Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Who Will Follow Daley -- Someday?

Another Daley post especially since he has just won re-election this year with just about 73% of the vote.

Governing.com's blog has a post about who might suceed Daley. In this post there are a few oddball names that have popped up as Daley's successor...

There's no heir apparent -- familial or otherwise -- although Governing's executive editor and Chicago native Alan Ehrenhalt reminds me that it wasn't clear early on that the younger Daley was capable of taking up his father's political mantle, either. To many observers, the more likely candidate was his brother Bill, but he went into law and business, eventually serving as U.S. Secretary of Commerce in the Clinton administration.

We started kicking names around here on the 13th Floor, and our short list includes U.S. Congressman Luis Gutierrez (a former city alderman who declined to challenge Daley this year) and Chicago Library Commissioner Mary Dempsey (click here for more on her political/managerial savvy).

My colleague Zach Patton suggested Barack Obama might be interested in the job -- if he loses the Democratic presidential nomination to Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Or, I responded, perhaps Clinton -- if she loses to Obama. After all, she has stronger personal ties to Chicago (being born there and raised in suburban Park Ridge) than New York.
Hmm I don't know about all that. Especially Clinton, but what do you guys think will happen with Daley during his sixth term. Do you think he'll go for his seventh term? Do you think he will hang it up after 2011? Or perhaps who might make a great mayor in the future?

Read more...

A Way to Reduce Teen Car Deaths

Osewego does not have to re-invent the wheel.

Since 1998, Crystal Lake has figured out a way to induce teens to wear seat belts.

A combination of prizes and education has proven successful in increasing seat belt use from 65% to 95%.

As Crystal Lake’s Deputy Police Chief Dennis Harris told me,

We have seen almost a 50% increase in seat belt compliance. That 95% is significantly higher than the national average of between 72 and 75%.

Anecdotally, we do believe that the rate of teen accidents and the severity of those accidents has declined.
And the biggest inducement:
The grand prize is now a new car, but was a late model car previously.
There is nothing to stop this idea from spreading widely.

In fact, the program is now being introduced into four more high schools.

Maybe your town will have someone like Crystal Lake Pontiac-GMC Truck dealer Sam Oginni, who just opened another dealership in Fox Lake. He donates the car.

Maybe other towns will have a public-spirited car dealer or used car dealer.

There’s, of course, a federal tax benefit, but there is no reason the State of Illinois couldn’t offer one, too.

That’s a way legislators could get into the act.

And it would probably have more effect than the bills now being considered.

Could any of the legislation now being considered increase seat belt usage to 95%?

How about a 50% state tax credit for anyone who is willing to give away a car as a grand prize for a program similar to Crystal Lake’s at high schools all over Illinois?

If all 781 high schools in Illinois took part with one car per high school and the car costing about $14,000, the maximum cost would be $5.5 million. Of course, it could start with a pilot program of 71 high schools would only cost half a million.

If high schools were grouped so they can compete, $500,000 would go a long way.

The state already provides up to 50% state tax credit for businesses that help employees buy housing.

How about a tax credit to help keep teens alive?

How much could it cost at $5,000 to $10,000 per high school?

And Crystal Lake’s program, which used to be called Operation Cool, covers four high schools and is in the process of expanding to four more.

For whatever reason, the Illinois State Police will not relinquish the name “Operation Cool” to the successful non-for-profit group in Crystal Lake, so the program has been renamed “Operation Click.”

You can learn more about Operation Cool, now Operation Click, here at McHenry County Blog.

= = = = =
Crystal Lake Pontiac dealer Sam Oginni is seen with Operation Cool car winner Matt Frederick in the picture above. The other images are from Operation Cool's web site.

Read more...

A note to wingers: You're not helping us

I'm going to disappoint everyone here and not taunt anybody. Yes. That's right. I won't taunt anybody. I'm not going to taunt anybody because it was a great election on both sides. Brown and Walls fought hard and kept it close to a sliver of just 175,000 votes. They did far better than they, or anyone, ever expected. Your wildest dreams will come true if you just work hard and never give up.

I know, Zorn, 'Big' Ben Joravsky, and Ray Hanania are all out right now celebrating as we speak @ the bar in the mall parking lot in Orland Park. For today, they have sent a message: That they and all Chicagoans, will not tolerate the Mayor's skulduggery. Enjoy your victory, for I shall not taunt today.

Instead I want to talk about Paul Richardson and why he hates the unborn by correctly assessing that the stem cell research resistance is positively futile and ultimately pointless - unless of course your point is to further emotionally exhaust the ILGOP base in Illinois. I thought the post was nicely punctuated with this:


Drifting further to the ideological right on a social issue that runs counter the vast majority of Illinoisans, is against the national tide, and has a pragmatic “out” to appease most moderate conservatives.

The state GOP can't afford to stay on the wrong side of this one.


If you really look at the Illinois GOP and you say to yourself: Here's a vital, fully functional, and healthy political organization, than you can go ahead and talk about stem cell research and HPV vaccines all day and all night. I mean, all 8 of you can sit back and marvel at the efficiency of the party, gawk at just what a credible threat we are anywhere in the state ballot and just yuck it up over the fake issues.

And oh yes. Yes they are. One of the cringer comments was, unfortunately, the good Dr. Baar's, as I generally respect him - though I don't always agree with him. It was a cringer because I really didn't think he'd fall for this one:


It shouldn't and isn't a partisan issue. Look at Cong Lipinski's position. Some Democrats try and pretend it is and use it as a club against the GOP as a party dominated by the religious right.


Ok. Reverse it. Change the polarization. Actually, near as I can tell the stem cell research faux 'controversy' really only made it's mark into the national discussion 'round abouts Bush Era. Maybe I'm wrong here. Wait, I'm not. The real steam here wasn't generated until 2001. And, in the midst of the social conservative revitalization, it's not hard to read between the lines. Wingers, on either side of the aisle, aren't very bright. Tell our wingers that somehow, doing research and destroying a cell that could one day be human life, should generate the same kind of outrage that abortion does, make it a partisan issue with "See? More democrat baby killing", and your wingers will be out in force. It'll make great news for your infotainers. Get'em all angry and out to the voting booths. All that, to essentially maintain the Clinton setstatus quo.

And the issue has lost whatever steam it once had. I'm sure it's good for a quick gag every now and again, but it doesn't have the fire power it once had when early Bush era high was in full force. The worst thing is, it's the pro-lifers that should understand more than anybody why it's this is a loser issue. Pro-Lifers can be wingnuts (Note, I am not dismissing all pro-lifers as wingnuts. I am saying that there are pro-life wingnuts).

I feel like I have to teach them a lesson as to why they're losing on this one. What those wingnuts get is that their wingnuttery can be overlooked for the reason that they're seen mostly as just strident advocates for a victim who can't defend itself. See image:


The issue of stem cell research there is no tangible victim. You don't have anything to elicit people to your side. With no victim, you're just back to being ideological zealots, because you're defending this:


And the bad news is, your wingnuttery can't justified by victim advocacy. Just to make it worse, the other side has their victim to advocate for and it's infinitely more powerful than you're flow chart.



Face it: You're advocacy on this issue is a waste of time and you're hurting the party more than you already have. You've been tricked by the big man. The sooner you get over it and move beyond this and the other fake issues, the better off we are.



As a party we have neither the time, the resources, the emotional energy, nor the surplus of swing voters to play up to yet another national dead end issue on the local scale. It didn't work with Jimmy the Milkman in '06 and it isn't going to work in the future.

Read more...

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Daley Forecast: Continued Reign In Chicago

Mayor Daley, is actually featured in the Washington Post political blog The Fix. Take a look, he talks about his road to re-election and the candidacy of Sen. Obama. Even touches upon Obama's main rival for the Democratic nomination Sen. Hillary Clinton.

Read more...

Political Promises

Somehow this "Message of the Day" from McHenry County Blog seems appropriate the day of a Chicago election.

I found it on District 300 school board candidate John Ryan's web site, but have no idea where he found it.

The sign on the back of a California septic tank pumper truck says,

CAUTION.
Truck may be Transporting
Political Promises!

Read more...

Broken promises: How "jarheads" got shunted aside at the University of Illinois: A Marathon Pundit series

Now that the orange and blue smoke has faded from the Chief Illiniwek controversy at the University of Illinois--my alma mater--I have a story to tell that will that will make the administration of the state's flagship university wish for the good old days of defending the Chief.

Last Sunday I met with Robert van der Hooning at a Starbucks a few miles north of Morton Grove. He's a former Assistant Dean at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign College of Business. We spent a little more than an hour together. This post is the first of a series.

Van der Hooning noticed my post from last month that drew from an ABC 7 Chicago story, He contacted me via e-mail, and we agreed to meet. He’s passionate about University of Illinois and providing world class education to veterans.

After a successful career in the private sector, van der Hooning decided he wanted to give something back to the community. In early 2004, van der Hooning was hired to beef-up enrollment and academic standards for Urbana-Champaign’s money-losing operation in Chicago, including its Executive MBA ("EMBA") program. Two years later he was promoted to Assistant Dean and commended for recruiting good classes, launching a capstone course in China and strengthening the University’s position with the Chicago corporate community.

He was not new to academia, however. He's a former professor at Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management and McCormick School of Engineering, the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, and IMD International (Lausanne), the #2-ranked B-school in Europe. He also ran the International Bankers School on Wall Street and built a $50 million software company in artificial intelligence.

Van der Hooning was "reassigned" by the University last June--but he remained under contract to the school until two weeks ago.

When van der Hooning signed on at Illinois, there were about 23 students enrolled in an EMBA program which had been shrinking and losing money in previous years. Even Illinois’ MBA program in Champaign had shrunk from over 200 students to about 100 today and most of them are foreign students. Illinois’ other masters degree programs in Finance and Technology serve nearly 100% foreign students.

The most-sought after MBAs in the Chicago area attend the University of Chicago and Northwestern University. Both of those schools have thousands of MBA students enrolled in their programs every year. Thousands more attend Loyola, DePaul, the Illinois Institute of Technology, and even Notre Dame. The radio airwaves here are dominated by commercials from schools touting their MBA programs--why should Illinois' flagship public university not be part of that mix?

Heck, even DePaul University, a frequent topic of my scorn here because of the ongoing the Thomas Klocek case, has a larger MBA program than Illinois. They want it even larger, as they occasionally send me postcards urging me to enroll there.

The College of Business holds its classes on the fourth floor of the 200 S. Wacker building--across the street from the Sears Tower. I've been in the building at least a dozen times--the alumni association is on the second floor.

(Note: The University of Illinois at Chicago, located on the city's Near West Side, has an MBA program, too, run separately from the downtown Executive MBA program of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Yes, it's a little confusing.)

The fourth floor facilities of the Urbana-Champaign College of Business have three classrooms, one huge meeting room that seats 200, and several meeting rooms. Two classrooms can accommodate 110 students. Van der Hooning came up with an idea to reach that number by partnering with the Illinois Veteran's Grant program. 110 seats could easily be filled with Illinois veterans.

From the Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs web site:

The Illinois Veteran Grant (IVG) Program pays tuition and certain fees at all Illinois state-supported colleges, universities and community colleges for Illinois residents. An individual must:
· be a veteran; and
· reside in Illinois six months before entering the service; and
· have at least one full year of active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces which includes veterans who were assigned to active duty in a foreign country in a time of hostilities in that country, regardless of length of service
· return to Illinois within six months of discharge from the service.

With thousands of Illinoisans fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan--many of whom, sorry John Kerry, have bachelor's degrees and years of hands-on leadership experience, surely this would be a marriage made in heaven.

Van der Hooning's boss, Dean Avijit Ghosh (pronounced "gauche") liked the idea. So did David Ikenberry, van der Hooning's U of I business school mentor, and many others in the Provost and Chancellor’s office. David Ikenberry is the son of Stanley O. Ikenberry, former University of Illinois president. Van der Hooning even made sure the Board of Trustees approved of what he was doing.

So the idea was a go and a press release announcing the program was sent out on March 3. In it, the 110 military scholarships was the big news. No other University in the country had ever done something on this scale for veterans.

Here is an excerpt from that press release:

The IVG Program is funded by the Illinois Student Assistance Commission
and provides up to 120 units for tuition of eligible students. According to Robert van der Hooning, Assistant Dean and Director of the Executive MBA Program in Chicago, the College will make this a cost-free opportunity for qualified and eligible candidates by waiving tuition and program costs. The Executive MBA Program consists primarily of classes that meet every other weekend (Fridays/Saturdays) in Chicago and is designed exclusively for mid-to senior-level managers and professionals. The program is valued at $74,000 and includes tuition, a trip to China, mandatory fees, books, meals, and lodging.

A trip to China, too. Awesome.

That press release, van der Hooning told me at our Starbucks chat, "was approved by the public relations director and Dean Ghosh in writing." Ghosh wrote others at the University confirming the ambitious plan.

I want to reiterate this point: With financing coming from the Illinois Veteran's Grant, those 110 scholarships were meant to be for the 2006-2007 academic year. Van der Hooning told me, both in person and via e-mail, the understanding within the College of Business was also very clear--110 military scholarships were to be awarded for the current academic term. He showed me an internal document written by the top administrative dean at the College called "Guidelines for Implementation for Academic Year 2006-2007."

The Christian Science Monitor wrote an article about it. Then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld talked about the program -- this link comes from the University of Illinois College of Business web site. Within the article, there's a video link of Rumsfeld discussing the U of I MBA scholarships. Van der Hooning communicated with about 1,000 veterans in 2 months. Soldiers serving in Iraq and Afghanistan called him at his home.

The Daily Illini, while not the official newspaper of the university, is essentially the newspaper of record for the University of Illinois, and it wrote about the program here. US Rep Rahm Emanuel touted it here. And in a press release from Illinois Lieutenant Governor Patrick Quinn, the state's number two man "saluted the College of Business at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) for its commitment to award free tuition for its Executive MBA Program to Illinois service members who have served in the Global War on Terror" in his press release.

Lieutenant Governor Quinn also gave a speech about it on the Champaign campus in front of U of I’s President, Joe White, the Chancellor, Provost and several dignitaries in May. He received a loud round of applause when mentioning the 110 veteran scholarships.

Veterans who qualified for the program, van der Hooning told me, were accepted on a "quick admit" basis, which meant busy veterans and overseas soldiers were conditionally admitted based on grades, college degree, experience and the like pending receipt of those seemingly endless forms. Van der Hooning got the idea from his mentor, David Ikenberry, who used it to expedite admissions for foreign students in his Masters of Finance program in Champaign.

And a whole bunch of Illinois veterans were accepted--and received letters confirming that.

Then problems came up. Van der Hooning told me that Dean Ghosh wrote him two months after the launch of the scholarship program and demanded dramatic cut-backs in the scholarship program for financial reasons. Ghosh wrote van der Hooning an email and said he wanted "additional cash flow from the additional students so we need to think about how the veterans scholarship will affect our cash flow." Ghosh said he only wanted a class of 45-50 students total – military and non-military students – regardless of the promise made to deliver 110 scholarships just for vets. Van der Hooning said Ghosh was concerned about "underfunding by the Illinois Veteran's Grant, and he didn't want to have the College of Business left holding the bag."

Actually, IVG funding has been constant for several years, van der Hooning told me. As schools raise tuition prices, there is less IVG funding to go around, but this is something Ghosh acknowledged in writing to van der Hooning and others on the Urbana-Champaign campus.

And then there was the complaint that there were two many "jarheads" in the program. That phrase, which caught my eye in the ABC 7 Chicago report, bothered me. So I asked van der Hooning who said that to him.

"Actually three people, John," he told me. Professor David Ikenberry, Dean Ghosh, and Larry DeBrock, a professor and associate dean.

So the decision was made by the University of Illinois College of Business to rescind most of the scholarships by using petty bureaucratic bullying. In a meeting in Champaign on May 17, van der Hooning was ordered by Ghosh to reduce the number of military scholarships from 110 to 15-17. Worse, van der Hooning was told to find or create technical reasons to rescind admission to military candidates already admitted. He was told "too many jarheads will bias the class demographic."

To the best of my knowledge, "military" isn"t a demographic. But to the all-too-quick-to-classify-and-demography world of academia, I guess it is.

He refused to cooperate. He told them their plan was unethical, discriminatory and probably illegal. (Just one of those things is good enough for me.) He told them to consult the University’s attorney, Chancellor Richard Herman, President Joe White, the Chief Ethics Officer and others.

What happened next is shocking. Ghosh, DeBrock, Admissions Dean Sandy Frank and Ikenberry decided to take matters into their own hands. So they got a copy of the admissions database from the Executive MBA program, studied it, and in an ex post facto manner, put in new procedural deadlines for the completion of application materials in order to reduce the number of military veterans in the program.

They basically looked at military candidates' application data and came up with new deadlines that they knew military candidates hadn't met. Sort of like betting on a horse a couple days after the race...or moving the goalpoast before a field goal attempt.

They told van der Hooning to implement the new policy. They e-mailed him a letter to send military candidates and told him to sign it on official College letterhead. He refused. Eventually, Ghosh sent DeBrock to meet with van der Hooning. DeBrock came armed with a list of about 35 military veterans to rescind from the MBA program. Again, van der Hooning protested on grounds of ethics and discrimination, so DeBrock added one civilian to the list of rescinded candidates.

Most of those dozens of military men and women, "the jarheads," got tersely-worded letters rescinding their admissions statu--ironically right after Memorial Day weekend. The letter, which van der Hooning refused to sign, contained his electronic signature literally cut-and-pasted from a marketing postcard. Robert told me he refused to sign it. The letter stated that an applicant’s "quick admit" had been rescinded but they could still wait in line with a new admissions committee Ghosh formed that now included DeBrock and Ikenberry. What the letter didn’t say was that the class size had been capped at 60 but there were 85 people already admitted. Worse, van der Hooning was told to continue recruiting non-military students to the class at the same time the rescind letters went out to military students. DeBrock and Ikenberry told van der Hooning "you'll be a hero if you get this done."

The former "quick-admittees" were furious. They contacted an equally furious van der Hooning who had written a letter of protest to Ghosh citing concerns of ethics and discrimination. The veterans sent e-mails and letters to Lt. Governor Pat Quinn and Congressman Emanuel, who were not only upset, but like van der Hooning, felt their support had been misused by the university. They also wrote Joseph B. White, President of the University, and the University of Illinois Board of Trustees.

Robert told me he was contacted by UIC Chancellor Sylvia Manning’s office in early June on behalf of President White to investigate the problems associated with the military scholarship program. He asked for and received a promise of confidentiality--fearing for his job.

He gave Manning's investigator a 30-minute debriefing of the situation and was told that the matter needed to be escalated to President White. A few days later, President White's office called him and scheduled a phone conference. Robert waited for the call, but it never came, so he called President White's office and was told that Ghosh and President White had talked and the "matter would be handled internally by Ghosh." A few days later, Robert was "reassigned."

Representatives of Quinn and Emanuel, both Democrats I'd like to add, made their opinions known to Ghosh personally, and after two interventions, the "jar heads" who Ghosh rescinded were promised they could attend after all. Ghosh wrote on June 14, "... the College will not waiver from its commitments. Be assured each case where an applicant has received a notice of conditional admission, via email or by letter, will be honored by (the) College." It’s ironic that the "commitments" Ghosh spoke about were the ones he tried to break.

Despite assurances in Ghosh’s letter, van der Hooning was again pressured by DeBrock and Ikenberry to quietly discourage some of these same veterans from enrolling in the program. He was told to be a "team player" and keep recruiting more non-military students to the program while telling military candidates the program was full. There were about 100 military veterans waiting in line.

Ultimately, 37 veterans enrolled in the Executive MBA program.

But 37 is not 110. Tom Hardy, U of I’s top PR spokesperson, told Chuck Goudie of ABC 7 Chicago that the 110 scholarships were always meant to be spread over 3 years. However, all references to the military scholarship program have been dropped from the college’s web sites and program brochures.

Ironically, most of the graduate students in the College’s MBA, MS Finance and MS Technology programs in Champaign are foreign students outside the United States. Overseas students are highly coveted by US universities for the same reason, as I learned in covering the DePaul-Klocek story, that American Muslims are. They often pay cash for their tuition--so there's no cumbersome student loan paperwork for the schools to deal in order to satisfy government requirements. For religious reasons, many US Muslims eschew loans, believing that dealing with financial transactions that involving interest is against their faith.

But the University of Illinois is a state-funded institution. The Illinois vets who had the scholarships pulled from them are, like myself, Illinois taxpayers. These men and women were promised education benefits from the Illinois Veteran Grant program and GI Bill. The U of I is good enough for the international students, but not the jarheads, it seems.

But one of van der Hooning's military recruits would be a proud addition to any master's of business program. He's author and blogger Matthew Currier Burden, better known as BlackFive. His book is The Blog of War: Front-Line Dispatches from Soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Too many jarheads? I say, not enough.

During our discussion, van der Hooning told me his motivation in getting his story out now is "to do the right thing, to fulfill a promise the university made to these vets and bring attention to the problem of veterans' education." Since van der Hooning was "reassigned," he has been developing a business plan to provide education to returning veterans through partnerships with Illinois businesses, several other schools and benefit programs like the GI Bill and the Illinois Veteran Grant. He’s spent his own time and money to develop the idea.

As with all "B" schools, I'm sure there is a mandatory ethics course in the curriculum. Perhaps the administration of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign should take it.

Yes, he's suing his former employer. He feels he was wrongfully forced out of his job because he tried to get the university to honor its promise to those War on Terror veterans. He believes because he challenged Ghosh’s ethics and revealed the details to an investigator sent from President White that he was pushed out by the university. Incidentally, Ghosh led the search committee that nominated Joe White for President of U of I.

Incidentally, the Sarbanes-Oxely Act, something I for the most part oppose, protects whistleblowers. Surely Sarbanes-Oxely is required subject matter for all MBA programs, including the one at the University of Illinois. SOX only covers corporations. The State of Illinois has a whistleblower protection act in place, but I couldn't find much online about it, and besides, I'm not a lawyer.

Bad publicity is something the University of Illinois can weather--after all, the Chief Illiniwek controversy will die down, and the university will still be here. But being hit in the pocket book is something walled-off administrators understand much better.

John Mauck, Thomas Klocek's attorney, mentioned that DePaul wrongly pinned a "Scarlet R of racism" on him. Van der Hooning, probably has a Scarlet "T" for troublemaker attached to him. He wants to continue working in academia. But that's pretty hard to do with a scarlet letter next to your name.

He’s a single father with three daughters.

Meanwhile, the man who had a dream to build up the little MBA program across the street from America's tallest building just deposited his last U of I paycheck--he's officially unemployed, his final "reassigment."

Is there something missing from this post? Yep, there sure is. I e-mailed Tom Hardy, the U of I public relations office spokesman quoted in the ABC 7 Chicago story. He never replied to me. My e-mail to him was firm, but polite. If Hardy wants to get in touch with me--or for that matter if anyone from my alma mater wants to--the door is open.

To comment on this or any other Marathon Pundit post, please click here.

Read more...

Monday, February 26, 2007

Trial Lawyer Agenda Begins To Unfold In Statehouse: Here Are Two Bills That Should Be Defeated

The Illinois General Assembly got down to serious business this past week and the anti-business, anti-insurance and anti-medicine agenda of the personal injury trial lawyers began to take shape.

Two bills (of many expected) are on the agenda for the Senate Judiciary (Civil) Committee this week. They could be called Wednesday or held over until later but they will be considered and likely passed out of the Committee before the March 15 Senate committee deadline.

The first (SB 747) is sponsored by Sen. Don Harmon, a Democrat from Oak Park. Harmon frequently carries the personal injury trial lawyers' water and fights their battles. This bill, similar to one sponsored during the last General Assembly, has been dubbed the "plaintiffs' windfall bill." It would allow compensation to plaintiffs and their lawyers for amounts that were not actually lost.

For example, if a hospital bills a patient (the plaintiff) $6,000 for care and services, but agrees to accept $5,000 because of an agreement it might have with Blue Cross/Blue Shield or some other insurer, SB 747 would require that the defendant pay $6,000, the full amount originally billed, even though that amount was not paid (or lost) by the plaintiff. The legislation does not require that the plaintiff receiving this windfall pay the extra recovery to the provider of the medical service.

Instead, the plaintiff and his/her attorney reap the benefits of this added cost -- a cost above and beyond the actual loss to the plaintiff.

(Anyone who has ever received an "explanation of benefits" from his/her insurer understands what this means: The doctor/hospital bills a certain amount but because the doctor/hospital has a contract with a health care insurer, the actual amount paid is reduced. This legislation would require the defendant in litigation to pay the billed amount, not the actual amount.)
The second problem bill is (SB 1296), introduced by Sen. John Cullerton, a Democrat from Chicago and the chairman of the Senate Judiciary (Civil) Committee. Cullerton is usually fair and open and is likely to listen to arguments and public opinion. This bill is one that deserves argument and plenty of public opinion and pressure.

This bill would make sweeping changes in the personal injury and property damage litigation law. It would increase a defendant's liability and responsibility to pay under joint and several liability by changing the formula for determining apportionment. A defendant could/would be held liable much beyond his or her own fault. The defendant with "deep pockets" would be the plaintiffs' target, even if the degree of responsibility was minor.

*

Two years ago, Illinois legislators heard the call for reform from Illinois citizens and the legislators responded by enacting medical liability reform. This was done in the face of heavy odds against reform. A law was passed and the governor signed a liability reform bill into law.

That would not have happened without public (translation: voter) pressure. Legislators do respond to their constituents, especially when they sense that constituent unhappiness could translate into voter unhappiness.

These first two bills -- SB 747 and SB 1296 -- are certain to be only two of many that we will urge civil justice reform advocates to speak out on this year.

But it is important early in the legislative session to let legislators know that we -- their constituents and their employers -- expect them to be paying attention.

The first vote on SB 747 and SB 1296 will be in the Senate Judiciary Committee. The members of that committee are listed below.

Please click here to contact these legislators:

Senate Judiciary (Civil) Committee:
John J. Cullerton (D)
Kirk Dillard (R)
Don Harmon (D)
Dan Cronin (R)
William R. Haine (D)
Randall M. Hultgren (R)
Michael Noland (D)
Matt Murphy (R)
Ira I. Silverstein (D)
A. J. Wilhelmi (D)

To post or view comments, please visit Illinois Justice Blog.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Digg!

Read more...

HPV Vaccine & Circumcision-Relative Publicity

As I was reading the Chicago Tribune while waiting for my swim conference- bound son to finish a two-hour practice, I read an article on page 14 entitled,

AIDS risk lower than thought for circumcised
Maybe it got better play in the New York Times, where the story by Donald G. McNeil Jr.originated, but page 14 in the Tribune struck me as not good enough.

Especially when put into juxtaposition with the coverage given Merck’s “Gardisil” HPV inoculations.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which I have been calling the Centers for the Spread of Disease since about 1989, say that vaccinated will be protected against 70% of cervical cancers and 90% of genital warts.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, still somehow director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, is quoted in the story thusly,
If we had an AIDS vaccine that was performing as well as this, it would be the talk of the town.
What’s the news you probably haven’t read?
Circumcision reduces a man’s risk (of becoming HIV-infected) by as much as 65%
Seems like the Bible has some good advice quite early on.

More at McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Oh boy, the Chicago municipal elections are tomorrow...

As a blogger this is certainly my first city election and there were so many ways to keep track of it. I found grass roots blogs that really critique their respective aldermen. There were blogs run by newspapers such as Clout St by the Chicago Tribune and Clout City from the Chicago Reader that keep track of the city elections. There's even AlderTrack that keeps track of news in the various wards going into this election.

I really have a feeling that the election coming up is going to be good. I think some Aldermen are going to lose their jobs and yeah Daley is certainly going to have one more term as Mayor. Still this has been a cycle where there are plenty of stories to be told. And it's not the media who are telling the stories. Nope it's mostly everyday people.

BTW, I'm sure everyone here who are following the Chicago elections have favored wards they are tracking. The wards I'm watching the most in no exact order of importance are the 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 7th, 9th, 15th, 16th, 20th, 25th, 42nd, 45th, 46th, 49th, & 50th wards. Some of these wards are probably of no surprise to you.

The 20th contains an alderman who is tainted by bribery. The 15th ward is an open seat so there's some excitement there. The 42nd because of Natarus and his young opponent. The 50th has been reported here, that should be interesting. Oh yeah the 49th looking at the blogs from there nobody likes Joe Moore, but we'll see if this means that Ald. Moore will lose his seat. The 7th well it's just a barometer (my 2 cents) of whether Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. will be a force in the future. His wife Sandi Jackson is taking on the daughter and successor of the former 7th ward Alderman and current Cook County Commissioner Bill Beavers, Darcel Beavers.

Oh yeah why the 6th ward? Well I've noted on my blog how Ald. Fredrenna Lyle is one of my favorites on the city council. Unfortunately it seems, she is projected to face a runoff if not lose outright. One of her opponents, Karin Norington Reaves, has been endorsed by not only the Chicago Sun-Times also the Chicago Tribune. I could ask if an endorsement by any major newspaper will mean anything in some of these wards.

Finally, what are the issues in some of these campaigns. I've seen development a lot (either too much or lack of it) people complaining about the building of condos, a lack of affordable housing, a lack of buidling period (as is the case in the 3rd and 20th wards), and the lack of economic development. There's also issues of crime, this has been one issue in the 6th ward for instance. I'm sure there are other issues I am missing.

So I guess I'm going to open up the floor. What's going on in your neck of the woods? And be sure to vote tomorrow.

Read more...

CONTRIBUTIONS TO MAYOR DALEY’S CAMPAIGN COMING AT A FAST CLIP

MORE THAN $50,000-A-DAY COMING TO MAYOR’S CAMPAIGN

Cross posted from ICPR's blog, The Race is On:



Since the start of 2007, Mayor Richard M. Daley’s campaign has collected more than $3 million in contributions – a rate of more than $54,000 per day or $2,250 each hour.

In the first 56 days of 2007, the Daley reelection committee has received just about the same amount of money as it collected in the prior two years, according to the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform (ICPR) and the Sunshine Project.

Daley, who is seeking a fifth term, received $3,058,556 in campaign contributions between Jan. 1 and Feb. 25. In the 2005-2006 election cycle, his campaign committee reported $3,226,870.

Information about contributions to Daley and other candidates in Tuesday’s election are now available at www.ilcampaign.org.

The Sunshine Database has been updated with more than 36,000 individual contributions to the election campaigns of every candidate for citywide office, all 50 aldermen and their opponents, and the wealthiest political ward committees. The database has complete records for the 2005-2006 cycle. Large contributions in 2007 are being tracked and noted on the web site, and the complete documentation will be added after the election.

New information added to the web site on the eve of the city election includes Daley’s top 20 individual contributors from Jan. 1 through Feb. 25, 2007; the top 20 union and corporate contributions to the Daley campaign in the same time period; and top 20 contributors to aldermanic campaigns in 2007.

Judd Malkin, Chairman of JMB Realty, so far is the top 2007 individual contributor to any candidate. He has contributed $200,000 to the Daley campaign.

The political action committee controlled by the Illinois branch of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) is by far the biggest single contributor to any of the campaigns. Between Jan. 1 and Feb. 25, the SEIU Illinois Council PAC Fund contributed $860,000 to aldermanic campaigns. SEIU represents more than 165,000 Illinois workers in government, health care and building services. SEIU gave nearly $1.2 million to Illinois candidates in 2005-2006, the largest of all contributors in the 2006 campaigns.

Downloadable files of top donors to the Daley campaign and fundraising totals for aldermanic and citywide races as of 9 am the day before the election are available on ICPR's blog, The Race is On.

Read more...

Dead end issue for GOP

The stars are aligning for Illinois tax dollars to support embryonic stem cell research. The bill (SB1336), sponsored by Sen. Jeffrey Schoenberg (D-Evanston,) calls for $25 million to be dolled out and includes a provision banning human cloning. Last week the Senate, which had killed similar measures in the past, approved the bill with a comfortable 35-24 vote.

The House now takes the reigns and will likely send it to the Governor who will almost assuredly sign the legislation. Just last year Blagojevich skirted state restrictions by using his executive power to create the Illinois Regenerative Medicine Institute, which awarded $15 million in a variety of stem cell research grants.

All of this keeps the state in line with the current nationwide trend, starting with the always prophetic California:

California's stem cell agency on Friday doled out nearly $45 million in research grants to about 20 state universities and nonprofit research laboratories, far exceeding the federal government's spending on the controversial work….

California voters in 2004 passed Proposition 71 to create the institute and give it authority to borrow and spend $3 billion for the research….

Next month, another round of 25 grants worth about $80 million will go to established stem cell scientists.

Four other states have also skirted federal restrictions with stem cell research funding schemes of their own: Connecticut has a 10-year, $100 million initiative; Illinois spent $10 million last year; Maryland has approved a $15 million budget; and New Jersey has spent about $25 million in two years.


Our northwestern neighbor also tagged along last week:

A controversial bill easing restrictions on the research of embryonic stem cells obtained through cloning is headed to Gov. Chet Culver's desk after being approved in the Iowa House Thursday night….


Culver, a Democrat, argues Iowa's current law leaves the state at a competitive disadvantage, while Wisconsin, Illinois and Missouri moved ahead with research facilities. Culver has called for lawmakers to approve $12.5 million to create Iowa's Center for Regenerative Medicine at the University of Iowa.


This makes me wonder how some in the Illinois GOP, already in sinking circumstances, can afford to politically stonewall on the issue. Sen. Chris Lauzen epitomizes the rhetoric of those in opposition:

"Obviously we all want cures to diseases. The question is, what are willing to sacrifice to get them?" said Sen. Chris Lauzen, R-Aurora. "The unique identity of an individual human being disappears for eternity."

But his Republican colleague, Sen. Kirk Dillard who voted in favor of the legislation offers the pragmatic logic that conservatives can use as an out:

"They go into the public sewer system. I really believe my maker would want me to use these embryos to sustain and improve human life," he said.



As Dillard makes clear, in almost all cases the “individual human being” will be “lost for all eternity” with or without this legislation. A "No" vote will not change that. Most reasonable Illinois voters can make this distinction, leading to the very strong public opinion supporting the research.

Republican legislators in select areas may spark some local displeasure among the most faithful by supporting of this type of bill, but it certainly wouldn’t be the end all. Even then, I'd imagine that the political damage could be partially neutralized by appealing to the sympathetic stories of human suffering. Michael J. Fox can be persuasive.

But more important than individual legislators, further opposition to stem cell research politically damages the State Republican Party. No matter how it is spun, the party loses by staying the course. Nevermind the distinction between embyonic and adult stem cells. The public won't process the nuance, and the political damage will still be done.

No one knows how to right the sinking GOP ship in the state….

But it is clear what wont:

Drifting further to the ideological right on a social issue that runs counter the vast majority of Illinoisans, is against the national tide, and has a pragmatic “out” to appease most moderate conservatives.

The state GOP can't afford to stay on the wrong side of this one.

Read more...

Just when you thought the 46th ward couldn't get any stranger.

I've said it before: I don't have a dog in the 46th Ward fight. My girlfriend lives up there, so I'm in that area quite a bit. I am minus an opinion on the whole thing.

Now, that doesn't mean I can't watch it just for the purposes of watching it. I've always wanted to see how Netroots would function in Chicago on a localized race in a diverse ward. We're a town where things like that can work, after all, what we call 'The Machine' was effecitvely one of the more powerfull grassroots movements of all time. I've observed What the Helen, I've done some nice back and forth with them, and I participated in my own form of combat journalism, braving Broadway after dark, dodging the pools of vomit and the homeless. I am a true people's hero.

I kid.

Anyway, I was pretty sure that the 46th Ward race couldn't get any more odd. You've got a former anti-Daley 'independent' alderman (turned Daley toe liner) facing off against an openly gay social worker. There are rumors that Shiller's outfit pays homeless folks to do ward work for them - but even if those rumors aren't true - you've got the fact that she or her designees actively seek out the homeless to get them registered to vote. The homeless don't mind - a voter registration card is one step closer to getting a real ID.

Cappleman, who has been widly criticized for his debate skills, likened to being a 'republican' (whatever that means), and has generally failed to generate the kind of visible steam that I would expect to be easy given the sheer visibility of Uptown's problems.
It's been strange. But now it's just bizarre.

Jesus People USA (or JPUSA, pronounced 'Japoosa') is a 'church' which makes it's headquarters on Wilson Ave. I guess it's not a headquarters, so much as it's a commune where the more devout members make their home. It also provides a handfull of social services and about 2 floors of income based housing for the elderly.

For the good that they may do, they're still an oddball cloistered religious organization - and have the long tail of cult allegations to prove it. They were the subject of a 2001 Trib investigative report alledging psychological abuse and shifty financial dealings.

One of the group's more vocal members, a cat named Jon Trott, keeps a couple of blogs where he muses the usual defense of the indefensable that you would expect from this breed:


I will tell you here and now that doing so (calling JPUSA a cult) is essentially the same as calling a black person "n****."


What makes it weird is that he's apparently Shilling for Shiller.

Strange. Very strange. So we've got a left wing, anti-gay, communal living, Christian fundamentalist organization who's name couldn't be any more comical if it were "Hippys For Jesus", out on a limb making hay in a hot political race involving 2 left leaners trying to make their mark on what could only be described as ward with some mismanagement issues.

Maybe I'm becomming a little too cynical, but just what is the deal here? What interest could this kooky group have in picking Shiller? Heck, what interest could this group have in being involved in the political ongoings to begin with?

I mean sure, everybody has a voice. Everybody has a vote. But when somebody who's functioning as a 'spokesperson' for such a strange fusion of extreme Christianist thinking and at least 'cult like' behavior, is out there directly nodding a candidate, somebody has to ask the question.

Read more...

Sunday, February 25, 2007

Madigan's Plan to Stick It To Suburbanites

I don’t know why it took so long to figure out that House Speaker Mike Madigan has plans for suburban tollway motorists to finance his version of the Crosstown Expressway.

The scheme struck me Sunday night when I was reading Chicago Tribune transportation reporter John Hilkevitch’s article entitled,

New Crosstown project has key difference—tolls
Back in the 1970’s Glencoe Democratic Party State Representative Harold Katz passed a bill, which I was pleased to support, requiring that any new tollway pay its own way.

This law, of course, was repealed by DuPage County legislators when they wanted to build I-355.

So, toll tax payers on the Tri-State, the Northwest and the East-West Tollway have been forced to subsidize the old 355, as well as its extension into Will County.

Who cares that Northwest Tollway, Tri-State and DuPage portion users of the East-West motorists have paid for their road more than once?

Madigan obviously plans to use this Pate Philip technique to build the Crosstown.

Why not?

It’s free money, isn’t it?

And suburbanites won’t raise a stink.

There too busy earning money to continue paying tolls that should have been abolished decades ago.

Always more on McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Poop!

I generally don't have much love for muckrakers in my fair city. There's at least one I can get into, simply because Official Dan L Girlfriend (TM) lives in the horrible horrible ward, but for the most part letter-writers and committee-formers annoy me usually because they're yapping about nonsence.

Usually, I hear something like this:


WELL YESTERDAY I TOOK THE TRAIN AND THE TRAIN RAN SLOW. THE TRAIN WAS LIKE 10 MINUTES LATE AND LIKE I WASN'T ABLE TO GET TO NY UNTIL THERE WAS ONLY 30 MINUTES LEFT IN THEIR HALF PRICE MARTINI HOUR. DARN YOU CORRUPT DALEY. I'M CALLING THE ALDERMAN!!


But for the shock value, Peter Zelchenko may have a point

I think we should send Patrick McDonough over to the 43rd to investigate this. In addition to being a water department hero, certified plumber, ace corruption investigator, and having an engineering background - his expertise in these matters are legendary.


Sometimes I really, really can't help myself.

Read more...

Clock Ticking on 'Buck' Somerville's 2nd Stab at Keys to the 19th Ward





An Hispanic activist, Len Torres, from the City's 12th Ward wrote this comment on a previous ILLINOIZE ( posted by DanL) blog:

"I am voting for Mayor Daley. However, there is a machine in our neighborhoods it is not indigenous, it is not good, it is not part of a positive 19th ward machine like Hickey has and I wish we could have."

To hear Somerville talk you'd think this was not a nice neighborhood. Thanks Len! It's nice to hear that good folks beyond the 19th ward appreciate neighbors who care for one another. This is a great community of hard-working neighbors. John Somerville wants to Buck that trend. Make this more Hyde Park-like, where folks go to class, work downtown and lock themselves in their apartments.

Anguished mother -'You see Timmy and Clare Mr. Kilroy? They were playing in front of your apartment? -

Josh Kilroy ( Somerville Campaign Manager, Hyde Park resident and Obama basher) -'Hey, lady, they're not my Kids! I have a Ben The Commie column to read in the Chicago Reader; now, mind your kids and leave me alone!' Paradise.

Hmm. Seanbone Star has morphed in the last day's of John 'Buck' Somerville's second stab at control of the 19th Ward Aldermanic Chair in the City Council.

John Somerville, the friend of real estate barons north of the 'picket-wire' has had Duttonhead Lowry morph his appeal to the folks in the neighborhood. No longer the earnest young lawyer, Rance Stoddard Somerville. The guy whose sole claim to office is his willingness to drag movie projectors all over the neighborhood and grab credit for work already done by Beverly Area Planning Association ( BAPA), The Mount Greenwood, Park Foundation, The Maeve McNicholas Foundation, Alderman Ginger Rugai, State Rep. Kevin Joyce and State Sen. Ed Maloney is now Buck Somerville. The only thing that Dishonest John, the Bucker of Everything, has not taken credit for is the Information Super-Highway owned by Al Gore. He did however mention that he was 'The Man Who Broke the Bank at Monte Carlo' as well as the Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.

With the Clock ticking and hours fading as fast as a Somerville pledge of eternal loyalty - like the one he made to Tom Dart - Buck Somerville will Buck the old guard - Ancien Regime -Rance didn't do it for the folks, Buck Daley, Buck the Neighbors! Buck the Insiders! Buck the Voters who will cast their votes for Ginger Rugai!

Ride 'em, Buck! All the way to a third place finish!

Read more...

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Stem Cell Bill Too Controversial

Two instances in one week where citizen pressure made a difference in public policy formation! First the McHenry County Republican Cat Tax and now a stem-cell research vote.

Wow!

(Sorry for the college verbiage, but I have taught state and local government at Rockford and Harper Colleges in years past and sometimes lapse into "classroom speak.")

If you even wonder whether McHenry County’s Republican State Senator Pam Althoff will listen to her constituents, take a look at what is under the Senator’s picture on the front page of today’s Northwest Herald.

It says, “Program is too controversial.”

The fight against the bill, which would legitimize the illegitimate Executive Order of Governor Rod Blagojevich to spend $10 million on stem cell research, including on human embryos, was hotly opposed by pro-life groups.

McHenry County’s Right-to-Life lady, Irene Napier, was sending out emails encouraging people to contact Senator Althoff.

Apparently enough did to convince Senator Althoff not to offend a large proportion of her Republican primary voters.

Althoff is up for re-election next year.

Althoff told the NW Herald reporter Brenda Schory that she opposed the bill for two reasons:

* it would cost money the state did not have and
* the state should not be spending money on a program that so many of her constituents oppose

Althoff told the NW Herald that she supported

Senate Bill 19 sponsored by State Sen. William Haine (conservative Democrat from the Metro East area), which would establish a statewide network of umbilical cord banks and supports umbilical cord stem-cell research.

“To date, there are absolutely no successful studies that have shown embryonic stem-cell research will cure or help any of the diseases frequently referenced—like juvenile diabetes or epilepsy,” Althoff said.
SB 4, the bill Althoff voted against, passed the senate 35-23, with 30 needed for passage.

There are more stories on McHenry County Blog this weekend, as usual.

Read more...

Where's the Machine?

There's something else I wanted to say about Ben Joravasky's Reader piece, "Daley is a Wife Beater, and I his spouse". Having already had my fill of chuckles over the whole thing - making a list of other such folks you could compare him to for similar over the topness to show just how whacked out of their mind this crowd is. I think I settled on Nero and Mao being the funniest. That's not the only chuckles to be had as you're reading through the obligatory litany punching bag issues, the bold shocking revelation that Chicago likes winners, followed by an ideological teary eyed plea for mercy, "A vote for the opposition—whoever the opposition is—is a vote of defiance against a system that needs to be changed". Of course as we all know, even if Red Line Chicago turns out in force to attempt to even make a statement, the election will still be a complete and thorough butt kicking.


