our tax money.

= = = = =

The Chicago Tribune has a poll on its web site on whether the new blue Blagojevich signs are worth $15,000.

At 2:15 Monday afternoon 7.7% (600) were in favor, while 92.7% (7,756) voted, "No."

= = = = =

More good stuff at McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Blagojevich Takes Another Hit on Education Funding

The Building Owner's and Managers Association (BOMA), released a study of Chicago's commercial real estate last week, blaming Illinois' over-reliance on property taxes for school funding for high vacancy rates in Loop high rises. From The Chicago Reader (circluation 158,000):

“Illinois’ dependence on property taxes jeopardizes Chicago’s long-term economic prospects,” says Ron Vukas, executive vice president of the association, which represents about 80 percent of the commercial rental buildings in the Loop. “We need a change.”
....
For starters, the vacancy rate in downtown office buildings remains stubbornly high. At about 18 percent, roughly five points higher than the national average, it’s below the rate in Houston (21.2 percent) and higher than rates in New York (8 percent), Boston (11.5 percent), and Los Angeles (around 15 percent).
....
New office buildings have gone up in the Loop over the last few years. But according to the report they’re being built not for a new market but for an old one, as tenants move from one building to another. “Notwithstanding a few significant moves by companies to Chicago, on average the city has added only 100,000 square feet of new tenant-occupied space a year over the last five years,” the report says. “Those 100,000 square feet translate into just one large new commercial tenant a year for the whole city.”
....
According to BOMA, rising property taxes are the chief culprit in making it hard to keep commercial tenants downtown, let alone draw new ones. Tax increases are forcing both tenants and landlords to pay a significant chunk of their income in property taxes. “Chicago had the highest property taxes over the last ten years, with an average of $6.98 in taxes per square foot,” says the report. “This compares to $5.31 for New York, $2.78 for Dallas, $2.40 for Atlanta and $1.98 for Los Angeles. By far, Chicago leads the other cities in how much of a building’s income goes to taxes. Nearly 25 percent of a building’s income in the city goes to property taxes alone. In New York and Dallas, that figure is 12.6 percent. In Atlanta, 9 percent and Los Angeles 7 percent.”
....
In this regard, the report is aimed at Governor Blagojevich as much as Mayor Daley. It’s Blagojevich who’s resisting attempts to have the state pick up a greater share of educational funding—he doesn’t want to back away from his promise not to raise taxes, particularly on the eve of his reelection campaign against Judy Baar Topinka. The best bet for some sort of change will come after next fall’s election, when the newly elected governor has more freedom to act boldly.

“I don’t have a prediction for what will happen with property tax legislation,” says Vukas. “But it really worries me. People think these downtown buildings are cash cows. They don’t get it.”

Of course, the problem for Vukas and BOMA if Blagojevich wins while maintaining his "no new taxes" mantra is that he will cling to that soundbite like a shipwreck survivor clings to driftwood as the '08 Presidential race approaches.

The article also takes a look at the impact that TIF districts have on the overall tax burden, showing once again why The Reader is one of the best sources for in-depth public policy reporting. This week's round-up of the police torture scandal centered around Jon Burge is also a must read.

UPDATE: BOMA's study is here.

Read more...

Sunday, June 18, 2006

Arlene Jones asks Why can’t the West Side get that casino?

If we're going to gamble, this makes sense to me.

A license for a 13th casino that is still available. Why can’t the West Side get that casino and have a group of African Americans become part of the investors in it? The jobs to build any part of the new Entertainment District would put a priority on local African-American participation. No one wants to see folks just gamble, so we can include a first-class hotel with an auditorium offering musical acts and plays. How many of us have gone all the way to Merrillville, Ind. for a concert or play?

Read more...

Saturday, June 17, 2006

RTA Universal Pass Roll-Out Time

My family kids me about how my little computer work space looks like the office of the hero in the movie “A Beautiful Mind.”

Well, it’s time to take down one of those notes.

That little article published on December 18, 2005, in the Chicago Tribune stimulates this post.

Its headline:

One card for Metra, Pace, CTA? They’re working on it
Sure…

Just like in 1974, when the RTA Citizens Committee for Better Transporation (Really. That's what the proponents' committee was called) made this false promise boldly, although not often:
Public transportation, when and where you need it, thoughout the region.
What an outrageous promise!

Then.

And, in December, Steve Schlickman, RTA Executive Director, said the RTA’s “goal” is to have the “universal fare card available to Metra riders in six months.”

The RTA's six months is up.

A footnote:

Steve’s father, State Rep. Gene Schlickman (R-Arlington Heights), and I were on Milt Rosenberg’s Extension 720 the Friday before the primary election RTA referendum in 1974.

As we sat at a hotel bar that is now near the last CTA station before O’Hare after taking the negative side of the question to WGN radio’s 50,000 watt listeners, I asked,
Are you more conservative than you before this campaign started?
He agreed that he was.

Both of us would have been labeled moderate Republicans at the time.

The opposition committee was know as "kNOw RTA." We arrived at this title at a meeting in State Rep. Don Totten's basement shopping center office in Schaumburg. Since the opponents had those like Don and me who thought government had no business in subsidizing trains and buses, plus mass transit proponents like State Reps. Gene Schlickman and Don Deuster, we had to reach some compromise that would fit us all.

We decided that using a combination of the words "NO" and "know," would allow fit us all. While the mass transit proponents among us were in favor of the public's subsidizing train and bus travel, they believe that if people knew enough about the actual RTA plan that they would vote "No."

Hence, the small "k" and "w" in the final "kNOw RTA" button design. What you see here is the prototype. Above is the cover of the pamphlet, 188,000 of which were printed in my father's office at the tip of the "V" of the Crystal Lake Plaza, plus the cost and benefit analysis on the first inside page.

If you want to read the rest of the opposition pamphlet, including a larger view of the McHenry County pitch, click here.

McHenry County voted 93-7% against creating the Regional Transporation Authority. the paper ballot RTA referendum passed by less than 13,000 votes and no recount was allowed, even though there was obvious vote fraud in Chicago.

Also posted on McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Friday, June 16, 2006

Patronage Tax

Patronage politicians often say that it is OK to hire your friends as long as they are as competent as other applicants.

Makes sense, doesn’t it?

But, there is a cost to patronage hiring because the best qualified are often not hired.

Andrew Jackson is credited with starting the “spoils system.” Chicago politicians obviously have been excellent students.

Today, the Chicago Tribune starts what I hope will be a continuing series. It was written by reporters Laurie Cohen, Todd Lightly and Dan Mihalopoulos.

This a big step beyond the typical television finding of guys leaning on shovels or operating a business while on a public payroll.

It took a lot of work to see what a former legislative assistant to State Rep. Eddie Acevedo (D-Chicago) cost Chicago taxpayers because she backed a garbage truck into a pole severely injuring her helper. The article says Acevedo is a leader in HDO, the Hispanic Democratic Organization.

Read more...

Madigan should start blogging

He's writing a lot notes. Here's Matt Adrian writing about him in The Southern. Check the link because there is space for comments. They'll be worth watching.

House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, outlined 17 questions that should be answered before the state's 274 miles of tollway are placed on the auction block. Questions raised include who will be in charge of road repairs and how much authority would private companies have to raise tolls.
[***]
Madigan has penned several such memos in recent weeks. A similarly worded letter was sent to Gov. Rod Blagojevich raising several questions about his proposal to sell or lease the Illinois Lottery.

Read more...

The Chicago way

Three contractors are bidding to fix the White House fence. One is from Chicago, another from Kentucky and the third, Florida. They go with a White House official to examine the fence.

The Florida contractor takes out a tape measure and does some measuring, then works some figures with a pencil. "Well," he says. "I figure the job will run about $900: $400 for materials, $400 for my crew and $100 profit for me."

The Kentucky contractor also does some measuring and figuring, then says, "I can do this job for $700: $300 for materials, $300 for my crew and $100 profit for me."

The Chicago contractor does not measure or figure, but leans over to the White House official and whispers: "$2,700."

The official, incredulous, says, "You didn't even measure like the other guys! How did you come up with such a high figure?"

"Easy," the Chicagoan explains, "$1,000 for you, $1,000 for me and we hire the guy from Kentucky."

Read more...

a self-serving letter written simply to cover his own behind.

It just seems lame to me trying to stick Hastert with the culture of corruption label on a perfectly legit land-deal when we have so many fish-in-the-barrel to take pot-shots at in Illinois.

Banker Alexi Giannoulias -- the Democratic nominee for state treasurer -- is accused of approving a $1 million loan to an 86-year-old mentally incompetent woman whose "business partners" have been suspected of fraud in the past.
[***]
Additionally, Giannoulias wrote a letter to Billings, expressing his concern to her about their history, recommending she hire an attorney to help review the documents.

However, attorney Peter King, representing Billings' estate, which filed the suit against Broadway, called that "a self-serving letter written simply to cover his own behind."

The suit marks the second time questions have been raised about bank loans tied to Giannoulias.

Corruption is rampant in Illinois and it's mostly among Democrats because that's mostly what we have.

