Saturday, September 08, 2007

One Teamster officer, three former Teamster employees indicted on election fraud charges in Chicago

I'll say it again in the land of the free, use your freedom of choice. Devo, "Freedom of Choice," 1980.

But will workers really have "Freedom of Choice?"

Organized labor, through the Democratic Party, is trying to enact something into law with the deceptive name of the Employee Free Choice Act.

Workers hoping to unionize will be able to, if the bill becomes law, choose to join a union by signing a card--bypassing one of the most sacred foundations of American society--the secret ballot. The legislation passed the House of Representatives in the spring, but it faces a doubtful future in the Senate. If it somehow makes it out of the Senate, President Bush vows to veto the bill.

Opponents of the bill have raised the valid (to me) concern that workers, via the card-signing option, could be bullied into voting in favor of joining a union. In other words, their freedom to make a choice will be taken away from them by the "Employee Free Choice Act."

Unions have been hemorrhaging members since the 1950s, mostly because fewer Americans work in manufacturing jobs. However, government workers being an exception, workers have been less willing, via the secret ballot, to say "Union, Yes!"

The "Employee Free Choice Act" is an attempt, a desperate one, to if not reverse that trend, at least slow it down.

Can union officials be trusted to run an honest "free choice" card signing? Based on the alleged actions of three former Teamster Local 743 employees and one current officer from that local, I have my doubts.

That local, by the way, has a long history of corruption. For more, read this story from not the Wall Street Journal, but the Socialist Worker Online.

From CBS 2 Chicago:

Teamsters Local 743 officer and three former union local employees were indicted on federal charges of stealing ballots in an effort to rig two elections in favor of an incumbent slate of officers in 2004, according to the U.S. Justice and Labor departments.

In two closely-contested elections just months apart, the defendants and others allegedly diverted to their friends, family and confidantes hundreds of mailed, official ballot packages intended for delivery to Local 743 members, then cast the ballots or caused them to be cast to ensure election of the incumbent slate, the indictment alleges.

Local 743 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, based in Chicago, represents more than 12,000 members engaged in warehouse, office, medical, service and other industries, and is one of the largest Teamsters locals in the country.

The seven-count indictment was returned Thursday by a federal grand jury, according to a release from the U.S. Attorney’s office. All four defendants are charged with one count of conspiracy to commit fraud by depriving Local 743 of their honest services and to embezzle, or steal, the official ballots, the release said.

Organized labor is not a good environment to exercise "Freedom of Choice."

To comment on this post, please visit Marathon Pundit.

Read more...

Friday, September 07, 2007

Norman Hsu and Illinois

Reverse Spin checks Hsu's donations in Illinois and finds $3,500 to the 25th Ward Regular Democratic Organization. (Why the 25th Ward?)

Anyways RS speculates whether any Illinois Dems will feel inclined to donate their Hsu contributions to charities.

If no worthy charities can be found, I suggest the 25th Ward splurge on dinners for political junkies just a few doors down at Bruna's.

Read more...

Thursday, September 06, 2007

New Jersey moves to stake claim as nation's most corrupt state

It's a constant struggle between the top corrupt states in our fair nation. Is it my own Illinois? Rhode Island? Louisiana? Which state is the most crooked?

Or could it be New Jersey?

Today the Garden State, in an awe inspiring performance, saw two of its mayors, two state legislators, and seven other public officials indicted today on bribery charges.

And I don't think there is a Republican among the bunch.

Because Democrats and Republicans (such as disgraced former Gov. George Ryan of the latter group) have not been shy in taking part in Illinois graft, I still have to declare, with shame, that Illinois is still the most corrupt of America's 50 states.

However, if New Jersey continues to run up the score on indictments, Bobby Bowden style, I might reconsider. But Illinois will probably still come up on top in the end, since US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald is still very busy investigating all kinds of things going on in Illinois state government, many of them involving Barack Obama's indicted pal, Tony Rezko.

Since 2003, the Democratic Party has dominated Illinois government, the sole exception was that a Republican served as state treasurer. She ran for governor last year and lost; now a Democrat, another Obama pal with a questionable background no less, is the state's chief investor. Alexi Giannoulias, whose bank his family owns lent money to a convicted mobster, has pledged to raise $100,000 for Barack "New Kind of Politics" Obama.