I’ve had people tell me that as much as they despise the mayor’s policies they’re afraid to vote against him because chaos will ensue if he loses. I remember machine aldermen using that line as far back as 1979, when Jane Byrne was running against Mayor Michael Bilandic. To hear them talk, you’d have thought the city would fall apart—the Sears Tower would jump in the lake, as Mike Royko satirically put it four years later, when it was Harold Washington running against the machine and chaos again was predicted. Well, guess what: under Byrne and Washington, and Eugene Sawyer for that matter, city workers picked up the garbage, cleared the snow, salted the streets. The trains and buses ran—a hell of a lot better than they run today.


The implied premise is that The Machine is still alive in Chicago. That, Cermak's largely organic and somewhat popularist method of government from the 1930's still has the gears running today as it did during King Richard I's rule. That's a notion that I've never been certain of.

I believe that there are still some good ol' fashioned Machine based roots somewhere in the Daley II apparatus. I believe that there still is a good ol' boy network of political favoritism. I'm sure that there are still plenty of old mechanizations that remain in city government. I do not believe that when you sum up whatever is left of The Machine you still have any system that resembles Cermak's Machine which if you're tracing lineage, to say that Daley I was the result of the Cermak Machine, and Daley II is the result of Daley I you would have to find some similarities.

You may have something else. Maybe over the last 50 years the Machine has evolved. Or maybe the myth of the Machine perpetuates while the reality of it has been in a true decline since 83. Perhaps the reason why the Red Line Liberals have had so much difficulty defeating the Machine is because it no longer exists. It's possible that what's left of the Machine's architecture is woven so deeply into city government that it is not something that can be realized and rooted out by any increase in Aldermanic spine or reform Mayors.

Read more...

Daily Southtown: Hospital police disbanded

After years of vacillating about it, the Cook County Board decided to disband the Stroger Hospital police force after a quick debate.

As debate on the county budget wound down early Friday, Commissioner Roberto Maldonado (D-Chicago), a long-time critic of the agency, pushed through a budget amendment disbanding the force by September and replacing it with a contracted security firm.

The measure was approved on a 9-to-7 vote. Commissioner Pete Silvestri (R-Elmwood Park) abstained.
Cook County will contract it out instead. That'll be a contract to watch.

update: I don't follow the South Burbs that much (Kane County has its own idiot recordings) but you don't want to miss their story today 'Humbugging and scheming' ,
The chairman of Markham's Police and Fire Commission offers to help a female officer cheat a police test, discusses a plot to fire her, suggests her career is being held back because she won't sleep with the mayor, and boasts that corrupt "humbugging and scheming" is his "hobby" in taped conversations.
Material here worthy of a tragic-comedy in the right writers hands.

Also, Check Daley has to talk in police torture case which is way too late for Bill Dock Walls to do much with against the mayor in the election.

Read more...

Friday, February 23, 2007

Let's All Talk

Just found out that the House is going to meet as a Committee of the Whole next Tuesday at 1p.m., a day earlier than session was set for next week. The purpose of the committee hearing is to discuss the electric rate issue that has set people into somewhat of a frenzy, especially downstate.

While I fully sympathize with my downstate colleagues about the need to address the concerns of their constituents, it sure would be nice if we were able to get the same attention paid to the property tax issue that is ravaging many of the families in Cook County.

On a tangentially related note, Tuesday's hearing is going to pose a logistic issue for many House members. Next Tuesday is the municipal election, and there are a number of people that want/need to tend to local battles back home.

To read or post comments, visit Open House

Read more...

Inappropriate Letter to the Editor

I read a comment that Cary Grade School member Chris Jenner made about his letter to the editor of the Northwest Herald being edited and was so amused, I thought I would share it with you.

Use the link above to read what the NW Herald published. Here is the Jenner's original letter:

To the Editor:

State Rep. Mary Flowers (C-31st) recently introduced HB382, which would make it state law that school children wash their hands before eating. I'm not anti-hygiene, but where does government nannying stop?

In 2005, Illinois passed a law (PA 093-0946) requiring K/2nd/6th graders to have dental exams. It was sponsored by State Rep. David Miller (C-29th), who by coincidence is a dentist and president of the Illinois State Dental Society's Political Action Committee.

Gee, I wonder if Rep. Flowers owns stock in an antiseptic soap supplier.

It's clear you parents are incapable of electing ethical officials who understand the concept of limited government. Are you also completely incapable of raising your children without government telling you what to do every step of the way?

Why stop with washing hands? I call on our legislators to introduce the Clean Posterior Act of 2007, requiring all Illinoisans to wipe in a manner consistent with national standards.
The NW Herald didn't like the last paragraph.

It's so funny it belongs in an editorial cartoon.

I don't know Representative Miller, but I do know Mary Flowers and I would be astounded if she had any conflict of interest.

I agree that it looks pretty bad to have a dentist sponsoring a bill to get his profession more business.

And I think Jenner's parting shot about legislators who aspire to the role of nanny is hilarious.

Someone who would introduce such a bill would obviously be an ally of the McHenry County Republican Cat Tax Collectors, where McHenry County Blog even gets a front page hat tip for leading the fight agaist the Cat Tax.

Read more...

$16M for Contested Chicago Council Races

Cross posted from ICPR's blog, The Race is On:

Candidates for contested seats on the Chicago City Council have raised at least $16 million for their 2007 election campaigns, and only a handful of challengers have been able to match the fundraising success of the incumbent aldermen, according to an analysis by the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform (ICPR).

Fundraising totals vary wildly from one candidate to another. One candidate reports a six-figure total, but others have raised just a few thousand dollars. Nine candidates are unopposed and are not included in these figures.

14th Ward Ald. Ed Burke once again is the fundraising king of the City Council. Burke, a long time council veteran, reported more than $5.8 million in contributions. His opponent, his first in years, has yet to form a fundraising committee. By comparison all 12 candidates running for an open seat in the 15th Ward have a combined total of less than $250,000.

Citywide candidates report $8 million, though incumbent Mayor Richard M Daley holds the lion’s share of those funds: $7.1 million, while all other citywide candidates, for all three citywide offices, combine for $850K.

Among the more interesting Aldermanic campaigns:

* In the 2nd Ward, three candidates report raising over $100K, with a fourth close behind. From a fundraising perspective, this race appears to have the most well-funded candidates.

* In the 7th Ward, appointed Ald. Darcel Beavers and opponent Sandi Jackson have both raised more than $100K;Jackson reports the most, at $227K, while Beavers shows $136K. No other candidate reported over $10K in funds for next Tuesday’s election.

* In the 12th Ward, incumbent Ald. George Cardenas reports $149K, giving him a slight financial lead over challenger Carina Sanchez, at $129K. Only one of the other four candidates, Jesus Salazar, reports raising over $10K; Salazar stands at $12K.

* In the open 15th Ward, Toni Foulkes reports $196K; all 11 other candidates combine for about $50K.

* In the 19th Ward, incumbent Ald. Ginger Rugai shows $142K, more than both challengers combined. Repeat challenger John Summerville shows $58K, while newcomer Tim Sheehan shows $26K

* In the 20th Ward, indicted incumbent Arenda Troutman shows just $33K for Tuesday’s election. She still holds a strong fundraising lead over both challengers, one of whom, Willie Cochran, shows $17K and the other of whom, Edward Chaney, has failed to file timely campaign disclosure reports.

* In the 21st Ward, Leroy Jones reports $206K in receipts, $200K in recent money. He's facing incumbent Howard Brookins, who reports $50K in receipts; two other challengers, Sylvia Jones and Dwayne Belle, have yet to form fundraising committees.

* In the 25th Ward, Ald. Danny Solis shows $290K, most of which was raised since January 1. Challenger Juan Soliz shows $70K, nearly all of which came in since January 1, while Martha Padilla reports $53K. Three other candidates combine for another $70K.

* In the 42nd Ward, challenger Brendan Reilly reports$335K for the race; more than most incumbents. The incumbent he is facing, though, Ald. Burton Natarus, reports more than twice as much, at $684K.

* In the 43rd Ward, incumbent Vi Daley holds a strong fundraising edge, at $315K, but two opponents, Michelle Smith and Tim Egan, have raised over $100K. Of the other two candidates, one, Rachel Goodstein, shows $1K, while Peter Zelchenko hasn’t filed timely disclosure reports.

* In the 50th Ward, Ald. Bernie Stone and challenger Naisy Dolar both show $130K available, while Greg Brewer shows $91K. A fourth candidate, Salman Aftab, reports $15K.

Figures for all races are available from ICPR's blog. Totals are based on disclosure reports filed with the State Board of Elections, including cash on hand on December 31, 2006 and reported funds raised since then as of 9AM on Friday, February 23.

Read more...

Illinois Same Sex Marriage Bill: "Because it is the right thing to do"

And I think it's awesome news. Greg Harris, to my knowledge the only openly gay state legislator, is responsible for HB1615, "Religious Freedom and Marriage Fairness Act", brought out yesterday. You can read the synopsis at the link above. It's fairly basic it would seem. Some of the highlights:



Makes legislative findings: same-sex couples are denied equal access to civil marriage benefits; the current marriage law is discriminatory and harms same-sex couples; and there is no compelling interest or rational basis to deny same-sex couples those benefits. Provides that the Act does not interfere with any religious beliefs about marriage..

* - Bold - We found that out yesterday, didn't we?

Additional nuts and bolts:

Provides that benefits apply equally to same-sex marriages in these areas: causes of actions related to spousal status, for wrongful death, emotional distress, and loss of consortium; adoption; family leave; group insurance for State and municipal employees; accident and health insurance protections tied to former spouses and dependents; and taxes and tax deductions based on marital status.

rovides that nothing in the Act should be construed to interfere or regulate any religious practice concerning marriage and no religion is required to solemnize a marriage to which it objects.

Provides that a marriage is between 2 persons (rather than, a man and a woman) licensed, solemnized, and registered under the Act. Effective immediately.


Obviously, I have significant doubts about whether this bill will pass but it's a good, fair, honest start. Read more general spots at Chicago Pride and 247Gay. For other bloggers talking, check Good As You. To see counterfeit "Christians" question the bill with things obviously addressed in the bill check AFT, NOW COMPLETE WITH FINANCIAL GROVELING!!!

This comes as the exclamation point to a Day of Defeat for people of the glorious Republic of Wingnutistan who saw their beloved Protect Marriage Illinois organization (Spin off from Illinois Family Institute, Concerned Women For America, "Porno" Peter Labarbera's Americans For Truth and any other organization that those 8 people are presidents or policy directors in) got themselves sent packing by the Supreme Court
on their challenge related to their previous attempt to get a anti-SSM referendum after they were shown to have doctored the necessary petition with "tens of thousands" of questionable signatures.


Since commentary on such things tends to get heated, out of respect to all comments may be made at my joint where I don't moderate anything.

Read more...

Strogers Budget Victory and Cook County's GOP triangulators par excellence

Stories today in the Trib, and Sun Times. Trib writes,

But late Thursday, when it become obvious that Stroger had the votes he needed, the Claypool camp called their proposal for a vote doomed to defeat. That gave each commissioner the chance to explain their position on the budget in front of a standing-room-only crowd that included sheriff's deputies, nurses and other county workers.

Claypool and commissioners Roberto Maldonado (D-Chicago), Tony Peraica (R-Riverside) and Timothy Schneider (R-Bartlett) voted against Stroger's budget.
And the Sun Times tells us those who lended Stroger a hand here,
Though a formal vote by the County Board had not been cast by 12:30 a.m., it appeared Stroger had locked up 10 of the 17 votes necessary, including winning the support of Republicans Peter Silvestri, Gregg Goslin and Liz Gorman, along with surprise support from Mike Quigley.
Makes you wonder about the GOP in Cook County that they can't unite around fellow Republican Peraica allied with a Progressive Dem like Claypool. Silvestri, Goslin, and Gorman all candidates for the Carl Davidson triangulator par excellence award.

xp Bill Baar's West Side

Read more...

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Big-box shy Chicago facing "food desert"

For the past year or so, Chicago Alderman Joe Moore has been leading the charge to keep big-box retailers such as Wal-Mart and Target out of the city. The Chicago City Council passed a bill mandating "living wages" for big-box employees--but the bill was vetoed by Mayor Richard M/ Daley.

Organized labor has a hit-list of alderman it wants to see defeated--because they voted against the "living wage" bill--later this month the first round of Chicago municipal elections take place.

Here's some irony: Dominick's is closing more than dozen Chicago stores--Dominick's is a union operation. The doomed stores are shutting down because they aren't profitable.

From ABC 7 Chicago:

The planned closing of more than a dozen Chicago Dominick's grocery stores will create what one researcher calls a "food desert" in some neighborhoods.

More...
Gallagher Research found the move would leave 75 city blocks and more than 18,000 residents with little access to full-service grocery stores. The research also indicates closing grocery stores may have a negative health impact on women and children.

"You have to have access to healthy food to choose. Sometimes we tend to preach eat those five vegetables a day where in some neighborhoods you can't find five vegetables," said Mari Gallagher, urban research consultant.

The study calls on public officials to create better tax incentives so more grocery stores will open in underserved neighborhoods.

Wal-Mart and Target's largest stores sell groceries, so having more of these big-boxes in Chicago is a natural fit--unionized staff or not.

The big-boxes have acquired a reputation for driving out other retailers. But these closings can't be blamed on the big-boxes; there is just one Wal-Mart in Chicago, and only a few Target stores.

To vote in the Pajamas Media presidential straw poll or to comment on this post, please visit Marathon Pundit.

Read more...

Sen Matt Murphy's Blog

He just started and his third post has 68 comments already.

Read more...

Confession: I am Not a Platform Republican

A friend told me that Ash Wednesday services were rather uncomfortable this year. The priest was dogmatic and on a tirade, demanding that everyone behave just like 50 years ago or don't bother at all. My friend was expecting the priest to tell them all, "If you're not a Platform Catholic, you can just get out." I started howling with laughter.

The term, Platform Republican, is the latest by which some conservatives identify themselves. The problem is that platforms don't create Republicans; Republicans create platforms. A platform is not a dicta telling Republicans what to think; it is a quadrennial effort by Republicans to tell the public in general terms what they think. (Of course, the same device is used by almost all parties, major and minor. For the purpose of this article I'm only concerned with Republican platforms).

When drafting a platform, usually not even all members of the drafting committee agree with every tenet of the final product. Are they all heretics? And if the platform they draft is, in any particular, different from the platform it replaced, aren't they heretics for not having given fealty to the previous platform? And which platform are we supposed to worship, the state or the national one? In areas in which the two platforms are not in conformity are we in schism?
When the old Illinois Republican platform approved of abortion, but merely opposed taxpayer funding of it, was I obliged to agree or get out? If the next platform reverts back to the same language I might not cease to be a Republican, but I sure won't cease to be pro-life. If the next platform adopts some moderate, or even leftist, clauses, will the people who style themselves 'Platform Republicans' suddenly become born-again moderates?

Of course these are absurd questions - but only because the term, Platform Republican, is based on an absurd premise. Each Republican will continue to think for himself and try to elevate some of that thinking into successive versions of the platform, which attempt to portray contemporaneous Republican thinking, not command it.

I AM a Platform Catholic, but am only a conservative Republican, which I shall remain whatever any current or future version of the platform has to say on the matter. So if you are not a Platform Republican, don't get too exorcised over it. Neither am I. And the punishment, much as some elements might prefer otherwise, is not excommunication.

Cross Posted at Illinois Review

Read more...

Why so quiet on Illiana?

I'm curious. The most recent incarnation of Crosstown has generated some some talk, there's a little discussion around about the improvements of 190 into O'hare but I haven't seen a lot of commentary coming from Illinois about the Illiana expressway. That wouldn't exactly cause me to raise an eye brow, if it weren't an absolute firestorm on the other side of the fence.

Maybe, it's because we folks from Illinois undoubtedly benefit from it, or maybe it's because we've got enough road stuff on our plate with 355 and the 53 North extension idea.

So, what's the take?

Read more...

Push to make every voter equal and relevant to picking the president in Illinois and Missouri

From today's St. Louis Post-Dispatch, a good article on the National Popular Vote -- a state-based initiative to cast states' electoral votes not for the winner of each statewide popular vote but instead for the winner of the national popular vote.


State Rep. Tom Holbrook, D-Belleville, who sponsored a popular-vote bill in Illinois last year, sees the issue as one of fairness.

"It's one man, one vote," Holbrook said. "You can muddy the water all you want. If you think every voter is equal, then you support this."

....

Illinois state [Sen.] Kirk Dillard, R-Hinsdale, is among those who support a popular-vote plan.

"From my standpoint as a state legislator, regardless of party affiliation, it's a disservice to Illinois to never see the Democratic or Republican candidate come through our state, and we don't get the benefits of their advertisements," Dillard said.
The bills in Illinois are SB 78 and HB 858. SB 78 is sponsored by Senator Jacqueline Collins and has 9 co-sponsors while HB 858 is sponsored by Representative Bob Molaro and has 26 co-sponsors (as of this morning).

To my mind, the dumbest thing about the status quo is that about 1/4 of the nation's voters participate in a vigorous presidential campaign while the rest of us do not. Remember October of 2004? If you wanted to help elect John Kerry or George Bush, you had to road trip. From the Chicago area, thousands of people drove to Wisconsin. In other parts of Illinois, people poured into Missouri and Iowa. That is patently absurd.

As Representative Holbrook said, if we want Illinois voters to be equally relevant to picking the president, then we need a national popular vote. Those who oppose a national popular vote are essentially supporting the status quo -- and that means, Illinois is completely ignored.

There are a few interesting angles to this debate I'd like to mention.

Some have argued that if we held a national popular vote, the cities would overwhelm the rest of the nation, and candidates would simply campaign in New York, LA, Chicago and Houston and then take over. Well, let's do the math.

There are 300 million people in the United States today.

How many people live in the biggest cities?

First, take a guess.

Would you say something like 40%? 35%?

By the way some people talk about the city vote dominating elections (particularly state legislators in other states, not Illinois), I'd assume those people would make those guesses.

Well, here are the population numbers of the biggest cities:

New York 8.1 million
Los Angeles 3.8 million
Chicago 2.8 million
Houston 2.0 million
Philadelphia 1.5 million

That's a total of 18.2 million people.

About 6 percent.

Not a tsunami of voters to overwhelm the nation.

Even if you take the top 50 cities by population (stopping at Arlington, Texas with 362,000 people), combined they have 45.9 million people or only 15.2 percent of the total population.

Good to keep in mind.

The second interesting point is what the Founders would think about this.

Well, lots of the Founders wanted a national popular vote. In fact, at the convention in Philadelphia, proposals to implement a national popular vote were debated and narrowly lost (6-5 in one vote, because delegates voted by state). The main reason why delegates didn't create a national popular vote is because in 1787, having a national census, much less reporting the results of a national election, was administratively impossible.

The other factor was that the slave states didn't want any elections at all, since they relied on their slaves to count as 3/5 of a person for apportionment purposes, and they had far fewer voters (white male landowners) than the free states. The Electoral College, based on Congressional apportionment, gave the slave states a lot more clout than their population entitled them to.

So, many of the Founders, particularly James Madison (known as the Father of the Constitution), James Wilson, Rufus King and Governor Morris (who wrote the final draft of the Constitution), supported a national popular vote from the start and would love to know that there's an effort to finally implement their vision.

Further, none of the Founders ever debated the Electoral College as currently practiced: a non-deliberative body generated from elections that disenfranchise 2/3 or 3/4 of the nation's voters from meaningful participation. Remember, the Founders thought that the Electoral College would actually meet and consider who would make the best President. That never happened.

So, Illinois is leading a push to make every voter equal and finally implement what more than 70% of all Americans consistently say they want in polls: a national popular vote for our president.

Full disclosure: I lobby for the National Popular Vote campaign in Illinois.

Read more...

Dubious coalition killed a proud Chief

Robert Novak's latest column a must read.

The accusation that Illinois and other schools degrade Native Americans is absurd. These schools picked Indian symbols in admiration of their valor, ferociousness and indomitable spirit in the face of overwhelming odds. Native Americans were honored in naming states. Illinois is Algonquin for "tribe of superior men." Indiana means the "land of the Indians."

The NCAA originally demanded that the university not only dump the Chief but also drop the Fighting Illini nickname. Would Brand next demand that the states of Illinois and Indiana change their names (sticky for the NCAA, headquartered in Indianapolis)? The NCAA backed away from its ban on the Fighting Illini.

Read more...

Tullimonstrum gregarium for U of I Mascot

Yesterday Rich asked for a new mascot for U of I. Let me offer Illinois's State Fossil: The Tully Monster (Tullimonstrum gregarium)

The state fossil of Illinois is an enigmatic, wormlike creature called the Tully Monster (Tullimonstrum gregarium). It was a predatory creature that inhabited the lowland swamps that covered the state during the Pennsylvanian Period, around 300 million years ago. This member of the world-famous Mazon Creek fauna still presents science with a mystery regarding its relationships to any modern creatures.
[***]
The first Tully Monster was discovered by amateur collector Francis Tully in 1958. He took the strange creature to the Field Museum, where none of the staff could identify it. Curator Eugene Richardson gave it a proper scientific name in 1966, dubbing it Tullimonstrum gregarium, meaning "Tully's common monster."

Illinois State Geological Survey paleontologist Donald Mikulic lobbied the State Legislature for designation of the Tully Monster as the state fossil, and a bill to this effect was passed in 1989.
The pictures in the link aren't very good. You need to visit the Field Museum for a better idea. Lots of teeth so I think a good artist could come up with something fearsome.

Read more...

Jesse Jackson Jr to Todd Stroger: there are consequences to a vote...

From the Sun Times: Todd's trash talk

On the eve of his biggest day as Cook County Board president, Todd Stroger took to name-calling of elected officials he says have whined too much about having to cut their budgets.

State's Attorney Richard Devine and Sheriff Tom Dart are "prima donnas" who have complained about cuts on "just about every talk show," Stroger said Wednesday.

Stroger's comments came one day after he called Devine "the biggest pain in the ass I have ever met in public life" in an interview with the Daily Southtown editorial board.
Yesterday's Sun Times wrote: Stroger, board near compromise
A compromise is in the works between Cook County Board President Todd Stroger and the commissioners who have just seven days left to pass a $3 billion budget.
The Trib's Editorial sends a message to the GOP board members:
For the five Republicans in particular, this is a gut check: If they exploit these final hours of budget negotiations to savage the bureaucracy, they can boast to constituents of playing a key role in starting the lengthy process of county reform.