At least Durbin and Obama both voted against the culture of defeat when the both voted to yea to table amendment 4269 to the Defense Authorization Act,
To require the withdrawal of the United States Armed Forces from Iraq and urge the convening of an Iraq summit.
My problem is I'm not sure if Durbin and Obama voted to table this because they believed it wrong, or if because they're more Democrats covering their own behinds.

cross posted at Bill Baar's West Side

Read more...

Thursday, June 15, 2006

$550,000 for paper shredders.

I kid you not. (Via Dan Curry.)

State Sen. Bill Brady (R-Bloomington) wants to know why the state plans to spend $550,000 on paper shredders in light of budget concerns, ongoing federal investigations and recent reports that a Governor's employee was fired when she refused to shred documents.

You know the saying about giving a bottle of whiskey and the car keys to a teenager? I'd say "giving" $550,000 worth of paper shredders to a Blagojevich administration under investigation is pretty similar.

Read more...

Questions About Denny's Drive-Thru

I don't know Denny Hastert's spokesman Ron Bonjean, so I can't tell you whether he holds the public in contempt or if he thinks we are all fools. But this story from your Chicago Tribune about Denny's windfall profit for flipping land near his Prairie Parkway indicates it is one or the other:

Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert and two partners turned a profit of more than $3 million on property they accumulated and sold in just over three years near the route of a proposed controversial freeway on the western fringe of suburban Chicago, according to land records and financial disclosure reports released Wednesday.

Hastert spokesman Ron Bonjean rejected the notion that the land, located 5 1/2 miles from the proposed Prairie Parkway route, rose in value because of the highway project. The speaker long has been an aggressive proponent of the highway and helped secure more than $200 million in federal funding through an earmark in federal transportation legislation.
Of course he has. But the question is not whether the Prairie Parkway was a new idea. The question is whether Denny's personal profit of more than a million dollars was due to some abuse of his position as speaker.
The property near Plano, Ill., was sold three months after the transportation bill was signed into law. It was purchased by a real estate developer who is planning to build more than 1,500 homes on the land.

Kendall County, where the land is located, has one of the fastest-growing housing markets in the nation, and there has been a corollary rapid rise in land values. ***

Hastert received five-eighths of the proceeds from the land sale, said Dallas Ingemunson, one of his partners. That indicates a profit of more than $1.5 million for Hastert. ***

Bonjean said the speaker had fully complied with financial disclosure rules for members of Congress and had simply profited from a well-timed real estate investment.

"For 26 years, the speaker has been a proponent of the Prairie Parkway to address the transportation challenges in northeast Illinois," Bonjean said. "None of the properties purchased by the speaker are near enough to the Prairie Parkway to be affected by the proposed highway."
That's right. Mr. Bonjean thinks you will believe that having an expressway built five miles away has no effect on a property's value. As I said above, I don't know if he thinks you are stupid enough to believe that load of bull or if he doesn't give a damn if you believe it or not.
Kendall County land records show the 138-acre parcel was transferred to a real estate developer in a sale valued at $4,989,000 in December 2005, about three months after the highway legislation was signed into law.

The land had been accumulated in phases. The first 69-acre parcel was part of the purchase of a larger 196-acre farm made under the name of the speaker's wife, Jean Hastert, in August 2002. According to land records, she paid $2,125,000 for the property. On a per-acre basis, the original prorated cost to Hastert of the parcel included in the later deal was $868,000.

The remainder sold to the developer was purchased by a land trust in which Hastert shared a quarter-interest in February 2004. The partnership paid $1,033,000 for the parcel, according to land records. In addition to Ingemunson, the other partner was Thomas Klatt, a local trucking company owner who also has been a long-time supporter and campaign contributor to Hastert, Bonjean said.

Bonjean said he could not immediately determine how the partnership divided the proceeds. He added that the value of the two parcels was enhanced by combining them because the land purchased by the partnership gave the property direct access to a roadway.
So Mr. Bonjean apparently understands that transportation availablity enhanced the value of Denny's property -- but doesn't seem to understand that the transportation opportunities offered by a 200 million dollar expressway would also enhance the value of that property.
The developer who purchased the land said the proposed Prairie Parkway was not a deciding factor in making the deal.

"We would have done the transaction whether it [the parkway] was proposed or not," said Arthur Zwemke, a partner in Robert Arthur Land Co. who also has been a donor over the years to Hastert's campaigns.
Once again, this misses the point. I don't doubt that Mr. Zwemke might have purchased the property even if the Pairie Parkway had not been funded. The question that needs to be asked is, "Would he have paid as much if Denny hadn't secured federal funds to put in the nearby expressway?"
More important than the planned freeway are the land's location in the fast-growing western exurban Chicago corridor, a favorable political climate for growth, and the availability of good infrastructure like water and sewer, he said.
Again, he might have purchased it, but would that purchase -- without the expressway -- have resulted in such a windfall profit for Denny?
Zwemke said he inherited the financial terms for all of the land in contracts acquired from another developer, who decided not to pursue the project.

He acknowledged that he paid a price well above what Hastert and his Little Rock partners paid in assembling the property in less than four years, but said, "We have a fair deal. Everything was market value."
But what would the property's market value have been if Denny had not seen to it that an $200M expressway was built nearby?
The site is attractive, Zwemke said, because the land for it was assembled in just two transactions, the one with Little Rock and another concluded last August with the owners of an adjacent 589-acre farm.
Say it with me: The question isn't whether the site is attractive or if the parcels of land would have been sold if Hastert's Prairie Porkway had not been federally funded.

The question is: Could the Speaker of the House and his partners have flipped the property for such a huge profit, in such a short time, if not for Denny's using his power as Speaker to earmark $200 million dollars of taxpayer money to build a freeway nearby?

Unlike Mr. Bonjean, I think you are smart enough to figure out the answer.

UPDATE: Think Progress has a "graphic timeline explaining how House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) used a federal earmark to turn a $1.5 million profit"

Read more...

Equal Pay Act Benefits Less Than Employee's Salary

Never let it be said that Governor Rod Blagojevich or the Democrats in control of the General Assembly know how to do a comparison of costs and benefits.

Especially if the primary goal of a bill’s passage is a headline.

The feminists wanted a state equal pay for equal work law and the Democrats responded with Senate Bill 2, sponsored by Senator Carol Ronen.

”Women doing the same work as men should be paid the same wages,” the Governor says piously in an April 25th press release.

Find someone who disagrees with that axiom.

The law has now been in effect for over two years. Before its existence the Illinois Human Rights Department and the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission handled such complaints.

But, the proponents argued, these didn’t cover small employers. Democrats contend that the new state law covers an additional 330,000 workers.

There were 2,250 calls to the toll-free line (1-866-EPA-IDOL). The high number of inquiries is probably the result of the politically motivated placard mandated posted in all businesses. It says,

IN ILLINOIS, WOMEN EARN 71 CENTS FOR EVERY $1 A MAN EARNS.
If I were a woman, I’d probably have called, too.

No matter that the statistic is an argument for “comparable worth,” not equal pay for equal work. (See this article for a dissection of this invalid comparison.)

7.5% of the 2,250 calls resulted in
nearly 170 cases, prompted settlements between employees and employers as a result of strict enforcement, and recovered close to $7,300 in back wages under the Act.
Read that back wage recovery figure again:
$7,300. No, it’s “close to $7,300.”
But, to be fair, the figure is really probably higher than that. If I add up all the numbers in the press release, I can get to $41,828, including wages and fines sought in court. (The press release actually uses the most conservative estimate of benefits for the program--$7,300.)

That’s the tangible benefit side of the cost-benefit equation that the Democrats will ignore by keeping this law on the books.

The cost side?

Prior to passage the Labor Department estimated that it would cost $325,000, but, apparently, only one employee, Nancy Hernandez, was hired. She “devotes 100% of her time to handle cases and conduct investigations,” according to Public Information Officer Anjali Nayyar-Julka.

Hernandez gets paid $43,104 per year, the State Comptroller says. (The Labor Department refused to provide the salary information.) Fringe benefits are $13,800 for health insurance, $4,134 for pension and $3,297 for the state’s share of Social Security. So, the one enforcement employee costs taxpayers $63,335.

An entirely new division was created:
the Equal Opportunity Workforce Division, which also administers the
· Equal Pay Act, it oversees the Victims’ Economic Security and Safety Act, which allows victims of sexual assault to take up to 12 weeks off without pay and

· Displaced Homemakers Program, which provide participants with education, training and employment services through a $621,300 grant program.
It looks like it is $47,000 per year or less, because the rest of the division’s money goes to help displaced homemakers.

The cost for the two years it has been in operation?

Certainly over $100,000, considering the approximate $20,000 in fringe benefit costs each year.

Did the law do some good?


It appears so.

Did it do enough good to merit staying on the books?


Compare my liberal benefit estimate of $41,828 for the two years or so about which the press release talks with a cost of something under two times the $63,335 for the salary of the one enforcement employee.

What do you think?

Read about the beneficiaries of the Equal Pay Act in a June 8th article at McHenryCountyBlog.com

Read more...

