Sunday, September 24, 2006

Creepy Pete: How Gigolo Can You Go?

Eric Krol of the Daily Herald lays out some history on Creepy Pete Roskam, a man he describes as "a politician who sometimes comes across as poured from the old 'Leave It to Beaver,' Eddie Haskell mold."

The first plot was The Sir Thomas More Justice League:

[A] campaign fund-raising scheme devised by Salvi and Roskam in the mid-’90s to capitalize on their planned votes against limits on pain-and-suffering damages in civil lawsuits. ***

To some, promising to vote a certain way while simultaneously soliciting campaign checks looked an awful lot like selling your vote.
But that piece of legislative entrepreneurship paled in comparison to this:
The other Roskam wheeler-dealer example comes courtesy of Salvi’s failed 1998 bid for secretary of state.

Roskam asked the Illinois comptroller’s office for a list of the names and addresses of more than 3,600 secretary of state employees. “I just wanted to look at the list to find out about the nature of the office,” Roskam claimed to the Chicago Tribune in 1998.

But Roskam also admitted he gave the list to the Salvi campaign, of which he was chairman. Team Salvi used the list to send numbered $50 campaign fund-raising tickets to secretary of state employees. The numbering made it easy for Salvi to track which employees ponied up and which employees didn’t. One ethics watchdog at the time blasted the move as “classic Illinois political prostitution with a twist.”
And so the choice for the 6th District is clear: An Iraq war veteran or a George Ryan-style political wheeler-dealer.

14 comments:

Bill Baar 4:54 PM  

Will Duckworth join Jan Schakowsky and Danny Davis in consponsering,

H.RES.635
Title: Creating a select committee to investigate the Administration’s intent to go to war before congressional authorization, manipulation of pre-war intelligence, encouraging and countenancing torture, retaliating against critics, and to make recommendations regarding grounds for possible impeachment.


If I were in the 6th, that would be the only issue worth deciding the race on.

Anonymous,  6:51 PM  

Huh, I don't recall getting any Salvi tickets. Would have thrown them out anyhow. What a sleazy dealer-just another typical Illinois politician.

Carl Nyberg 7:05 PM  

Bill, are you for or against holding President Bush accountable for the incorrect information used to justify invading Iraq?

Anonymous,  10:56 PM  

Are we supposed to be shocked by these revelations? This is the "business as usual state."

steve schnorf 1:04 AM  

Excuse me, just what is the allegation against Roskam in all this? It seems to me we have nothing here but a cheap attempt to smear Roskam. I don't know Duckworth, she may be a fine person, but I do know Roskam and he has been a first class legislator. I don't agree with him on some things, but he is always straightforward and you know where he stands. He is a man of his word.

Bill Baar 3:47 AM  

Bush is accountable. We're holding him accountable with the election. He had the best information at the moment of the decision. This resolution says he lies and intends to impeach him for it.

Democrat Laesch in the district next store believes that's the case and signed on with Impeach PAC.

Duckworth owes us her stand on it.

In otherwords it's not what I believe Carl, it's what does Duckworth believe, and does she believe in this House Res as do Davis, Schakowsky, and Lasech.

Is it too much to ask Duckworth to take a stand?

If not, I'd like to know why.

grand old partisan 9:21 AM  

SCAM, the fact that you hide behind Duckworth’s admirable service while tossing around personally demeaning nicknames is pathetic – not to mention dishonorable to her sacrifice.

It’s painfully (and sadly) obvious that Duckworth’s true worth to the Democratic party is not her inherent virtue as a veteran, but rather their ability to exploit her virtues and make this campaign a one way mud-fest.

Anonymous,  10:08 AM  

"yawn"...being fixated on Roskam can't be healthly...it's also sad.

Anonymous,  10:55 AM  

The Republicans wrote the rules on impeachment just a few years ago.

If a president lies, he must be impeached. The Republicans (not the Democrats) set that standard.

Bill, do you disagree with this standard?

If so, how strongly did you fight against it during the most recent impeachment proceedings (a few years ago)?

--

Anonymous 10:08 -- choosing to remain ignorant and favoring partisanship rather than honesty is much more unhealthy and sad.

Bill Baar 11:03 AM  

Somewhere on this blog you'll find a copy of my letter to Hastert telling him not to vote for Clinton's impeachment.

Impeachment is have poltical and half legal... I felt betrayed by Clinton as a guy who voted for him twice.

I don't feel at all betrayed by Bush and I only voted for him once in the last election.

Anyways, impeachment is largely political and I think candidates running for office need to explain where there at with this since Conyers along with Davis and Schakowsky have put it on the table.

It's a question that would dignify Duckworth... as opposed to adding Roskam's image to a poster from an ancient film of the 60s.

Bill Baar 11:04 AM  

is Half...you get the idea

Anonymous,  12:36 PM  

Post was lame, as usual, but the photo was funny. The choice is certainly clear, VOTE ROSKAM!

Or vote for a Rahm puppet being exploited by the Democratic Party.

Bill Baar 12:44 PM  

She's not a puppet. Her interviews from Walther Reed were fantastic.

She needs to get out from under her supporters though, who deep down inside, don't support her.

  © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP