Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Every Successful Strategy is Unique

At the Cook County Republican Convention over the weekend I was approached by a supporter of State Sen. Bill Brady. The supporter was upset with my baleful assessment of the Brady campaign's prospects. "Have you ever heard of the downstate strategy?" he demanded.

Well...I was its primary author, so I have a passing familiarity with it. Today, a little history and a few general comments on strategy.

In 1996 I was chief strategist for Al Salvi's campaign for U.S. Senate. It was the conservative's breakthrough statewide campaign. Before that, no Illinois conservative had gotten out of the 20's in a statewide Republican Primary. Hard as it is to believe, conventional wisdom held then that conservatives could not win statewide primaries in Illinois. We based the campaign on three innovative strategic approaches. The first was the downstate strategy, which almost every political professional is familiar with - and which every statewide campaign now uses to some extent. But the latter two were equally critical.

Let's start with the first, the downstate strategy. Sixty percent of the vote comes fromCook and the collars; only 40% comes from downstate. The battle in most statewide races had been largely contained to Cook and the collars, with only token efforts going downstate. I believed that if downstate were heavily and seriously contested, it could come in in a monolithic block, leaving a candidate only needing to break even or stay close in Cook and the collars. But television is not as effective downstate. The good news was that downstate had stronger nuclear communities and their political events played a much broader role in the larger social network than they did upstate.

That meant that Cook and the collars could be defended through traditional organizations and a heavy program of effective television. Going after downstate effectively would be very labor intensive. It would require strong, motivated field organizations and frequent in-person candidate visits. I never was all that fond of offices anyway, so I spent half my time on the road. Having divided the state into 17 regions outside of Cook County, my protocol was that I would never let more than three weeks go by without personally visiting every region. A real person can accomplish a whole lot more than a disembodied voice on the phone can - and when you are actually in the region, you can make your own accurate appraisal of how things stand there.

It worked - so well, in fact, that almost every statewide campaign since has adopted elements of it. Only three campaigns have used it fully the way it was designed: Salvi, Peter Fitzgerald and Rod Blagojevich. While Blagojevich used it with brilliant effectiveness in his primary campaign, he utterly abandoned it after election and became, perhaps, the most Chicago-centric governor in memory.

The second element was uniting conservatives to act as a single, cohesive organization of volunteers in each region. Until that time, conservatives had been consigned to disparate ghettoes of like-minded souls. That meant pro-lifers had no interaction with 2nd Amendment supporters who had no interaction with home-schoolers, etc. etc. Our template was that in each region, the top person would act as overall coordinator and all groups would work through that coordinator. We would use traditional coalitions, but only working through the organization we created.

The reason this had not been done before was that conventional wisdom said you could work with various conservative groups, but if you put them in the same room together a fight would break out. Oddly, this was the strategic prong I got the most internal dissent on. I finally put a stop to it when, at a meeting, a junior staffer demanded to know how I was going to do this when it had never been done before. I angrily retorted that a conservative had never gotten out of the 20's before, either, and that it might be it could not be done. But if it couldn't, then we couldn't win.

It worked, too. Once it had been established conservatives, who had been accustomed to seeing 10-15 people at their segmented meetings, began seeing 50-75 at our organizational meetings. It fired everyone's imaginations and gave them a whole new idea of what they were capable of accomplishing.

The third prong was absolutely key - and many conservatives seem not to know it was ever done at all. I did not believe that the midlevel establishment (county chairmen) hated conservative ideals; they just weren't interested in suicide missions and they were offended at the attack rhetoric that was such a staple of conservatives. We set out to seriously contest for those midlevel establishment figures.

Salvi had an engaging wit and used it to great advantage to defang the chairmen's ideas of what a conservative was. We started out with two chairmen for us and 100 against us - and it took a lot of work to get the two. The early days were brutal. Not only did many chairmen refuse to let Salvi speak at their events; they wouldn't even let us put our literature out. It was bad. But I was resolved I would take no offense - and would relentlessly follow protocol in every county. I alerted chairmen whenever Salvi was going to be in their county and invited them to introduce him. I constantly asked their advice, both on what we were doing and what we should be doing. We sought their input on who coordinators should be - and talked to the people they suggested, even if we did not choose them.

