Camelot Lives
Standing before a packed auditorium of nearly 4,000 American University students Senator Edward Kenney, Congressman Patrick Kennedy, and Caroline Kennedy passed the torch to a new generation, and formally endorsed Barack Obama.
There had been rumors in the party for the past week that Ted Kennedy was not very pleased with President Clinton’s campaign tactics, and he even went so far as to personally call him to tell him so. However, even as the news broke the other night that Caroline Kennedy was going to write an op-ed piece in the New York Times for Obama, few in the media believed that Sen. Kennedy would break his silence. That all changed yesterday.
Ted Kennedy approached the podium, his frailty and old age apparent, amongst a sea of fresh faces that weren’t alive to witness his fight for civil rights or his bid for the presidency nearly three decades ago. The barn-burner that ensued left few of those same people questioning why they call him the “Liberal Lion of the Senate.” Kennedy railed against cynicism and a “politics of distortion” while the crowd intermittently screamed back “yes we can.”
In what can be considered the biggest refutation of Hillary Clinton’s campaign to date, Kennedy took up nearly every accusation by the Clintons. "With Barack Obama we will close the book on the old politics of race against race, gender against gender, ethnic group against ethnic group, and straight against gay," Kennedy said.
"There was another time, when another young candidate was running for president and challenging America to cross a new frontier. He faced criticism from the preceding Democratic president, who was widely respected in the party," Kennedy contiuned, referring to Harry S. Truman.
"And John Kennedy replied, 'The world is changing. The old ways will not do. ... It is time for a new generation of leadership.’ "So it is with Barack Obama.”
The end of his speech boasted what I thought was the sharpest jab at Clinton, with the Senator chuckling that he knows he is “ready to lead on Day One.”
There are several tangible benefits that Obama will receive from this endorsement. First and foremost, it will offer cover for other high profile politicians to jump on the bandwagon. I personally witnessed the commanding respect that Kennedy has over his colleagues when I interned in the Senate last spring. Many Democratic Senators look to him for guidance and leadership. Kennedy’s endorsement is likely to open up the flood gates to other like-minded officials.
Second, and probably most useful, Kennedy has promised to stump for Obama in the Southwestern states before the February 5th primary. This could greatly help him with his lagging support among Latinos and older voters that associate Kennedy with his initiatives on immigration reform and health care.
Lastly, there is a huge symbolic benefit from this endorsement. Aside from a coronation of the Kennedy image, this endorsement is largely apolitical. Senator Kennedy did not stand to gain politically from this move. If anything, it may severely endanger his relationship with Hillary is she becomes the nominee. Additionally, Caroline’s endorsement may bear even greater weight. She mostly stays out of the spotlight, and to the best of my knowledge has never formally endorsed a candidate. Furthermore, for her to write something as personal as a piece entitled “A President like My Father,” really hits home with Americans hungry for another administration like Kennedy’s.
Only time will tell how important yesterday was, but if Obama wins the nomination I’ll bet it will be seen as a turning point.
8 comments:
I have a feeling Obama's reckless Rezko friendship is going to be like JFK's reckless friendship with Sinatra except Rezko will do his singing in court.
The only effect the endorsement would have would come from the fact it came the same day as the Rezko arrest, thus taking the national news off the Rezko story.
I think Hillary Clinton will do better in Illinois than expected. Barack will dominate the black and Lakefront/Oak Park/Hyde Park, etc liberal vote, but I really don't see why he'd do well among other demographics. I mean, he's running against a much tougher opponent than Alan Keyes this time, and I'd expect a much tighter vote.
ili,
You might consider checking out that invention, the internet.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/
Research 2000, 1/21-1/24
BO 51, HRC 22, JE 15
Obama Fav/unfav 68/27
HRC fav/unfav 53/42
Tribune, 12/09-12/13
BO 50, HRC 25, JE 7
Yeah, I think she'll hit 30, maybe 33. I didn't say she'll win Illinois.
And another thing:
Why are people so upset about race playing a role in the election? In Illinois, it's clear that politics is racial politics. Is that not the case in other states?
Sacred cows suck. Martydom sucks.
Our myths determine a great deal of our understanding of history. We are currently being overwhelmed by seniors with mystic chords pining for JFK dreamingly following Obama. He is the new Pied Piper. Not only does Obama utterly fail when compared to Kennedy, Kennedy ultimately fails when being compared to the Camelot Kennedy myths.
Ever since that horrific day in November 1963, generations alive that day have seen the Kennedy administration as a romantic tragedy, not as a presidential administration. To even suggest the truth behind the myth keeps most historians from helping us understand the Kennedy administration and colors everything in a mystic glow.
Kennedy's beauty and Obama's beauty are preventing normally rational voters from comparing their presidential status and comparing Obama's status currently. The recent endorsements by the Kennedy clan enrobes Obama with a false mysticism and robs voters of seeing Obama as he should be seen. The Kennedys and those who pin Camelot on Obama are mystifying a presidential candidate at a time when we should be examining him critically. Presidential candidates cloud themselves enough without having 'keepers of a legacy' complicating matters further.
Even with 30 years of foreign policy experiences and over a dozen years in Congress, JFK was unprepared for the presidency, as his handling of The Bay of Pigs, the debacle at Vienna, and JFK's mishandling of the Cuban Missle Crisis clearly shows. Compared to JFK, Obama is a beautiful zero with no foreign policy experiences. As the Chairman of Foreign Affairs for Europe, Obama has NEVER visited this vital part of the world, NEVER held a substantive meeting regarding it, and avoided foreign travel as he prepared for his presidential run during his 24 months in office before announcing.
Enough with the myths - we have a cold hearted reality awaiting the next president. Obama is the least qualified major presidential candidate in over 140 years. Betting that he has even the slightest clue regarding the challenges we face is a bet no one should be making with a straight face.
We cannot gamble with a pretty face with an eloquent voice. These are not qualifiers for the Oval Office, and that is really all Mr. Obama offers us at this time.
This is no way to vote.
Avoid people selling what you know to be false. Avoid candidates selling easy answers. And avoid candidates that enshrine themselves in false myths that cover an empty resume.
While I very much appreciate the Kennedy family's years of service and mourn their huge losses, I, too, cannot understand the continued use of the Camelot; Jack and Jackie; and John Jr. and Carolyn images and approach to endorsing someone or aligning one's self politically.
Post a Comment