Let me be real clear on this: Giannoulias came from nowhere to win the Democratic primary for state treasurer last year. Obama's endorsement, and his appearance in a Giannoulias television spot, are the only reasons he won that race, which last year was the only election Alexi needed to win. The Illinois GOP fared much worse than the national GOP in 2006.

Woodrow Wilson was the last man from New Jersey to move into the White House. As for Illinois, my state has to reach back to Ulysses S. Grant for its last Illinos-to-1600 Pennsylvania Avenue transition.

Bad luck? Maybe. But both are populous states where it's pretty easy to raise money. But it could be that both states are tainted with corruption that keeps top state politicos from claiming the top prize in American politics

As far Illinois' Republican Party, now is a good time to get involved. If the party focuses on the basics, which is what I think they should: Clean and efficient governrment, there's no where to go but up.

Start here, at the Illinois GOP Network.

To comment on this post, please visit Marathon Pundit.

Read more...

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

2010 CENSUS, REMAP THREATENS 38th WARD - by Russ Stewart

ANALYSIS & OPINION BY RUSS STEWART

In politics, a month is a lifetime, a year is a millennium, and 2010, when the next census occurs, is an eternity. Voters forget, situations alter, and current problems, and conventional wisdom, invariably change.

Politicians on Chicago’s Northwest Side are already nervously pondering, or eagerly anticipating, the impact of the next census on their respective wards. At least one Northwest Side white ward, probably the 38th, will be dismembered in order to create a new Hispanic-majority ward.

The city’s geographic area west of Western Avenue and north of North Avenue – known as Jefferson Township on tax records -- contains all or parts of 15 wards. It includes all of the 41st, 45th, 38th, 36th, 39th, 33rd, 31st, 30th and 35th wards, and parts of the 50th, 40th, 29th, 26th, 37th and 1st wards.

The 29th and 37th wards have a black majority, and an exploding Hispanic population. After the 2010 census, the city council remap will combine those two wards, creating a new Hispanic-majority ward, and another pitting Aldermen Ike Carothers (29th) and Emma Mitts (37th) against each other in a black-majority section. Mitts is a protégé of Carothers, and he helped her get elected. She will certainly step aside.

The 26th, 30th, 31st, 33rd and 35th wards have a solid Hispanic majority, and will retain their Hispanic aldermen. The 1st Ward’s Hispanic majority is declining rapidly, with a white majority imminent, but that won’t threaten Alderman Manny Flores. The far northwest 41st and 45th wards are still all-white, with a minimal Hispanic presence. But there is a growing Hispanic population in the 39th, 40th, 50th, 38th and 36th wards.

Ongoing Northwest Side demographic change, particularly the burgeoning Hispanic population in the area south of Addison and east of Central, will surely necessitate the creation of another Hispanic-majority ward. That means that the white areas from the 36th and 38th wards – represented, respectively, by Aldermen Bill Banks and Tom Allen – will be collapsed into one new ward. And, if it comes to a confrontation, Banks will win.

The elongated 38th Ward extends from Kedvale (4100 west) to Octavia (7300 west), between Belmont (3200 north) and Gunnison (4800 north), with many dips and turns, and includes Mayfair (north of Schurz High School), Portage Park (west of Laramie and south of Montrose), Chopin Park, Dunham Park, Mount Olive Cemetery, and the old Chicago-Read facility along Forest Preserve Drive. According to sources in the ward, the Hispanic population his grown to almost 80 percent in the area from Cicero to Laramie, between Belmont and Irving Park – which is the corridor that attaches Portage Park to Mayfair. That area will definitely be appended to the 30th Ward in the remap. And Mayfair will be part of the a new 45th or 39th ward.

The Belmont-Central area, once a mecca of Polish-American immigrants, has evolved into a Little Mexico. The area between Cicero and Narragansett, from Addison to Belmont, is now heavily Hispanic. Polish residents have moved west and north into River Grove, Elmwood Park, Franklin Park, Schiller Park, Harwood Heights and Niles. In the next remap, Belmont-Central will be part of a new Hispanic ward.

The 38th Ward has long been the fiefdom of the Cullerton Clan. In the 76 years since the ward was created in 1931, in roughly the same area, a Cullerton – or Cullerton Clan member – has been alderman for 72. In fact, since 1871, when Eddie Cullerton was elected alderman on the West Side, and had a street named after him, a Cullerton has been in the city council for 119 of those 136 years.

The legendary P.J. (Parky) Cullerton was elected the ward’s alderman in 1935. In 1955, Cullerton aligned himself with a then-obscure South Side mayoral contender, Richard J. Daley, and hit the jackpot. After Daley won, he made Cullerton county assessor in 1958. After P.J. resigned, brother Willie became alderman, and served until his death in 1973. P.J. Cullerton was 38th Ward Democratic committeeman from 1932 until his death in 1981.

Willie’s successor was nephew Tom Cullerton, the city’s assistant chief electrical inspector when he won the 1973 special aldermanic election. After P.J.’s death, Tom became Democratic committeeman. Tom barely survived tough aldermanic contests in 1987 and 1991. He died in 1993, and Mayor Rich Daley named attorney Tom Allen as his replacement. Allen is part of the Cullerton Clan, at least by affinity. His wife’s sister is married to Tim Cullerton, Tom Cullerton’s son, who was, until his recent retirement, the city’s chief electrical inspector. Tim has no political ambitions, although his children might.
Allen was easily re-elected as alderman in 1995, 1999, 2003 and 2007. Allen, age 55, is presently seeking slating as the Democratic nominee for State’s Attorney in 2008. “I’m happy as alderman,” said Allen, but, he added, being state’s attorney would be the “fulfillment of a dream.” Added Allen: “I’m not now ready to be a judge,” for which he could slated if he wanted.

After Tom’s death, daughter Patty Jo (P.J.) Cullerton became Democratic committeeman, and has held the job since 1993. P.J. carried on the family business, working for the county assessor’s office, rising to become manager of technical review, and then shifting to the Cook County Forest Preserve District, as assistant to the superintendent. After 30 years on the county payroll, P.J. retired in 2005.

Should Allen be elected to another office, and resign, his successor as alderman would surely be P.J. Cullerton. “There are many qualified people who could replace (Tom),” said Cullerton, but she didn’t name one. She is daily at the aldermanic/Democratic ward office on Irving Park.

If the 38th Ward is strangely configured, so, too, is Banks’ 36th Ward. Much of the old 38th Ward, the area west of Harlem and north of Belmont to the city limits, is now in the 36th Ward. The old 36th Ward, prior to the 1990s, was south of Belmont and east of Harlem. The current 36th runs south to North Avenue, between Narragansett and Harlem, and then follows Belmont west to Cumberland and the city limits, curving in a crescent from Austin westward and then northward to Lawrence.
According to sources in the 36th Ward, the Harlem-Narragansett corridor south from Belmont contains an eclectic demographic mixture: It is Hispanic and Polish from Belmont to Diversey; it is overwhelmingly Hispanic from Diversey to Grand; and it is white and black from Grand to North, with the blacks primarily east of Oak Park, and the whites west.
The next remap will surely slice the area south of Belmont off Banks’ 36th Ward, and the area east of Central off Allen’s 38th Ward. That means the creation of a new white-majority ward running from Central to Cumberland, north of Belmont. The white, upscale area where Allen lives, around Portage Park, will be appended onto Alderman Pat Levar’s 45th Ward.

The bad news is that, if P.J. Cullerton replaces Allen as alderman, she would be remapped into a ward with Banks, who would be unbeatable. Cullerton resides in the Harlem-Forest Preserve Drive area, around Chicago-Read.

The good news is that the next Chicago aldermanic remap would not be effective until 2015. Hence, if Cullerton is appointed to replace Allen anytime before 2011, or if Allen remains as alderman, either would run for election in 2011 in the ward’s present boundaries. The 2011 municipal election will occur in February, with a filing deadline in December 2010. The 2010 census figures won’t be disseminated until mid-2011. So the 2011 ward races will be run in the existing wards.

If Allen is at risk, then Alderman Dick Mell (33rd) is at requiem. When Mell leaves, a Hispanic will win the seat. But as long as he runs, Mell can’t be beat. Mell’s 33rd Ward, which runs from Belmont to Foster, east of the Chicago River to Central Park, is now over 60 percent Hispanic. Mell, the father-in-law of Governor Rod Blagojevich, is known as “Old Gringo” among Hispanics, and the bulk of his precinct captains are Hispanic.

Mell, age 68, has been alderman since 1975, and Democratic committeeman since 1976. Without Mell’s sagacious advice and political assistance, Blagojevich would never have risen from assistant state’s attorney to state representative to congressman to governor. Now, according to sources close to Mell, he is ashamed that he did so.