After a time a strong rapport developed. Kustra used what I call the "Important" template in his appearances - arrive late, leave early, do a walk-through but don't mingle with the crowd. It is a horrible template that can usually be gutted by a determined opponent because the candidate never develops a deep connection with the activists whose support he is seeking. The only candidate I know who won a primary using that template was Jack Ryan in 2004 - and I'm convinced the only reason he made it work was because the field was so large those who were offended by it never gravitated to a single alternative.

This also worked. In the last critical month and a half, we had a whole host of county chairmen who were working like crazy for us, even as they were formally committed to Kustra. They had to keep up appearances in order not to get punished in their patronage appointments. But it was very satisfying at the end to have chairmen who a few months earlier wouldn't even let us in their halls ask if we would be offended if they put on a dog-and-pony show on the rare occasions Kustra showed up in their counties. They would assure me that it didn't mean anything and that all the locals were in on the gag. We were glad to let them maintain the illusion - I wasn't really interested in letting the opponent know how much trouble he was in.

The whole thing worked because it was custom-designed. We had the right candidate in the right place at the right time - and used it to create a larger, more broad-based movement.

But there is a key: every successful strategic framework starts with solid fundamentals and then is custom-designed to meet the unique challenges and take advantage of the unique opportunities of a specific campaign in a particular time and place.

If I were designing a statewide campaign today, though I would never neglect downstate as it used to be neglected, I would put much more emphasis on suburban Cook County and the collars. That is because the GOP organizations there are dramatically weaker than they were 10 years ago. To be competitive in statewide races, Republicans must substantially rebuild their suburban base. That is actually the main reason I am working for David McSweeney in the Eighth Congressional District. I decided last December that if I could find a candidate in the Eighth who had the resources, was willing to start early, and was as committed to overall party-building as I am, that was where I would work.

The point is there is no 'one size fits all' strategy. While everyone loses sometimes, the general or strategist who is constantly fighting yesterday's battle usually loses.

18 comments:

Anonymous,  7:38 AM  
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous,  8:07 AM  

you invented the downstate strategy? how's that working in the 8th?

Anonymous,  10:27 AM  

So what do you say about three of the four candidates for governor fighting over the same base....suburban cook and the collars?

I think it makes your point that no two races are the same, but clearly Brady should be able to cultivate downstate while scrapping to make a decent showing in the suburbs.

And by the way, I think a god way to look at it is using the 2002 numbers that put 18% of the vote coming out of Suburban cook and the city (which, if you're running against Topinka) leaving 82% of the vote from downstate and the collars.

When two of the top three right now are conservatives, the battleground is for the conservative base in downstate and those collars....a base that was 75% of the vote last time and will likely be at least 65% this time.

Interesting discussion.

Anonymous,  10:47 AM  

It's too bad people are making nasty comments here. I probably stand opposite you on 90 percent of issues - but I've found your last few articles especially intriguing.

Interesting, well-written stuff.

Charlie Johnston 10:59 AM  

Hi anon 10:47...yeah, I thought about it and have decided if you can't be civil, I'm going to toss your comment. Be as critical as you want, but I am not going to do the "Jane, you ignorant slut..." style of discourse here. So folks are on notice. Be tough, be critical, whatever, but by God, you will be civil.

Also, anon 10:27, I'll address you later today. You are working from several of what I believe to be false suppositions.

Anonymous,  11:27 AM  

Anon 10:27

I have to ask who you are talking about when you say 2 of the top three are conservative? The last numbers I have seen show that after a year on the campaign trail Senator Brady is still in single digits behind Gidwitz. This is a two person race so far JBT and Oberweis.Gidwitz has a ton of money so you can't count out his impact in the race.
Charlie is correct in that the most votes are up in the north eastern part of the state, but the south turnout is higher and more conservative. Charlie is again correct that the southern conservative vote is monolithic, but I think that is because historicly one campaign trys to maxamise the southern strategy.

Anonymous,  2:35 PM  

I think anon 10:27 is right about the three way race. I can't recall any independent poll that's shown Gidwitz above or near Brady. Now, if you want to count Joe Wiegand's poll that's on Oberweis's website, this is not a discussion about reality. And the party poll McKenna touted had a Republican sampling so small (under 200 if I remember right) that there's no way it can be taken seriously.

Brady has spent nothing on advertising to this point, and I would imagine, as I'm sure anon 10:27 is thinking, that when he does his numbers will move because he's attractive, conservative, and something new - something Gidwitz's millions so far has NOT been able to say or accomplish.