If, on the other hand, the Republicans don't insist on wringing hundreds of administrative jobs out of the 2007 budget, they'll spend the rest of their terms battling GOP challengers who portray them as patsies for Cook County's Democratic bosses.
And lays out the questions:
As of Tuesday night, the county budget was a moving target, with many key issues unresolved. Among them:

-Will the county keep all of its health clinics open, including those with very few patients? For the sake of efficiency, it should not.

-Will someone have the common sense to tell county officials they'll have to survive for one lousy year without buying any new vehicles? We can only hope.

-Is it time to start asking if the county can continue to operate three costly hospitals with low occupancy rates? Yes, it is.

-And will Republicans on the County Board unite with reform Democrats to stop protecting the vast army of paper pushers who need to be fired? That's the key to the future of Cook County government.
From the Daily South Town's story, (Note the lower left side of the page. The South Town has links to audio of Stroger.)
The board is scheduled to vote Thursday on the budget. Stroger said Devine is trying to make him appear soft on crime as part of a strategy to lure commissioners to his side of the debate.

"I think the state's attorney is really trying to put the fear on people that criminals won't be prosecuted," Stroger said. "I don't mind saying that because he's been lambasting me like I'm trying to put criminals on the street.

"He's been working me over like a punching bag."

Stroger also said, apparently without irony, that when Devine "gets in the press, he talks about me in a manner that is not befitting a public official."

The two officials disagree over just how many people are cut where in Stroger's proposal. Stroger said the only prosecutors trimmed in his budget proposal were 52 vacant positions.

But Devine laid off 43 prosecutors last week, saying it was required by Stroger's budget.
Finally, Jesse Jackson Jr. teams up Forrest Claypool,
U.S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. stepped into the Cook County budget mess Wednesday, threatening county commissioners in his congressional district with "political consequences" if they don't oppose board President Todd Stroger's spending plan.

In a joint news conference with Stroger's loudest critic, Commissioner Forrest Claypool (D-Chicago), Jackson (D-2nd), of Chicago, said the proposed cuts to health care and the sheriff's department in Stroger's budget were not acceptable.

"These are not negotiable items, period," Jackson said. "The county board faces a choice, and it should be an easy choice."

[***]

"Let me be clear, we are watching this vote ... and there are consequences to this vote," Jackson said. "Real political consequences."
Sounds a little late to me. We're dealing with real sad political consequences of the last election. This is no surprize. The only surprize is more people haven't been booing more at more Illinois Politicians.

Read more...

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

GOP Senate Race Reality Check

There's a lot of grousing that Republicans don't yet have any clear candidates for the nomination for U.S. Senate to take on incumbent Democrat Dick Durbin next year. But there are some institutional realities to this race that have to be taken into account. It is, by no means, a worthless nomination. But it is the political equivalent of venture capital - a high-risk opportunity that offers a big return with ultimate success, but long odds against achieving that success. There are limitations on who can take on that type of risk.

First the problems. Durbin is a high-ranking member of Democratic leadership in the senate. He will start with access to all the resources he needs. He is a Democratic incumbent in a blue state. He is identified as an outspoken opponent of the war; a war that, whatever its merits, is currently both at the top of peoples minds and very unpopular.

If nothing significant changes in the political landscape, any serious GOP candidate would have to largely self-fund. The State Republican Party is coming off a devastating cycle. That dampens the ability of the state party to raise money for the next cycle. While it can't give directly to a federal candidate anyway, it puts serious hurdles in the way of it being of serious help in offering support services in improving the climate or helping in direct fundraising appeals.

The Washington Republican establishment (regular party apparatchiks, vendors, and conservative organizations) regards Illinois as a lost cause. The terms I hear most frequently to describe it are, 'hopeless, sinkhole and career-eater.' Sometimes, when a campaign looks as if it must run on a shoestring, ideological leaders will counter that by launching an intense, focused grass-roots effort to take up the slack. But the conservative movement in Illinois is in at least as much disrepute with national conservative leaders as the regular party is with national party leaders.

To give the short version of how we got to this pass, when the Reagan Revolution swept Republican politics throughout the nation, it largely bypassed Illinois because of the then-successful center-left Republican politics of former Governors Jim Thompson and Jim Edgar. A mature conservative leadership, combining both ideology and practical political skills, never took deep root here. Besides its own flaws, efforts to participate in Republican leadership were often blocked.

Now the issues most publicly identified with the Illinois conservative movement are minimalist procedural issues rather than broad philosophical ones: who will hold relatively obscure party posts, how will they be elected, etc. These sorts of issues have limited appeal to committed conservatives; they put average voters to sleep. I don't argue here whether they are right or wrong, merely that they are not the stuff average folk decide to get up to fight and bleed for. So conservatives are not busy winning new converts and filling them with principled resolution at a time when we are a minority. Instead, we are putting average people to sleep and driving other sympathetic-minded people away because we resemble a movement less than we do an ongoing food fight.

Meanwhile, with the passing of Thompson and Edgar, the institutional Republican Party in Illinois was set adrift, disconnected from the broad themes that animated Republican resurgence in other parts of the country. Without a conservative leadership that could prioritize issues for broad appeal and with a regular leadership that was fumbling with themes that time has passed by, Illinois Republicans have little to inspire confidence in anyone outside Illinois. One might argue that this is not the way it should be, but when real candidates are contemplating putting their lives and fortunes on the line for a year or two they have to deal with how things are; not how they should be.

So if outside money comes in at all it will come in a trickle. Inside money won't be much more robust. That leaves two types of candidates who can reasonably run for this nomination. The first is one who can self-fund. The second is a mid or low-level politician who goes into it knowing defeat is nearly certain, but runs a shoestring campaign as a placeholder in service of the party with the benefit of getting some broader recognition for the future.

As I said at the beginning, the nomination is by no means worthless. Politics is very volatile. While Durbin's position on the war effort is currently very favorable for him, dramatic upheavals often happen in wartime. Because Durbin is so deeply rooted in that position, a dramatic change in public opinion on the matter could leave him mortally vulnerable. Dramatic upheavals also happen occasionally in the normal course of politics.

You might remember that in 1991 many of the Democrats of the greatest national stature were deciding against seeking what many considered a worthless nomination against Republican incumbent George H. W. Bush, whose approval ratings were then at about 274%. Their reticence paid off quite nicely for a relatively little-known former Arkansas governor named Bill Clinton. This is not pollyannish: the top names in the Democratic Party made what was, for them, a rational decision and Clinton made what, for him, was a rational decision.

The odds of such dramatic turn-arounds happening in public opinion happening in any given cycle run anywhere between 5-1 and 20-1. For a well-established name to take on such a venture carries a lot more downside than upside. Victory only marginally improves his status. Defeat sows doubts about his prowess that may not have existed before. But for someone who is not so well-established and has not already spent much political capital in losing efforts, it is a great opportunity. Defeat carries no great sting, as victory was not expected in the first place. The very act of taking on impossible odds creates a bond of affection with many party loyalists the candidate had not known before, thus expanding his reach rather than contracting it. Unexpected victory against such long odds immediately propels the candidate into the top ranks of his party. Huge upside, almost no downside.

Offhand, I can think of four potential candidates with some political presence who could self-fund at least enough to make a credible go of this race: Kathy Salvi, Jim Oberweis, Ron Gidwitz and Andy McKenna.

As I mentioned last week, Salvi's is the only name that has some people actively working. She probably is the best conventional fit. She ran a creditable race for the 8th District Congressional nomination last time. The downside is that some tend to lump hers and her husband Al's races together, and so a loss would have a bigger sting here than for the average candidate who has only run once before. Further, if she had a clear path to the nomination to oppose incumbent Democrat Melissa Bean in Illinois 8th Congressional District, that would be a race less dependent on outside intervention of either events or money to pull off an upset. It has almost all the potential benefits without nearly as much risk.

Jim Oberweis is coming off three consecutive state-wide losses. It would be a very bad bet for him to take on such a high-risk proposition. Besides, he has a much better option. Presuming former Speaker Denny Hastert does not run for re-election, Oberweis would be the clear front-runner to replace him (that will be the subject of another column).

Ron Gidwitz is a prudent man with a very sharp learning curve. Following a heavily-funded race for the gubernatorial nomination that yielded deeply disappointing results, he would be unlikely to either come back so soon or take such a high-risk flier following a loss. He is much more likely to help others this cycle while taking a hard analytical look at how to improve performance in a future run for another office.

Andy McKenna has his platter full as state party chairman. If he runs again for high office, it would likely not be such a high-risk proposition as this. His stature right now is more dependent on recruiting an articulate candidate who can lay groundwork for the future rather than running himself.

Depending on what Salvi does, then, the table is set for either an unknown millionaire or a little-known politician to take this nomination. If they run a clumsy campaign, it is another Illinois Republican embarassment. If they run a prudent, technically sound campaign focusing our attention on issues of general import, the worst case is they lay a hopeful seed for the future and serve as a sign of unity - minority unity, but unity, nonetheless. The best case is they end up rocketing to the top levels of national leadership. It's a good bet, even a no-lose bet, for the right person.

Cross-posted at Illinois Review

Read more...

Staff of Seanbone Star Shape up for Somerville




With only five days left before perennial Aldermanic Candidate for the 19th Ward, John Somerville concedes his second defeat for that office, the sharp staff of the Seanbone Star, also known as 19th Ward Agenda www.19thwardagenda.com hit the stairmasters at Cardinal Fitness Center for the sprint to third place. It's a strain mocking a woman's breast cancer, but Sean Lowry has the right stuff!

The Anonymous regulars of the Seanbone Star - Ginger Spanker, Ed on Monday Nights, Concerned Beverly Resident, William Wallace 1,2,or 3 and Longtime Resident stretched the spandex for the shattering finish - One is better than the other and All are Champions. They are Anonymous! They are Challenging! They'll be back for the next election and the next and the next. Warts go away more quickly than these stalwarts!

Thanks Citizens!

Don't forget to Hydrate, Men! Oh, and Vote - John Somerville won't get into single digits without those!

Read more...

Hiding Behind The Myths

This Cap Fax bit about the backlash to the HPV vaccine being pushed in Illinois. One of the discussion points was Jill Stanek's "Debbie Does...??" a remarkable exploration as to why the social right is inherently incompatible with modern day living. My commentary is nicely summed here although, if you're interested in the funnier more foul mouthed version of the post you can visit my joint.You can also see Archie for a kinder, gentler take.

"Debbie Does...??" was silly. It was logically flawed - even if for some bizarre value oriented reason you were against the idea of giving the HPV vaccine to young women, you certainly aren't going to find worthy reasoning in the Stanek piece. It really came down to a very personal smear piece about Sen. Debbie Halvorson. Usually when the so-con right goes on such a tangent it's either extreme and directed at a straw man or it's more subtle and directed at a specific individual. Either way, it doesn't raise the pulse of anyone but the sensitive. In this case, Stanek's lust/anger whatever got the best of her, and she raised the specific individual smear to the highest caliber. Even her small cadre of wingers couldn't defend it.

Neither could she, as a few days later she let loose a follow up which contains the usual tactics that Social Cons depend on. Observe.

1. Vast corporate conspiracy.


Why? Halvorson is a director in a group called Women in Government, which is pushing mandated HPV vaccines across the U. S. Why? WiG receives funding (it won't say how much, so it must be a lot) from Merck, currently the sole FDA-approved manufacturer of the HPV vaccine.


I like business. I like healthy kids. I think this is a bold stance to take, but um....I'm proudly anti-cancer. As far as I'm concerned, this is a win win situation.

2. "What are you talking about? I am a feminist"

Their loud demand for ignorance can be interpreted only one of two ways. Either they hold a paternalistic view of women as being too weak to handle the truth or an exploitive view of women who should remain sex objects no matter the cost to their health. There is no other explanation for hysterical protests to shut up about the cause of HPV.


After spending a sizable number of keystrokes dedicated to a bald faced public stoning of a woman who dared fornicate and admit to it it's always good to do something like this just to make sure you won't lose your woman creds. Stanek goes back to her kitchen, turns on her stove,and cooks up this steaming hunk to somehow try to convince you that having sex without the benefit of protection (or, not having sex at all) is somehow empowering to women. Sure, she garnishes it with some sophomore year "woman's studies 215" logic - and she uses the big words like the real feminists do, but ultimately what's cooked ends up being undercooked chicken breast stuffed with mustard greens and smoked clams. It was a poorly conceived idea to begin with, the execution sucked, and the finished product is barely edible.

What scares the faux feminists out of their miserable little holes is the thought that there might be young women who are more bold than they ever were in terms of sexual empowerment. There's also probably something to be said for Rich's comment that boomers will always run everything through the prism of their own youth. To attempt to defend And if you're tempted to let this silliness fool you, note that she titled the post "Debbie does" after a popular series of pornographic film which illustrates that she's not critically attacking the idea, just trying to mock a woman who caught an STD.

Enough of that.

3. If you're really feeling the floor cave in, just lie.


If there is no quid pro quo, why doesn't WiG list even ONCE on its website the only real way to prevent HPV and cervical cancer: abstinence? Instead it says, "Cervical cancer is highly preventable - regular screening is key." Really, that's how you prevent it?


Actually, Jill, as you must be aware, since you did take the time to highlight and delete: the quote was:

Cervical cancer is highly preventable – screening and vaccination are key.


Naturally, if you're asking yourself how screening for a disease that somebody already has, by itself somehow prevents the individual from getting the disease, you've obvious put more thought into it than Stanek did.

Underlying here is the idea that, I guess, screening might alert an infected young woman that she in fact has HPV which might encourage her to not continue her sexual deviance and spread it some more. The nice byproduct for the slut shaming crowd, is that particular straw woman gets to stew in her own shame which is the entire point of Stanek's original post.

What's not said here, is that the threat of STD's is one of the few things that disables women from making their own decisions about sexual activity, thus is inherently contrary to the idea. It's a way for the So-Con crowd to scare young women into submission into their role as a virginal ideal. The So-Con's implicitly view the existence of STD's as one of God's little checks and balances to keep the little girls in line.

4. When in doubt, chalk it up to the other evils:

Why? Because sexually destructive behaviors are important financial and ideological cornerstones of liberalism. The abortion industry and homosexual lobby both funnel huge amounts of money to liberals, and both push the same agenda: complete sexual autonomy with no consequences.


"Come on!! Yall hate the LGBT's dontcha? Well, this vaccine is part of the gay conspiracy!!". Yeah. Sexual autonomy is a terrible thing, right folks?

It's easy to get people on board with all of this. The front and center of the argument is that somehow by enabling women to make their own choices about sexual activity the rates of sexual activity amongst teens will go up. Of course, as we all know that's completely impossible given that the average age for losing one's virginity is right around 16. But the so-con's understand that parents don't want to think about their kids having sex and they don't want to talk about their kids having sex, and that leaves parents who speak up in favor of the vaccine living in fear that their ability to parent will be questioned.


For more of Stanek's bizarre version of faux feminism, check out her bit in World Net Daily. You really have to read the whole article. Put your drink down before doing so, because if you know anything about anything it will make milk come out of your nose. A sample:


But the feminist in me says this mandated vaccine is patriarchal. After all, women already bear almost all the responsibility for sex-without-consequences. We're the ones who have to ingest birth control pills packed with female steroids, or transport that copper IUD with the weird vibes it sends throughout our uteruses and who knows where else, or insert that clumsy diaphragm, or wear those birth control patches that cause heart attacks. And then we end up pregnant anyway and have to get the abortions or raise the products of conception as single moms.



I hereby call on all feminists to resist mandated HPV vaccinations (well, at least the ones who won't get some sort of kickback) to join me and call instead for a Condom Nation!


Condom Nation? I suppose it's a step up from "Condemnation", which is what the Stanek Ilk has been hocking for some time.

Read more...

11 Republicans, 1 Democrat Kill McHenry County Republican Cat Tax

If you ever think that your voice can’t make a difference in local government, think again!

Both opponents and proponents of the Republican Cat Tax mentioned they had been lobbied by their constituents.

And some of them used language ("Cat Tax Collector") that made me know that McHenry County Blog readers had been spreading the word.

The McHenry County Board, stacked 23-1 in favor of the Republican Party, defeated the cat tax backed by County Chairman Ken Koehler (he called it a “fee”) and nine other GOP county board members.

The motion to eliminate the cat tax from the revision of the animal control ordinance passed 12-10 on a motion by Lyn Orphal, seconded by Mary Lou Zierer. Perhaps Republicans have been this split on a board vote before. I don't follow it closely enough to know. It must be a rarity, however, for a county board chairman not to get his way.

The 11 Republicans voting to kill the Republican Cat Tax follow:

Yvonne Barnes of Cary, a newcomer
Sue Draffkorn of Wonder Lake
Randy Donley of Union
Ed Dvorak of Crystal Lake
John Hammerand of Wonder Lake
Mary McCann of Woodstock, just elected
Lyn Orphal of Crystal Lake
Nick Provenzano of McHenry
Daniel Ryan of Huntley, just elected
Dan Shea of Fox River Grove
Mary Lou Zierer of Marengo
Newly elected Democratic Party member Jim Kennedy of Lake in the Hills joined this majority of voting Republicans (two were absent) to kill the cat tax.

Get down, Catkins. I’m writing a story.

Don’t worry, you’re safe now from the McHenry County Republican Cat Tax Collectors.

Relax.

I'll scratch your chest and neck later.

Those voting in favor of the Cat Tax ordinance, which would require rabies inoculation, plus the fee (which even a supporter slipped and called a “cat tax"), couched their arguments primarily toward being fair to both dog and cat owners, plus getting ahead of the spread of cat rabies, which is in Pennsylvania.

Those voting in favor of imposing the Cat Tax Hike were all Republicans. Their names follow:
Ken Koehler, County Board Chairman, Crystal Lake
Marie Chmiel of Crystal Lake
Mary Donner of Crystal Lake, just elected
John Heisler of Crystal Lake
Tina Hill of Woodstock
John Jung of Woodstock
Anna May Miller of Cary
Virginia Peschke of Woodstock
Sandra Salgado of McHenry
Linda Wheeler of Crystal Lake
= = = = =
Here, minus Chairman Ken Koehler, are those who attended the Cat Tax County Board meeting. (Click to enlarge.)

Koehler is pictured in profile on top, while Lyn Orphal, the Crystal Laker who made the motion to kill the McHenry County Republican Cat Tax is just below.

Keely cat is shown relaxing after the death of the McHenry County Republican Cat Tax Collector ordinance.

Posted first on McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Action Heroes

Cross posted from ICPR's blog, The Race is On:

In this week's Crain's Chicago Business, ICPR Director Cindi Canary lists governors from around the nation who have identified corruption problems in their states and taken bold and clear steps to address the problems: Connecticut's M. Jodi Rell,. New York's Elliot Spitzer, and Wisconsin's Jim Doyle. Where does out governor rank on the list? Read more in Crain's.

Read more...

What a Difference a Decade and a Half Can Make

I was so proud when not one single Republican Party vote was cast for the riverboat gambling bill in the earliest of the 1990’s.

Today readers of the Chicago Tribune are greeted with a headline reading,

House GOP’s $5 billion capital plan built on gambling
How sad.

Posted first at McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

IHRO unvails cap improvements plan

I don't have an opinion on this. No. Seriously. I'm suffering from the worst case of mental exhaustion ever. I couldn't even bring myself to say how much this American Digest post rules or just how idiotic it is to continue the Barack HUSSEIN Obama meme.

At any rate, Illinois House Republicans spent their morning touting a new capital improvements plan which proposes $5 billion in investment in roads, public trans, and education. Method to pay for it all: more slot machines, something that I don't find myself inherently opposed to. It's infinitely better than the other obvious alternatives.

I find myself a little disappointed that the first capital improvement plan in a long time(ok, there were others that were shot down, amusingly by House Republicans) doesn't seem to be getting play on the newly launched IHRO Vast Web Empire proudly running Web 2.0 1.0, save for this bare minimum link and run. Seeing as they seem to want information from us one would think they'd be quick to show us we're not shouting our 102 ideas into a 102 foot deep black hole especially given the fact that they just dedicated time and effort to feel good wingnut appeasement essentially saying, "All of those marriages we've just protected by banning myspace in school are now back at risk because of our gambling proposal".

Couldn't help myself there.

Read more...

Illinois Crime Commision, Police Athletic League and Leo Boxing Presents!




The event will feature an exhibition by Leo Boxing Great and Heavyweight Pro- Heavyweight Contender Thomas Hayes (26 W.; O L.)

This is note from our pal Neil Steinberg of the Chicago Sun Times in this past Sunday's column!

'It's just a huge time'
"A kid goes to a party on a Friday night. We all went to parties. The only difference is this party gets busted. Everybody gets disorderly conduct. Everybody gets underage consumption of alcohol. They get a fine. They lose their license for a year, so they can't drive. And then there is the 'divine mystery' -- three bags of dope show up on the floor, nobody brought them, but somehow they appeared. Obviously God put them there. Divine mystery. So they get charged with possession of narcotics. This goes on the kid's computer record and two years later, when he tries to get a job at Walgreens, it shows up he was charged with disorderly conduct, underage drinking and possession of narcotics."
Jerry Elsner is speaking -- executive director of the Illinois State Crime Commission, director of the Police Athletic League of Illinois and proud product of St. Ethelreda Parish. He is explaining PAL's First Chance Program.

"If a kid goes through our program, goes to school, has 100 percent attendance for six weeks -- even if he has diphtheria, -- at that point the state's attorney will toss charges. They're BS charges anyway. No computer record, no charges, a First Chance."

But programs need money, and to that end, the Police Athletic League, along with the Leo Catholic High School boxing team, is having a benefit this Wednesday at 7 p.m. at the 115 Bourbon Street entertainment complex at 3359 W. 115th Street, Merrionette Park.

I've been to this kind of boxing event, and it's a lot of fun -- don't let all those boxing movies about down-and-out lunks fool you. These boxers are good athletes and good kids. You can both bring your children and buy a beer, there are raffles and giveaways, it's only $10 to get in and it all goes to a good cause. What else do you want out of life?

"It's just a huge time," says Elsner.




Don't Miss the Next Event!!
. Wednesday Night Fights
Wednesday, Feb 21st, 7p.m.
115 Bourbon Street
3359 W. 115th Street Merrionette Park, IL
Fun
Games
Prizes
Get out the word. Invite all your business acquaintance, friends, and family.
Help by volunteering to work the event.
call Jerry, 630-778-9191 with any questions

Read more...

Crains: Guv's big new biz tax blitz

Crains on Blagojevich's looming Gross Receipts Tax.

Though it's billed as closing loopholes, Gov. Blagojevich's pending plan seems designed not just to rearrange but to raise taxes. That may not sit well with gubernatorial antagonist Michael Madigan, speaker of the Illinois House, whose spokesman says, "A tax of that magnitude would have as much or more impact as a tax on income or sales, and people have rejected that."

Mr. Johnson, the former revenue director, raises another concern: research indicating that about 70% of the cost of levies such as a gross-receipts tax either are passed on to consumers or forced onto workers in the form of lower wages, he says.
The Big Box ordinance, the minimum wage increase, all seemed mostly symbolic gestures to me. This tax is going to passed onto everyone and will hit lowest-income families hardest. Crains one of the few talking about it. You wonder where the progressives go when an awfully unprogressive tax comes our way. HT Reverse Spin

Read more...

Monday, February 19, 2007

Illinois Amtrak ridership explodes with new service; Schoenberg calls for additional expansion

If you run them, they will come.

The Illinois General Assembly and Governor Blagojevich doubled Amtrak service in Illinois last year and the new trains started rolling October 1st.

Ridership exploded.

On the Chicago-Springfield-St. Louis line, ridership went up more than 90% in the first three months of service.

Can you say: unmet demand?

That's a great investment in our economy, as we're buying mobility for our state. With affordable and reliable trains connecting the state, our quality of life and our economy are both improved. The more we're connected as a region, the more economically competitive we become, because instead of sending our money to fund the other side of the War on Terror by driving all over the place, we're sharing the oil on a train. Plus, with the money riders save with affordable transportation, they can spend on other things.

Mike Ramsey of Copley Newspaper, again, has the best piece out of many on the ridership numbers. It's here in the Springfield Journal-Register.

The legislature and Gov. Rod Blagojevich agreed last year to double the state's Amtrak budget to $24 million as part of a plan to grow intercity passenger rail in Illinois and promote tourism and commerce. The amount covered only eight months of service through June 30, 2007, and funding for a complete fiscal year is expected to cost about $30 million.

Sen. Jeff Schoenberg, an Evanston Democrat who pushed for the rail expansion, said continuing state support is warranted, based on the ridership numbers IDOT has reported. In fact, he said, the results justify additional rail expansion.

Additional rail expansion. Fantastic! Hello, Decatur, Peoria, Rockford and Quad Cities. Would you like train service? All you have to do is ask. Wouldn't that be a better investment in economic development than another interchange or a 10 miles of a four-lane highway?

And with that sort of explosive growth on the Chicago-Bloomington-Springfield-St. Louis corridor, we should be moving up from 5 trains a day to 7 trains a day. I really would like a 3:00 pm northbound train out of Springfield for those Thursdays or Fridays when session gets out at 1:30 or 2:00. Wouldn't it be great to catch a 2:30 pm train back up to Chicago and be home in time for dinner? A late dinner, but still. How cool would that be?

The other corridors had fantastic growth as well in their first three months of service. From the Ramsey article again:

Ridership on the Carbondale line increased an average of 68 percent from November through January, compared to the same period a year before, according to the IDOT numbers. The "Illini" and "Saluki" trains carried 19,406 riders in November, 20,314 riders in December and 15,996 in January.

The ridership increase on the Quincy route averaged about 40 percent during the last three months, compared with the same period the previous year. The "Illinois Zephyr" and "Carl Sandburg" trains carried 14,103 riders in November, 14,650 riders in December and 11,126 riders last month.

40% growth is great. And that's only going up as more people start to realize that Amtrak in Illinois is a reliable service and shed their memories from the late 90s when Amtrak was a lot worse. These state trains also have a much better on-time-performance record than the national trains that come from San Antonio or New Orleans.

The more we invest in our trackwork to improve average speeds and decrease congestion choke points where there's only one track so one train has to wait on the side, the better these trains will be and the more economically competitive and viable all of our Downstate Amtrak cities will be -- not to mention how Chicago will grow stronger as well.

It's like an airport is right downtown for every Amtrak city.

Hopefully Congress will catch up with the General Assembly. I was going to say hopefully President Bush will catch up with Governor Blagojevich, but Bush is so tone-deaf on this (and so many other issues) since he's listening to his ideologues, that he'll never catch up to Blagojevich (who, in his statement, rightly called out Bush for releasing another dumb budget that cuts Amtrak. No wonder he's a 30% approval President).

Anyway, this is great news for Illinois. If you want to see the schedules for the new service, check them out here. Or call 800-USA-RAIL. If you haven't taken Amtrak in a while, you'll be pleasantly surprised.

[cross-posted at the Midwest High Speed Rail Association's blog that has federal discussion and advocacy as well as Illinois news]

Read more...

Wal-Mart creating jobs in Chicago and elsewhere

The first city that will benefit from Wal-Mart's jobs building program is Chicago, which Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott announced last year. The other nine were named today.

From AP:

In April, Wal-Mart Chief Executive Lee Scott said the company planned to build 50 stores in areas with high crime or high unemployment. At the store on Chicago's west side, and at the nine identified Monday, Wal-Mart will offer advertising to the other businesses in local newspapers and through the pulbic address systems in Wal-Mart stores.

At each of the stores, five small businesses will be picked each quarter for special treatment, the ultimate focus of which will be "how to take advantage of having a Wal-Mart in your market," Menzer said.

Near the Chicago store — the first in the city limits for the retail giant — Menzer said a number of new businesses are under development nearby, including a coffee shop, a drugstore and a home improvement center.

"It could be any type of small business in the area that would draw on our traffic," Menzer said.

The Chicago store is in Chicago's poverty-stricken and retail starved Austin neighborhood. When Wal-Mart's first Chicago store opened there last fall, people were lined up around the block to get inside on the morning of the grand opening.

Did some Austin businesses fail because Wal-Mart arrived? Maybe a few. But it couldn't be more than that, because Chicago's West Side for the most part is a retail desert.

Now Wal-Mart is working to create more jobs in areas like Chicago's West Side.

In two weeks the first round of Chicago municipal elections will be held. The Chicago Federation of Labor and the Service Employees International Union is sending foot soldiers to selected city wards where the aldermen didn't cave in to labor's threats to vote in favor of the jobs-killing big-box "living wage" ordinance.

One of those wards is the 16th, where Shirley Coleman is the alderman. It's located on the Chicago's South Side, in another poor part of the city. She voted against the "living wage" bill, and the CFL and the SEIU have targeted her for defeat. Organized labor, particularly the well-paid building trades which make up a big chunk of the CFL, have a rotten history when it comes welcoming blacks and other minorities into its membership. Coleman's ward is overwhelmingly African-American.

I'm sure those union foot soldiers are getting an earful from the residents of the 16th Ward, as well as some other parts of the city.

Hat tip to Marshall Manson of Edelman Public Relations for the AP story.

To comment on this or any other posts--or vote in the Pajamas Media presidential straw poll, click here.

Read more...

Tax Credits for Government Lawyers

House Bill 1323 - Rep. Mary Flowers (D-31, Chicago)

Synopsis As Introduced
Amends the Illinois Income Tax Act. Creates a tax credit for individuals who are assistant state's attorneys, assistant attorneys general, assistant public defenders, assistant public guardians, or civil legal services attorneys. Provides that the amount of the credit is an amount equal to the interest paid on the taxpayer's student loan during that year. Provides that the credit may not reduce the taxpayer's liability to less than zero. Effective immediately.

I came across this bill when Rep. Flower's hand washing bill made me curious about what other bills she may have introduced. This particular bill strikes me as playing favorites for certain government employees and granting them special treatment that the rest of us meer taxpayers don't enjoy. I sure could've used a tax credit for my student loans after I graduated. How about you? I'm generally not opposed to tax credits, but this one seems to benefit a much too narrow audience.

Read more...

Ariel Execs Kiss Up to Daley After Losing State Pension Money

McHenry County Blog posted an article Saturday about Ariel Capital Management having kicked out of the State Board of Investments’ pension investment business, but remaining in the state's deferred compensation program as an investment option.

By November 17, Ariel has lost $165.7 million.

So, it did not surprise me to read on the front page of Sunday’s Chicago Tribune that its executives had kicked $157,000 into Mayor Richard Daley’s mayoral campaign.

The notation:

Their business with the city: investment managers of city pensions.
The Tribune reports that Ariel
  • Chairman John Rogers, Jr., gave $100,000 (given after Ariel lost the state pension money)
  • President Mellody Hobson gave $50,000 (all after losing the state pension business)
  • Other employees chipped in $7,000 Other employees chipped in $7,000, none of which was listed in the Tribune article (I found $3,000 of it.)
    · Portfolio Manager John Miller gave $1,000 (after the state pension money was withdrawn)
    · Investment Manager Franklin Morton gave $1,000 (after the state money left)
    · Investment Manager Matthew Sauer gave $1,000 (also after the loss of state money) and
  • The company contributed $1,000 the very day the last State Board of Investment money left the company.
President Hobson told the Tribune:
We have this business because of our investment record, not because of anything else.
Guess the State Board of Investments doesn’t know what it was talking about when it dumped Ariel from its pension business because of its poor recent investment record.

Here’s what these state pension managers said,
the Board of Investment “has concerns regarding recent performance of Ariel Capital Management.”

Apparently, it has done well enough over the “longer term,” that is, over ten years, but “the performance over the one, three and five year time periods has caused a great deal of concern.”
I wonder how much city pension money Ariel has to manage.

Always more at McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Free speech issue at the University of Illinois

Once again, my alma mater is in the news. This story comes courtesy of FIRE, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.

In this oh-so-touchy world, a "threat" made on a Facebook site that no one could possibly take seriously, University of Illinois Chancellor Richard Herman sent an e-mail to the students and faculty of the Urbana-Champaign campus that he "can not and will not tolerate such violent threats. The University will take all legal and disciplinary actions available in response to the threatening messages."

Here is that that "threatening" Facebook post:

Apparently the leader of this movement is of Sioux descent … the Sioux are the ones that killed off the Illini indians [sic], so she’s just trying to finish what her ancestors started. I say we throw a tomohawk [sic] into her face.

Actually, it was the Iroquois tribe, with help from European diseases, that decimated the Illini.

And just where does one find a tomahawk?

Oh, ease up, Chancellor Herman. Or I'll have to use my catapult--with a cow--against you.

To comment on this post, or to vote in the Pajamas Media presidential straw poll, click here.

Read more...

U of I supporters may withhold donations over abandoning Chief Illiniwek

The University of Illinois' longtime halftime mascot, Chief Illiniwek, will make his final performance on Wednesday during the basketball game against Michigan in Champaign.

There's talk in Illini-land of major donors pulling their financial support of the school, but that'd be a big mistake.

Already, the U of I has been banned from hosting NCAA post-season tournaments in Champaign, and the University of Illinois' athletic director, Ron Guenther, has said there was talk that the NCAA would expand their postseason ban on Illini appearance in the NCAA basketball tournament on college football bowl games.

There was nothing my alma mater could do.

Besides, if you want to pull withhold funds from the U of I, there are a couple of good reasons to do that--if you so choose. Up at the Chicago campus, former Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers is a tenured professor in the education department.

Marxist anti-American radical Robert McChesney was hired at the Champaign campus in 1999 as a Research Associate Professor at the Institute of Communications Research, Graduate School of Library and Information Science.

(Try saying that title is one breath. Of fitting it on a business card.)

Both men are profiled in David Horowitz' 2006 book, The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America.

Back to the nickname battles. Now that the University of Illinois yielded to NCAA pressure, the remaining skirmish is up in North Dakota, as the University of North Dakota, aided by the state legislature, pursues the preservation of its nickname "The Fighting Sioux."

The U of I, sans the Indian imagery, gets to keep it's nickname--so says the NCAA.

To comment on this post, or to vote in the Pajamas Media presidential straw poll, click here.

Read more...

McCain Presents Public Affairs Award to Patrick G. Lee

After meeting with U.S. Senator John McCain, along with some other conservative bloggers and leaders, I hung around talking to my former legislative colleague Maureen Murphy.

It was at the Union League Club, a place I hadn’t visited since House Speaker George Ryan was negotiating the RTA agreement with Chicago Mayor Jane Byrne in 1983. Having just lost a Republican primary election for Congress, I was advising Ryan on RTA, along with Kathy Selcke.

In the 5th floor hall, I heard Public Affairs Committee Chair Elaine Roth talking to Patrick G. Lee, a Barrington High School senior who had won Union League Club’s Public Affairs Award, which included a check.

Lee was scheduled to get the award from McCain at a later press conference, but Roth decided that was the time to give him the monetary award.

So, I snapped a picture, getting Roth, the award winner and his parents.

Since I didn’t have to be anywhere, I talked to Lee about politics (what else?) and waited for McCain’s Chicago press conference. I used to represent his South Barrington neighborhood in the Illinois House.

At the press conference, I thought McCain was quite bold in pointing out the truth of the consequences of our pulling out of Iraq, that is, genocide, ethnic cleansing, etc.

After the press conference and McCain’s presentation of the Public Affairs Award to Lee, the Fox news reporter interviewed Lee.

Unfortunately, the interview ended up on the cutting room floor and got edited out of the short Chicago Sun-Times story.

The Fox reporter had obviously been briefed on the young man’s accomplishments. Astronomical SATs, starting the Abner Mikva Challenge at Barrington High School (and I won’t embarrass us lower achievers with more).

Lee was off to Harvard Saturday for a national debate contest. (I had earlier asked if that were Harvard, Illinois. Silly me.)

Since he was interested in politics, the reporter asked Lee if he was ready to take a pledge not to raise taxes.

He paused slightly and answered,

"No comment."
How perfect.

Here's where you can find more McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Cynics: Daley Combined With Snow, Wind For Election Year Ploy.

Only in Chicago, is the snow political. I wrote a post the other day (subsequently linked by Cap Fax) which basically says:

"Hey. How come nobody is saying, "thanks Mayor, by getting the removal crews out there in force, the city didn't have to shut down" Additionally I commented about how there were a pair of very bitter Tribune employees writing a cynical snark piece blaming da Mare because they didn't get a snow day and instead had to like...go to work and stuff...to write cynical snark pieces. It's a vicious cycle...really.

But that was hardly the only attempt to make the snow political. Patrick McDonough of Chicago Clout decided to pull a Fred Phelps and photo documented hired trucks and city employees clearing out private property - which turned out to be the Montclair-Luciana Funeral Home which is where a slain CPD officer was to be waked. After being called out on it, McDonough nicely informed us that the wake of a hero is "B.S." I've never seen the anti-Daley crowds sizeable cop hate coupled with their snowy criticizm in the same post.

Still, other bloggers (whom I assume know not what they say) wax the ever Rovian "I question the timing" of the "over the top snow removal". I suppose this particular blogger has this vision for what was going on @ 35th And Michigan:

Mike Picardi (Streets and San head honcho - if you're not in the know): Sir, the snow has reached 12 inches. What should we do?
Daley: Activate Phase 3. It's an election year.
Picardi: But sir, people will assume that you're only shoveling the snow because it's close to the election.
Daley: Hmmmm. That's silly.....it's silly...it's a silly pickle. So if I don't get the plows out there, people will blast me for not removing it during an election year. But if I do get the plows out there, pre-invalidated criticizm will be levied against me based on the fact it's an election year. Gee wiz. Whatever shall I do?

As I mentioned before, I'm a life long Chicagoan. I grew up watching the 10 oclock news with my parents. So when Rich Miller mentioned to me that Dorothy Brown jumped on Daley for his snow removal plan I instinctively knew that it was going to be that her street wasn't plowed and the implication would be that black neighborhoods weren't getting the attention that they should. As is the case quite often, I was right:


"The Phase Three obviously is not working very well," Brown said. "So, obviously he's taking that extra step because of the elections, but from my street it hasn't worked yet."

But "a lot of communities are still suffering. ... They are not doing a good job with the snow," she said.


Of course, a few minutes later Brown conceded that she would have done the same thing. I don't blame her. What's she going to say? "I wouldn't get the plows rolling to keep the city running".

It is a sad state of affairs, when a mayor has a city running so well that the absence of a stoppage is cause for political hoohaa.

Read more...

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Affirmative Action Mutual Fund?

I’ve got some money in the State employees deferred compensation program, so I get quarterly statements.

Included with the one that arrived on Lincoln’s Birthday was a letter from William R. Atwood, Executive Director of the Illinois State Board of Investment.

If was peculiar.

There may have been others, but this is the only one I remember.

It says that the Board of Investment “has concerns regarding recent performance of Ariel Capital Management.”

Apparently, it has done well enough over the “longer term,” that is, over ten years, but “the performance over the one, three and five year time periods has caused a great deal of concern.”

Catch that?

“…a great deal of concern.”

Since last March, “Ariel has been on the DC plan Watch List.”

The Board of Investment continues to have regarding recent performance, but

is also aware that some investors take comfort in the long relationship that the deferred comp plan has with Ariel, and that some investors value the option of investing with a minority owned Illinois firm.
Next, the “on the one hand, this, and, on the other hand, that” paragraphs:
Thus, the Board has decided not to terminate Ariel as an option…at this time…(but it) will keep the firm o the Watch List…It is left to the discretion of each plan participant as to in which play option they choose to invest.

As a result of Ariel’s recent performance, (the Board) has terminated its relationship with Ariel under which the firm managed defined plan assets under (the Board’s) fiduciary control
So, if you want to keep your money in the firm, go right ahead, but we’re pulling all the other money the firm had out.

State employees have almost $132 million invested in the mutual fund. That’s a little less than 5% of the assets. Put another way, it’s almost 84% of the money invested last year.

The State Board of Investment had $165,730,099 as of the first of 2006 and zilch as of the first of this year.

All was withdrawn by last November 17th.

Posted originally on McHenry County Blog, a web site that is alive and kicking on weekends.

Read more...

Somerville Dedicates Playlot at Beverly Park - By Himself!


Here is a photo of the Real Maeve McNicholas Playlot dedication by the people who actually did the work - more great photos - none of Somerville by the way -
AND. . .



Here is John Somerville's Personal Dedication of the Maeve McNicholas Memorial Playlot at Beverly Park


Over at the SEANBONE STAR an occasional note is posted by a high wattage intellect -occasional mind you - and usually in a frustating attempt to toss in the truth. By and large the swamp-critters overwhelm such efforts.

One poor guy objected to Somerville's claim that he helped build the Playlot at Beverly Park on 103rd street. Not true. Dishonest John had NO part in helping the McNicholas family and friends build a playlot in memory of Maeve McNicholas. A neighbor called and asked that I take a look at the post on www.19thwardagenda.com sure enough:

Anonymous, on February 17th, 2007 at 3:45 pm, said:

The best thing I’ve read in the Beverly Review in years is the letter from Frank Bilecki chastising John Sommerville for implying he was involved in the new playlot at Beverly Park. I appreciate Bilecki setting the record straight. He said, “John Somerville never lifted a finger…”

Like most community efforts in the 19th Ward, the majority of folks pitch in and then John Somerville perenial candidate for Alderman puts his spin on things: When every one else particpated in the Night Out Against Crime at the 22nd Police District John hosted - 'John's Night Out at Beverly Park' attended by his cousins from Oak Lawn - on the very same night! Mr. Let's Work Together! Together? Like in '60's -Together, John? Or, do you mean Togather - as in you wish to gather as much free stuff - like credit for things you have not done?

To all you good folks out there ( no not you 40 watt types) - here's a great link!

http://www.maevesfoundation.org/ Write a check, Folks! Good cause.

Read more...

Wash Your Hands. It's The Law

House Bill 382 - Introduced by Rep. Mary Flowers (D-31, Chicago)
Co-sponsored by Rep. Monique Davis (D-27 ,Chicago), Rep. Jerry Mitchell (R-90,Rock Falls), Rep. Robert Pritchard (R-70, DeKalb), Rep. Sandra Pihos (R-42, Glen Ellyn)

Synopsis As Introduced
Amends the Chicago School District Article of the School Code. Provides that under the Chicago Board of Education's policies and rules concerning infectious disease, the Board shall require that all students wash their hands with an antiseptic soap or detergent before consuming any meal at school and shall establish nationally accepted standards and provide the facilities, materials, and supervision necessary to implement the handwashing requirement. Amends the State Mandates Act to require implementation without reimbursement.

Really? It is true that the flu contributes to more deaths per year than second-hand smoke, so we probably should have seen this coming. I've still got some questions though. Is it a good idea for kids to wash their hands before meals? Absolutely, no argument there. Is it wise to make every good idea into a law? No. Chicagoist's Alicia Dorr has even jumped on the nanny bandwagon.

Why discriminate against 2nd graders in Chicago? Why not all kids in Illinois? How will it be enforced? Will kids get fined, detained after school, have to write "I will always wash my hands before meals" on a chalkboard 500 times, or be forced to wear gloves? How will the kids be held accountable and responsible? Who will enforce such a law? Are we going to have to hire hand washing monitors for every school now?

When this law goes statewide, will private schools have to hire hand washing monitors and the state have to hire hand washing inspectors for private schools and homeschooled children?
If a school isn't meeting hand washing scores will it lose funding? Will private schools be closed and homeschooled children taken from their parents for criminal negligence if their kids are caught not washing their hands?

If it's a good law for kids, why not for adults? Will we station hand washing police in restaurants to make sure adults are washing their hands? Will search warrants be issued if they suspect adults aren't washing their hands in their own homes? If hand washing laws don't reduce the number of flu related deaths, will we then ban sick people from going out in public? How do we enforce that?

Sure, my questions are preposterous, but so is this bill. And what is very telling about our education system in this bill is that it requires the students to wash their hands, but does not require the teachers to make sure the students are washing their hands. The burden is being placed on the students, not the teachers (finely represented by their unions), to comply with the law.

Would it not make much more sense for the school to write it into the teachers' contract that they must make sure their students wash their hands before meals? Yes it would, but that would require holding teachers accountable, which we don't do in Illinois. Firing a teacher for failing to meet the job requirement of making sure the students wash their hands before meals? We can't have that. It might mean the average number of teachers fired in Illinois each year for poor performance will surpass two.

Hand washing before meals is a good idea for students. The Chicago Public Schools, and all Illinois government schools, should probably write that rule into their union contract as a job description requirement for the teachers if they think this is such a grand idea as to require it being made into law. Just because the unions would never agree to such a thing, does not make a law requiring the students compliance a good idea.

This type of silly micro-managing by our elected politicians is largely why their educational system keeps getting worse. Holding the students accountable and not the teachers? Really?

Read more...

I'm Your Newest Noizemaker

It's time for an intro post.


I'm Dan L. Rich asked me several months ago to contribute here at ILLINOIZE. Because I'm occasionally dysfunctional with a computer, the invitation got lost, I forgot, he forgot, anyway - I'm here. The quick run around:


Who am I?
I'm a god fearin', Sox Fan, born and raised Sout' Sider. My dad is a 35 year veteran of CPD and my mom a librarian. I spent 20 years in Catholic Schools - from grade school to college.


Political Leanings
Tough one: I self identify as being right leaning on all this economic and foreign policy. I would identify myself as being left leaning on most social concerns. This is a local blog, thus you'll probably see my left side more. If I render an opinion that seems right, consider it a little spice. I am an unapologetic Daley supporter.

Where else can you find me? (or where might you have seen me before?)
I maintain my personal blog at Moveonandshutup.org. *Fair Warning* - I do, from time to time, use language that is quite blue. Over the last few months, my act has been cleaned up, but still there are some things that might be a little rough in the archives.

I frequently comment and occasionally contribute at the excellent blog Pam's House Blend.

Once in a while, you can find me running my mouth at GOP Progress, an organization which I whole heartedly support.

Assorted Other Facts
-I dabble in watching 46th Ward Politics. My girlfriend is a social worker in Uptown.
-No matter your political affiliation, you'll find a reason to like me.
-No matter your political affiliation, you'll find a reason to dislike me.
-From time to time, I'll pick on the local environmental movement saying that I drive a huge SUV. It's a lie. I drive a Honda CRV. I get 26 miles to the gallon.


Any and all comments/questions/rips will be entertained (or responded to in a hopefully entertaining way). Thanks for having me folks.

Read more...

Daily Southtown: "Report: Hospital board not providing the cure"

Pull the plug. Let it pass. From the Daily Southtown,

A new report to be delivered to Illinois lawmakers next week finds little evidence the state's regulation of health care construction actually holds down costs or provides any other benefit.

The Health Facilities Planning Board, which decides whether projects are necessary, expires April 1 unless the Legislature extends its life.

A draft of the study requested by House Speaker Michael Madigan was obtained by the Daily Southtown. Madigan had not seen it and couldn't comment, spokesman Steve Brown said.

Read more...

Somerville Proofs The SEANBONE STAR



" Ok - Made of fun of Ginger's Breast Cancer . . . Good . . .Sheehan is a Plant, Na Na Now that's just fine, Sean, but can we say that we will kill the first-born of every opponant's male issue, when I'm elected - No, No. - might be a bit too . . .No, I see what you mean, Sean but let's not tip our hand just yet."

Another twenty four hours in SEANBONE and the bile merchant of Beverly is micturating down everyone's Wellington's this morning. Duttonhead Lowry might have wee-wee'd down the wrong pair of Timberlands. Here, Folks, is one of the best people in size 14s, that I know, Mike Heenan. There is not a family in the 19th Ward that Mike has not helped in organizing a benefit, putting up posters, writing checks to, or driving kids to baseball while the Mom and Dad are at the hospital with a sick kid.

Mike Heenan and I are on the opposite side of the two good candidates in the 19th Ward Aldermnaic race ( Somerville - The Cheese stands alone - is not one). Mike asked if I would vote for Tim Sheehan, but I had already committed to helping Ginger. Now, Mike has had enough of the SEANBONE STAR! He's a much more tolerant soul than your faithful correspondant; I slept through a lot of catechism on tolerance of jerks - people who go out of their way to hurt people not even remotely involved in a dispute. The old grammar school 'hocker-spitters' who let fly and ran and hid behind Sister's robes - today they call it - 'I have a Right to My Opinion! I'm Like Cindy Sheehan!' Yep! Gender perfect! Here's my pal Mike Heeenan's beef with Seanbone Star Lowry and Dishonest John's Sponsrship of www.19thwardagenda.com


Mike Heenan, on February 16th, 2007 at 7:21 pm, said:

The one thing I can’t understand with everyone on this site is that none of you are actually doing anything to help your candidate. You rant and rave back and forth like kids in the schoolyard. I would guess that none of you have been to any of the respective campaign offices to offer some help. You would rather anonymously attack the other candidates with hateful false statements that I have no doubt any of you would have the courage to say face to face. Sean, How can you allow this ridiculous forum to continue spiraling out of control.

I am proud to admit that I am active in Tim Sheehan’s campaign. Tim is an old friend who asked me to serve as a coordinator in his campaign. I have been out there working door to door for Sheehan for over a month. I have seen very few Rugai/ 19th Ward people in my travels, and not one single Somerville volunteer. I have had people ask me… Is Tim Sheehan is a plant? Do you think I would be out there freezing my — off if he was a plant.

I am excited for this election because I really believe that when Tim Sheehan wins on February 27th, then things will be better in this community.


The People of the 19th Ward - nearly all of them - are like Mike Heenan. A very few are like Lowry and Somerville. God made jerks to keep the rest of us from getting too complacent about our debts to our neighbors. Like scabs over a wound, they have their places in God's ordered universe, I guess. There will be more touching reminders of human folly coming from the SEANBONE STAR! AS sure as there are jerks on this lovely earth.

Read more...

Greg Livingston: Why don't our leaders speak out on health care cuts?

From Greg Livingston in Austin Weekly News:

The first line of this column posed the question, "Where is everybody?" The everybody I'm referring to are the Black and Latino political caucuses. Where are our Black and Latino State of Illinois elected officials? Why don't we see them caucusing before television cameras, demanding that the governor fight for the poor. Where are the state representatives and state senators? Are West Side preachers the only ones who are supposed to wage this battle?
[***]
Our politicians must never forget that the people do have a voice.

It's called voting.
Well, they did just vote, and as Carl Nyberg writes,
For all those people who bad-mouthed Stroger's Republican opponent Commissioner Anthony Peraica, it now looks like more clinics in the hood would have stayed open under Peraica.
Before people band together into Livingston's caucuses Livingston might want to reflect on the nonsense said of Peraica during the campaign. Peraica put out a hand to those West Side Preachers but they didn't reach back in return. Maybe they wouldn't be in this lonely battle today if they had.

Where is everybody is the right question but it should be asked of many.

Read more...

Friday, February 16, 2007

Crystal Lake’s 62 Million Internet Prescription Doc Not in Prison Yet

There was a small article in the Chicago Tribune Thursday concerning the increase in the misuse of prescription drugs by teens.

It was the bottom of four stories on a page with mainly advertising.

It reminded me that no Chicago area newspaper has run an article on the 46-year old Crystal Lake physician named Michael Millette. He illegally wrote 62 million internet prescriptions.

Wouldn’t you think 62 million internet prescriptions would be newsworthy?

An internet site that can be found in this January 17th McHenry County Blog article says the University of Illinois College of Medicine graduate practiced emergency medicine in Woodstock and McHenry, as well as other locations.

You can find Millette's name on the U.S. Bureau of Prison's web site, but he's not behind walls yet.

More at McHenry County Blog, the site that stays awake over the weekend.

Read more...

Illinois is finally Chief free! I'm joining the Alumni Association

Fantastic news. Finally, finally, finally, the University of Illinois is shedding an embarrassing vestige of a racist time and retiring the white dude who jumps around in a Native American costume. Thank goodness someone had the testicular virility to cut off the endless non-debate and modernize our image with one executive decision. I love it.

Progressive alumni of the University, now is the time to reward bold initiative. Send them money. The Alumni Association is here and the University Foundation that will take your gifts is here.

My guess is that the bogeyman of petulant alumni who will withhold their millions from the University are likely to be the people who send the money exclusively to the Athletics Department. And if Athletics takes a hit for a few years, I really don't care. The University's culture and priorities are already too skewed towards the sports teams anyway. Higher education is likely our best economic engine for the next few decades, and we should be pouring resources into higher education to generate economic returns. The dancing Chief was a distraction and worse, a symbol of a less-innovative, less-modern and less-progressive state -- particularly in East Central Illinois where we have the opportunity, still far from fully realized, to attract global talent and capital for technology-driven businesses -- than Illinois actually is.

Congratulations to Chairman Eppley (assuming he goes through with it). Today is a good day for the future of Illinois.

[cross-posted at djwinfo]

Read more...

Stroger Hospital Cops: "You think this is a game?"

Durbin locks his doors and its by appointment only now. Stroger Hospital Cops cuff Steve Patterson,

"I'm a reporter," I implored. "I'm not with them."
Pushed to the ground earlier, I was desperate to find anyone who could help convince the sergeant that I was a reporter -- not a protester.

I had backed away from the protesters, who were upset about comments Simon made in a Chicago Reader story years ago, and I repeated again that I was a reporter covering an event, to no avail.

"Cuff his ass," I heard. "Cuff him. Cuff him."

"You think this is a game?" the sergeant asked me. "I ain't playin'."
Democrats win big in Illinois and then put up the no trespassing signs for the dissidents and anyone unlucky enough to look like one,
I was told I was seen chanting with the protesters, that I didn't have an appointment, and that I was trespassing.

And, he reminded me, "If I wanted you down, you'd have been down."

As he led me to an elevator, I told him I was confused -- "I'm not with them. I don't understand."

"Oh, you're going to understand," the sergeant said as the elevator doors closed.

Through corridors and down hallways, past patients and doctors, I was escorted in handcuffs through the labyrinth of Stroger Hospital.

Again, I said, I'm a reporter, in a public building, covering an event -- that's when I was read my rights, told I was being charged with trespassing.

"You didn't have an appointment," I was told. "You were trespassing."
When these guys say appointment you better have one or you may find yourself cuffed disappearing down the labyrinth with a guy playin' no games.

Read more...

19th Ward's SEANBONE STAR



To Take Sean Lowry's www.19thwardagenda.com as a means of getting a good look at the 19th Ward requires a willing suspension of disbelief.

Instead, return with me now to John Ford's classic western - THE MAN WHO SHOT LIBERTY VALANCE - great old movie that had the great line "This is the west, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."

Things can get skewed - especially when a guy like Lowry has all the raw materials for a good skewing - In Sean's bizzaro world - John Somerville is the Ransom Stoddard good guy and every one else in the Ward are collective Liberty Valances. Sean is the Dutton Peabody character who runs a paper called the Shinebone Star - John Ford's Dutton Peabody writes about the Rights of Man and Justice and Free Elections - Duttonhead Lowry tosses acid. Here's today's offering from the SEANBONE STAR:

25 A St Walters Kid, on February 15th, 2007 at 6:15 pm, said:

I just want to see my old neighborhood spruced up a little. Ginger has had 15 years to fix the blight of 115 and Western. I may not live long enough to wait for her fix. Let’s give someone else a chance.

I’m voting for that young handsome man, John Somerville

24 Sean Thorton, on February 15th, 2007 at 6:16 pm, said:

Ginger aint Irish vote her out

23 Anonymous, on February 15th, 2007 at 6:19 pm, said:

It seems that all you need in this ward is a little money and you can get things done. Perhaps the federal prosecutor should look a little closer into the 19th ward affairs and hiring practices. He might find a whole bunch of corrupt employees here. It’s time to root out all the corrupt politicians. Ginger it’s time to pay the piper.

22 newbie, on February 15th, 2007 at 7:39 pm, said:

Can anyone tell me which union backed GR? I received a flier in the mail stating that she was the union backed candidate. If this has been touched on already I’m sorry for the repeat.

21 Newcomer, on February 15th, 2007 at 7:42 pm, said:

I’m with Ginger Rugai. She did a great job after this recent snowstorm. She’s hooked up with Daley and can so much more than S or S.

Another issue is did Sheehan misrepresent his educational credentials? If he did he needs to get out of the race. Sort of that that head coach from Notre Dame a few years ago. If he didn’t misreprepresent something, he should stay in the race.

20 Anonymous, on February 15th, 2007 at 7:57 pm, said:

To
newbie, on February 15th, 2007 at 7:39 pm, said:
The AFL-CIO is backing Ginger which includes many unions.

19 Conservative One, on February 15th, 2007 at 8:21 pm, said:

It seems that we now have legislators legislating handwashing in elementary schools. Good thing too, because of the injustices committed by baked goods and foi gras all over Chicago! Is it getting clear that legislators, as well as the city council feel they have nothing to do? Or maybe the really important issues that affect lifestyle and long term betterment of the community aren’t of interest. If nothing else, voters should demand the voice of reason be present in city council to get them back on track. A heckuvalot will change after Ginger is replaced. The council is made up of more appointees and heirs that will need cleaning out if the other wards show the guts on 2/27. Did anyone read the article about the county budget in CTribune today - two administrators mentioned how they didn’t realize that steering budget cuts away from doctors and service providers would result in their appointed relatives being without meal tickets. They are laughing at you so do something about it on election day or we’ll become Ghana in three years!

18 Conservative One, on February 15th, 2007 at 8:23 pm, said:

Im the most moderate writer around here. What’s the beef?

17 Harry Twickler, on February 15th, 2007 at 8:39 pm, said:

I think it would be nice if everyone would base their decision in this election on the issues. Stop the name calling and negative posts just because an individual has an opinion that you disagree with.

16 Anonymous, on February 15th, 2007 at 8:43 pm, said:

So let me try to keep this straight. The ward ofice imps are now trying to paint John Somerville as more of the same? Huh? Didn’t he just reject Hynes’ offer to be set up at a lucrative criminal defense firm to run against the organization for alderman? Are the rats fleeing the sinking ship? Are people starting to say the obvious, that she is and always was worthless? Stay tuned, the last desperate acts of a losing alderman are about to be seen. Goodbye, Virginia.

15 Anonymous, on February 15th, 2007 at 8:44 pm, said:

Ginger smokes and claims sympathy as a cancer survivor? That’s balls.

Lovely and High Minded Folks in SEANBONE!

Here's my favorite in response to an inquiry from one guy who asks what Sean Lowry will get for his $2,000 duke-aroo to Tailspin Somerville.

WheresItGo, on February 15th, 2007 at 3:49 pm, said:

Well, we asked it for the other candidates, so might as well ask Sean. “What’s $2000 in private campaign donations buy you?

A: I’ve already answered it here previously. In my opinion John Somerville presents the best opportunity for us to beat the incumbent, Virginia Rugai. Alternately, as I said in yesterdays Beverly Review, I will support anyone who can beat Ginger.

The answer seems to be here in John Somerville's - PLAN for the 19th Ward.


Though some major projects have taken place under Rugai, there are too many locations throughout the ward where progress has lagged. As a result, the ward seems to lack the vibrancy it once had. Somerville believes the task at hand requires outside expertise. He proposes pooling money that civic groups within the ward currently spend on planning and use it to hire a professional commercial development company. From the Daily Southtown's endorsement of the Eric J. Kellogg of Beverly!

Now, Sean, could you be the recipient of Community dollars? Only in SEANBONE - The neighborhood is still Beveryly/Morgan Park/Mount Greenwood and those voters know 'sidewinders' when they see them.

Here once more- just for giggles -

WheresItGo, on February 15th, 2007 at 3:49 pm, said:

Well, we asked it for the other candidates, so might as well ask Sean. “What’s $2000 in private campaign donations buy you? A PRIVATE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY??????

A: I’ve already answered it here previously. In my opinion John Somerville presents the best opportunity for us to beat the incumbent, Virginia Rugai. Alternately, as I said in yesterdays Beverly Review, I will support anyone who can beat Ginger.

Tim Sheehan is not interested, Sean. Sheehan has integrity. Besides, you already tossed your investment to Dishonest John. Maybe you have more dough planted in the yard, or hidden at the SEANBONE STAR!

Read more...

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Picking a Winner

Found an interesting article in the New York Sun titled, "Why Daleys Endorsed Obama". The author draws upon Chicago political history and changing national times to attempt to explain the Mayor's going with Barack over Hillary Clinton.

You should read the whole article, but if you don't want to, I'll give you the last two paragraphs which pretty well sum it up.

Illinois history also explains the Daleys' endorsement of Mr. Obama. The brothers learned not only from their father's victories but also from his mistakes. They don't want to look out of step with their times, as he did in 1968.

When it comes to general elections, Old Democrat often trumps New. If the Daleys are to prove they are as good at picking winners as their father generally was, they have to prove to themselves, Chicago, and the nation that Mr. Obama isn't another George McGovern. One thing is already sure about Campaign 2008 —whatever political behavior we see this year, much of it was learned in Chicago.

To read or post comments, visit Open House

Read more...

Ilana: The 50th Ward's Queen of Mean


I had a fabulous day yesterday, best day I've had in a long time, as a matter of fact. It was sunny, not too cold and it was Valentine's Day - le Jour d'Amour. However, I can't say I was feeling any love from Alderman Bernard Stone's daughter and Chief of Staff, Ilana Stone Feketitsch.

A little background before I move on to the fun stuff...

Currently I work as the field director on Greg Brewer's campaign for alderman in the 50th ward against Bernie Stone. Bernie has not faced a real challenge since 1991. Even then, he still walked away with a significant portion of the vote without a runoff. I'm not sure that he or his broken organization quite know what to do with a well-funded, organized, competitive challenger, so I was not entirely shocked that they fell back early on to their usual yard-sign-removal and rocks-through-windows. So far all we've seen is a ridiculous amount of signs on businesses and empty storefronts, piles of terribly designed literature laying on front doorsteps, and a campaign manager (a.k.a. "aide") paid out of Bernie's Vice Mayoral budget tailing our canvassers in the official aldermanic Towncar.

So, bottom line is that these folks have been far too confident for far too long and they're lazy as all hell. People constantly tell us at the door that "I haven't seen my precinct captain in years" and "I get no response from the alderman's office when I have a problem," or "Once upon a time Bernie [insert ward service perceived as special favor here], but what has he done for me lately?" That sort of thing.

They almost always go on to tell us a completely crazy story about Bernie Stone's daughter and Chief of Staff, Ilana Stone Feketitsch. It's been an open secret for a long time that Bernie plans to have his daughter appointed in his place at some point. When Bernie announced his plan to run for reelection the day after Thanksgiving, he confirmed that one of his goals is to have Ilana take his place (along with being the oldest alderman of all time). When I first started hearing these stories they were so off the wall that I thought they had to be exagerations. Usually they revolve around Ilana going crazy and screaming her head off and acting abusively towards anyone in her path. Since this is so prevalent that I've been forced to keep track, it's fair to say that Ilana is considered by over a thousand 50th ward voters to be the Queen of Mean of the 50th ward.

I had never met Ilana before yesterday. I had seen her once or twice and she seemed normal enough. A little biker-chick-crazy-looking for a Chief of Staff of an elected official, but hey - this is Chicago, right? We like our pizzas deep, our beer cold, and our polticians nutty. Why should their staff be any different? No big deal. So all I had were these crazy tales of Ilana and her legendary nastiness that I've been tracking...until yesterday.

Apparently Ilana didn't like that we were canvassing a street that she referred to as "her block" with Valentine's cards and flowers. It could be because we've been making quite a bit of progress in her neighborhood and Bernie's numbers, even in his own backyard, are not encouraging. It's hard for me to believe that she doesn't know her dad is in trouble and her job is in serious jeopardy; given her anger management issues, I can't imagine that anyone who isn't related to her would hire her. She's way too much trouble for a patronage job, but I doubt she would be trusted to drive Streets & San equipment anyhow. At any rate, Ilana apparently forgot that she's living in an age of burgeoning technology. A word to the wise: if you're going bat$#*t crazy in public, be wary that the people you're harrassing may very well have a video camera, and your tirade will likely show up on the internets (which, fyi, is a series of tubes) shortly after that.

Such as right...about...NOW! Come one, come all and witness The Ilana screaming at us to "Get the F**K off my block!!" (WARNING: Not suitable for workplace listening. May cause permanent mistrust of government in small children.)



Whoa. Is this how the daughter of a 34-year incumbent and aldermanic Chief of Staff should behave? And a solidly Democratic ward that went for Tony Peraica no less! During the middle of the day, when she's being paid substantially out of taxpayer funds, Ilana finds it necessary to take a break and intimidate and verbally assault campaigners, which is a felony under federal law.

If I don't do my job there's a very good chance this menace to society will be "representing" the people of the 50th ward sometime within the next four years. That's incentive enough for me to make damn sure Greg Brewer is elected alderman of the 50th ward! (It's worth noting that Mr. Brewer does not currently have any angst-ridden offspring waiting in the wings for daddy to hand over the keys to the kingdom.)

Read more...

Let the Searches Begin

Cross posted from ICPR's blog, The Race is On:


In the last two years, more than $29 million has flowed into campaign funds controlled by Chicago city officials and their challengers, and now it’s easy for voters to identify the big contributors and see where the money is going.

The Sunshine Database at www.ilcampaign.org has been updated for the Chicago elections, with more than 36,000 individual contributions to the election campaigns of every candidate for citywide office, all 50 aldermen and their opponents, and the wealthiest political ward committees.

“The Sunshine Database has become one of the handiest and most popular investigative tools for journalists and everyday voters,” said Cynthia Canary, Director of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform (ICPR). “Once limited to statewide, legislative and judicial campaigns, the search tool has been expanded to include every candidate vying for a piece of the power in Chicago’s City Hall.”

“Visitors to the web site will find the names of the top 50 contributors to the reelection of Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley, as well as who is contributing to Dorothy Brown’s and Dock Walls' campaigns to unseat Daley,” said Kent Redfield, Director of the Sunshine Project and a professor of political studies at the University of Illinois at Springfield. “It is now easy to find information about the contributors, how much they gave, and what other candidates received money from them. The web site also reports how the campaigns have been spending their money."

“Because contribution reports prepared by the candidates have a variety of name spellings and even nicknames for the same contributor, it is impossible for some web sites to provide an accurate account of who is funding campaigns,” Redfield said. “But we have standardized all of the names and done additional coding to make searches far more complete.”

The extensive update of the Sunshine Database was accomplished with the assistance of an investigative journalism class at Columbia College in Chicago and college interns working at ICPR.

Read more...

Alderman Troutman Blocks Development Of The 20th Ward

If you ever get to crack open an issue of N'Digo you will often see an editorial by the owner and publisher Hermene Hartman. What she tackles is generally going to be local in nature but the scope could be business, national politics, or perhaps more cultural. This week since N'Digo is a weekly publication she tackles a local issue or a person Ald. Troutman.

Not a very good editorial for Troutman. Yeah OK she does touch upon the corruption charges that she is facing right now. Hartman notes...

...At the last City Council meeting, Alderman Troutman said that her signature had been forged on papers that gave approval to a $77 million housing (mixed income) project that has the ability to turn the community of Woodlawn around.

How could an alderman stand up in a room of law, and claim forgery? Who could have forged her signature?

Sounds like an outright lie, and hopefully voters will find this information troubling enough to replace Troutman in the upcoming election.
Then she goes on to talk about how Troutman has proven herself unable to move development in her ward. Hartman makes bullet points on project that should have gone forward but Troutman kept at a standstill...

  • St Bernard’s Hospital is located in Englewood. The population here suffers intensively from heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, respiratory disease, infant mortality, and obesity. For years St. Bernard’s has tried to build a new state-of-the-art community health clinic for Englewood citizens. Alderman Troutman refuses to meet with the principals to discuss the project. A new hospital is not in St. Bernard’s future because of the alderman. This should not be allowed to happen.

  • The Grand Ballroom at 63rd and Cottage Grove has been restored to its splendor. It is one of Chicago’s historic ballrooms that sat next to the Regal Theater. The building has been restored with painstaking efforts, and is one of the most beautiful in the city. It took guts for the developer to drop millions in a desert of a community. The same developer also bought the old Strand Hotel, which is vacant and boarded up. Now that the Ballroom has been reopened, he has spent thousands to develop the hotel for residential and commercial purposes. The alderman encouraged the developer, and now refuses support his multi-million dollar project.

  • Another site that receives no notice from the alderman sits on the southwest corner of Garfield Boulevard and King Drive. The site begs for development as it sits at the entry corridor leading into Washington Park. This gateway could be a centerpiece in the 20th Ward.
In closing Hartman says that developers in Chicago generally pass over the 20th ward because of their difficulty in dealing with Troutman. She doesn't seem to be interested in developing her ward which isn't exactly doing that well. I drive through that wear every now and then and I would see boarded up and empty buildings as well as vacant lots. So Hartman hopes that the people there will elect a new alderman. Right now though I'm totally not sure if she's either going to be indicted or lose her seat on the city council.

Also check out the cover story on black political families in Chicago.

Read more...

Tsarpalis, Salvi and Heffley

I was disappointed to read today that John Tsarpalis will be stepping down as Executive Director of the Illinois Republican Party (IRP). He will join the Sam Adams Alliance as a national alliance director. Speaking with him this morning, he said the job largely entails helping local groups organize to fight tax and regulation hikes.

Rumors had begun to bubble a few days ago that he might be departing but I had hoped they were not true. Tsarpalis brought real-world experience to the post, experience in the trenches. He was deeply committed to grass-roots action and collegial consultation across all spectrums of Republican thought, commitments he had lived as a successful volunteer organizer. At last month's State Central Committee meeting, Tsarpalis had announced he would be focusing on work to develop a coherent Republican message for Illinois. It was a critical component that largely got lost in the shuffle during the last cycle.

While his departure is a tough loss, Tsarpalis says he will continue the good fight for lower taxes and less regulation, just from a little different angle. He will remain a valuable and key ally for Republicans in their efforts to rebuild.

While there is no word on a successor yet, Jason Heffley has returned to the party as deputy executive director. Heffley had formerly worked with the party as a field coordinator and was Kathy Salvi's campaign manager in her bid for the GOP nomination in the Eighth Congressional Dist. last spring. Having worked with rival David McSweeney during that time, I can vouch for the fact that Heffley is a tough opponent. He ran a strong race. Again, the real-world experience he gained will work to the benefit of the IRP.

Speaking of Kathy Salvi, hers is the only name I hear mentioned seriously and frequently as a potential candidate for U.S. Senate against incumbent Democrat Dick Durbin. I spoke briefly to her husband, Al, a few weeks ago. He said she has not given it serious consideration, but some people have talked to her. I hear from others that an intense effort to create a "draft Salvi" movement has been underway for over a month. The only question is whether it would be for the U.S.Senate nomination or for another bid for Congress in the Eighth District. Certainly, if David McSweeney decided to run again for Congress, he would be my first choice. Barring that, I think Salvi would be a solid, articulate candidate for either spot.

Cross-posted at Illinois Review

Read more...

Why not change the license plates to "Land of Obama," while we're at it?

Okay, I’m gonna tempt fate and do another Obama-related post. But this one is undeniably Illinoize-worthy.

There's a a really great story over at Capitol Fax about the Governor using state letter-head to explicitly “support Senator Obama in his bid for the Presidency.” I certainly agree with Rich that this is troublesome...but perhaps not nearly as troublesome as an issue the Governor brought up while trying to defend himself. Rich says that Blagojevich’s office pointed “to the fact that the guv urged the General Assembly to pass a bill moving the ‘08 primary.” Let’s explore that point for a moment.

The Governor, as well as the Speaker, have both explicitly discussed this bill in terms of benefiting Obama. Madigan admitted that by introducing the bill, it was “rather apparent that I'm trying to help his candidacy,” and the press release from the Governor’s office in question above urges the legislature to pass the early primary bill in order to “send an early message in support of Senator Obama.” It seems to me that passage of this bill would be tantamount to a political endorsement of Obama by the Government of the State of Illinois.

Perhaps the Governor should wait until after the bill passes, then he can send out all the letters in support of Obama he wants under state letter-head. Then he can say that he's just promoting an official state program.

Read more...

Erin Cox and Ron Durham: Constituents Beware: Senator Durbin's Closed-Door Policy in Chicago

On February 5, the Occupation Project, a sustained campaign of nonviolent civil disobedience to stop the Iraq war, began in Chicago. Eight activists were forcibly removed from the Chicago offices of Senators Durbin and Obama when they demanded the Senators vote against future war funding. On Monday, February 12, one week after being arrested for civil disobedience, three of the eight activists returned to Senator Durbin’s office. In returning, we hoped to demonstrate our commitment to the issue in Iraq with our consistent presence and determination to share our concerns with the Senator. We also felt it important to reconnect with the staff in order to recognize our common humanity in peaceful efforts to bring awareness, express ideas, and share concerns. We had no intentions of disrupting business in the office.
[***]
Each one of us had previously visited the office of Senator Durbin multiple times in groups or as individuals. Each time we had come to visit the office, which is open to and paid for by the public, the door had been open so that constituents could freely enter. This time however, we came upon a closed, locked door. On the outside of the glass door there was a sign that read "Meeting by appointment only."
The complete story here....

HT PrairieStateBlue (note their image of Anarchist Samuel Fielden raising his fist at the shooting cops while the bomb goes off has been replaced by flowers. Lots of things change come election time.)

Read more...

Stroger's Friends and Family Plan

Is this revolution Cook County Style? From the Trib's Editorial today,

Stroger's proposed budget, rather than slaughtering needless herds of political hacks in the county bureaucracy, instead tilts toward cutting front line service workers. And his Stroger Friends and Family Plan, with top jobs awarded to his cronies, has betrayed voters who had trusted his campaign lip service to reform.
[***]
As a result, board members are stepping forward to reshape his budget. Late Tuesday, 10 of the 17 commissioners completed an omnibus budget amendment that would cut administrative jobs from the county's budget while restoring money for health professionals, prosecutors, public defenders, sheriff's police officers and other service providers. The 10 co-sponsors are Forrest Claypool, Earlean Collins, Liz Gorman, Gregg Goslin, Joan Patricia Murphy, Tony Peraica, Quigley, Timothy Schneider, Robert Steele and Larry Suffredin.

The board members' initiative is partly a matter of tuning out an increasingly clumsy Todd Stroger, partly an acknowledgment that there aren't enough votes on the board for a tax increase. If those votes ever existed--we doubt it--Stroger's hiring and promotion of so many high-paid pals and relatives has made the mere notion of tax hikes that much more toxic. Are taxpayers supposed to give more money to an institution where nepotism and patronage are arrogantly celebrated as the boss' favorite sport?
And from the Sun Times,
"There's going to be lots of pressure on commissioners to backtrack," county Commissioner Forrest Claypool said. "It's important that commissioners stand firm."

But two -- Robert Steele and Joan Murphy -- didn't realize the cuts they were endorsing affected some of their own relatives, and Murphy said she might reconsider.

Some commissioners supporting the new proposal previously backed Stroger's plan, leading some to wonder what they're really going to support.
Sometimes the revolution has to devour it's own. Let's see if these late blooming Jacobins up to the task.

And one not asked to the barricades (also from the ST),
Commissioner John Daley, who indicated he wasn't invited to join those presenting new cuts, said "you have to cut at the top, middle and bottom" to make a real impact.
That's one complicated guillotine.

Read more...

Somerville Campaign Sinks in Sean's Swamp






One thing that is true in this information silly world, is the advent of mopes like me. One guy's comment on my other piece on the 19th Ward said that I lost all credibility ' by backing Stroger' - My God! Who listens to me? Credibility to whom?

But then I remember the 19th Ward Agenda www.19thwardagenda.com 'where people believe that politics is as real as pro-wrestling.'

The ring master is local cry-baby Sean Lowry, never met him - never care to. This guy seems to exude all the balance and charm of Frank Booth in Blue Velvet;all he needs is the amyl-nitrate mask. Read some of his 'Open Letters to . . .' Yikes.

Well, strangely enough, this guy's Blog has served as a weapon for the Somerville Campaign - since 1964 - when his leap for office seems to have begun, including his years as Regular Organization porch climber, to his current 'wilderness years' which will continue long after Feb. 27th, 2007. They have made fun of Ginger's breast cancer, maligned people who have nothing to do with local politics, explained to all and sundry that 'Ginger's not Running; It's 19thWard Committeeman Matt O'Shea get Him !'Now it's honorable candidate Tim Sheehan's turn.

Here is a random sampling of the bilge on this site:
15 fed up, on February 14th, 2007 at 7:55 pm, said:

I have often stated that I thought sheehan was a plant. I have read a lot of articles and visited all the web sites . Ginger was never going to get my vote this election I think she does nothing. sheehan after much debate is going to get my vote, I truly hope either beats ginger. we need to move forward and I dont believe in ginger she has no plan and is an obstacle to development not an asset. just my two cents

14 anonymous, on February 14th, 2007 at 7:56 pm, said:

OK, All you nay sayers, after calling the University of Pennslyvannia Wharton School Media Relations Office. Talked to Meghan Laska, Senior Associate Director of Wharton Communications. After explaining to her that the bloggers of 19th Ward Agenda needed to verify Tim Sheehan’s academic record at Wharton. (Press credentials are really not given to Bloggers) but considering the timing of the campaign in two weeks it was given. Two hours later it was confirmed Tim Sheehan has an UPenn-Wharton undergraduate degree from that prestiguous institute founded by Benjamin Franklin one of the founding founder of this great sovereign nation.

13 Sheehan Fan, on February 14th, 2007 at 8:34 pm, said:

Sean, I find it interesting that you have stated on this blog that you will do whatever you can to assist either opponent in toppling Rugai. If that is true, and I assume that you are a man of your word…than you will write a check for 2,000.00 to Friends of Tim Sheehan. That is the amount of the check that you wrote to Somerville. If not, then I will understand why Tim Sheehan is not interested in dealing with you. I also wonder if you have the courage to post my entry.

A: As I told Tim Sheehan personally just 10 days ago, I feel John Somerville has the better chance of beating Ginger, but if I’m wrong and Tim is there at the end, I will support him.

12 Forrest GUMP, on February 14th, 2007 at 8:40 pm, said:

When I get a Wharton on my finger, my Momma usually just puts some “Compound-W” on it and that just makes it go right away. Don’t know if its from a plant though. The Compound-W, that is.

11 Anonymous, on February 14th, 2007 at 9:08 pm, said:

I have lived in the 19th ward for three years now and i already want to move.I drive down western ave. everyday and i think to myself what a pit. Our community is very unappealing to the eye.I also believe our crime level is way up kids being beat up people can’t walk home from the train station without getting mugged banks being robbed and so on and so on.If our alderman is doing so much for this community why does western and 95th st. look the way they do? why is crime up? Why our are schools so crappy?why can’t you go to the school of agirucultural science if you have no political ties? why don’t we have a place for our teenagers to go bowling or skating? The answer to all these questions is ginger rugai that’s why we don’t have any of these things she has the power to get more police on the street to devlope commerical properties and to have a skate park built. It appears to me the only one thing ginger cares about is the power she gets by calling herself a alderman and whats up with those flyers she mails out or her ads in the beverly review i am really glad ginger survived breast cancer but her survial sounds more like a pitty me thing i mean read it once you say what a brave and couragous woman but after hearing it so much it gets old and sounds pittiful.Not to sound uncaring but ginger’s surival of breast cancer is not going to make our community better. not going to make our streets safer. we need a big change and we need it now before our community gets any worse.

10 Anonymous, on February 14th, 2007 at 9:13 pm, said:

Tim Sheehan and John Somerville are good people. Ntice that they don’t attack eachother. Good for them. The point is that you should not vote for the Corrupt machine hack.

9 Sean Lowry, on February 14th, 2007 at 9:17 pm, said:

Tim doesn’t have to deal with me, he just has to be a good candidate for alderman and if he wins, I will offer to work with him. If he is personally offended that I asked questions about his campaign,I do not apologize. If you run for office, all questions are fair game.

8 Anonymous, on February 14th, 2007 at 9:21 pm, said:

Sean, I fel the same way. Somerville has earned my vote but, like you, I will vote for Sheehan if he wins the run off position. If Sheehan fan has any class he can say the same thing. Is it about beating the incumbent or is it about getting your guy elected?


THESE Phi Beta Kappans are Not only worried that Tim Sheehan is a 'plant' ( he's not boys and girls he's an animal life form) but whether he attended the Bay Rum Good Smelling After Shave Institute, like John did. Lowry herded all these folks pretty much into his one swamp, but word gets out - usually when a neighbor is getting slandered.

One really needs to immerse oneself in real French Film Self-Loathing to fully enjoy this fondue but like a bad accident one can not look away -do not make eye contact, however.

When Tail-spin John crashes again, he will have Sean Lowry to thank for 'Bringing the Community together' against his candidacy. Sean, I can not thank you enough!

Read more...

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Can Mormons Save the Illinois GOP?

As I was shoveling the driveway, that was what was running through my mind.

But, that’s really not the real question.

The real question is

Will Mormons save the Illinois Republican Party?
I know they can.

At least in suburban Chicago and parts of Downstate.

I lived in Salt Lake City in the 1950’s.

This is the best-organized church in the country.

And its leaders know how to motivate people.

Maybe this isn’t true, but what I picked up as a Boy Scout in Utah was that the Church of Latter Day Saints knew how to motivate their young men to achieve the Eagle Scout Award. The rumor was the boys couldn’t play basketball at the stake houses until they earned it.

In any event, their troops produced a massive number of Eagle Scouts.

If Mormons in Illinois buy into the Mitt Romney campaign for president, local Republican organizations could be energized like they haven’t been since Jim Thompson ran for governor in 1976.

I’m hoping Romney supporters are smart enough to encourage people to run for Republican precinct committeemen outside of Cook County. That only takes ten signatures, although I’d recommend getting 20.

In Cook County any township or ward committeeman would be nuts to turn down anyone volunteering to be a precinct captain.

I’ll bet no one is willing to argue that the Illinois Republican Party doesn’t need a massive infusion of new talent.

And here’s where it could come from.

More, of course, at McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Chop Wood, Carry Water

There is a story I love about a young man who, seeking the meaning of life, joined a monastery which promised him enlightenment if he would serve them faithfully. For 20 years he worked, chopping wood and carrying water all day long. Finally he asked to be brought to the master to gain the enlightenment he sought.

In the master's simple cell, the seeker finally asked, "What, Master, is the meaning of life."

The master regarded him with a gentle smile and replied, "Chop wood, carry water."

Regular readers know I am decidedly Catholic. But I love the delightful Zen quality of this delicious story. And yesterday's news of the attempt by a few conservatives to appoint an 'official' Illinois conservative spokesman brought it to mind. For more information see Conservative "Spokesmen" Annointed - My Bag Please, Deja Vu All Over Again, and More "Spokesperson" Stuff, in yesterday's Illinois Review (www.illinoisreview.typepad.com).

Last week a group of various individual conservatives met, calling themselves the Conservative Caucus (CC) and operating under the umbrella of the Republican Assembly of Illinois. There is some confusion as to what actually happened at the meeting. Some say it was an effort to begin a regularly scheduled collaborative meeting of all conservative groups - and to appoint a formal spokesman for the group. Others say it was to unite behind that single 'official' conservative spokesman. Businessman Jim Oberweis was elected spokesman of the group with WARS Radio (an internet station) talk show host Bruno Behrend elected Deputy Spokesman.

Unfortunately, the press release announcing the formation of the group styled Oberweis as the official spokesman for all conservatives. Even more unfortunately, a great number of prominent conservative activists announced they had never heard of the Conservative Caucus, much less participated in its deliberations. Most unfortunate of all, at least one group, the respected United Republican Fund (URF), sent out a release late in the day stating that it was not a participant in the CC meeting, contrary to the inferences of the press release it sent out.

Despite the general respect and affection most conservatives hold for Oberweis, the announcement was met with catcalls rather than hossanas. It was a textbook case of how NOT to launch a successful movement - and how NOT to win friends and influence people. First many, perhaps even most, conservative organizations were not even aware, much less invited, to participate in the deliberations.If you plan to unite a divided group, you first need to get them to the table. Announcing that you have settled their differences without having consulted them is guaranteed to draw hoots of derision. Second, conservatism is more a spectrum of related beliefs - with lots of room for dissent - than a particular color. Occasionally a spokesman, such as Ronald Reagan, rises by common consent. Even then there is substantial disagreement. No less a conservative than George Will accused Reagan, near the end of his tenure, of being a closet liberal.

But the aborted episode also underlined what most ails the conservative movement in Illinois - our stated principles do not match our behavior.We call for openness and elections - but hold little-heralded meetings (often shrouded in secrecy) and then proclaim to speak for the masses. We can't mount enough unity to win a primary - and counsel patience. Then we rip the victors for failing to win a general election. No counsel of patience there. It gets bizarre to listen to people who can't muster 30 percent of the vote in a good Republican year denounce those who can't prevail in a terrible year as 'losers.' We demand inclusion in Republican counsels, as we should, and then ourselves act as some secret high priesthood when it comes to dealing with the conservative rank-and-file.

In the closed society of power in pre-revolutionary France, every power group which perceived itself to be less priveleged than another denounced the latter in the name of the "people," people that all the groups distanced themselves from. When the "people" finally spoke for themselves in a terrible voice, they and the guillotine chewed up many of those who, just a few months before, had spoken so confidently on behalf of the "people." It seems every other conservative imagines himself a dauphin and we have competing coronations - lacking only loyal subjects.

Even more disreputably, a lot of what passes for conservative debate seems suspiciously more like vengeance for a loss, a failure or a snub. I will not today write about what the various and ugly chains are, in hopes that conservatives involved may think better of it and give more than lipservice to their devotion to principle. But when we behave like roving bands of rival warlords, it should come as no surprise that normal people decide to steer clear of all of us - and the political party with which we are most closely associated.

When I traveled the state 12 years ago working to cobble together the coalition that nominated Al Salvi for U.S. Senate and later elected Peter Fitzgerald, I constantly told conservative groups that what I then referred to as 'regular' Republicans did not object to our ideology: it was our penchant for running suicide missions that scared them off. That is still true.

In the little more than a decade I have been actively involved in conservative politics in this state I have borne the brunt of quite a bit of criticism myself - some deserved, some not. In that time, though, I have been neither a candidate nor sought to head any particular group. The closest I came was a few years ago when I was a prominent candidate for Executive Director of the Illinois Republican Party. When my candidate for chairman lost and John Tsarpalis was appointed to the post, rather than embarking on a vendetta, I became an outspoken admirer of Tsarpalis. He is the best executive director in memory and one of the best decisions Chairman Andy McKenna made. I am not interested in being either king or high priest of conservatives. All I want to do is chop wood and carry water.

And there, my friends, is the rub. The competition over who will be king or high priest would be more tolerable if more of the contenders would quit spilling the water and spoiling the wood. Until it stops, we can't win - and the longer it continues, the more understandable it is that many Republicans want to distance themselves from the ugly fallout we create.

Read more...

Legislation of the Day - Pension Reforms or Padding?

Do the taxpayers of Illinois owe government employees pensions in excess of $100,000 per year? I don't believe they do. In fact, I've been saying for a few years we should at least cap pensions at $75,000, but $100,000 is a lot better than nothing.

Senate Bill 246 - Chris Lauzen (R-25, Aurora)
Synopsis As Introduced
Amends the General Provisions Article of the Illinois Pension Code. Provides that the total retirement annuity, including any automatic, one-time, or other increases in that annuity, shall not ever exceed $100,000 per year. Applies only to a person who first becomes a participant on or after the effective date. Effective immediately.

If you'd rather scrap the pension system and start over, Senate Bill 621 might be more your speed.

Senate Bill 621 - Bill Brady (R-44, Bloomington)
Synopsis As Introduced
Amends the Illinois Pension Code. Requires the General Assembly Retirement System, the State Employees' Retirement System of Illinois, the State Universities Retirement System, the Teachers' Retirement System of the State of Illinois, and the Judges Retirement System of Illinois to automatically enroll its newly eligible employees in a self-managed program of retirement benefits instead of the program of retirement benefits currently offered and allows currently eligible employees to elect to participate in the self-managed program. Provides that a self-managed plan shall authorize a participating employee to accumulate assets for retirement through a combination of employer and employee contributions that may be invested at the employee's direction in mutual funds, collective investment funds, or other investment products and used to purchase annuity contracts. Provides that, to the extent that the changes made by the amendatory Act are determined to be a new benefit increase, the changes are exempt from the 5-year expiration provision. Effective immediately.

Then again, if you don't feel the least bit guilty raking in millions after retirement, you'll like some of these pension sweeteners.

Senate Bill 212 - M. Mattie Crotty (D-19, Oak Forest)
Increases the maximum pension from 75% to 80% of salary.

Senate Bill 217 - Iris Martinez (D-20, Chicago)
Provides that the service retirement pension for a teacher who retires on or after the effective date of this amendatory Act shall be 2.4% (now 2.2%) of average salary for each year of creditable service.

Senate Bill 1743 - Iris Martinez (D-20, Chicago)
Amends the Chicago Police Article of the Illinois Pension Code to base retirement benefits on the highest 36 months, rather than 4 years, of salary within the last 10 years of service, for persons retiring on or after January 1, 2008.

Senate Bill 85 - John Cullerton (D-6, Chicago)
Allows a designated domestic partner to qualify as a surviving spouse for purposes of survivor and death benefits. (Not really a sweetener, but controversial enough to mention.)

Senate Bill 159 - James A. DeLeo (D-10, Chicago)
Increases the amount of unused sick time that may be included in calculating the retirement pension, from 244 to 315 days.

There were many more pension padding bills that I won't even pretend to understand how they work. SB719, SB1143, SB1197, SB1198, SB1740, SB1741, and SB1748 were a few of notice just in the Senate.

Read more...

Snow Jobs

Cross-posted from ICPR's blog, The Race is On:

Suppose for a moment that you've got a really great snowplow. And your fondest wish is to clean your driveway, and your neighbors' driveways, and the street in between. Suppose your neighbors all know you have this great plow, and they call to ask if you've done the job yet. Now suppose you can't tell them. You can take the phone calls, but you're not allowed to tell them what you've done. And when they look out their windows…

Well, that's where the analogy breaks down. Because your neighbors can look out their windows and see if the snow's been plowed. But with our Executive and Legislative Ethics Commissions and Inspectors General, it's not so easy to look out the window and see if they've ferreted out corruption. We know how many complaints have been filed, and we know how many investigations the IGs have undertaken. We don't know what happened with those investigations, but we do know that most of them have been concluded without going to the Ethics Commission for final resolution. In fact, nearly all investigations have been concluded by the IGs without oversight from the Commissions. So what's going on? Is the ethics process working?

A bunch of great stories on this problem have come out recently. ABC 7 Chicago did a story you can read and watch here. The Tribune has a story, as does the Daily Herald.

The 2003 Ethics Act made great strides in creating the mechanisms necessary to clean up Illinois government. What it did not do is let anyone else know what's going on or, even, if anything is going on. A little disclosure, a little sunshine in ethics, would go a long way, to clean up government, to educate public employees about what's allowed and what's not, and to assure the public that their interests come first.

Read more...

Somerville's Campaign Manager Insults Obama to Get at Rugai



The Somerville Campaign for Alderman of the 19th Ward - He Thought it Looked Good Going In!

Like I said months ago, there will be a tough race for Alderman in the 19th Ward of Chicago's south side.

It is a tough and good two person race between incumbant Ginger Rugai and challenger Tim Sheehan. There is the third wheel making a great deal of noise and tossing vitriol but offering nothing of substance. That is last time loser John Somerville.

Last week, when the world got a great look at the next President of United States. Senator Barack Obama, Somerville's Green Party Campaign Manager Josh Kilroy smeared Ginger Rugai as a racist - without charge or example - but also smeared Senator Obama 'for endorsing a racist.' Posing as Scafish on Aldertrack, Josh Kilroy, the genius behind Somerville's idiotic literature that includes color photos of Somerville's biggest backer's slum property as an example of blight.' And they are paying this guy? Here's Josh's foot going into John Somerville's gaping Yapper:

by scafish on Feb, 10 2007 @ 11:44 AM DISCLOSURE - This user is participating in this market.
Actually, it is very unclear that Senator Obama endorsed Rugai. A reporter I know has made repeated calls to the office and has gotten no confirmation of an endorsement. Rugai said that he had in an ad but, in addition to being a racist, she has a history of lying. Why would Obama endorse a racist?
profile for Josh Kilroy

username: scafish
.
Listening to: xrt
Reading: johnny cash biography
Favorite restaurant: medici
Favorite charity: amnesty international

How about that folks? Is this amateur hour or what? No - Josh gets paid!

As for the ‘hang-nail of Beverly’ his last ego-driven fluke and impressive numbers had nothing to do with his intrinsic worth as a candidate for any elective office. He is a career ‘appointment’ employee. Somerville was convinced by someone at an early age that he was somebody – he is – Not the biggest jerk in politics but he will do nicely.
He will not poll double digits on Feb. 27th, because he is such a polarizing and self-absorbed entity. Good race between Ginger and Tim, but run, John, run is not a factor,

Read more...

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Cook County proposal: tax pollution

We should tax things we don't like as much as we can.

We don't like pollution. It kills people.

So I was glad to hear the some members of the Cook County Board, while trying to figure out how to balance the budget without raising the property tax, have come up with a neat idea: tax pollution.

They would focus on the two power plants in Cook County that, under current plans, will continue to spew out pollution for another decade or so.

And they would tax each ton of pollution emitted.

Here is a Chicago Public Radio report on the proposal, introduced by Commissioner Roberto Maldonado. The Commissioner's website has a Daily Southtown article that includes reference to a $400 per ton of sulfur dioxide tax.

This would be a good thing. Cook County residents largely pay the cost from air pollution generated in Cook County, especially when poor people go to Cook County hospital for their asthma treatment, or when they die from cancer caused by air pollution (and we pay the cost of the coroner), so it seems right to tax the pollution that imposes these costs on us.

Cross-posted at djwinfo

Read more...

Where'd Stroger go?

From Martese Chism, board member, Cook County Nurses and Deborah Burger, national president, National Nurses Organization-California Nurses Association's letter in today's Sun Times: Lack of leadership takes toll on nurses,

After creating a political crisis by delivering a budget that would cut health care for tens of thousands of Cook County residents and lay off hundreds of employees, Stroger effectively disappeared from public view. Despite unprecedented public concern and outcry, he failed to attend a single public hearing on his budget.

Stroger's only action in the intervening weeks has been to blithely hire and promote his friends and family and award them huge raises. What message is he trying to send us?
Well, one leadership tactic is to create a crisis and then hold everyone hostage for the bailout. It's not unprecedented. It's an old story. It's not a lack of leadership. It's Cook County's style of leadership.

Thanks though for acknowledging Stroger created this.

Read more...

Obama, Jackson, Jr., Off FEC Hook

The Illinois Republican Party failed to pin the tail on three donkeys.

An ex post facto rule seems to have saved two federal legislators.

U.S. Senator and Presidential candidate Barak Obama and U.S. Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr., are off the Federal Elections Commission hook with which Illinois Republicans tried to catch them for primary endorsements of then-State Treasurer candidate Alex Giannoulias in radio ads and billboards.

The GOP charged that the use of non-federal funds for the radio ads and a billboard in which Jackson endorsed Giannoulias “constituted electioneering communications and coordinated communications that were financed with non-Federal funds.”

According to its email,

The Commission concluded that
  • the radio advertisement did not qualify as an electioneering communication and
  • was not a coordinated communication with respect to Senator Obama.
I certainly do not know what “electioneering communication” means in FEC-speak, but it seems to me that all political radio ads are “electioneering communications.”

And, so are political billboards.

Perhaps someone more conversant with Federal rules than I can enlighten us.

The FEC
exercised its prosecutorial discretion and dismissed the coordination allegation against Congressman Jackson on the grounds that a regulation enacted four months after the airing of the radio advertisement exempts the complained-of activity from the coordination regulations.
Let’s see.

It was illegal for Jesse Jackson, Jr., to do what he did when he did it, but, if he had done it four months later, it would have been legal.

Case dismissed.

Oh, now I understand.

John Tsarpalas filed the complaint.

Nice try, John.

Posted first at McHenry County Blog.

Read more...

Thank You Rich Miller / Smoking and Pot

All of the BO here sure was starting to smell. You'd think Illinois stopped stinking since BO is going on to take over America. But yet, Illinois isn't anywhere near perfect. Otherwise, why would we need all that legislation being introduced in Springfield. So let this be the first of, hopefully, several posts to come that open the discussion on legislation that may or may not rule our lives in the near future.

I'll start with two pieces from my State Senator John Cullerton (D-6, Chicago). One I like. One I don't.

Senate Bill 500 - Smoke Free Illinois Act

Synopsis As Introduced
Creates the Smoke Free Illinois Act. Sets forth the findings of the General Assembly. Creates several definitions. Prohibits smoking in public places, places of employment, and governmental vehicles. Requires "No Smoking" signs to be posted in each public place and place of employment where smoking is prohibited. Requires ashtrays to be removed from any area where smoking is prohibited. Prohibits smoking in student dormitories, including, but not limited to, sleeping rooms, dining areas, restrooms, laundry areas, lobbies, and hallways, of a building used in whole or in part as a student dormitory that is owned and operated or otherwise utilized by a public or private institution of higher education. Provides that the Department of Public Health, State-certified local public health departments, and local law enforcement agencies shall enforce the provisions of the Act. Sets forth fines for violations of the Act. Provides that the Department, a State-certified local public health department, local law enforcement agency, or any individual personally affected by repeated violations may institute, in a circuit court, an action to enjoin violations of the Act. Prohibits discrimination against individuals who exercise their rights afforded by the Act. Provides that a home rule unit may regulate smoking in public places, but that regulation must be no less restrictive than the provisions in the Act. Prohibits smoking within a minimum distance of 15 feet from entrances, exits, windows that open, and ventilation intakes that serve an enclosed area where smoking is prohibited. Amends the State Mandates Act to require implementation without reimbursement. Repeals the Illinois Clean Indoor Air Act.


Senate Bill 650 - Cannabis-Medical Use

Synopsis As Introduced
Amends the Cannabis Control Act. Provides that when a person has been diagnosed by a physician as having a debilitating medical condition, the person and the person's primary caregiver may be issued a registry identification card by the Department of Public Health that permits the person or the person's primary caregiver to legally possess no more than 12 cannabis plants and 2.5 ounces of usable cannabis which must be grown in an indoor locked facility. Provides that within 30 days after the effective date of the amendatory Act, the Department shall adopt emergency rules to implement these provisions. Creates a task force to implement permanent rules. Provides that if the Department fails to adopt rules to implement these provisions within 6 months, a qualifying patient may commence an action in a court of competent jurisdiction to compel the Department to perform the actions mandated pursuant to these provisions. Provides that a municipality may not prevent a registered organization from operating in accordance with the amendatory Act in an area where zoning permits retail businesses. Limits home rule powers. Effective immediately.

Smoking bans are popular for comment arguments, so how about at least some thoughtful comments about medical marijuana and why people battling diseases should be locked in cages, or not. These two bills seem to point out that freedom has become largely a trivial and ignored matter. We do need educational reforms. We are considering locking people up for allowing smoking on their own property where others can choose to go, while at the same time contemplating ending the practice of locking people up for doing something that gives relief without harming anyone else. Remember, the only way to enforce a law is with the deadly end of gun.

Read more...

Monday, February 12, 2007

OK, I've just about had enough

I'm gonna unilaterally declare this an Obama-free zone or start kicking people off the island if the national echo chamber crap doesn't stop now.

This blog is called Illinoize, not Iraqinoize, not Australianoize. It is not an outlet to repeat something you saw on a national blog about a national or international issue. It is not an outlet to repeat national party talking points.

I refuse to allow this blog to be hijacked by people with a national ax to grind. This blog is supposed to be different. It is about ILLINOIS. Either preserve that unique difference or get the heck out.

Read more...

Barack-out-of-Iraq Obama: 3,000 lives of Americans wasted

Well, Barack Obama has firmly entrenched himself within the Kos cut-and run netroots.

The YouTube video clip is from an Iowa State University speech Obama gave over the weekend. Yes, he wants us to Barack-out-of-Iraq.

Hat tip to Little Green Footballs for the video.

To comment on this post, or to vote in the Pajamas Media presidential straw poll, click here.

Read more...

Quick reflections from Obama's Chicago rally at the Pavilion

I went to the Obama rally at the Pavilion tonight with around 7000 other people. There were a lot of legislators and electeds in the crowd.

Instead of a rally, Barack had more of a wonky discussion as is his style.

There were two important themes that came out from his discussion and one tactical shift.

The first political tactic: he's getting tougher on Hillary Clinton and John Edwards. The phrase about the Iraq War is now "a war that should never have been authorized." That's a clear dig at the U.S. Senators who did not share his foresight about the predictable results of invading Iraq and that's a challenge that Senator Clinton has not responded to well. I don't think she ever will. Senator Edwards, to his credit, has come clean by admitting he was wrong to vote to authorize the invasion.

One of the themes of his conversation was a point Senator Paul Simon was fond of making: the policy solutions to our big problems (a dumb health care financing system, a dumb reliance on foreign oil that funds the bad guys and a dumb public education system that still runs on the agricultural calendar) are (a) not particularly technical, (b) fairly well-known and (c) generally opposed by special interests. They are nuts-and-bolts solutions.

That's important to recall, because otherwise it's easy to think that the problems are intractable and investing in solutions is not only pointless but dangerously naive. That's certainly what the special interests like the peddle.

The other theme of his conversation was that he is an imperfect vessel for a movement to ensure that the solutions discussed earlier are put at the heart of the D.C. agenda. Because today, it isn't our agenda that's discussed. For health care, it's the agenda of the drug companies, the insurance companies and, to a lesser extent, the hospitals at the center of the discussion. For that to change, we'll have to have millions of people become better citizens to force the non-special interest agenda on to D.C. That's how we'll win that next battle. And that's one of the core purposes of the Obama presidential campaign.

Cross-posted at djwinfo

Read more...

Bill Cellini Works Crystal Lake

Every week the number of people who have looked at the 30-second YouTube posting of Crystal Lake Mayor Aaron Shepley and successful businessman Bill Cellini creeps up.

When I looked Sunday, 77 had looked at it. Those viewing the extended version is up to 33.

Always more on McHenry County Blog.

Here's the background.

There's an amazing thing about Shepley’s reiteration that the council would not use condemnation on properties in the Vulcan Tax Increment Financing district.

The Crystal Lake City Council, with Councilman Howie Christensen absent, voted to condemn three properties in that TIF district two months before what you hear on this video.

I first heard him make the promise eleven months before.

Cellini, whom people at the meeting said was clearly in charge, made the presentation four days before Stuart Levine's plea agreemeent. Newspapers subsequently said that Cellini was named as Individual A. (My work on the 1971 Springfield mayoral campaign with him is in the same linked story.)

At the end of the month Cellini's firm wrote a letter saying he would not be involved in the project. I thought it strange that the person most likely to pull off what the city wants would be allowed to leave the team.

Read more...

Obama's Imperialism

Obama at UIC yesterday from today's Trib.

Then a vocal crowd of anti-war protesters quickly made the issue the central focus of Obama's evening rally at the University of Illinois at Chicago Pavilion, holding up a sign that read "Cut the Funding" during his address and chanting loudly as he tried to speak.

"I'm glad they were there," Obama said later. "They feel a sense of urgency about a war that should have never been authorized and a war that should have never been fought."

But he said he doesn't want to cut funding for the troops who already are serving in Iraq, saying that could mean they don't get the equipment they need.

"We need to bring this war to an end," he said, "but we need to do it in a way that makes our troops safe."
Terrorist suicide bombers have a sense of urgency far greater than any Obama saw yesterday. It's born from a hate of Liberalism, the West, and the noblest of our beliefs and principles.

Terrorists won't stand-down from the fight in Iraq because we redeploy away from them.

Obama, the African-American, seems strangely full of Kipling's White Man's Burden. A belief that like undisciplined college kids, these messianic Arab rustics will somehow come to their senses if given space to grow from their helicopter parents. (Or perhaps a view Mom and Dad best wash their hands of them.)

No sense on Obama's part that we're allied with Iraqi brothers and sisters in a struggle for freedom and Democracy. No sense of that at all from Obama.

Obama foolishly under estimates Al-Qaeda's resolve. They're resolved to suicide. They mean to butcher us. The say so. They video their slaughter. We can't end a war unilaterally, and it's the grossest Imperial hubris to believe we can.

Read more...

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Aussie PM Howard hits back at Obama

It's already tomorrow afternoon in Australia, and it's time for Prime Minister John Howard to answer back Obama's criticism of him.

From News.com Australia:

Now Mr. Howard has fired the latest salvo, saying Australia is making a "very significant and appropriate contribution'' given its population.

"I think the most interesting thing about (Senator Obama's comments) is that it didn't really address the substance of the issue,'' Mr Howard told ABC (Australia) Radio.

As for myself, I'd like to take Obama to task for this comment of his from earlier today:

"I think it's flattering that one of George Bush's allies on the other side of the world started attacking me the day after I announced (my candidacy),''

Uh, Senator, John Howard is the leader of Australia, one of America's allies in the War on Terror, he's not just an ally of George Bush.

Obama needs to work on his diplomatic skills. As I mentioned earlier today, Australia has fought with us in every one of our conflicts since World War I.

To comment on this post, please visit Marathon Pundit.

Read more...

Obama on Howard's comments: "Empty rhetoric"

Wow, things are getting intense in what I guess we can now call the John Howard--Barack Obama feud.

From the Sydney Morning Herald:

The 45-year-old senator waded into a major foreign policy row just one day after formally announcing his candidacy, telling (Australian Prime Minister) Mr. Howard he should dispatch 20,000 Australians to Iraq if he wanted to back up his comments.

"I think it's flattering that one of George Bush's allies on the other side of the world started attacking me the day after I announced," Mr. Obama told reporters in the mid-western US state of Iowa.

"I would also note that we have close to 140,000 troops in Iraq, and my understanding is Mr Howard has deployed 1,400, so if he is ... to fight the good fight in Iraq, I would suggest that he calls up another 20,000 Australians and sends them to Iraq.

"Otherwise it's just a bunch of empty rhetoric."

So much for Obama taking the high road in this dispute. All he had to do was dismiss Howard's comments as meddlesome in regards to the American political process.

I wonder how Obama will respond when Hillary Clinton lays some criticism on him?

To comment on this post, or vote in the Pajamas Media presidential straw poll, click here.

Read more...

Amid arctic media frenzy, Chris Matthews gets frosted

The following was originally posted at The Inside Dope

Needless to say, there were thousands of members of the press from literally around the world in Springfield, IL yesterday, technicians, cable haulers, riggers, producers, and of course, the on-air "talent".

There were endless lines of satellite trucks all chugging away spewing diesel exhaust and trying to keep the important equipment from freezing, and outside, millions of dollars of camera and broadcasting equipment, the people to operate it, and those who stand or sit in front of it all in the bone-chilling temps. The spectacle of the massive press circus almost overshadowed the actual event.

The downtown and major hotels looked like the staging point for the most massive polar expedition ever mounted, with hundreds of photographers, reporters, and camera operators smothered from head to toe in every coat, scarf, and hat they owned apparently. So many times I was reminded of the little brother in the film "The Christmas Story", they were so bundled up it looked like if they fell down, they'd never be able to get back up.

I noticed that as a sort of badge of honor I imagine, some photographers sported Arabian or Lebanese style scarves as a sign they'd covered the mid-east. Now they were wearing the scarves against the perils of the mid-west.

Walking downtown or in the hotels, you could overheard news crews speaking in every imaginable language. One reporter from Tokyo was wandering around in the arctic temperatures dressed in black leather pants, not exactly the best cold weather gear, even back in the early 80s when they were last in style. His camera man accidentally leaned on my hand as it rested on a chair and he spent about 5 minutes apologizing in Japanese. Not exactly your stereotypical pushy member of the traveling press.

Even on Friday afternoon the day before, while walking around watching the crews erecting all the elaborate scaffolding and hanging bunting, and the networks setting up their live shot locations, a woman approached and asked if she could interview me. She was very pleasant, from the Canadian Broadcast Company, and even better, didn't have a cameraman. That's my idea of the ideal encounter with the press, namely, no camera, and not broadcast in the United States. It doesn't get better than that, in my experience.

After Obama made his stirring announcement speech, the race was on for most of the press to pack up and try to avoid frostbite and hypothermia, especially the so-called "talent", the people in front of the camera, who had to engage in the gargantuan struggle between looking perfect and staying warm.

But some had to stay on for live shots.

And we learn that whatever you do, don't bring up Chris Matthews' socks.

Here are some shots I took Saturday, post Obama announcement.
As always, click on images for a better view.

The Decatur NBC affiliate had a damn anchor desk sitting out in the Old Statehouse yard. It looked like something out of a Monty Python sketch.



Then there was this tent set-up. It was much more elaborate than other media outposts, most of which were in the open air. But this one even had propane heaters running.

Note the sharpshooters on the roof in the background.


Who could command such posh accommodations? None other than Tweety Bird himself, Chris Matthews.


Note the little silver disk in the lower left. It's the propane heater to keep Chris' tootsies warm.

And speaking of Mathew's tootsies, one of the spectators who increasingly gathered around the tent was taken by the fact that Matthews was wearing big, thick, hunting socks. At one point as Matthews was waiting to go on-air, this guy good-naturedly called out, "Hey Chris, nice socks!"

Matthews immediately shot back, "Go f___ yourself!", and he wasn't smiling.

Yep... dropped the f-bomb... again, only this time it wasn't on-air. (See this clip of Matthews dropping the F-Bomb live during the Don Imus program)

I had been shooting video just seconds before, but had stopped in order to take some still pictures. I will go to my grave regretting that. If I had kept shooting only seconds longer, I would have had the remark and Mathew's salty reply live on tape. I'd imagine it would have generated some traffic on YouTube.

Matthews then made a few more pleasant comments back and forth with his fans before settling in. In the meantime, the make up person was working on the next guests, Howard Fineman, the editor of Newsweek, and Lynn Sweet, the political correspondent for the Chicago Sun-Times (whom I'd met and chatted with the previous evening). Sweet has become a regular on Matthew's "Hardball" show as his "go-to" reporter on things Obama.



Howard Fineman


Lyn Sweet with Matthews


HAAA!


Matthews looks on as technicians untangle and unhook the previous guests in preparation to bring on Sen. Dick Durbin.

Sen. Dick Durbin is interviewed by Matthews. One wonders if guests have to be toweled down after having Matthews sputter at them.



Sen. Durbin greets fans and well-wishers after his on-air appearance and before going into the Old Capitol where Obama held a meet-and-greet session for about an hour after the announcement.

As I was eating breakfast in the hotel restaurant around noon, Matthews and a few others came in and sat down about 5 ft. away. The thought of speaking to him or getting a picture crossed my mind, but I think that interrupting someone when they're eating is a bit tacky.

Though I have many achievements under my belt, with his reaction to the fan earlier in mind I'm not sure I wanted to count getting cussed out by Chris Matthews at breakfast among them.

So, after getting home and looking forward to seeing the segment I'd just seen being shot live earlier, I found that I'd shut down the computer which of course meant that it hadn't recorded schduled shows in my absense, one of which was Hardball. If anyone has the segment recorded, let me know.

Coming later.....
Some random scenes of weirdness around the event... including the Obama Superman



NOTE Several more posts and many more pictures of political and press luminaries from before, during, and after the event can be found at The Inside Dope.

[Note: Slightly edited by Rich Miller for language purposes.]

Read more...