Thursday, August 31, 2006

ICIRR: "Denounce what we just said!"

Sun Times headline:

Group: GOP mailer likens immigrants to 'disease'
Wow, that’s eye catching, isn’t it?

The story, by Scott Fornek, opens:


A pro-immigrant group Wednesday called on Republican congressional hopeful Peter Roskam "to publicly denounce and repudiate" a GOP mailer that the group charges treats immigrants as "some type of disease."
Geez, after reading that headline and first paragraph, even I started to think, ‘maybe the NRCC went too far this time. That was pretty bad.’

But, wait!

I remember that our good friend, the So-Called Austin Mayor, has a copy of the controversial mailer on his blog. I've read it three times since I got to the office. I don’t see the word “disease” on it anywhere. Do you?

Interesting. Wonder why Fornek fails to mention that. I mean, he does relate a quote from an NRCC spokesperson saying that "They (the ICIRR) are trying to play politics by mischaracterizing what the mail piece actually says." Maybe that would have been a nice place for Scott to insert some background on just what the piece does say, which, whether you agree with the "path to citizenship" proposal or not, hardly likens anyone or anything to a disease.

Now, many of us in the blogosphere love to play the “why-haven’t-you-repudiated-or-distanced-yourself-from-that” game. But, really, this is a whole different game. This is the ICIRR – with the assistance of a sloppy journalist and headline writer – essentially trying to bully Roskam into repudiating and distancing himself from a quote that they just invented.

As a fan of spin and manipulation, I say to ICIRR: Bravo!

As a Republican supporter of Roskam, I say to ICIRR and the Sun-Times: Are you freaking kidding me?!?

UPDATE: It was brought to my attention by “Bridget” that the mailers in question may be these here. I took a look. Still not even a remote reference to illegal immigrants as “a disease.” So, my point still stands.

4 comments:

Bill Baar 12:20 PM  

This attack on the mailers startegy is an odd one to me.

Whatever you think of Roskam, his stands on things are pretty clear.

His mailers attack Duckworth becauser her positoins far less clear.

It's a shame she doesn't reach out to Emanuel's plan. That is clear and has some proposals worth of debate.

The attack on the mailers, especially when it gets into the deconstruction of why Roskam's campaign chose a shocked women, etc.. really leaves me shrugging my shoulders.

Anonymous,  8:41 PM  

Great analysis, really.

Bridget 2:26 PM  

I have copies of the latest anti-immigrant mailer on my blog http://www.bridgetinthesixth.blogspot.com. I think that is the one they are addressing.

grand old partisan 2:42 PM  

Thanks. I just took a look at those mailers. Still no written or visual reference to illegal immigrants as "a disease." I see a paddywagon, which is a reference to illegal immigration being illegal. But that's about it.

My point stands, but correction noted.

  © Blogger template The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP