Nuclear hawk Schock chickening out of foreign policy debate
As discussed earlier, State Rep. Aaron Schock is saying he cannot attend Wednesday's 18th District candidates' debate on foreign policy issues. It seems that Gov. Rod Blagojevich has called a special session to find a way to bail out the Chicago's mass transportation system.
Schock just couldn't possible miss this session because whether or not Chicagoans have to pay more for their ride to work is of such importance to voters in Peoria County. The Journal Star has details here.
The whole thing seemed to coincidental to me. Schock just happens to be forced to miss a debate where his two opponents for Congress can revisit the most embarrassing gaffe of the Schock campaign -- his plan to sell nuclear weapons to Taiwan. It would violate the nuclear anti-proliferation treaty and almost certainly create a shooting war with China. Schock was vilified in the national press and blogs all across the country. State newspapers ran editorial cartoons showing him straddling a bomb, like a scene from Dr. Strangelove:
Because this is the 21st century and there's this little thing called "the Internet," I was able to scour the Web looking for evidence on whether or not Schock really was needed in Springfield on the evening of this debate.
It took me, oh, about three seconds. I clicked on Rich Miller's Capital Fax Blog, which led me to this post on the Chicago Tribune blog Clout Street,
I found these paragraphs describing this week's "special session:"
"We are not going to vote for anything this week," said Rep. Julie Hamos (D-Evanston), who has led two failed efforts to find money for the region’s transit agencies.
Though Gov. Rod Blagojevich issued his call for a special session before Christmas, many lawmakers are not expected to show up for Wednesday’s scheduled meeting. Included on that list is Senate President Emil Jones (D-Chicago), who has tickets for the Rose Bowl pitting University of Illinois against the University of Southern California in Pasadena. Jones’ spokeswoman did not return calls. House Speaker Michael Madigan (D-Chicago) also is not expected to turn out Wednesday.
As for the governor, he's planning on holding a news conference in Chicago Wednesday to talk up the mass transit issue before heading to Springfield. Blagojevich has not yet scheduled any meetings this week with legislative leaders, his spokeswoman said.
The leaders of the House and Senate won't be there. No one is going to vote on anything, because there are no meetings scheduled to create any legislation for anyone to vote on.
And even if there were any meetings, Schock won't be part of them, because he's in the minority party. And hold onto your hats, Schock is in reality a relatively minor player in the state GOP. He NOT in anything remotely close to a leadership position.
If he is going to be in Springfield on Wednesday evening, he won't be on the house floor. And if he is, he'll be very, very lonely.
Folks, this "special session" is nothing more than a photo-op for Blagojevich. Everyone knows it, except for, perhaps, the local mainstream media, which doesn't really follow state politics all that much. And because of that lack of coverage, Schock thinks the public is so ill-informed that he can get away with using the situation to duck out of an uncomfortable situation.
And besides, shouldn't we all just stop worrying and love the bomb?
But give Schock some credit. He plans to attend a televised debate on WEEK on January 14, even though there will be *gasp* video cameras.
Crossposted to Peoria Pundit.
8 comments:
It's gavel and go Wednesday. He'll almost assuredly be back in Peoria no later than 2pm, and maybe much earlier - unless he stops off at Saputo's.
Subject: San Francisco should not buy Sequoia
CALIFORNIA: I would like to make this statement before San Francisco County meets to discuss the purchase of Sequoia Voting Systems equipment. This meeting is to be held December 5th 2007.
My Name is Gerard Gonzalez, Visalia CA.
I worked as a WinEDS support, training and prelate expert working in many states.
My opinion is that San Francisco CA and every other State and County should not purchase WinEDS Election Management software because of non disclosure of a critical piece of software used by the Vendor and misleading statements in contracts when describing the functionality of WinEDS Election Management software.
The reason is all instruction manuals seem to describe the election creation process as a simple and quick process using only the WinEDS Election Management software.
The contracts do not mention Sequoia’s need to use a (tool) which imports the basic ballot data (text, contests, and candidates). But also at the same time processes all other calculations necessary to create a DRE image of a paper ballot. This software used by Sequoia (the tool) does not work and has never been certified or disclosed to the public. Major changes where made to the code of this software (the tool) after the completion of the databases for the Primary 2006 elections. These changes affected every database in every state for the General 2006 elections. What this means is Sequoia completed work for counties and delivered data with major errors. Sequoia then had to make changes to correct theses errors and reinstall data over and over again before beginning the 2006 General Elections. We also replaced final sets of data without the customer knowing of our actions. The prior sets of data had major errors.
The situation I’m describing, could have been a disaster in many states.
My experience is with the state of NV. All Counties in NV had to reinstall data and prelate (setup) their machines as many as three times before the data was correct in order to begin the General 2006 Elections in that State.
I would like to speak more in detail as to what type of errors would have occurred because of this uncertified piece of software used by Sequoia. Sequoia also sells this product (the tool) to counties that produce their ballots in house.
I feel since this (tool) is sold openly to Counties, that we would have the right to review the source code and it no longer would be considered a secret proprietary piece of property.
-Gerard Gonzalez
Visalia CA
He couldn't be back by 2, session isn't until 5. And if he didn't go to session, he would get hammered for campaigning rather than doing the job he was elected to do. So he's in a no-win situation. Ah, politics.
Not as much as he's going to get hammered for skipping out on the debate to attend a joke of a "special session." Good think there are blogs like mine to tell 18th District voters that in reality, there's going to me NO legislative business on Wednesday that required his presence.
Anon is right. I hadn't checked the special session time until tonight. Assumed, as always, that it was at noon. My bad. But, still, there won't be anything done, and if I'm not mistaken he has missed other sessions.
One more thing. If it's gavel and go at 5, he could be back by 7.
One more thing. If it's gavel and go at 5, he could be back by 7.
Sounds like he is in a no win situation. If something does go down in Springfield, and he leaves early for the debate, Billy will be relentless that he is putting he personal ambitions infront of his distrcit that he is elected to represent. If it stays the same and he dosen't attend the debate, he is a chicken.
I don't see anything wrong with what he is doing and think Billy is becoming too critical and petty over Aaron.
Post a Comment