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Prairie Porkway: Denny Hastert's Retirement Plan

TPMmuckraker reveals Rep. Denny Hastert's sure-fire investment strategy: Buy Low, Earmark Funds to Build Nearby Highway, Sell High

Over at the Sunlight Foundation, they've found Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) taking a page from Rep. Ken Calvert's (R-CA) investment playbook.

For years, Hastert has been pushing the construction of a highway called the Prairie Parkway in Illinois. He secured $207 million in earmarks to support the project. But what he didn't tell constituents was that he owned a huge plot of farmland just a few miles from where the road would run. And now that the project's gone through, the land has been tranferred to a real estate development firm with plans to build a 1,600 home community. The land has already improved in value by millions of dollars.

I wonder how much Hastert will ultimately make on the deal?

More at the Sunlight Foundation.

Hat-tip to "Backup Pundit" at Archpundit

Read more...

State of Economic Interest

Cross-posted from ICPR's blog, The Race is On:

Federal office holders have just released their statements of economic interest, and the reports give the public a good view of their elected official’s finances. These reports show major financial interests, and also give the value of the interest, so that the public has a better sense of where conflicts of interest might arise, and which matters may present more conflict to the official than others. If an official, for instance, derives a few thousand dollars a year from a particular company, they might be tempted to give that company special treatment. If they get hundreds of thousands of dollars from that holding, the pressure might be all the more intense.

Illinois officials also file statements of economic interest, but while the name is the same, the content is not. The forms are available for download here, but all they list is the name of the interest, with no specific information on the value of the investment or the income earned from it. In short, Illinois’ statements of economic interest provide very little meaningful information for Illinois voters. Many electeds list simply that the question does not apply to them.

Changing the forms has proven to be a tough hill to climb. While reformers have recently succeeded in getting the forms posted to the Internet, measures to improve the content have stalled in Rules. That reform, to paraphrase Cubs fans, apparently has to wait until next year.

Read more...

Gay Games' State Subsidy

When the Gay Games’ spokeswoman was in Crystal Lake for the meeting during which the Crystal Lake Park Board capitulated to legal threats, I asked how much was taxpayer subsidy was expected from Springfield.

The answer given was $450,000.

I just received a copy of a subsidy agreement from the administration of Rod Blagojevich, which says Chicago Games, Inc.—the official name of the Gay Games—will receive $296,616 out of the Fiscal Year 2006 budget. (That’s the budget year that ends June 30, 2006.)

That's 66% of what was expected.

The money is for presumably non-controversial items:

Administration - $45,000
Purchase of Services - $3,000
Marketing/Promotion - $18,000
Equipment/Facility Rental - $59,000
Cash Match-Equip/Facility Rent - $171,616
There must have been something revealing in the first application, because it was withdrawn and re-submitted.

Of course, more could come from next year’s budget. The FY07 budget year starts two weeks before the Gay Games are being held.

Tomorrow on McHenry County Blog- Rowing event scheduled on the Chicago River...on Monday, July 17th.

Read more...

Quit De Wining about the Santorum Spectercle

My WND column today does not mention Illinois, but as a discussion of the U.S. Senate balance of power, it should be of interest to Illinois pro-lifers and pro-choicers: If Republicans lose the U.S. Senate, the pro-life issue will lose and vice versa.

Any discussion of balancing purism with strategy is complicated, and that's what this is....

wnd_logo.gif

A few weeks ago, I sent an e-mail to my list, encouraging Pennsylvania pro-lifers to support Republican Rick Santorum in his rebid for the U.S. Senate against Democrat Bob Casey.

Both are pro-life, but because Santorum and the White House supported pro-abortion incumbent Arlen Specter in the 2004 Republican primary against pro-lifer Pat Toomey, pro-lifers consider him a traitor. Specter won 51-49 percent. Pro-lifers blame Santorum and Bush for the edge.

This was typical of negative responses I received regarding my e-mail:

Let Rick Santorum be the example to all the other Republican politicians that we will not allow them to play games with the lives of our unborn children, and if they do, they will be gone.


I wish Santorum had not supported Specter. But would turning from Santorum help or hurt the pro-life cause?

I submit it would hurt, badly. Here's why....

Read my column today, "Quit De Wining about the Santorum Spectercle," on WorldNetDaily.com.

Read more...

Don't blame Blagojevich

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch editorializes on the Illinois race for Governor today and states: "Blaming Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich for the condition of the state's economy makes only slightly more sense than blaming him for the weather. In truth, no governor has much influence over a state's prosperity during a single term in office.

Economies don't turn on a dime."

Tell that to Missouri Governor Matt Blunt, a frequent target of the Post-Dispatch for his attempts to do something about the state budget.

The paper is reacting to charges by Blagojevich's opponent, Judy Baar Topinka, that, "Mr. Blagojevich torpedoed the recovery by raising a number of taxes and fees on business."

I haven't noticed the governor getting much involved in a real need at this end of the state, a new bridge over the Mississippi, but the Post defines where the real influence of state government lies, including transportation, "Investing in transportation improvements pays economic dividends over decades; that's why a new bridge over the Mississippi River is critical to southern Illinois' economic future."



Read more...

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

Prison Cheese

Cross posted from ICPR's blog, The Race is On:

Today’s news is full of stories about corruption in Illinois, but lest anyone think we’re the bottom of the bucket in American politics, don’t forget that our neighbors to the north are also watching an on-going series of live courtroom dramas. Convicted legislators? They've got’em. Convicted lobbyists? Got those, too. Today’s papers report on the conviction of a state purchasing manager for directing contracts to the governor’s campaign contributors, over-ruling the recommendation of the proper evaluation committee.

So who’s more corrupt? If we’re just looking at state government, it’s probably a toss up. Throwing in local government (Laski’s sentencing today is just gravy), I think we win. Or lose, depending on your perspective.

Read more...

80 MPH

The speed limit for 521 miles of Texas’ Interstate highways has been raised to 80 miles per hour.

Before it was 75 MPH, so Texas was already higher than Illinois. As is Indiana's on at least its tollway.

When I ran for Governor on the Libertarian Party ticket, I advocated raising the speed limit to 65 MPH on two-lane state highways—what it was before the gas crisis of the 1973—and 75 MPH on Interstates.

Indeed, the speed limit on the tollway was 75 MPH outside of the six-county area until Governor Jim Edgar decided that was too fast.

Raising the speed limit still makes sense. Interstates were designed for 80 MPH, I’ve been told.

More non-Left-Stream articles at McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Democrats on fool's errand with Wal-Mart issue: UPDATED!

Crossposted on Marathon Pundit.

In regards to the subject of Wal-Mart, it's always been obvious to me that Democratic politicians are listening the their funders from big labor rather than its working-class base it claims to represent.

Marshall Manson tipped me to this Real Clear Politics article that puts some hard numbers on my beliefs:

· Democratic candidates face different constituencies in different geographic areas, but it is hard to imagine any Democratic candidates in diverse districts winning with the defection of 3-in-10 African-Americans and Hispanics.

· Overall, 40% of registered voters would vote against an anti- Wal-Mart Democratic candidate, while just 18% would vote for such a candidate--a 2-to-1 margin that would be hard to overcome among the balance who say the candidate's anti- Wal-Mart stance would make no difference.

The temptation to "stand up to Wal-Mart" as a campaign ploy reflects the sometimes cocooning and self-deceptive nature of Democratic Party activists. Indeed, in RT Strategies polls we consistently find that the most vociferously anti- Wal-Mart groups are Northeast and West Coast liberals who themselves rarely or never shop at Wal-Mart, shunning the retailer as not worthy of their patronage. They cannot understand how others fail to reach the same conclusion. At the extreme, such a person as a Democratic candidate for office might even want to suggest a few new laws or regulatory interpretations to help those who cannot help but dally in the devil's workshop.

The author of the article is Thomas Riehle, a long-time Democratic pollster.

Ald. Joe "No foie gras for me" Moore is the champion of the anti-Wal Mart forces in Chicago.

I used to live in his ward, there is just one decent retail plaza in his 49th Ward, and it's on the Evanston border. It's not a well-to-do area, in short, it's filled with people who are target customers for Wal-Mart, and these residents probably hop in their cars or a CTA bus and take Touhy Avenue down to the Niles Wal-Mart, contributing to the sales tax revenue of that suburb.

Last week, the Chicago Tribune--free registration required---took Moore to task in an editorial.

Yet some Chicago aldermen want to welcome Wal-Mart with a slap to the head. They're pushing an ordinance that would require all so-called big-box retailers in the city to pay their workers at least $13 an hour in wages and benefits. The $13 minimum would apply to anyone who works more than five hours a week in a store larger than 75,000 square feet. A University of Illinois at Chicago study last year estimated that, as of 2003, this would have applied to about 35 stores in Chicago.

So why Wal-Mart workers and not, say, Radio Shack workers?

Ald. Joe Moore (49th), sponsor of one of several versions of the wage ordinance, argues that the largest retailers "can absorb the higher wage costs." And, he said, "they have nowhere else to go."

Now, as far as we know, Ald. Moore does not have a background in retailing. He worked for the city's Law Department before he joined the City Council. But even if he were Ald. Sam Walton, we'd argue that a City Council member has no grounds for telling a private business what wage scale it can or can't "absorb."

The Trib goes on to point out that yes, Wal-Mart does have other places to go. There are 18 Wal-Marts in Chicago's suburbs, the first Wal-Mart will open on Chicago's West Side this summer, bringing 400 much-needed jobs to an impoverished neighborhood.

My advice to Moore is to walk around his ward and talk to his Rogers Park constituents and ask them what they think about a Wal-Mart opening up on the North Side of Chicago.

My guess is that there answers will surprise him.

And as far as I know, Wal-Mart does not serve foie gras in their cafeterias.

Go for it, Joe.

UPDATE, June 15: Betsy's Page (a big deal blog) adds more, and links back to Marathon Pundit.

Joe Moore really can't laugh off this criticism anymore.

2nd June 15 update: More on the Democrats jihad against Wal-Mart

Read more...

Monday, June 12, 2006

Dan Proft on WYLL radio today

I heard Proft (filling in for Scott Thomas) say 2006 won't be 1994 because Gingrich was a Field General and Emanuel is an assassin (wish he would have used a different word but the point is Rahm is fighting the congressional elections one by one; without a national strategy. Proft was finishing an interview with Rick Garcia by the way when he closed with this thought.)

I have a bet going with someone on this blog the Democrats will implode (explode if you prefer) come 2008. One reason will they can't get it together like Newt. Here's Greenberg and Carville on the party. I think this was presented at the Take Back America 2006 Conference,

If the Democrats and challengers fail to show voters something more, this disillusionment could show itself in fragmentation to smaller parties and more likely, a stay-at-home protest. The current measures of potential Democratic turnout and enthusiasm are not impressive. And while it is likely that a low turnout election will hurt Republicans more than Democrats, a stay-away protest vote could also cut into the margin Democrats might have achieved.

There has been no improvement in feelings about the Democrats in this change environment; in fact positive views of the party have actually declined over the past few months, with negative assessments slightly higher than positive ones. [my emphasis]
Putting some distance between the party and Rick Garcia might be a nice start in Illinois.

Update: Froma Harrop chews out Emanuel too on Busby's loss to Bilbray and Busby's advice to illegals to vote... well illegally.
Which leads to some pointed questions for the Democratic Party: Is anybody home? Didn't someone coach Busby on how to handle the hot issue of illegal immigration? Does the Democratic Party have an intelligent being who can explain to the others that illegal immigration is their concern, too?
[***]
Rahm Emanuel, who heads the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, played down the import of Busby's loss for the Democrats' hopes in November. Waving off the immigration issue, he said, "Not every district is going to be on the border of Mexico."

I have news for him. Not every district is on the border with Mexico, but just about every district feels like it is.

Read more...

Blogs, Moulitsas, and Obama

I heard a sound bite last night from Meet the Press with Markos Moulitsas telling Russert blogs had a hand in getting Obama elected to the Senate from Illinois.

Thought that was a bit of a stretch. Maybe all these Dem Pols traveling down to Las Vegas are going to Kos's head.

I thought blogs irrelevant in Illinois politics.

Read more...

Sunday, June 11, 2006

And Giuliani in town for McSweeney

This visit completely missed my radar screen until I read Tom Roeser singing Giuliani's praises.

But I’ve got to tell you: this guy Giuliani has magnetism. I feel about him as I would from the gut. From my gut I think John McCain, though a hero, is something like a cardboard pop-up. The same with everybody else who’s mentioned for president-except.
Republicans are just a bigger tent. I can't imagine a Democratic activist in this state gushing over a National Democrat who was pro-life and supported preserve marriage amendment. They'd hound him or her right out of the party.

Read more...

Lynn Sweet: Bush on his way to Illinois for Topinka

Sweet writes there were no hard feelings over Topinka's cracks a few months ago,

Democratic blue state Illinois is flashing onto the radar of the Bush White House, with the governorship up for grabs and two high-profile House seats.

The Sun-Times has learned President Bush is coming to Chicago July 7 for a fund-raiser for Judy Baar Topinka.

The White House political operation, run by Karl Rove -- who helped convince Topinka to run against Gov. Blagojevich -- is also closely monitoring two of the most-watched House races in the country, in the west and Northwest Suburban 6th and 8th congressional districts.

Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin are seen by the White House as having very serious potential to pick off a Democratic governor, notwithstanding low approval ratings for Bush and Congress.
Maybe the all the protestors a visit like this brings out serves to pump up those conservatives thinking of sitting out November? (Gay Activists demanding a right to marriage they would disdain exercising themselves, linked arm-in-arm with angry Kossaks crying no war for oil with Ahmadinejad's Iran. Think of the image.)

Also heard Rick Pearson on WGN radio yesterday morning talk about Blagojvich's TV ads. For a guy with a pile of money, they're kind of cheesy commercials. The quality seems poor. Pearson said without a key issue that could knock off Topinka early, they're a waste of money; and they're clearly not hitting he with an issue that will crush her early.

I wish he'd bring out a Ryan-Topinka polka commercial. That would at least hold my attention.

Read more...

Saturday, June 10, 2006

Are you shocked?

Mr. Hare originally had planned to take four weeks of vacation and to campaign at night and on the weekends.

"I don't want to do anything in violation of the House ethics committee," said Mr. Hare, who was chosen this week to replace Rep. Evans, D-Rock Island, on the November ballot. He said he'll submit a resignation letter, taking a week to clean out his desk and reassign cases he was working on before his last day.

Mr. Hare said he had looked through the House Ethics Manual and assumed he could keep his job.

The campaign booklet says that congressional staffers can run for office and still work at their jobs, as long as they campaign on their own time. However, congressional staffers who are candidates to succeed their employers must quit their jobs because of a strong potential of a conflict of interest, according to ethics rules. Another concern is that a congressional campaign takes up a lot of time.

So six months into the year after campaiging for the last 60-days, he still has four weeks of vacation left? I need this kind of job. He's already violated the House ethics committee given the recent news that 'he outworked the rest of the field'. Due to the charade of a selection process by which he was appointed, one might suspect that Hare was going to be a 'business-as-usual' guy. It is just astounding that he is so out-front with it. This will matter little to the Democrats of the 17th, nor will the fact that he has little or no aptitude in reading comprehension.

Come on now "assumed he could keep his job", "campaign at night and on the weekends", Good god, man! He must have cheated to get those C's in High School if he thinks everyone is that dumb. Evan's chief of staff was appointed guardian of Lane's estate yesterday. Any bets on when Evans will step down due to "health issues" and appoint Phil Hare to complete his term? Afterall, the man's gotta eat. (The Quincy Pundit)

Read more...

Milk it while you can, Ray

U.S. Rep. Ray LaHood (RINO-Peoria) is the luckiest sumb*tch on Earth.

We all know the story by now. LaHood was one of many people attending a meeting with President Bush the other day. LaHood remarked that it sure would be nice if somethign could be done about Abu Musab Zarqawi, the terrorist leader responsible for, among many other things, the videotaped beheading of Nick Berg. What LaHood didn't know was that throughout the meeting, Bush was getting secret updates on the attack on Zarqawi's safehouse.

As a result, LaHood is getting press like this piece from the admittedly pro-GOP Washington Times:

Given the irony surrounding this week's U.S. air strike in Iraq that killed terrorist leader Abu Musab Zarqawi, one thing is certain: henceforth, Rep. Ray LaHood of Illinois will have President Bush's ear whenever he desires. "I was shocked, I really was. I had no idea this air strike was going on over there," the six-term Republican from Peoria told Inside the Beltway yesterday.
[snip]
"The president was nice enough to call me this morning," Mr. LaHood told this column. "He said, 'LaHood, you will go down in history for making a prediction that this would happen. ' "


Yeah, that's right. LaHood's a friggin' genius for figuring out that it might be a good idea if one of the world's worst terrorists took a dirt nap. The episode reminds me of the time LaHood told several newspaper editorial boards that the U.S. was close to arresting the then-figutive Saddam Hussein. At the time, he denied saying it, then denied saying it on the record. Then some U.S. troops found the deposed thug hiding in a hole.

LaHood has a lucky streak a mile long. I suppose if you make enough stupid, ill-informed generic statements about a subject of great importance, you might get lucky once in a while. If he was really in the know, he would have kept his mouth shut about both Hussein and Zarqawi. We can safely assume LaHood knew absolutely NOTHING in advance

But he's getting national press now, press he should have received when he joined a bunch of Democrats who opposed a bill that cuts off U.S. aid to the Palestinian Authority while the terrorist group Hamas is in charge. LaHood was worried that this would deprive little children of aid, a conclusion based on the incredibly naive belief that Hamas wouldn't divert aid into the making of the bombs that strap around little children, who they then send to kill Jewish people.

Upon learning that LaHood accidentally became part of the Zarqawi story, Peorians reacted with their typical provincialism. "Oh, look. They mentioned a Congressman from Peoria on CNN. Gee, I guess LaHood is an important guy."

Nonsense. LaHood followed Illinois House speaker Dennis Hastert to Iraq and visited a few secure areas. Nothing wrong about it, but there was nothing particularly brave about it either. He may or may not have gathered a few insights from his visit, but nothing to change his opinion and nothing to change the fact that the reason for the trip to was to help deflect some of the criticism and accusations of corruption being leveled against Hastert. The primary beneficiaries of the Hastert/LaHood visit to Iraq were Hastert and LaHood.

So keep telling the rubes in the beltway that you have President Bush's ear, LaHood. Keep saying it over and over. Fewer and fewer people are buying your act. You don't have a real opponent this time around, but two years from now ... the Dems might screw up the courage to find a real candidate.

Crossposted at Peoria Pundit.

Read more...

Friday, June 09, 2006

Fact Checking the Other 20,500

There have been a lot of posts on several different blogs today, including Rich’s, regarding the Governor’s job numbers statement.

Greg Blankenship of the Illinois Policy Institute fact checked, and determined that “they have the numbers right, this time." He is right, in regards to the 23,600 reported for April. But, as he says earlier in his post, "there are other aspects of these numbers, however, that one could question." Like, the 43,600 jobs the Governor claims were created "in the last three months."

Well, allow me:

The February and March BLS reports do not list figures for Illinois because they did not reach the “statistically significant” mark. Now 20,500 (43,600 – 23,100) divided any way over 2 months would have appeared on at least one of those reports. The lowest figures considered statistically significant in those two months were 2,000 and 3,200.

To be sure, this wasn’t an oversight by the BLS in February and March. The ‘over-the-year’ change from April 05-April 06 is 56,500, according to the BLS. That means that 33,400 jobs were created from April 05-March 06, which averages out to about 3,000 a month.

Something doesn’t add up, right? Well, remember that the Governor’s statement references “state and federal figures” (emphasis added). The only logical explanation is that the state figures for February and March differ from what the Feds counted. Isn't it reasonable to ask why? Or how?

Don’t get me wrong, 23,100 jobs is fantastic. We should be excited, and the Governor has every right to boast about it. I know I would, if I were him. But we should take a closer took at what else he is claiming, and perhaps wait a month before we get too excited or pat him on the back too much. It seems very likely that this April was a pleasant outlier in what has been a far less impressive trend. If that is the case, then it’ll be harder to argue that April was “the result of the governor's policies,” as his spokesperson has claimed.

Read more...

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Illinois Ballot Access Laws On Trial

Not exactly, but Friday at 9:30 am Lee vs. Keith (Illinois State Board of Elections) (05-4355) goes before the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the number of signatures independent candidates need for the General Assembly (which are the most in the world not to mention the US) and challenging the deadline for independent candidates (the earliest in the US). Let's hope sound logic and evidence prevails.

It's remarkably sad how Lisa Madigan and her office are arguing in favor of some of the worst ballot access requirements in the US and the world for independents. If you like reading 100+ pages of legal briefs, go for it. It looks to me like the plaintiff attorney is ripping Madigan's arguments to shreds, but I'm more than biased. We'll see.

Plaintiff Filing - 370kb
Defense Reply- 160kb
Plaintiff Rebuttal - 140kb

There are a lot of arguments going back and forth in the briefs that are interesting, but a few issues stand out for me.

Both sides cite the Stevenson case from 1986, when Adlai Stevenson III won the Democratic primary but didn't want to be on the same ticket as the two LaRouche Democrats that won the primary for Lt. Governor and Secretary of State. (Yes, LaRouche is a self-proclaimed Democrat and ran for President in Illinois' primary as a Democrat in 2004) Stevenson then wanted to run as an independent, but the deadline had already passed since independents must file the same day for the General Election as the Rs and Ds must file for the Primary. The courts said no to Stevenson running as an independent, so he ended up forming the Solidarity Party to run for Governor.

Madigan's office says Stevenson is the precedence for the early deadline for independents in Illinois. The Plaintiff says, Stevenson was a unique circumstance and that the ruling acknowledged it was unique. Stevenson's problem was not created by the deadline, his problem was created by his own political party's primary.

From Madigan's office, we get this doosey (page 18 of the pdf).

"The Supreme Court has held that “the States’ interest permits them to enact reasonable election regulations that may, in practice, favor the traditional two-party system,” and that the Constitution allows States “to decide that political stability is best served through a healthy two-party system.” Timmons, 520 U.S. at 367. If States may favor the two major parties over minor parties and independents, then they certainly may take the lesser step of favoring major and minor parties over independents."
Yes, right here in America, where we have a state Constitution that says "All elections shall be free and equal", we have Attorney General Lisa Madigan thumbing her nose at democratic elections and our state Constitution by arguing if government can favor the two power parties and discriminate against minor parties, you can therefor discriminate even worse against independents. The Supreme Court has been wrong in the past in their rulings regarding "other" candidates, in my opinion, but that doesn't mean Lisa Madigan should use those rulings to defend political discrimination in our ballot access laws.

Madigan's office also argues that Illinois requirements are no worse than Georgia's. But they fail to recognize some key differences between Georgia and Illinois. Georgia requires signatures from 5% of registered voters in aperiod of 180 days. Illinois requires signatures equal to 10% of the votes cast for that office is the last election in the period of 90 days.

In this Lee case, it was based on 2002 election returns with less than 60% turnout. If it were based on 2004 election returns, the 10% of votes cast would exceed 5% of registered voters in many State Senate and State Representative districts in Illinois. In Illinois, if you sign an independent petition you are forbidden from voting in the primary. That is not the case in Georgia and it reduces the potential for signatures in Illinois. In Illinois, you may not sign an independent petition and another candidate's petition for the same office, which you can in Georgia. Looking at the overall picture, no one can argue Georgia's requirements are harder than Illinois' for the General Assembly. The Georgia requirements cited are actually for US House.

The Plaintiff argues that no independent candidate has been able to get on the ballot in 25 years, but Madigan's office argues that a few were on the ballot in 1980. Current requirements were put in place in 1979. They don't state, however, whether those candidates met all the requirements or if they just snuck by without being challenged. I don't know if they met the requirements or not, but suspect they just weren't challenged.

Madigan's office also strongly argues that Lee did not have to run as an independent and had the option of running as a "new party" candidate with the lower signature requirements and later filing deadline. The Plaintiff argues that the Supreme Court has recognized the difference between independents and new parties and that forcing an independent to form a new political party is contrary to First Amendment rights of association.

The Plaintiff argues the Supreme Court has ruled against filing deadlines 229 days prior to the general election, which is less than Illinois' dealine of 323 days prior to the general election. Madigan's office argues that was for a Presidential race (Anderson in 1980) and shouldn't apply to the states' offices. The Court has also ruled against deadlines 218 and 270 days before the general election.

What are Illinois' requirements for independents wanting to run the General Assembly?
First their filing deadline is the same day the Rs and Ds file for the primary, which is in the middle of December the year preceding the general election. They have 90 days to collect signatures.
Independents must gather valid signatures from 10% to 16% of the number of votes cast in the previous election for that district. In 2006, the average for State Rep. was 4,534 valid signatures. Rs and Ds need 500 or 0 if they are slated. It was 300 until Michael Madigan and the Dems decided to make it harder for challengers in the primary starting this year.
For State Senate the average was 6,220. Rs and Ds need 1,000 or 0 if they are slated. It was 600 until this year.

The deadline for independents is the earliest of any state in the US. The signature requirements are the highest of any state in the US, and, according to Ballot Access News Editor Richard Winger;
"Outside of Illinois, no other jurisdiction in the world requires petitions for parties or candidates in excess of 5% of the number of registered voters."
The implications of Lee vs. Keith may seem trivial and unimportant to most, but consider the following information before siding with Lisa Madigan, her father, and most everyone in the General Assembly.

In a New York Times interview, Iranian president Ali Akhbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, very credibly defended Iran's elections by pointing out the imperfections right here in America.
Question: The criticism that I hear both from the inside and outside the country is that Iran has a veneer of democracy but the tools are not there so that everybody can use it. Will there ever be a democracy in Iran where all ideologies are allowed to compete openly?

Answer: We think it is the opposite and there is only a veneer of democracy in the Untied States and we have a real democracy. Election laws are so complicated in your country that people have no choice but to vote for one of the candidates who are with one of the two parties. The electoral system in U.S. has put the election out of the control of people and independent groups.


Question: Throughout your presidency and that of President Khatami there has been a constant tension between the reformists and conservatives. Mr. Khatami was unable to put through many of the reforms in terms of freedom of speech and other civil rights. I know you had similar problems during your administration. What would you do differently to allow those kinds of reforms to move forward?

Answer: Isn't there tension in the United States between the two major political parties? No other viable candidate can get anywhere except for the one who is with one of these two parties. The tension between Mr. Kerry and Mr. Bush was more than the tension in Iran. People of the U.S. have no choice but to choose between one of these two candidates. And, In Britain, which is one of your allies, there is constant tension between the conservatives and the labor party. They drag one another to court. I think it is more decent in Iran than in any other country.
Iran is far from democracy, but Illinois hardly allows all ideologies to compete freely. Putin in Russia has also cited restrictive ballot access laws in America when President Bush scolded Putin about Putin recently making it harder to get on the ballot in Russia.

What implications will Illinois laws have in Afghanistan and Iraq 10 or 20 years down the road?
What good would all those purple fingers in Iraq be if the majority Shiite parties made it almost impossible for minority Sunni, Kurd, and Christian prospective candidates to run for office? Five years from now the majority Shiite parties could make it 30 times harder for competition to get on the ballot and accurately say that they are in line with a U.S. state like Illinois.

Even if The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals doesn't see the importance of free and equal elections or the sense of truly democratic elections where ideas can freely compete, the General Assembly should immediately change our worst in the US and world ballot access laws as soon as possible. Certainly they should change them before they again have to change the deadline in Illinois for Republicans to be on the ballot for President in 2008, like they did in 2004.

In one case, we have the Illinois Democrats going along with changing the deadline for President Bush to be on the ballot in Illinois for 2004 by moving it to less than 65 days before the General Election, but here we have Illinois Democrats saying a deadline of 323 days before the general election is perfectly fine. Give us a break and change the name to Anti-Democratic Party already.

If you can't trust your Leaders to hold free and equal elections, what can you trust them with?

Sorry for the length, but if there was a Read More category I would've used it.

Read more...

Quality of life monies or pork?

State Representative Jay Hoffman held a press conference in Collinsville yesterday to announce the grant monies being given to several metro east cities. $8.4 million will see its way to local communites while the rest of the $60 million from the federal government through the Illinois Transportation Enhancement Program will see its way to other parts of the state.

While taxpayer watchdog groups like The National Taxpayers of Illinois are unhappy, calling this money pork barrel politics and wasteful spending, local officials are smiling. Hoffman deflects criticism by saying "I tend to believe that what this does for quality of life is well worth it."

In many ways he's correct. Most taxpayers who despise what they consider pork money in other parts of the country or state, enjoy the benefits it brings to their own city. If this weren't so, these grants would never see the light of day and elected state officials would be voted out of office instead of being regularly re-elected.

So what do we think about Fairview Heights receiving $864,390 in order to plant 443 trees, nearly 3,400 shrubs and 22,660 perennials along the busy intersection's off-ramps? Or Collinsville receiving $1.5 million to enhance its already enhanced Main Street? Or $2.7 million for a Madison County hiking and bike trail?

Is quality of life spending a reasonable use of tax dollars?

Read more...

John Concepcion: We buy homes, shop locally and protect our nation.

Trib has a bunch of letters on same sex marriage including this one by John Concepcion. I've quoted a sentence from it in the title for the post.

Everyone complains Bush and Republicans are dividing the country. Seems odd because opposition to same sex marriage is one of the few issues I know of where there is a consensus against it. I'd be hard pressed to name a politican who favors allowing same-sex marriages (real marriages; not civil unions).

Concepcion gets it though: ...and protect our nation. Why he linked national security with buying a house and shopping locally a bit odd. But he's right.

The great strategic-political failure of the majority of Gay Activists will be they didn't promote the patriotism of Gay Americans and instead sought to drive ROTC's off campus because of don't ask, don't tell.

The price they'll pay for that is this: I'm certain there's a Gay equivalent to Gen Powell out there and we'll never now much about him or her. A big part of the reason will be the failure of Gay Activists to acknowledge the importance of ROTC in protecting our nation.

Read more...

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

Bloogers

It's not local... and this makes my third post for the day. But it's funny and an example of how some of us can't help blooging away.

I'd like to think though, if you requested me not to bloog it; I'd keep myself in control. Maybe he should have chatted with me on Illinoize instead.

Read more...

Yep, this looks about right

Read more...

Water and the incredible growing Elgin

From the Press Release for yesterday's kickoff,

June 1, 2006 (Chicago) …State Sen. Susan Garrett (D-Lake Forest) and regional and statewide advocates for a clean, abundant water supply will mark World Environment Day – celebrated across the globe each year on June 5 to spur political action on environmental issues – by launching the Illinois Water Supply Initiative, the state's first step toward a much-needed comprehensive approach to managing our water resources. The news conference will take place Monday, June 5, at 11 a.m., at the John G. Shedd Aquarium on Chicago's Museum Campus.
and from the report (a pdf),
Illinois currently uses close to 20 billion gallons of water per day but consumption is expected to increase over the next 25 years. Although Illinois is considered to be a water-rich state, water shortages are forecast for at least 22 townships in the Chicago metropolitan area by 2020 and many more shortages are expected in years beyond 2025. Moreover, the lack of rain in the spring and summer of 2005 caused temporary shortages in many communities around the state.
I wonder how we'll quench the thirst for Mayor Schock's incredible growing Elgin. From Wikpedia,
Elgin ranks as one of the fastest growing cities in Illinois. In June 2005, the Chicago Tribune quoted Elgin Mayor Ed Schock saying that Elgin will in 40 years be the second largest city in Illinois.
I'm watching the battle on managing growth unfold here in Campton township and it's not a pretty sight as Sen Lauzen found out with SB2933. It brought the lobbyists out of the woodwork last February,
In the meantime, a lobbyist for powerful land developers visited me and they began their work to deny Campton a voice and St. Charles Township statutory opt-out before referendum. An email and fax campaign of misinformation was begun to panic senators, claiming that a school district was opposed to incorporation when, in truth, they had not even been asked about the issue. Another lobbyist from organized labor was sent ganging up against legislation that they could not have even read because it was in the drafting process at the Legislative Reference Bureau. And, finally, just forty-five minutes before my first presentation to the Illinois Senate Local Government Committee hearing, a reporter called to get a reaction from me to Kane County withdrawing their commitment to the legislation and amendment that they had written and Campton had agreed to.
Maybe we'll just drink beer instead.

Read more...

Chuck Goudie: sell the schools, not the lotto

Goudie had a good column in yesterday's Herald asking why we don't consider selling the schools instead of selling the lottery.

He relates some horror stories on bloated adminstrations and exhorbinate salaries and concludes,

Judging by the most recent results of statewide science testing, something needs to be done. Almost three-quarters of Illinois’ fourth- and eighth-graders flunked the test on physical, life and earth sciences. The results were even lower than five years and worse than the national average.

Selling the Illinois Lottery might be an easy answer. It certainly would be politically expedient for the governor if it could be tied up with a neat ribbon before the November election.

It would pump some fast money into the schools. But if the cash just ends up fattening administrators’ wallets, why not leave the Lotto alone?
Seems everyone sees through this lottery sale scheme, and I wonder if Rev Meeks isn't feeling Blagojevich shellaced him with a goofy deal.

Read more...

Monday, June 05, 2006

Laura Washington talks about the County Board Race...

So basically she does a run down of all the candidates for the Presidency of the Cook County Board. She didn't seem to do what Rev. Jesse Jackson did this weekend to call for the end to the silence with regards to John Stroger's health. But she did discuss who might be good fits for the job of County Board President.

Of course Todd Stroger's (8th Ward Alderman) name has come up often. He wants the job but Washington isn't exactly falling into line that if white politicians can anoint their children, so can black politicians. This is what she said about Ald. Stroger...

There's 8th Ward Ald. Todd Stroger. His public flip-flops about his father's condition and intentions are laughable. Cook County government -- a $3 billion corporation -- requires a keen administrator. He's a nice young man, but Todd Stroger has never run anything.
Which is why I think he'll be eaten alive if they let him have it but if he did get the nod this comment from Washington sizes up that situation...

Cook County needs a leader and a manager -- not a placeholder or a puppet.
So how about those other contenders. What about CHA chief Terry Peterson? Well he's not interested. Though he and Ald. William Beavers (7th ward) are considered compromise choices according to Washington. Then there's Circuit Court Clerk Dorothy Brown...
...the ambitious Cook County Circuit Court Clerk Dorothy Brown. Besides, her independent black base gives the royal families of Stroger, Daley and Jackson the heebie-jeebies.
I like her already. But before this there was Cook County Commissioner Bobbie Steele. Almost in the same breath with Dorothy Brown. When Washington wrote this I honestly would have had absolutely no idea...

Cook County Commissioner Bobbie L. Steele is a 20-year board veteran and says she is up for the job. As a woman who has paid her dues, she's my sentimental favorite. She is up against her gender, and she knows it. Black male politicians are a sexist bunch, and they are not about to move over for any woman. I must say that even though he has no official sway in the decision, kudos should go to the Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. for backing Steele.
Those ladies have an uphill battle but I would like someone who was outside of the "machine" as Dorothy Brown apparently is. But unfortunetly I'm not sure that Steele's or Brown's time is coming. Then a choice out of left field and I say this because the focus surely had to been on finding a black candidate for Cook County Board President...

The joker in the deck is Cook County Assessor Jim Houlihan. There a tiny problem there. He happens to be white. He also happens to be very qualified. Houlihan is a policy wonk who actually has a plan to turn the county around.
Oh, I just have to mention what she says about another potential candidate for the county board presidency. We've heard his name more than anyone else other than Todd Stroger. Rep. Danny Davis...

Rep. Danny K. Davis, aka The Voice of God, proclaims he is getting a raft of spontaneous "calls" for him to run. Davis is a veteran legislator and grass-roots advocate for the disadvantaged. No African-American official has worked harder to build political bridges between blacks and Latinos. Unfortunately, his operation has a reputation for disorganization, and I wonder about a congressman who would participate in a "coronation ceremony" for Sun Myung Moon. Davis did the crowning.
So she has some misgivings about that. It's interesting to see some intrigue around county government. And the characters seeking a very powerful and important seat. And just think this seems to be as a result of a man's failing health. And this man's health went down just before his primary election. Meaning that we see the drama unfolding at this very moment.

Cross-posted at It's My Mind

Read more...

See you in a Weil

George Ryan stood tall on the steps of the temple—scanning the crowd for signs of recognition. Suddenly, he locked eyes with his next victim.

“There’s my lawyer. Hey, Webb. Webb!”

Sixteen steps below, the infamous Dan Webb saw his former client. The wonder boy from Macomb looked shy and a little guilty, as though he wanted to forget the biggest defeat of his career.

“Governor. Governor,” Webb said as he ambled up the stairs. Oddly, he did not shake the pharmacist’s extended hand.

“Nice to see you,” Webb mumbled. Then with a sudden burst of trial adrenaline, Webb blurted: “We should do dinner…and I’ll pay!”

“We’ll Webb,” grinned the Governor, “you better hurry up.”

Dan Weil would have loved that exchange—unfortunately, it occurred at his funeral. He would have laughed hard, and then asked you a pointed question:

“So, do you know the name of the Governor who gained fame by firing his lawyer on the eve of his corruption trial?”

I rarely knew the answers to his teases. But it did signify the start of a lengthy political debate filled with laughter, intrigue and friendship.

Dan possessed amazing political instinct, and offered solicited and unsolicited advice to many pols, including Colin Powell, Jean Kirkpatrick, Mike Madigan, Dan Webb, the Daley clan, Jim Thompson, Jack O’Malley, Anne Burke, Dan Rutherford and many, many others.

Dan was a true friend, mentor—a modern day Obie Wan, boldly engaged in the dusty political arena. He loved politics because he loved people.

I will miss his advice—and the political arena, and life, will be less interesting without this warm and daring soul.

Read more...

Sunday, June 04, 2006

Novak: Emanuel as next Speaker of the House?

Novak speculating,

The highly regarded Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, second-ranking in the House hierarchy as Democratic whip, ordinarily would be in line to succeed Pelosi. However, tension between Pelosi and Hoyer has been so great that many Democrats would prefer somebody not identified as her antagonist. Consequently, there is speculation about Rep. Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, a second-termer who chairs the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, as Pelosi's logical replacement.
Back to back Illinoisans...

Read more...

Saturday, June 03, 2006

A little Adlai Stevenson blogging....



Crossposted on Marathon Pundit.

It's been a while since I did some Adlai E. Stevenson blogging....

Whoah....actually, I've never blogged about the former Illinois governor, two time-Democratic nominee for president, (lost to Eisenhower both times), and U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

Little Marathon Pundit had her dress rehearsal for her first play, and it took place at Adlai E. Stevenson High School in Lincolnshire, IL. Adlai owned a farm in nearby Libertyville--an excellent town to say you're from if you're a politician.

With my reliable Motorola V3 RAZR, I took a picture of the Stevenson display just inside the main entrance of the school.

Oh, some guy named Sufjan Stevens recently released a song titled Adlai Stevenson, apparently it's a leftover track from his Illinois CD.

Read more...

Corruption Coming to a School Near You

Saturday's Chicago Sun-Times headline:

Feds probe company over use of gift cards
It's on a page three article by Natasha Korecki. (When she was an intern in Springfield, Korecki's parents ran Algonquin's Edella's Family Restaurant south of where the old post office used to be on Route 31, just south of the hiking/biking trail. Korecki also covered the George Ryan trial.)

The gist of the story is that a Des Plaines school (and other government) supply firm with $420 million of sales last year is bribing school officials with supposedly untraceable Winners Choice gift cards in direct proportion to their purchases, as an inducement to purchase their products.

The last time something like this came up, it was cleaning supplies, I believe. Townships took a big hit.

Also posted at McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Blagojevich's Welfare State

Bruno Behrend finds a new study on Canada's Childcare program. Since 1997 Quebec has offered Childcare at subsidized child-care centers for $5 per-day. Bottom line was it pulled kids out of informal family managed childcare arrangemets and the outcomes weren't good for kids. (The study doesn't say how the subsidized child care owners fared).

John McCarron wrote a column yesterday about the rush to auction off State assets:


Before they auction off City Hall or turn the squad cars over to the Pinkertons, isn't anybody going to ask where we're headed, long-term, with privatization?
The word privatization stuck in my head yesterday because I was enthusiastic about Bush's Social Security ownership accounts, and Democrats called that privatization; meaning it's something bad.

Social Policy all comes down to power.

Put Child Care subsidies in a private account for a kid and it's bad privatization.

Offer the kid a queue (they wait in Quebec) to a slot in a subsidized child care center and it's good privatization.

Put your retirement contribution in your ownership account, and it's bad privatization.

But lease Illinios assests and give the money to the school system, and it's good privatization.

Give money directly to parents as school vounchers instead, and it's bad privatization.

Common theme here is: if you give funds to individual citzens, it's bad privatization; but turn over assets to contractors, it's good privatization.

And I think the differences have something to do with power.

We really need a study to tell us how the subsidized day-care owners in Quebec made out. Might help us think long-term as McCarron suggests.

Read more...

Friday, June 02, 2006

State-Paid Campaign Signs

Rich Miller asks why Governor Rod Blagojevich should force the display of re-election signs in pharmacies.

They are not the first blatantly political signs nor are they the most widely posted political signs that the Blagojevich administration has forced businesses to post.

This one is allegedly about the virtually bogus Equal Pay Act, a “headline bill,” if there ever were one.

It is designed to make women think they are not getting paid enough and that Uncle Rod can help them get paid more.

In a press release concerning the first two years of operation of the union-backed state equal pay for equal work law, Governor Rod Blagojevich is quoted thusly,

"Women doing the same work as men should be paid the same wages."
Anyone disagree with that?

Then the First Feminist, wife Patti, says,
"The fact that many women in the state are still making about 70 cents for every dollar a man earns is a stark reminder that we have more to do."
The problem with putting that canard in an equal pay for equal work press release is that it has nothing to do with the law being enforced. It is the slogan for those who wish to impose state regulations on private sector salary patterns.

It's called "comparable worth."

Here's what long-time employment law lobbyist Jay Shattuck told me several years ago:
"They’re mixing apples and oranges. The Equal Pay Act is about paying people paying people the same for the same work. The statistic is about comparing wages of men earned in male-dominated professions with wages earned by women in different occupations.

"That’s the old comparable worth issue. It’s not equal pay. Comparable worth’s goal is to bring the salary in female-dominated occupations to the same level as male-dominated occupations. A female doing the same work as a male on a construction project would be paid the same.

"That doesn’t mean that a construction worker would get paid the same amount as a nurse.

"Comparable worth is about imposing a societal, subjective value system, rather than a market system for determining wages."
The incendiary poster shown above was forced onto every employer's wall by the Blagojevich administration.

So, the mandated pharmacy sign is not the first to have heavy political overtones.

Both signs are obviously aimed at convincing women to re-elect him.

And, on McHenry County Blog, read who is making an independent expenditure for radio ads on 8th congressional district Republican candidate David McSweeney's part.

And, if you have not dipped into the California Democratic primary, which features Chicago Democratic crook Joe Cari, I think you should. It sounds a lot like what I think the last week of our Illinois gubernatorial election will be. In the following, just change the names and the issues:
If viewers believe the negative ads by Westly, they might well conclude Angelides is a tax-raising, wetlands-filling, Lake Tahoe-polluting developer in the pocket of big oil and a Sacramento development baron, Angelo K. Tsakapoulos.

And if they believe the advertising by Angelides, they may think Westly is a tax-raising, pay-to-play politician schmoozing with corrupt businessmen and taking money from school children as a "twin" of Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Read more...

Don't Touch that Dial

Cross posted from ICPR’s blog, The Race is On:

Candidates in the March Primary election spent nearly $12 million to broadcast more than 8,500 TV ads to the Chicago market. But while the primary ended on March 21, the ads have not. Gov. Blagojevich, in a highly unusual move, continued to air spots after the primary. The third wave of these post-primary ads begins today.

Over the course of the primary, four TV station in Chicago billed over $1 million for political ads. WLS (ABC- Channel 7) led the pack with $4.2 million in billings, followed by WMAQ (NBC – Channel 5) with $3.0 million.

Ironically, the top spenders on ads lost the primary. Republican gubernatorial candidate Ron Gidwitz spent over $2.4 million during calendar year 2006, only to finish fourth in his race. Cook County Board President hopeful Forest Claypool spent $1.9 million, but he, too, came up short at the ballot box. Gov. Blagojevich was the only of the top three spenders who won his primary.

Immediately after his primary victory, Gov. Blagojevich continued to air spots. These post-primary ads have come in waves, the third of which begins today.

• The first wave, which began immediately after the primary and continued through mid-April, featured 30-second spots. In frequency and distribution, this wave was largely similar to the pattern he established in the primary, with a high concentration in news and public affairs and daytime programming.
• The second wave, which began in late-April and ran for about three weeks, featured 15-second spots bookended during ad breaks.
• The third wave, which begins today and runs at least through next week, appears similar in placement to the second. We don’t know how broadly this third buy will run; contracts at WLS call for $136K worth of ads.

All told, the governor has now spent more after the primary than before; this calendar year, he has spent nearly $4 million running ads in the Chicago market alone.

Charts summarizing the ad buys will be available through ICPR’s homepage later today.

Read more...

Silly in Chicago

I like Mayor Daley. We're about the same age. I think we talk the same way. I'd be a disaster in a press conference. My best performance would be Daley at some of his classic worse moments. I'd blow up like him too.

My wife mentioned last night she heard this exchange on the radio and said he sounded terrible,

Mayor Richard Daley seemed intent on personally opening up the summer "silly season" of frivolous news stories Wednesday.

Court testimony this week that Chicago Skyway tollbooths were fully staffed to help ensure an unimpeded ride to his Michigan summer home was, well, "silly," the mayor said.

Then he said it again. About 20 times.

"Silliest thing I ever heard in my life," the mayor declared. "It really is silly.... It's silly, silly, silly, silly."
I haven't heard the audio but I wondered if this was more than the usual tangle and instead the sounds of nerves in a guy who feels the walls closing in and the air getting thin.

I got a feeling he's coming to a sad end. My father-in-law rode the Lake Street 'L' into the loop Tuesday and said the city's never looked better. He's known that stretch of street since the 1930's so he has some reference. Everyone in my family attributes it to the Mayor. We just hate to see him end on a bad note.

Read more...

Singin' the two-party system blues

Back when I was in grade school, I learned about America's great "two-party system." Basically, the theory was that because there were two distinct parties in the United States that competed for office, there was always a choice for voters. Yet, because there were only two parties, the government remained fairly stable.

Trouble is, there's nothing in the Constitution setting up political parties. In fact, George Washington warned against them.

But now, anyone not in one of these two unofficially official parties is essentially frozen out of the process. If the Founders had known this would have happened, they would have gone back to the drawing board.

The Wall Street Journal's Peggy Noonan says it's increasingly clear this is a bad idea:

Right now the Republicans and Democrats in Washington seem, from the outside, to be an elite colluding against the voter. They're in agreement: immigration should not be controlled but increased, spending will increase, etc.

Are there some dramatic differences? Yes. But both parties act as if they see them not as important questions (gay marriage, for instance) but as wedge issues. Which is, actually, abusive of people on both sides of the question. If it's a serious issue, face it. Don't play with it.

I don't see any potential party, or potential candidate, on the scene right now who can harness the disaffection of growing portions of the electorate. But a new group or entity that could define the problem correctly--that sees the big divide not as something between the parties but between America's ruling elite and its people--would be making long strides in putting third party ideas in play in America again.


I'm no longer a member of the Libertarian Party, but I sure would like the opportunity to vote for Libertarian candidates here in Illinois, just like I have for president and vice president.

But as Jeff Trigg constantly points out, the Land of Lincoln requires third party candidates to meet ballot requirements that are far tougher to meet that those faced by the Democrats and the Republicans. No doubt he'll read this post and let us know the number of signatures.

I can't help but to think that if there were more parties -- whose candidates had some possibility of success -- that would make all parties somewhat more ideologically based, giving voters real choices in the ballot box. These parties would have to learn to cooperate with each other on issues with which they agreed, and fight it out on issues with which they do not. Cooperation, not constant bickering over wedge issues, might lead to better government.

But I remain convinced that the Big Government Party likes things just the way they are.

Cross posted to Peoria Pundit.

Read more...

Cook County judge gives thumbs-up to Klocek case against DePaul

Crossposte on Marathon Pundit.

Late Wednesday, Marathon Pundit has obtained a copy of the below press release about the Thomas Klocek free speech case from TC Public Relations.

Covering the crimes against free speech by DePaul University has almost become a full time job for me.

(May 31, 2006, Chicago ) Today the most significant hurdle was cleared in the defamation law suit of Professor Thomas Klocek against DePaul University. Judge Stuart Nudelman of the Illinois Circuit County Law Division Court agreed that Klocek’s claims have merit, which will allow his suit against DePaul to move forward toward a trial by jury.

Judge Nudelman believes that DePaul’s actions to discipline Professor Thomas Klocek went to such extreme that their conduct rose to the level of defamation. He noted that DePaul exhibited destructive political correctness when it gave way to its fear of students’ reactions to Prof. Klocek’s challenges to the student groups’ literature and perspective on the Middle East conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. Judge Nudelman also commented that if such limited debate took place when he was a student, it would have resulted in having an inferior educational experience.

Judge Nudelman also stated that DePaul’s public disclosures about Prof. Klocek defamed him in that they denigrated his ability to perform as a professor.

"We have cleared the biggest hurdle before trial. The judge has agreed with us that we have properly stated valid claims for defamation charges against DePaul and individual defendants, including DePaul’s president," said Andy Norman, Klocek’s attorney with the law firm of Mauck & Baker.

Background of Case:

A defamation suit was filed in Illinois ’ Cook County Chancery last June charging that DePaul University and its leadership defamed Professor Thomas Klocek when DePaul publicly characterized arguments he presented to members of Palestinian and Muslim student groups as racist and bigoted. The suit seeks damages against DePaul for maligning Klocek’s integrity and professional competence. The defendants named include: DePaul University ; Rev. Dennis Holtschneider, President of DePaul; and Susanne Dumbleton, Dean of DePaul’s School for New Learning.


For much more on the Klocek case, visit FIRE and read Professor Suspended for Expression Without Due Process

Previous Marathon Pundit post: One year anniversary of the Thomas Klocek press conference at DePaul

Read more...

Thursday, June 01, 2006

George Dunne Helped Penny Pullen's HIV Bills

Many people might remember what brought down George Dunne, but probably no one knows how he helped protect Illinoisans from the spread of HIV.

He had to go around the radicals who were running Cook County Hospital to do it.

What brought him into the issue was a bill sponsored by State Rep. Penny Pullen (R-Park Ridge) that required health care workers involved in invasive procedures to tell patients if they were HIV-infected. Some physician at County Hospital was HIV-infected and Dunne was trying to assign him to administrative duties over the objections of his left-leaning advocates.

In Springfield, the health committee was, as usual, dominated by liberals, who had already cleared the AIDS Confidentiality Act that tied the hands of public health officials.

For the same committee to approve a comprehensive public protection package required divine intervention, in this case, of the human variety.

That intervener was George Dunne.

And, because of that intervention, Illinois did not go the way New York and California. Our HIV laws are a mixed bag, but relatively protective of the public’s health.

Dunne's wife, Claudia, is Chairman of the National Day of Prayer for Chicago.

A summary of May stories on McHenry County Blog can be found here.

Read more...

Why doesn't the GOP ban abortion now?

EMILY's List is fundraising group dedicated to electing pro-abortion women candidates.

Two of the 21 women EMILY's List is promoting are from Illinois - Melissa Bean (CD-8) and Tammy Duckworth (CD-6).

But Bean and Duckworth may not want to publicize that, since EMILY's List has such a poor track record. In 2004, it amassed only a 39% success rate, while 80% of its counterpart's (Susan B. Anthony List) candidates won. In 2002, 17 of EMILY's 21 candidates lost.

The pro-life issue is a winner. Properly framed poll questions show most Americans are against most forms and reasons for abortion.

So, the question posed by Human Events editor Terence Jeffrey yesterday is good: "Why not ban abortion now?" Jeffrey stated:

When I asked [Republican National Chairman Ken] Mehlman... whether the pro-life issue was good for Republicans, his response was instantaneous. "Absolutely," he said.

As proof, he pointed to the 2002 Senate races in Missouri and Minnesota....

Mehlman insists, however, that the GOP should advance the pro-life cause "because it is morally right," not because it is politically advantageous....

Mehlman's analysis can explain the self-contradictory behavior Democrats often exhibit on abortion. But it cannot explain similar behavior by Republicans. Democrats find themselves caught between the demands of commonsense and good morality on the one hand and a core constituency adamant about preserving legalized abortion on the other. They forsake commonsense and morality to appease their base.

But why are Republicans so timid about advancing a cause where they occupy the moral and political high ground?

Consider one of the few things President Bush, Senate Republican Leader Bill Frist, House Republican Leader John Boehner and Sen. John Kerry... have in common: They all say human life begins at conception....

The Republican Party's pro-life platform... endorses "legislation to make it clear that the Fourteenth Amendment's protections apply to unborn children."

In this Congress, Rep. Duncan Hunter, the California Republican, introduced H.R. 552, the Right to Life Act, which follows through on the platform by defining as a "person" for 14th Amendment purposes "all stages of life, including but not limited to the moment of fertilization or cloning."

It recognizes in law what Bush, Frist, Boehner and Kerry already recognize in fact....

Today, we are having a great national debate, driven by a president at odds with the base of his own party, over how many immigrants we should allow into our country and by what means -- so we can fill a shortage in workers. What if we had a great national debate driven by a president, in unison with the base of his own party, over how many babies we can save?

South Dakota had that debate this year, and the pro-lifers won.... What South Dakota proved is that truth is persuasive. All you need are politicians who will fight for it.

Read more...