I'm a conservative begging for a Brady or someone to break out and give us an alternative to the Milkman. I keep hearing people talk about not wanting another Alan Keyes trouncing. I think that's what the milkman will bring us, and I hope Mr. Brady can come up with enough cash to make it a race. If he doesn't, I think JBT win easily. Too many conservatives will hold their noses and vote for Judy before pulling the trigger on Oberweis.

While it may appear to be a two-person race right now, that's all name-ID. There have been no debates, virtually no advertising, and the voters and press are just starting to pay attention to the race. The next month should be telling.

Anonymous,  3:51 PM  

2:35
Brady has been out there ONE YEAR! Stop drinking the Kool-aid how many if's and whens can you put into a post and still be taken seriously?
The last tribune poll had Brady behind Gidwitz and Rauschy. I saw the numbers from Obys internal poll too but the people in the 8th congressional district that were mentioned in the release have not come out to my knowlage and said their polling was different and JBT or Brady have not done so either.
There are polls being done I have been called my self. You can only go by what you see and there is nothing from Brady. Theres very little from JBT and alot from Gidwitz and Oberweis. Gidwitz being on televison and in the mail box, Oberweis in the mail box and at every event with field staff.
It seems to me JBT is the only candidate that could not beat Blago right now. There were 1.3 million votes cast for Keyes, I would say that is a good reading of how many hard core conservative voters are in this state, Judy would get a fraction of that vote so would Gidwitz. Brady and Oberweis would start from that platform and have to draw another 1.7 or 2 million to win the next election going by the last Senatorial.
What is the crossover issue Oberweis has? Immigration, guns and School choice. Brady has guns but who would know it? Look at the polling on the illegal issue and you will see that even in a state wide race it is powerfull. It is supported most by blacks, women and people who make under $75,000 a year(around 78%). Those are Zogby numbers. We know that guns is a crossover issue because this posting is about the best example of the gun movement ever. Salvi was huge with the gun people and now is in their doghouse. And school choice is big among conservatives the building trades and blacks.
Brady has sponsored the Matricular cousular card, he has voted in favor of giving illegals in state college tuition and is against school vouchers.

Anonymous,  3:54 PM  

The Milkman has been really working the grassroots, attending every local event he can make, sending personal notes and making phone calls.

At the Palatine Twp. GOP endorsement session last week, Committeeman Skoien and his hierarchy backed Brady -- who we have NEVER seen before. Yet the best they could do was block an endorsement (Which reguired 60% on a single ballot).

I've found the grassroot precinct captains endorement votes to usually be a good barometer of how it will turn out on primary day in Palatine Twsp.

The result:

Oberweis 29 (48%)
Brady 17
Gidwitz 8
Topinka 7
Martin 0

Charlie Johnston 4:01 PM  

Okay to anon 10:27...first, being a downstate resident does not a downstate strategy make. I do keep in touch with many of my contacts downstate even though I am focused on suburbia right now.

Lumping the collars with downstate is not a good match: they behave politically much more like suburban Cook and respond in much the same ways. So you start with a template that doesn't really work when you do that.

Now the dynamics are changing regularly in this race, so things can change quickly, but Brady is in the toughest position. He is competitive in the central belt of the state (Bloomington, Champaign, Peoria, Quincy and Rock Island). But south of Springfield, Oberweis has by far the strongest presence. Topinka has real strength in Cook and the collars - and Oberweis is doing the best job of contesting her there. Brady has the weakest presence in Cook and the collars and he is competitive, but not dominant, downstate. His field organization is thin and his money is limited.

Could he win? Yes, but he would have to depend on several of his opponents to make significant and sustained blunders. You can be down in the polls and limited in cash in January and still win - but only if you have a dominant, well-drilled field organization.

Topinka has a base and she will probably hold it. Gidwitz has money and the potential to carve away at both Topinka's and Oberweis'base if all goes well. Oberweis has the strongest field organization.

Now Brady is a very attractive candidate. I think very highly of him - and I think he can play a key role in the party's future. I think his campaign made a few errors in the fall and early witner that have crippled his chances. If he does not win, but comes out of this carefully analyzing his rookie season as a statewide candidate rather than being embittered, he can be a very formidable force in the immediate future. That is how I read the race right now.

Anonymous,  4:12 PM  

and since when do you nkow what Blagojevich did in his primary. You may know the results, but you have no clue how he achieved the result. Pure speculation on your part.

Charlie Johnston 4:25 PM  

to political hack, wrong bucko! I lived in Belleville during that election cycle. While people were expecting Vallas to win, I was telling them very early that Blago was going to pull it off - because he was working the classic downstate strategy. People pooh-poohed me then, but it was right.

What you don't know is that, though they are ideologically miles apart, Al Salvi and Rod Blagojevich struck up quite a friendship while they were both in the legislature - and Blago paid close attention to how his friend pulled off that senate primary.

During the Democrat primary in 2002 I often joked with Al that Blago ought to be paying me royalties.

I rarely do wild-ass guesses...and there are a host of republicans who can tell you that I was saying very early that Blago would win precisely because of that - and the results matched my predictions.

Anonymous,  5:49 PM  

Will the real Milk Man please stand up? How many times is he going to switch his positions; is he with "Taliban"-pro-lifers or not? Is he pro-2nd amendment or not? I would hope the conservative base isn't taking this guy seriously because, who to say once he is elected he doesn't pull another switch and become a democrat. I know that is a stretch but come on, his values are based which consultant he hires for his next race. I would imagine it won't be long until JBT takes a swing at the Milk Man about his change of heart on these issues. Another thing I would like to ask the Milk Man is how can you call yourself a fiscal conservative when you blown over 8M of your own money (maybe more if you include all the ice cream he’s given away)? Has anyone worked out what it cost him per vote? I'm guessing Milk Man is already eyeing the next US Senate primary, nothing like using 3 unsuccessful state-wide races to setup a four. How much money is it going take for you to realize your not electable state-wide? Steve Forbes figured it out. Hey Charlie what is that noise? What did you say, its Milk Man calling and asking you to run his next race...

Pat Collins 7:19 PM  

Fascinating analysis.

That it reflects some of what I think helps too :)

But I am curious (and I don't expect you to answer CJ) as to how the McSweeney strategy plays out vs the "suburban" strategy of Mark Kirk and Teresa B.

Anonymous,  8:44 PM  

Brady's attractive all right: good looks, tan, nice smile, good talker, nice wife and kids, shaggy dog... then look at his voting record:

92nd G.A.

HB2671 State employee Early Retirement Initiative fia$co "YES"

SB88 '$implified' Municipal Telecommunications Tax (Rauschy's baby) a +$240 MILLION local utility tax hike "YES"

HB793 The UN inspired 'Smart Growth' nonsense "YES"

93rd G.A.

SB1239 +$240 million in Blago-pork. "NOT VOTING"

HB4266 Increases school foundation level +$396.5 million during state budget crisis "NOT VOTING"


SB1645 Blocks Federal overtime changes in Illinois to protect workers "NOT VOTING"

HB2345 MANDATES housing for low-income and homeless population. "YES"

SB2112 Cook County Assessors "7% Assessment Solution" capping assessments. "NO"

SB1006 Exempts blatantly illegal Ford Heights dumpsite from IL-EPA regulations. "YES" (Blago Vetoed)

HB60 (Rauschy's baby) Il taxpayer paid tuition for kids of illegal aliens. "YES"

94th G.A.

HB3471 Additional employment protections for day and temp labor services (many of which are part of the 400,000 illegal aliens in Illinois) "YES"

SB7 Illinois tax break for Doctors who practice in areas of physician scarcity. "NO"

SB1623
Consular Identification Document Act". "YES"

HB253 State employee medical coverage to include Federally OK'd AIDS vaccine. "NO"

HB1320 Increases penalty for school administrators failure to report evidence of child abuse. "NO"

SB1682 Tax Referendum Reform, insures property taxes extended only to amounts approved in voter referendums. "NO"


If this agenda is the future of the IL-GOP... why bother?

Charlie Johnston 9:55 PM  

Obviously, Pat Collins, I certainly would not discuss McSweeney's strategies, even in general terms,until after November.

But I did tell Rich I would frequently discuss matters of general strategy, as it could be useful for people to glimpse the thinking of a working strategist.

We certainly are paying attention to the details and feel confident we are working from a solid comprehensive strategic framework. Fortunately, David is the most disciplined and focused candidate I have ever worked with.

Pat Collins 9:37 AM  

Obviously, Pat Collins, I certainly would not discuss McSweeney's strategies, even in general terms,until after November.


Hope you're still working on that come Nov.!

Still, it will no doubt be an interesting post-mortem.

Anonymous,  9:49 AM  

But I did tell Rich I would frequently discuss matters of general strategy, as it could be useful for people to glimpse the thinking of a working strategist...wow, someone likes the sound of their own voice.

Go Kathy!

  © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP