Aaron Schock playing fast and loose with election rules?
I've written before about how Republican Party loyalists are a bit annoyed at Aaron Schock. Less than a year after they spent millions getting him re-elected to the Illinois House of Representatives, he decided to abandon that seat to run for the one being vacated by U.S. Rep Ray LaHood.
This means that the GOP is more likely than not to loose the seat to the Democrats. Until Schock defeated Ricca Slone, the 92nd was considered a safe Democratic seat. But Schock -- who has a knack for picking opponents who have weaknesses in their base -- won back in 2004.
And now Schock is making tongues wag yet again. This time, some of his fellow GOPers are upset at the special favors he's getting from the party organization, and for possible violations of campaign finance rules.
Here are some of the complaints I'm hearing:
- The Shock for Congress campaign is passing out the same literature, they say, that was distributed by the Schock for State Representative campaign. Presumably, that literature was purchased long before anyone knew Ray LaHood wouldn't run for re-election and long before Schock officially entered the race. So the literature must have been bought with money raised for a state race. That's a big no-no.
- The Schock for Congress campaign is using the same phone number from the state rep campaign. This account with the phone company was opened with money raised for the state rep campaign. Unless Schock office gave up that phone number, and handed it over to the congressional campaign and paid for with federal campaign funds, it might not be exactly legal.
- And some of the ire is directed at the Peoria County Republican Central Committee. They have allowed Schock to set up his Congressional campaign office inside their offices. That's a no-no too, apparently. In fact, sources say the desire to separate state and federal election efforts was one of the reasons the county GOP moved its offices away from its location next to Ray LaHood's local offices at 4238 N. Knoxville to its new location at 8835 N. Knoxville Ave.
Via Schock's own Website:
Here's a closer look:
And here is an image from the Peoria County Republican's homepage:
It's exactly the same address. Right now, I'm not sure if this means that "state" campaign funds are being used on behalf of a "federal" campaign. If so, it's a violation of federal campaign finance laws, or so I'm told. If not, then it's ethically questionable.
What I do know is there is serious talk about making a formal complaint to the Federal Election Commission. THAT is a big deal, unlike the allegations that passed back and forth when Schock ran against State Rep. Ricca Slone. Those were treated like most allegations of cheating are treated in Illinois -- with a certain amount of amused interest by the media, but with no real consequences (at one point, they were debating the ethics of free hot dogs and soda, for crying out loud).
But this is a federal race, and the national media is looking at it. And the media looooves to write about Republicans accused of campaign violations. Those guys have no sense of humor.
While 11 out of the 20 Republican county chairs in the 18th district have reportedly endorsed Schock, that doesn't mean that Schock is endorsed by the party as a whole. The GOP and the Democrats alike pick their parties' nominees through primary elections, not in smoke-filled cloakrooms.
Letting Schock set up an office inside the county's party HQ months before the primary sends a message to the rank and file: What you want doesn't matter. The powers-that-be have pre-selected their favored candidate, so just give up and go home. It's a great way to de-energize the party faithful.
And I'm sure that those folks who have contributed to or are working as volunteers for either Jim McConoughey or John Morris are absolutely thrilled (note the sarcasm, please) that their party itself is using their money to provide facilities to Schock.
And I'm also hearing that one of the people who is a bit POed is none other than Ray LaHood. As an incumbent, LaHood is very much aware of the effect this sort of nonsense is having on the GOP's chances of recapturing Congress.
And the thing is that Schock has a history of bending if not breaking what should be simple and easy to understand campaign rules. With the media and voters hype-sensitive to crooked electioneering, one wonders what other rules Schock might break or bend.
I'm recalling the history of the district. In 1956, Rep. Harold Velde endorsed his top aide Bob Michel, who won the party nomination in a crowded field. In 1994, Michel in turn endorsed Ray LaHood, his aide, instead of the more conservative Judy Koehler.
Perhaps LaHood might want to consider doing the same thing. Considering that everyone is assuming what whoever wins the GOP primary is going to win the general election, they may as well pick someone who acts like a grown-up and plays by the rules.
14 comments:
The big "shock" is your inability to grasp the facts. Fact is, Aaron Shock is going to be the next US Congressperson from Peoria. As far as I can see, Shock doesn't owe anyone other than the people he represents, and if they see nothing wrong with Shock becoming US Congressperson than what is it to you?
Get off this young guy as he is a decent person. If you want to call him on the obvious that's your bad.
So your points are:
1. Aaron Schock's victory is inevitable.
2. Aaron Schock is going to win, so it doesn't matter if the rules are being violated.
3. Aaron Schock a decent person,l so it doesn't matter IF he is violating the rules.
Boy, Steve Shearer really keeps his campaign flunkies on message doesn't he?
Or maybe you ARE Steve Shearer.
It wouldn't surprise me. I have yet to learn of a Steve Shearer campaign that didn't involve dirty tricks.
When Sullivan said no, the game was over for the dems.
When Darin said no, it was over altogether.
Schock owes it all to the Tazewell County Republican Central Committee Chairman.
Bill,
I'm hardly a fan of Mr. Schock... But it seems you're linking to his state rep campaign site. As I understand it, this would make it perfectly legal (even if not politically wise) to have the same address as a local GOP office.
If, however, they are also using this address for a Federal campaign - you have a point. I think they'd have to be paying rent to sublet a space (but I'm no lawyer).
Also, your other points about recycling state race campaign lit and other infrastructure for a Fed campaign are valid from what I understand.
One item you didn't bring up -- I question why he's using the State Seal on his state campaign site. If this were his legislative site it'd be ok, but they clearly list his campaign contact info, Citizens for Schock address, and officials right there under the Seal.
That'd seem to be a no-no (and one which conservatives recently hounded Dick Durbin for -- Sen. Durbin at least owned up to it).
Billy-
Excellent point about Shearer and his campaigns. I would love to see him act professionally just once.
These questions about Schock and Shearer's tactics are not new, nor will they end in the near future. I simply hope that the voters realize that there are better choices out there.
As far as the state seal, we did some checking when I last worked a campaign and, according to the people in Springfield, it is not a technical violation of anything. Ethically it raises questions, but it doesn't break any rules is what we were told. Could have been bad info, but I don't know of any specific rule/law/etc.
Rich Miller,
I hope that you are going to clean up this thread and make clear that Billy is to keep a eye on the comments being made under here, two of which CLEARLY violate your own rules.
The addresses listed on the Website is not even located in Schock's 92nd District. It's located in David Leitch's 73rd.
It's obviously his Congressional Campaign office, since it's not his legislative office.
And the guy who answered the phone at 693-9393 identified it as such and said the campaign literature will arrive there in a few weeks.
And my apologies for the comments, I'll try to delete them ASAP.
The thing is that the FEC is slow as molasses. They won't be able to investigate in time for it to matter much.
Oh, and this isn't Rich Miller's blog.
Peoria Pundit,
You still missed one from Anonymous 12:04.
archpundit,
Rick Miller is the overseer of Illinoize.
oops..Rich Miller.
I feel Aaron Schock and Barack are neither ready for prime time.
What happened to paying your dues?
So go tell Rich Miller
Shalom,
--- Prof. Leland Milton Goldblatt
Is there a truly good, no excuse reason for you writing these things that you've "heard" -you really dont know if they are true or the reasons behind them. If you're just wanting someone to pick on then go find a domocratic.
Post a Comment