Mell’s wife died in 2006. His aldermanic chief-of-staff, Chuck Lomanto, is his presumed successor if he resigns during his term. That will not occur. Mell will run again in 2011.

The bottom line: The 2010 census will be in effect for the 2012 ward committeeman races, but the 2000 census will be in effect for the 2011 aldermanic races. My prediction: The Cullerton Clan’s dominance will terminate in 2015, which means 84 years in the 38th Ward, and 126 in the council.

Read more...

Send in the clowns: 2008 Green Party Convention coming to Chicago

And where are the clowns?
There ought to be clowns.
Well, maybe next year.

Send in The Clowns, lyrics by Steven Sondheim as sung by Judy Collins.

Chicago will be home to a national political convention next year--that of the Green Party.

Until a few days ago, I thought such a gathering would be peaceful shindig of Dennis Kucinich vegan-types.

Perceptions and stereotypes can be wrong sometimes, as I blogged here last week.

But not always, as AP reports:

To Green Party members, bringing the convention to Chicago is significant for another reason: Next year is the 40th anniversary of the 1968 Democratic convention in Chicago that saw clashes between police and anti-Vietnam War demonstrators outside.

This time, (Green Party spokesman Patrick) Kelly said the anti-war protesters will be inside a political convention nominating the Green Party's candidate.

Sheesh, can't the Left get over the 1960s? Even Barack Obama, who was born the same year I was, 1961, gets mired in that decade, based on some passages of his Audacity of Hope.

Folks: The 1960s ended 37 years ago.

But some Greenies want to bring the country back to the early 1860s. Commenter Michael Pugliese directed me to a Joshua Frank article in the Atlantic Free Press. It's not just bicycle riding Vegans, or as Solomonia discovered, Islamists and anti-semites who've infiltrated the Green Party with a "the clap," but crazies on the from the extreme-right as well.

From Frank's article:

Green delegates from Tennessee have recently advanced a proposal which they call "Moving the Money from Wall Street to Main Street." Certainly sounds innocuous enough. Tragically the delegates from Tennessee based their proposal on a presentation made to the Green Party delegates at their convention by a woman named Catherine Austin Fitts.

Ms. Fitts, a Republican, was Assistant Secretary of Housing in the administration of George Bush Sr. and now supports libertarian causes. Why was Fitts invited to talk to the Green Party about banking issues? Nobody really knows. Perhaps not surprisingly, one of the associates of Catherine Austin Fitts is Franklin Sanders, a leading thinker in the extreme right-wing Constitution Party. Sanders is also chairman of the Tennessee chapter of "The League of the South", yes, from the same state of the Green Party delegates who offered the proposal in the first place.

The League of the South is quite an outfit. They advocate the ideology of "kinism", and would outlaw racial intermarriage and non-white immigration, expel all "aliens" (including Jews and Arabs), limit the right to vote to white landowning males over the age of twenty-one, and re-institute black slavery. The Green Party is about to adopt a proposal based on the philosophy of people like Fitts and Sanders. One has to wonder who would influence these guys if they were savvy enough to win elections.

Man oh man, the Green Party's slogan should be, "If you're nuts, your one of us." And this Clown-a-palooza is coming to Chicago.

Related Marathon Pundit post: Illinois gov race--Rich Whitney: What is Green once was Red

To comment on this post, please visit Marathon Pundit.

Read more...

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

Transit trouble

The Illinois House failed to approve a regional sales tax increase to help fund the mass transit systems in and around Chicago today, leaving little time for the House to gain the 10 votes needed to prevent the Regional Transportation Authority from laying off employees and cutting services. Legislation sponsored by Rep. Julie Hamos, an Evanston Democrat, is expected to come back as soon as House Speaker Michael Madigan thinks he reversed the votes of some House Republicans and downstate Democrats. That’s not going to happen this week, and it might not happen before the September 16 “drop dead” date outlined by the RTA’s budget plan.

The RTA oversees the three separate agencies of the Chicago Transportation Authority, Metra rail services and Pace suburban bus services. It was subject of a state audit in March that said the systems’ “serious financial shortfall” combines with representation problems on the separate boards, an outdated funding formula and an aging infrastructure.

Hamos’ measure would enact many of the recommendations in the audit. It foremost would increase a regional sales tax, raising money to be split among the CTA, Metra and Pace. It also would allow a Chicago-only real estate transfer tax that would have to be voted on by the Chicago City Council and would cover CTA’s pension and retiree health care costs. Metra also would gain authority to borrow up to $1 billion to secure a federal match for capital projects, especially for suburb-to-suburb routes. And the legislation would reform the three agencies’ pension systems by such changes as requiring higher employee contributions, higher retirement age for pensions and limits on health care benefits.

Without the legislation, Hamos said the region and the state would feel its effects through job loss, limited transportation routes, increased traffic congestion, air pollution and a poorer rating for Chicago’s bid to host the 2016 Olympics.

Standing next to Madigan in a Statehouse press conference following the floor vote, Hamos said, “People did not so much pick at the substance of the bill, which was very promising, actually, but instead were talking about other agendas that they still continue to bring to the table.” She said the only portion that would be looked at for possible change is what Rep. Bill Black, a Danville Republican, said was concerning.

Black said while the legislation would require the state to match 5 percent of new tax revenues to help mass transit services for disabled riders, he didn’t like that it would not cap the state’s contribution as tax revenue increased over the years. “You’re talking the state share growing by hundreds of millions of dollars over the next four to five fiscal years,” he said on the House floor. “It could be in excess of $1 billion by FY10, considerably more money than it has ever been in the history.”

House Republican Leader Tom Cross said his caucus rejects Hamos’ plan because members are holding out for a more comprehensive capital bill to fund school and road construction projects around the state. “You can’t do one without the other,” he said, but added, “The belief from a lot of us is we will never see a capital bill.”

He said even if there were movement on a capital bill, underlying tensions could stymie a deal. “I’m a little concerned about the trust issue that permeates around here — or lack of trust that exists in this building. I think we need to work through that. I don’t think we left … on a good note, so we’ve got to find a way to work through some of those trust issues.”

Willing to look at a Chicago casino previously promoted by Senate President Emil Jones and the governor, Cross said that’s not looking too good, either. “The more that discussion goes on, it just seems tougher and tougher to do. We may need to look at a different avenue.”

The governor issued a statement about the House vote that said “Speaker Madigan’s tax increase” was a “backdoor fare hike” and that the legislature was correct to reject that approach. He said he would continue to advocate the end of some business tax credits (a.k.a. closure of “corporate loopholes”) and find other sources of revenue to fund mass transit.

Read more...

The Feds are Really Coming

Cross-posted from ICPR's blog, The Race is On:

Earlier we posted that the Federal Communications Commission will soon hold a rare public hearing. A few more details have emerged. The FCC is holding its fifth official public hearing on media ownership issues in Chicago on Thursday, September 20th.

Date: Thursday, September 20th
Time: 4:00pm-11:00pm
Location: Operation Push National Headquarters
Dr. King's Workshop
930 East 50th Street
(corner of South Drexel Blvd.)
Chicago, Illinois 60615

Start thinking now about what your testimony might look like!

Read more...

Derailed

In the latest act of the 2007 Comedy of Errors Tour, SB572, legislation designed to fund and reform mass transit in northeastern Illinois, failed to gain sufficient votes for passage, receiving only 61 of the 71 votes necessary for passage.

The real surprise wasn't the number of Republican votes for the bill, however, it was the number of Democrats who did not support this issue that is critical to so many of us and our constituents. Some of the 'no' votes were disappointing but not shocking (Chapa LaVia, Franks), but others were very curious indeed.

A handful of Democratic legislators allied with the Governor did not support the bill, and while I don't want to get into a he said/she said exercise, it is my understanding that the Governor (either directly or through his office) was involved in pulling votes off of the bill.

My understanding is that the Governor may announce a 'plan' as early as tomorrow to address both the mass transit issue as well as the larger issue of a capital bill. For those keeping count, this plan would be in line behind the one to 'rock the system' on campaign finance and ethics; the one to improve health care for Illinoisans, and countless others.

One of the biggest impediments to any capital bill proposed by the Administration is a concern by members on both sides of the aisle that any projects set forth is such a bill would actually be funded. For those unfamiliar with the process, having a project enumerated in the budget is only part of the battle. The Governor's office has to then release the funding for the project. And there's the rub. The atmosphere right now is so poisoned that few people are willing to trust that their projects would actually see the light of day. (Save for the occasional half a bridge here and there.)

Accordingly, as recent events have shown, getting a capital bill passed is going to be an uphill battle to say the least. In the interim, however, if the Chicago public senses that the Governor should wear the jacket for the impending fee hikes and service cuts, his long summer may just get a little longer.

UPDATE - I just finished an interesting conversation with an individual well-versed in this process for longer than me who brought up a very interesting scenario. Realizing that 71 votes cannot be obtained for the bill, the Speaker could choose not exert any more real effort on this until the new session in January, at which time we would only need 60 votes to pass the bill.

Assuming that the blame in the interim can be laid at the feet of the Governor, which may not be real hard to do, this would have the double effect of having thousands of increasingly frustrated transit riders grow increasingly angry with the Governor while at the same time creating the ability to pass the bill over to the Senate, thus forcing both the Senate President's hand and putting an exorbitant amount of pressure on the Governor to address the issue on terms set by the Legislature.

Let me repeat, this is nothing more than conjecture, albeit very interesting conjecture at that.

The real problem with the above scenario of course, is that thousands of transit riders will suffer in the interim, and that even if a fix is had after the September 16 cut-off date, many riders who leave the system may not return to it.

This problem illustrates the bigger picture problem here, namely that as the political oneupmanship continues to grow, so do the needs and frustrations of the people of Illinois. Now it the time for statesmanship not gamesmanship.

To read or post comments, visit Open House

Read more...

Lawyer Groups Throw Weight Around In Judge Selection

The major lawyer organizations in Illinois -- and probably in most other states -- are dominated by plaintiffs' lawyers, the personal injury trial lawyers who frequently seem to be more interested in the size of the award than in justice.

So we react with skepticism when lawyer groups object to the appointment of a new judge who doesn't meet their approval.

That happened in Cook County last week when the Illinois Supreme Court selected as a new judge an attorney who has no experience in jury trials.

Furmin Sessoms, the Supreme Court's appointee, has served as a supervisor in the Cook County public defender's office. According to the Chicago Tribune on Sunday (see below), Sessoms has been a contributor to Citizens for Stroger in 2005. That's the campaign organization of former Cook County Board President John Stroger, whose son now occupies the president's chair.

Should his lack of experience with jury trials or his political leanings disqualify him from the bench? Certainly not.

He may be unqualified for lots of other reasons that the Supreme Court didn't know about ... and couldn't learn ... because several of the lawyer groups that opposed him refused to share information with the Supreme Court.

Court officials had asked the alliance of bar associations why they opposed Sessoms and they refused to provide their reasons.

"Your refusal to honor our express request for [information], particularly on the basis cited, [affects] the credibility of the evaluation and, frankly, gives us pause," the justices wrote. "Even more importantly, however, it renders near impossible Mr. Sessoms' ability to mount any credible appeal." (Chicago Tribune)
The Chicago Bar Association supported Sessoms while the Illinois State Bar Association did not.

The process of selecting judges in Illinois is flawed and needs to be reviewed and likely changed.

In fact, this single issue may be the only justification for calling a Constitutional Convention when that question faces Illinois votes in November of 2008.

Election of judges, while popular and specifically selected by Illinois voters following the last Constitutional Convention, is fraught with peril.

In many areas of the state, especially in Cook County, home of half of the judges in Illinois, judicial candidates are slated by the Cook County Democratic Central Committee. They may, or may not, have any qualifications beyond the endorsement of a local ward or township committeeman.

In Southern Illinois, a slightly different but equally as one-sided selection process has been in effect. Many Fifth Appellate District justices have been selected by the combine composed of the Madison and St. Clair Democratic parties, local organized labor, and the plaintiffs lawyers who have thrived in Southern Illinois court rooms.

While that process has been weakening in recent years, the framework for reform is fragile and is being challenged in 2008 by the immediate past president of the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association who has announced her candidacy against an appellate justice who has the support of all 37 of the Democratic county chairmen and, most likely, many Republicans.

Perhaps more disturbing than the dominant role of political parties in selecting judges is the intimidating influence of the lawyer groups, starting with the Illinois State Bar Association.

ISBA, heavily influenced if not controlled by plaintiffs' attorneys, weighs heavily in the judicial selection and election process. As the major organization representing Illinois attorneys, ISBA should carry weight.

But the state's major lawyer group -- or groups -- should not have final say on who will control one-third of the government structure of Illinois. In fact, with more than 900 elected judges in Illinois, the judiciary is the largest -- by far -- of the three branches of government and it should not be controlled by the lawyers who represent less than one-fourth of one percent of the population of Illinois.

That number is correct. ISBA membership represents less than one-fourth of one per cent of the population of Illinois. ISBA claims membership of "more than 30,000" on its website. The population of Illinois in 2006, according to the Federal Census Bureau, is 12,831,970.

That means that numerically, ISBA members are an insignificant percentage of the citizens of Illinois.

In fact, according to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, ISBA represents less than half of the attorneys in Illinois. ARDC shows 81,146 registered lawyers in Illinois as of October, 2006.

What it comes down to is this: ISBA has wielded far more influence than the organization deserves and its biases have been obvious.

In 2004, ISBA teamed with strong liberal and trial lawyer interests in an attempt to weaken the campaign of Lloyd Karmeier for the Supreme Court in Southern Illinois.

And in 2006 -- the following campaign cycle -- ISBA made sure it was not embarrassed by its own members in Southern Illinois as it had been in 2004 so it did a double mailing of its candidate evaluation poll to lawyers to assure that Democrat Bruce Stewart received a higher evaluation than did Republic Steven McGlynn in the Fifth District Appellate race. In 2004, Karmeier scored considerably higher than Appellate Justice Gordon Maag.

The ISBA effort in 2006 resulted in a higher vote among ISBA members in the appellate race than had occurred in the 2004 Supreme Court race.

There is no doubt ISBA will be involved in 2008 judicial elections but if they're going to be involved in the vacancy-replacement process, they ought to be willing to tell the Supreme Court the basis for their objections, as in cases such as that described below.

-- Ed Murnane
Illinois Civil Justice League
September 4, 2007

Read more...

Mass Transit Tax Eaters Spend $3 Million to Convince Legislators to Hike Your Taxes

If it were not bad enough that State Rep. Julie Hamos’ House Bill 572 will double collar county RTA sales taxes and give precious little in return, the Daily Herald’s Joseph Ryan has found this out.

The mass transit tax eaters have spent $3 million to convince legislators to vote “Yes.”
The goal?

To increase the average collar county family's sales tax by about $200 a year.

It would have been cheaper in the old days when bribes were paid directly to legislators.

And, such a deal this bill offers those living in the suburbs.

Take a look at this graphic of costs and benefits.

If you can’t figure it out, you can find my analysis on McHenry County Blog. The story is entitled,
Suburban Legislators with a Cost-Benefit Analysis Impairment

Read more...

Jim Krenz Challenging Tim Schmitz

Today is the day that Carpentersville resident Jim Krenz is holding his noon press conference to officially announce his candidacy.

It will be at Amy Plumbing, Heating & Cooling Inc., which will serve as campaign headquarters, 39 North Western Avenue in Carpentersville from noon until 12:30 today.

I thought you might be interesting in seeing an early piece of campaign literature that I managed to obtain. More info here.

You can click on it for an enlargement.

The issues include:

  1. Re-focusing secondary education from college prep to college prep or "focused technical or trade training." He favors a voucher system and creating specialized "alternative charter schools" for underachievers.

  2. Investigating an umbrella "stop-loss" catastrophic health insurance program to "keep families out of bankruptcy." "Stop-loss" is an insurance term meaning that one pays up to that amount and no more from one's own resources. Krenz emphasizes he is not for "universal health coverage."

  3. Re-structuring DCFS so there is less reliance on unsupervised agencies. He thinks the foster care system is in "disarray."

  4. With regard to illegal aliens, Krenz believes the borders must be sealed before anything else is done.

  5. Krenz thinks northern Kane County is being short-changed on infrastructure expansion, that tax dollars are not being brought back from Springfield.

  6. Changing the public pension system from one in which benefits are guaranteed to one more like most people have in the private sector, for example, 401(k)plans in which individuals contribute and invest their own money, some of which is often matched by the employer.

  7. Krenz labels himself "pro-life" and says he supports the "traditional family."

  8. The candidate comes out in favor of the Second Amendment, while calling for "vigorous enforcement" of any violation of criminal statutes.

  9. Finally, he favors "minimal intrusion" by state and federal governments "into our lives."

Posted first at McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Sunday, September 02, 2007

Hats Off

This Labor Day, try to make an extra effort to think about all of the men and women that have made, and continue to make, our country what it is.

While we will always have our issues and desires,
there is no better country in the world.

To read or post comments, visit Open House

Read more...

  © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP